Archive for the ‘research’ Category

Borrelia Miyamotoi DNA in Patient Suspected of Lyme Borreliosis

https://www.aaem.pl/-Borrelia-miyamotoi-DNA-in-a-patient-suspected-of-Lyme-borreliosis

Borrelia miyamotoi DNA in a patient suspected of Lyme borreliosis
Beata Fiecek 1, Tomasz Szewczyk 2, Grażyna Lewandowska 1, Tomasz Chmielewski 1
Ann Agric Environ Med. 2025;32(1):142-145

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/191046

Article (PDF, 771.39 kB)

ABSTRACT
Introduction and Objective.
Manifestations of infection caused by Borrelia miyamotoi can mimic highly variable symptoms of Lyme borreliosis. The aim of the study was to detect DNA from B. miyamotoi samples from patients with suspected neuroborreliosis.
Materials and Method. Samples of blood serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were collected from 133 patients. Diagnosis was established by the detection of specific antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) with ELISA and immunoblot. All Borrelia-positive samples were tested by nested PCR for the B. miyamotoi and B. burgdorferi s.l. DNA.
Results. B. miyamotoi DNA was detected in the CSF of one (0.8%) patient. DNA of B. burgdorferi s.l. was not found in any samples.
Conclusions. Detection of the B. miyamotoi in patients with central nervous system infections expand the development of knowledge on infections caused by Borrelia spirochetes.
_______________
**Comment**
Just like STARI, B. miyamotoi looks, smells, and feels just like Lyme but will never be picked up on standard CDC 2-tiered testing for Lyme.
While there are both PCR and antibody tests for Borrelia miyamotoi, they are offered at specialty labs which many mainstream doctors just assume are pure evil because that’s what the CDC has beat into their heads for decades.
For more:

“In vitro analysis has shown the susceptibility of B. miyamotoi to ceftriaxone, azithromycin, and doxycycline, with resistance to amoxicillin,” the authors explain.

Since Borrelia miyamotoi is not a reportable illness to the CDC, no one has any clue about prevalence but reports are coming in continually that it’s highly likely to be a much bigger problem than ‘authorities’ believe.

It was recently discovered that:

Category:

Borrelia Miyamotoi (Relapsing Fever Group), Lyme, research, Testing, Ticks

What’s the Beef With Tylenol?

What’s the Beef With Tylenol?

I’m thankful beyond words I was raised by a woman who would rather die than take a pill.  Seriously, the woman simply ‘dealt’ with whatever malady came her way with a staunch stoicism that Zeno would have been proud of.

Fever?  Put a cold compress on your head.

I truly feel sorry for women today.
Particularly pregnant women posting videos of themselves popping Tylenol simply for political reasons.

While the world normalizes injecting pregnant women with a literal stew of adjuvants, toxins, and contaminants, I was pregnant at a time when injecting a woman with anything would have been viewed as a crime against humanity.  Taking a pain reliever was heavily frowned upon.

Pregnancy’s hard – so suck it up buttercup!

We are now hearing for the first time that Tylenol makers concealed its role in brain inflammation (Autism) cascade for seven years.

http://

Tylenol Link to Autism

Dr. Christina Parks

Sept. 24, 2025

Dr. Christina Parks, PhD in Cellular and Molecular Biology, shares insights on potential links between Tylenol (acetaminophen), vaccines, and autism. She discusses emerging research suggesting that prenatal exposure to acetaminophen may be associated with increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism and ADHD. Her message emphasizes the importance of understanding biochemical pathways and the need for caution when using medications during pregnancy.

Parks states that when you combine a vaccine with Tylenol, it is a double whammy completely depleting glutathione, the main ingredient our body uses to suppress inflammation.  Since ‘vaccines’ often cause encephalitis (brain inflammation), the usage of Tylenol, which depletes glutathione, sets the person up to not be able to fend off this inflammation.

Please note the comment after the article:

As a Registered Pharmacist since 1969, I read about hepatotoxicity of Tylenol back in the ’70’s but it was sloughed off as some glitch in a batch or two that came from Japan or something.

Anyway I was in a Hooks drug store in Indianapolis, Indiana in 1972 when the McNeil representative came in and in the course of chatting with him I told him that I had read that Tylenol was toxic to the liver. So I asked him just how toxic it was and he replied:

“Every time you take a Tylenol tablet some of your liver cells die…”

From God’s mouth to our ears….

As little as 8 Grams of Tylenol taken in a 24 hour period can be lethal …to put it in context…that is 2 EXTRA Strength Tylenol tablets take every 3 hours around the clock!! The lethal reaction can be delayed for 24 to 48 hours, there is no known way to remove the Tylenol once it is in the body and once the reaction begins there is NO way to stop it!!

BACK THEN it was reported that conservatively around 10,000 Tylenol deaths occurred in the US YEARLY… in 50 years that is 5,000,000 deaths !!!! So while everyone has been heaving and hoeing about thousands of vaccine related deaths and I am sure they exist…. AT LEAST FIVE MILLION AMERICANS HAVE DIED FROM ACCIDENTAL TYLENOL OVERDOSE IN THE LAST HALF DECADE AND NO ONE IS TALKING ABOUT IT….UNTIL NOW! Tylenol SHOULD NEVER BE GIVEN TO INFANTS OR CHILDREN….. IT’S TOXIC TO EVERYONE…~ Dr. Dennis Kinnane OMD LAc RPh

Sadly, the good pharmacist downplays ‘vaccination’ in this drama.  This is a mistake.

As journalist Celia Farber states:

*I hope we can get past the deliberate distortion going around that anybody, RFK Jr. for example, claims Tylenol “causes autism.”

It is present in almost 100% of autism catastrophes, and seems to LOCK IN the reaction the body might otherwise overcome. (Glutathione response.) That would make it a driver of the cascade, or trap—not the originating toxin.

It locks the exits.

Well said.

But the deflection to Tylenol as the sole perp is already revving up hundreds of lawsuits.  To me this is like blaming only one of the three Musketeers.

Go here for a MWD’s more detailed analysis on Tylenol. He wisely states that if a fever is suppressed artificially, the diagnostic signal is lost – like in the case of Lyme and malaria.  Further, suppressing a fever will suppress the body’s ability to suppress illness.

Important quote:

Trials alleging the benefit of NSAIDs are frequently intentionally deceptive and frequently create the illusion of a benefit where none exists. What this means is that many patients ruin their lives with drugs that did almost nothing for them in the first place.—Peter Gøtzsche

Got pain?

Address the root cause – inflammation

For More:

Category:

Activism, Pregnancy, research, Treatment, vaccines

CABI: Promoting a False Lyme Disease Narrative

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33928315?

Is CABI promoting a false public health narrative?

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Sep 28, 2025

Over the next week I will be posting correspondence with the management team at the Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI) regarding a controversial publication offered through CABI’s Digital Library:

Lyme Disease An Evidence-based Approach 3rd Edition
https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/book/10.1079/9781800626225.0000
John Halperin

It is a compilation of misinformation from those who have controlled the Lyme disease narrative for the past three decades. Through CABI, the false narrative is now being propagated worldwide.

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: a.robinson@cabi.org, microbialservices@cabi.org
Cc: a.lainsbury@cabi.org, a.thompson@cabi.org, c.ashby@cabi.org, d.bird@cabi.org, h.fielder@cabi.org, j.cullum@cabi.org, j.porciello@cabi.org, r.schoelzel@cabi.org, w.cooper@cabi.org, h.jansen@cabi.org, k.shirley@cabi.org, support@cabi.org
Date: 08/25/2025 8:58 AM EDT
Subject: Is CABI promoting a false public health narrative?

CABI Digital Library

“CABI provides trusted, evidence-based content for researchers and professionals.”

Lyme DiseaseAn Evidence-based Approach 3rd Edition John Halperin

Chapter 16 Chronic Lyme Disease
https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/9781800626225.0016
Author: Adriana R. Marques

“The underlying mechanisms driving persistent symptoms after treatment of Lyme disease remain mostly unknown.”  

Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI)
Andy RobinsonManaging Director, Publishing

Dear Dr. Robinson,

The two NIH funded studies that set the stage for treatment denial (worldwide) had serious flaws in the methodology used to identify the causative agent of Lyme disease. This flawed science has caused unimaginable pain and suffering around the globe. What has been wrongfully established here in the United States has been propagated worldwide and promoted through CABI Digital Library.

Please take a moment to read the following email addressed to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Director of the National Institutes of Health identifying the problem that fueled the controversy over Lyme disease. A copy of this email has been sent to CABI’s Bioscience Services for review.

CABI is a leading provider of microbial and molecular services
https://www.cabi.org/products-and-services/bioscience-services/
“Our standard molecular identification service uses Sanger sequencing.” 

Question: Is CABI promoting a false public health narrative through the promotion of Halperin’s Lyme Disease, An Evidence-based Approach? 
 
A response to this inquiry is requested.

Respectfully submitted,
Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH USA

Email to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: jayanta.bhattacharya@nih.hhs.gov
Cc: adh1@stanford.edu
Date: 08/20/2025 9:14 AM EDT
Subject: Improving Science & Restoring Trust in Public Health | Dr. Jay Bhattacharya

Improving Science & Restoring Trust in Public Health | Dr. Jay Bhattacharya
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Y_PxTxLFVg

“We discuss which scientific questions ought to be the priority for NIH, how to incentivize bold, innovative science especially from younger labs, how to solve the replication crisis and restore trust and transparency in science and public health, including acknowledging prior failures by the NIH.” 

To: Jay BhattacharyaDirector of the National Institutes of Health

Dear Dr. Bhattacharya,

Twenty-four years ago, Dr. Mark Klempner’s NIH funded research set the stage for long-term treatment denial when his methodology could not isolate the causative agent responsible for Lyme disease. Although a growing body of peer-reviewed evidence refuted his findings, the Centers for Disease Control refused to acknowledge anything outside of Klempner’s results and turned the disease into a syndrome when patients remained sick after the one size fits all IDSA mandated treatment protocol of 2-4 weeks.

Recent evaluation of Klempner’s methodology has uncovered fatal flaws in his PCR testing for Lyme disease; grants N01-AI-65308 and M01 RR000054.

Two Controlled Trials of Antibiotic Treatment in Patients with Persistent Symptoms and a History of Lyme Disease
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200107123450202#article_references#t=references

Please take a moment if you will to read the following emails sent to Klempner identifying the flaws in his research as described by Dr Sin Lee of Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, specializing in DNA sequencing-based diagnostics.

Dr. Mark Klempner’s NIH funded research is responsible for unimaginable pain and suffering across America requiring immediate attention by the Director of the National Institutes of Health.

Respectfully submitted,
Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH

Cc: Andrew Huberman, Ph.D. Stanford School of Medicine, Department of Neurobiology

Emails to Dr Mark Klempner: (There has been no response)

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: mark.klempner@umassmed.edu
Cc: michael.collins@umassmed.edu, ddutko@hanszenlaporte.com, ryan.kantor@usdoj.gov, michelle.seltzer@usdoj.gov, william.rinner@usdoj.gov, makan.delrahim@usdoj.gov, john.elias@usdoj.gov, NIHResearchIntegrity@mail.nih.gov, support@grants.gov, reviewpolicyofficer@od.nih.gov, AskORI@hhs.gov
Date: 08/17/2025 1:43 PM EDT
Subject: Did Dr Mark Klempner purify samples before PCR in his NIH funded antibiotic treatment trials for Lyme disease grants (N01-AI-65308 and M01 RR000054)

On 04/27/2018 7:53 AM EDT Carl Tuttle <runagain@comcast.net> wrote: “Not a single positive Dr. Klempner? Doesn’t this statistically prove that your methodology was fatally flawed?” 

Dr. Klempner,

As a follow-up to my 2018 inquiry (which you did not respond) I would like to share a recent communication I had with Dr Sin Lee of Milford Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, specializing in DNA sequencing-based diagnostics. Following his lead, I asked AI a question about your methodology for detecting Borrelia burgdorferi in your NIH funded antibiotic treatment trials for Lyme disease.

Dr. Lee’s question to AI: 

Regarding Sanger Sequencing of Borrelia burgdorferi….

IMR Press   2025 Jun 19

Sanger Sequencing of Borrelia burgdorferi flaB Paralogs Detected Spirochetemia at the Early Localized Stage of Lyme Disease
Sin Hang Lee
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40613208/

-Dr Lee: “Accurate diagnosis of Lyme bacterial infection is the crux of the problem, which cannot be mitigated by mathematics. I asked AI to review my recent publication. Here is what AI says (I never purify any samples before PCR):” 

AI Overview

Yes, you’ve identified a significant risk associated with purifying a single target DNA molecule from a pool of non-target DNA for PCR amplification: 

potential loss of the very target DNA during the purification process.

Here’s why and some considerations:

Why purification can lead to target DNA loss

Multi-step process: DNA purification often involves multiple steps like cell lysis, binding to a matrix, washing, and elution. Each step presents an opportunity for loss, especially with extremely low quantities of starting material.

Low input DNA: When aiming to amplify a single DNA molecule, the initial amount of target DNA is minuscule. Even small inefficiencies at each stage can result in the complete loss of the target DNA before PCR can even begin.

Adsorption and binding inefficiencies: DNA might not bind efficiently to the purification matrix or might be lost during washing steps, especially if there are other cellular components or inhibitors present that interfere with binding.
Mechanical shearing: Some methods involve physical disruption or manipulation, which can damage the delicate DNA molecule and render it unusable for PCR.

Incomplete elution: The elution step, where the purified DNA is released from the matrix, might not be 100% efficient, leaving some target DNA behind.

Strategies to mitigate the risk
 

  • Optimize purification protocols: Careful optimization of buffers, incubation times, washing steps, and elution volumes is crucial to maximize recovery.
  • Use carrier RNA: Adding carrier RNA can improve the efficiency of DNA binding and recovery, particularly with low DNA concentrations.
  • Successive elutions: Performing multiple elution steps can help release more of the bound DNA from the purification matrix.
  • Avoid harsh methods: Consider less harsh purification techniques when working with minute quantities of DNA to minimize shearing and degradation.
  • Specialized kits: Commercial kits specifically designed for low input DNA or single molecule analysis may offer improved recovery rates compared to general DNA purification kits.
  • Direct amplification (where possible): In some cases, if the sample matrix is not highly inhibitory, direct amplification without extensive purification might be considered, although this increases the risk of PCR inhibition and false results.
  • Balancing purification and PCR inhibition

It’s a delicate balance. While purification aims to remove inhibitors that can hinder PCR, overly aggressive or inefficient purification can lead to the loss of the target itself. The choice of purification method and the level of rigor applied depend heavily on the sample type, the expected amount of target DNA, and the downstream PCR application.

Carl Tuttle’s question to AI: 

Did Dr Mark Klempner purify samples before PCR in his NIH funded antibiotic treatment trials for Lyme disease? 

AI Overview 
In a study co-authored by Dr. Mark Klempner, researchers purified PCR products using a commercial kit for sequencing and analysis

Specifically:

-PCR products were purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

-The purified samples were then eluted twice, and the eluates were pooled and sequenced.

Dr. Klempner,

Here are your PCR results from those NIH funded treatment trials: (ZERO POSITIVES!!) 

[View chart here:]https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/wlt03jb03gdu5whj89tfe/Klempner-PCR-Results.jpg?rlkey=jtobbpx9x5szyf0p5ttra0igf&dl=0

-Dr. Lee: To increase the chances of detecting single copy of Borrelia burfdorferi chromosome (or Osp A gene in a linear plasmid as Klempner et al did) in a specimen, pre-PCR purification risks losing the target DNA. Here is why according to AI (as Klempner et al did) 

AI Overview

When working with low quantities of DNA, especially when purifying a few molecules, silica-membrane-based DNA purification kits can indeed lead to DNA loss

Reasons for DNA loss

  • Inefficient binding: While DNA binds to silica in the presence of chaotropic salts, at very low concentrations, not all DNA molecules may efficiently bind to the silica membrane.
  • Inefficient elution: Eluting DNA from silica can also be inefficient, especially for larger DNA fragments or supercoiled DNA, which bind more tightly to the column’s matrix.
  • Low elution volume: Using a low elution buffer volume can also reduce the final DNA yield.

-Dr Lee: “The biggest flaw in Klempner et al.’s NEJM 2001 publication is the following statement:” 

Base-line specimens of cerebrospinal fluid and plasma specimens obtained at base line and on days 3, 5, 21, and 45 were tested by PCR for the presence of B. burgdorferi DNA, as previously described. [21]

-Dr Lee: In the Results section, they claimed that they found no BB DNA in the blood of the patients. 

They should have known that there is a big difference between blood and plasma. In medicine, plasma is the supernatant of the unclotted whole blood (containing anticoagulants) after centrifugation to spin down the RBCs, WBCs and platelets. Since the authors are experts in Lyme disease, they should have known how Borrelia burgdorferi cells distribute in the blood fractions when being centrifuged. For example, even the Google AI clearly stated the following: 

AI Overview

Yes, it’s generally understood that Borrelia (the bacterium that causes Lyme disease) is significantly heavier than platelets.

AI Overview

Studies have shown that when Borrelia burgdorferi (the bacterium that causes Lyme disease) is introduced into whole blood, it tends to concentrate within the platelet fraction. This suggests that Borrelia may have a similar sedimentation rate to platelets, or that it associates with platelets during the sedimentation process.

Here’s a closer look at what we know about the sedimentation rates of platelets and Borrelia:

Platelet sedimentation

Antisedimentation: Interestingly, platelets don’t actually “sediment” in the traditional sense of settling downwards in response to gravity. Instead, they float on top of the blood column, a phenomenon known as antisedimentation.

-Dr Lee: “The bottom line is that Klempner lost all the Borrelia cells, if any, in the blood specimens before he started his PCR that obviously generated false-negative results.” 

So, Dr. Klempner…. It appears that my original assessment was correct and your methodology was fatally flawed as suspected. Let me remind you that as an NIH funded author, you have a moral obligation to acknowledge mistakes which ultimately set the stage for long-term treatment denial.

A response to this inquiry is requested,
Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH

2018 Inquiry to Dr. Klempner….. 

From: Carl Tuttle [mailto:runagain@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 7:54 AM
To: mark.klempner@umassmed.edu
Cc: michael.collins@umassmed.edu; ddutko@hanszenlaporte.com; ryan.kantor@usdoj.gov; michelle.seltzer@usdoj.gov; william.rinner@usdoj.gov; makan.delrahim@usdoj.gov; Tick-Borne Disease Working Group (OS/OASH); Elias, John; officeofthechancellor@umassmed.edu
Subject: Persistent Borrelia Infection in Patients with Ongoing Symptoms of Lyme Disease

April 27, 2018

University of Massachusetts Medical School
55 Lake Avenue North
Worcester, Massachusetts 01655
Attn: Mark S. Klempner, MD, Executive Vice Chancellor, MassBiologics

Dr. Klempner,

I would like to call attention to the attached study recently identifying chronic Lyme disease in twelve patients from Canada.

Persistent Borrelia Infection in Patients with Ongoing Symptoms of Lyme Disease
http://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/6/2/33

All of these patients were culture positive for infection (genital secretions, skin “Morgellons” and blood) even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics.

In contrast, your 2001 antibiotic treatment study found; “no evidence of B. burgdorferi in a total of more than 700 different blood and cerebrospinal fluid samples from the 129 patients in these studies.”

Two Controlled Trials of Antibiotic Treatment in Patients with Persistent Symptoms and a History of Lyme Disease
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200107123450202#article_references#t=references

Not a single positive Dr. Klempner? Doesn’t this statistically prove that your methodology was fatally flawed?

Did you culture skin and genital secretions as the Middelveen paper reports? It would appear that you conveniently stopped looking after your results supported the existing thirty year dogma; chronic Lyme does not exist.

Persistent Lyme disease is not new and has been intentionally/deceitfully suppressed for decades as described in the Vicki Logan case identified in the following letter to past CDC Director Barbara Fitzgerald:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xaul84dqmqgbre0/Brenda%20Fitzgerald%20MD%20Director%20CDC.docx?dl=0
In 1991 B. burgdorferi had been isolated in culture from Vicki Logan’s CSF (CDC’s laboratory in Fort Collins CO.) despite prior treatment with 21 days of IV cefotaxime and 4 months of oral minocycline.

The dishonest science here in the U.S. has denied chronic Lyme which stifled research to find a curative approach. Now the rest of the world is suffering.

We have lost nearly four decades to this 21st century plague due to the racketeering scheme identified in the RICO lawsuit filed by SHRADER & ASSOCIATES, LLP against the Infectious Disease Society of America, seven IDSA Panelists and eight insurance companies. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control has aligned itself with the seven IDSA Panelists identified in this lawsuit.

Court Document:
https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/LymeDisease.pdf

Lyme is an incurable disease when not treated immediately which is spreading across North America and deceitfully misclassified as a low-risk and non-urgent health issue. Patient experience is describing a disease that is destroying lives, ending careers, causing death and disability while leaving victims in financial ruin. Current antimicrobials are ineffective for eradicating all forms of the Borrelia spirochete.

Public outcry has been ignored for decades while the Centers for Disease Control sat on evidence that this infection was not easily treated with a one size fits all treatment approach as dictated by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Once again your studies were fatally flawed while supporting the controlling dogma leaving hundreds of thousands if not millions worldwide with a persistent infection and absolutely no relief. We have another AIDS on our hands.

Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Lyme Endemic Hudson, NH

Cc: -Michael F. Collins, Chancellor

-The Tick Borne Disease Working Group

-US Department of Justice

-Daniel R. Dutko, HANSZEN LAPORTE

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research, Testing

Tylenol & the Autism ‘Bombshell’: Welcome to the Clown Show

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/trump-tylenol-and-the-autism-bombshell?

Trump, Tylenol & the Autism “Bombshell”: Welcome to the Clown Show

Mary Holland warns the Tylenol talk is a sideshow, the real fight is vaccines and the hidden safety data.

Lioness of Judah Ministry
Sep 22, 2025

So here we are, another “big announcement,” hyped up as a MAHA “big win.”

This time it’s Tylenol taking the blame for autism. But as Mary Holland bluntly put it:

“Tylenol is not what’s driving the autism epidemic. Vaccines are driving this epidemic.”

Her warning was clear: the Tylenol chatter might be nothing more than a sideshow.

Meanwhile, the real issue, vaccines and the government’s locked-away safety data continues to sit in the shadows.  Source: EDWARD DOWD

http://

The Meteoric Rise of Autism

President Trump Links Autism with Tylenol

Sept. 22, 2025

Without offering new evidence, Trump cited data from 40 patients with a rare disorder called cerebral folate deficiency, which can cause neurological symptoms sometimes seen in people with autism.

While there are over 80 studies on the dangers of Tylenol, the important question to always ask is, ‘who benefits?’  The simple answer is, those who will benefit from the FDA’s approval of an ‘off label’ use of Leucovorin, (also called folinic acid, a form of B9) a prescription drug mainly used in cancer therapy to counteract the toxic effects of certain cancer drugs which block the body’s use of folate, to treat autism, which 1 out of every 31 U.S. children are diagnosed with.  

Who manufactures it?

GlaxoSmithKline, (among others) who pulled the drug after it stopped manufacturing it.

Dr. Mehmet Oz, administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, said Monday,

“The FDA is approving Leucovorin for treatment of autistic children… Over half of American children are covered by medicaid and chip, government health insurance. State medicaid programs in partnership with CMS will cover the prescription around the country.”

There truly is nothing new under the sun.

It must be mentioned that doctors successfully treating autism with natural remedies like GcMAF, Bravo yogurt, and Goleic, die suspicious deaths.  It must also be mentioned that these substances have helped patients with chronic Lyme, CFS, as well as cancer.  Important excerpt:

After the European manufacturing facility for GcMAF and Goleic was raided and closed down in the first months of 2015, Dr. Bradstreet focused his research on a special yogurt formula known as Bravo. The microbes in this yogurt produce molecules of GcMAF and a newly identified compound called Rerum. These molecules stimulate the immune system when this yogurt is eaten or taken as an enema. At the same time, the microbes in the Bravo yogurt restore the microbiome of the human gut and the microbiome in the human brain.

To continue reading, please purchase the eBook “A Guide to Healing From Vaccine Injury”: (only $8.99)

Others are quick to point out that although Tylenol was emphasized, it was mentioned in the press conference that there are communities who take no pills and no vaccines and have NO AUTISM.

“We’re turning over every stone,” in the research, Kennedy said. Including genetics. He led with Tylenol as one cause of autism. Then he said mothers should be listened to—many mothers say their children developed autism after vaccination. Then, Kennedy said autism was caused by multiple factors.

All in all, Trump, Kennedy, Makary (FDA), and Bhattacharya (NIH) hammered on Tylenol.

The FDA is approving leucovorin (folinic acid) as a treatment for autism.  Source

Dr. Toby Roger says it like it is:

”Regression suggests an acute toxic exposure, not genetics, not better awareness, and acute toxic exposure. Which means that most cases of autism are preventable.”

Autism is not a medical or scientific mystery. 

We know beyond a reasonable doubt that toxicants, mostly from vaccines, and about a dozen additional toxicants, are causing autism.

If we repeal the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act, the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, and the 2005 Prep Act, that would remove the structural incentives that created the autism epidemic and the chronic disease epidemics in this country.”

And  Dr. Lynn Fynn-derella is another truth teller:

“Heads up-

Expect the blame of ancillaries like Tylenol and Folic Acid for the marked increase in autism. When they do, think of this. When parents witness the “lights going out” after vaccination and they become inconsolable later that evening, what does the pediatrician tell parents? Give them Tylenol. Chicken or egg? Prenatal correlation is even greater with tea consumption. Does it mean tea is responsible?”

Ignoring the elephant in the room.

Epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher states that regarding regression, vaccination is the main driver with Tylenol amplifying the effects due to the fact it’s toxic to the liver & depletes glutathione. The CDC is being sued and accused of running an illegal and unconstitutional hyper-vaccination program — never once tested for cumulative safety.

On a positive note during yesterday’s announcement, Kennedy emphasized the potential role of vaccines in causing autism. He said:

“One area that we are closely examining … is vaccines. Some 70% of mothers who have children with autism believe that their child was injured by a vaccine. President Trump believes that we should be listening to these mothers instead of gaslighting and marginalizing them like prior administrations.

“It will take time for an honest look at this topic by scientists, but I want to  reassure the people in the autism community that we will be uncompromising and relentless in our search for answers. We will perform the studies that should have been performed 25 years ago. Whatever the answer is, we will tell you what we find.” Source

Here’s hoping for the best, but not holding my breath.

Category:

research, Treatment, vaccines

Peer Review Scam Exposed

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/shocking-eric-weinstein-exposes-the#media

SHOCKING: Eric Weinstein Exposes the Peer Review Scam

COVID Didn’t Just Break Trust in Science—It Proved Peer Review Is a Weaponized Myth

Lioness of Judah Ministry
Aug 19, 2025

Source: NaomiWolf

Eric Weinstein Exposes the Peer Review Scam: How COVID Blew Up a 50-Year Academic Lie

COVID didn’t just break public trust in science—it proved peer review is a manufactured myth, weaponized to gatekeep truth.

As Eric Weinstein reveals:

Peer review isn’t some ancient tradition. It wasn’t born with the Royal Society. Real scholarship shows it was invented between 1965-1975—a bureaucratic tool, not a gold standard.

The Medicare Act (1965) forced it into existence. Suddenly, the U.S. government had to pay for endless medical procedures. Doctors circled the wagons, creating “peer review” to police themselves—not ensure truth.

By 1975, the NSF weaponized it. Under pressure, they turned “peer review” into a shield—”Trust us, we’re checking each other!” No—they were protecting each other.

Robert Maxwell’s Pergamon Press monetized it. As journals boomed, “peer review” became fake validation for a prestige industry.

COVID was the smoking gun:

– The Lancet & Nature published fraud (Remember HCQ hysteria? Surgisphere?).

– “Peer-reviewed” journals became propaganda laundromats.

– The system rewarded groupthink, crushed dissent.

Weinstein’s verdict: Peer review is a modern con—a Potemkin process designed to simulate rigor while entrenching power.

Until we admit that, “trust the science” is just a demand for obedience.  (See link for video)

______________

**Comment**

According to Wolf, Weinstein was until 2022 managing director for the American venture capital firm Thiel Capital.  Important excerpt:

Weinstein notes that Ghislaine Maxwell’s father, the late publishing magnate/reputed intelligence asset Robert Maxwell, founded the scientific imprint Pergamon Press, the Oxford-based imprint that published medical books and journals, which was bought by Elsevier, which is the main scientific publishing imprint (and the advance guard scientifically for the COVID/vaccine narrative; indeed, Elsevier created a “resource hub” about COVID for “librarians, campuses and health professionals”, an oddly activist offering from what is supposed to be a neutral scientific platform).

Eric Weinstein is correct. Jeffrey Epstein did fund cutting-edge scientists and mathematicians, especially in the fields of genetics and and evolutionary biology. He even convened them via another entity, into a community under his funding structure.

In Epstein we are not just looking at a sexual blackmail operation for US and foreign political leaders and hedge fund guys.

We are also looking at a “construct” that seduced and lured scientists; that was institutionally set up to seduce and lure scientists.

It may mean that whoever was steering Epstein — was also steering our science.

That makes it a very different, very significant — perhaps culture-changing; perhaps history-changing — story.  Source

For more:

Category:

Activism, research