Archive for the ‘Lyme’ Category

Diagnosis of Lyme Disease – Johns Hopkins

https://www.hopkinslyme.org/lyme-disease/diagnosis-of-lyme-disease/

Diagnosis of Lyme Disease

Many cases of Lyme disease are initially misdiagnosed. Lyme disease can be difficult to diagnose because early symptoms of fever, severe fatigue, and achiness are also common in many other illnesses. In addition, diagnostic blood tests are not always dependable, particularly in early disease. However, the round expanding red lesion rash is a unique sign that is more specific for Lyme disease, and many times a diagnosis can be made based on the tell-tale erythema migrans rash itself. Yet, it is important to understand that the erythema migrans rash is not always present or recognizable, and symptoms can fluctuate.

Think the Lyme disease rash is always a bull’s-eye? Think again.
Think it’s a spider bite? Think again.
Please refer to our
poster of varied rash manifestations as a helpful Lyme disease rash identification tool.

Recognizing the Lyme disease erythema migrans rash can be crucial to early diagnosis and treatment.

Despite common belief, the stereotypical ring within a ring bullseye rash is only present in a minority of Lyme disease patients. Instead, the majority of Lyme disease rashes are uniformly red or blue-red and do not have a central clearing or bullseye. Sometimes the site of the tick bite is clearly visible in the center of this lesion. The erythema migrans rash is almost always round or oval and expands over days to a diameter greater than 2”. The Lyme rash is often confused with a spider bite, despite spider bites not expanding in this way.

Though less common, blisters may appear in the center of a Lyme disease rash and can be mistaken for a spider bite or the rash of shingles.

It is important to note that not all infected tick bites successfully transmit Lyme disease. Tick bite reaction may occur due to skin reactions to substances from the tick bite and may be confused with the rash of Lyme disease. Tick bite reactions may last days to weeks, but unlike the Lyme disease rash, tick bite reactions remain small, do not enlarge, and are not associated with fever or other systemic symptoms.

A typical tick bite site reaction is dime-sized or smaller and does not enlarge each day like the erythema migrans rash of Lyme disease.

Bacteria from the Lyme disease rash can disseminate through the bloodstream and create new erythema migrans skin lesions at other sites distant from the initial bite.

What are the Systemic Symptoms of Lyme Disease?

Systemic symptoms of Lyme disease include:

  • Severe fatigue, musculoskeletal pain, neurologic symptoms and cognitive impairment
  • Cardiac problems, including life-threatening inflammation of the heart called carditis
  • Facial palsy, meningitis, and headaches
  • Swollen knees and Lyme arthritis

How do you diagnose the later stages of Lyme Disease?

Disseminated Lyme disease, due to unsuccessful or delayed treatment, can become disabling. The bacteria can leave the skin where it was initially inoculated by the tick and travel through the bloodstream to numerous systems of the body, primarily joints, heart, brain, muscles and the nervous system.

Late disseminated Lyme disease has a wide range of presentations including joint pain, extreme fatigue, neuromuscular pain, cardiac problems, headaches, and other central nervous system dysfunction. There are some distinguishable signs of later stage Lyme disease including facial palsy in the second stage, and swollen knees in the third stage that are somewhat specific for Lyme disease, but not absolutely, because there are other causes of Bell’s Palsy and swollen knees.

Diagnosis can be confirmed by serology blood tests which measure the antibodies that are formed by the immune system in response to the Lyme disease bacterial infection. Collection of cerebrospinal fluid by lumbar puncture may be indicated in neurologic cases that may involve the central nervous system.

Can you use a serology test to diagnose during the first stage of Lyme disease?

Serology antibody tests are generally more helpful for second and third stages of Lyme disease than first stage Lyme disease. Antibodies take weeks to develop, and if the initial presentation of Lyme disease is in the early stage those antibody tests may be falsely negative because the immune system has not yet had enough time to produce antibodies. If a physician is suspicious of Lyme disease but cannot make a diagnosis by the rash, then the antibody test in that first stage should be repeated 3 to 4 weeks later since a Lyme disease diagnosis can be missed with a false negative test in the first few weeks.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends measuring antibodies by using a two-tier testing process. If an ELISA test is positive, it is then followed by a Western blot test. However, this system can produce some false positive results and high numbers of false negative results, particularly in early infection.

In addition, the immune response to borrelia is heterogeneous, and not all cases are captured by current antibody-based diagnostics. Antibody testing can also be a problem in patients with early disease who are treated with antibiotics. In these cases, a follow up antibody test done after treatment may be negative and never turn positive.

Thus, a negative antibody test does not necessarily rule out Lyme disease and should always be considered in the context of a full health history and clinical assessment.

Current problems with Lyme disease diagnosis & patient care

  • Diagnostic tests cannot yet accurately identify the earliest stage of Lyme disease when making the diagnosis is crucial.
  • The rash is not always present or easily recognized
  • Misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis can make Lyme disease more difficult to treat and lead to prolonged and debilitating illness
  • Early symptoms can be mistaken for a summer flu
  • Lyme disease can involve several parts of the body, including joints, connective tissue, heart, brain, and nerves, and produce different symptoms at different times.
  • Antibody testing done after early treatment may be negative and never turn positive for some cases
  • Borrelia burgdorferi can evade our protective immune system and trigger immune system dysfunction.
  • No reliable blood test is presently available to measure treatment success, necessitating close clinical follow up and improved physician education.
  • Presently there is no vaccine to prevent Lyme disease.

What is the difference between this “indirect” blood diagnostic test and a “direct” test?

Direct diagnostic tests measure the presence of the bacteria directly and are much more reliable than tests looking for indirect measurement of antibodies that measure a person’s immune response to an infection. Lyme disease diagnoses and disease management would benefit from validated diagnostic tests that directly measure the infection such as a culture, PCR test, or antigen detection tests. Those are the kind of tests relied on in the management of other infectious diseases like HIV, hepatitis C or strep.

Does the time of year matter in the diagnosis of Lyme disease?

Since Lyme disease is a tick-borne infection, the seasonality of the disease is linked tightly to the life cycle and behavior of ticks. May, June, July, and early August are the biggest risk months for acquiring first stage Lyme disease in the US. This is the feeding time for nymph and adolescent ticks which are difficult to see. A viral-like illness in those early summer months might be Lyme disease. There is also some transmission of Lyme disease via adult ticks in the fall and winter and throughout the year anytime the temperature is above 40 degrees, but to a lesser degree.

The risk of acute Lyme disease is more of a year-round risk in more temperate regions such as northern California and the pacific northwest. Later stage Lyme disease, however, can manifest at any time.

Is Johns Hopkins trying to discover new ways to diagnose Lyme disease more directly?

Our Center is working on identifying biomarkers to improve diagnostics and to measure treatment success. Our research also supports the advancement of direct diagnostic tests to directly identify the Lyme disease bacteria.

USE OF THIS SITE

All information contained within the Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center website is intended for educational purposes only. Physicians and other health care professionals are encouraged to consult other sources and confirm the information contained within this site. Consumers should never disregard medical advice or delay in seeking it because of something they may have read on this website.

____________________

**Comment**

Fairly accurate article but deceiving at the same time.  A few points for consideration:

  1. The emphasis on having a rash is hurting patients. In the first ever patient sample in Lyme, Connecticut, only a quarter had a rash. The percentages vary from 25-80%. Hardly a done deal.  While the rash IS diagnostic for Lyme, not having the rash means NOTHING.
  2. I’m thankful the author states it can disseminate quickly.  This can happen far quicker than mainstream medicine cares to admit.  Case in point:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/12/07/igenex-presentation/  Within 4-6 hours after tick bite, little girl develops facial palsy and can’t walk or talk. That’s quick.
  3. Treat each and every tick bite as seriously as a heart attack.  This “wait and see” approach has been dooming patients for decades. To wait for a rash to enlarge is pure folly.  Everyone knows and admits early treatment is everything, so why are we WAITING?
  4. The symptoms listed don’t do this monster justice.  People can have severe psychological dysfunction (hallucinations, memory loss, anxiety, rage, and much more).  Please quit putting this into a 1 minute sound bite.
  5. Can we quit talking about the use of abysmal serology testing?  Seriously, throw that sucker into the trash can. We need doctors to become educated. Until a better test is created, this is a clinical diagnosis that needs astutely trained doctors.
  6. IT MATTERS NOT what time of year you become ill.  Not ONE iota.  To state otherwise shows a complete under appreciation for this organism.  It can sequester anywhere in the body and pop out at will.  Plus, there’s much to show there is FAR more at play than ticks:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/02/transmission-of-lyme-disease-lida-mattman-phd/  My initial symptoms were gynecological and in January in Wisconsin – hardly tick weather, yet, seriously infected I became:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/02/24/pcos-lyme-my-story/  Animal studies have existed since the 80’s showing contact transmission, via urine, congenitally, orally, ocularly, via synovial fluid, cow milk, colostrum, and on and on, yet nobody is touching this.  It’s just the Black legged tick, don’t ya know?
  7. Lastly, even ticks are defying the authorities and going everywhere on the backs of birds:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/11/07/ticks-on-the-move-due-to-migrating-birds-and-photoperiod-not-climate-change/  These ticks are chuck full of pathogens and are infecting people with a plethora of things. We need to admit the polymicrobial nature of this and the fact nobody knows what the cumulative effect is on the human body:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/30/study-shows-lyme-msids-patients-infected-with-many-pathogens-and-explains-why-we-are-so-sick/

Study on An Anti-tick Vaccine

https://parasitesandvectors.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13071-019-3468-x

Counterattacking the tick bite: towards a rational design of anti-tick vaccines targeting pathogen transmission

  • Ryan O. M. RegoEmail authorView ORCID ID profile, Jos J. A. Trentelman, Juan Anguita, Ard M. Nijhof, Hein Sprong, Boris Klempa, Ondrej Hajdusek, Julen Tomás-Cortázar, Tal Azagi, Martin Strnad, Sarah Knorr, Radek Sima, Marie Jalovecka, Sabína Fumačová Havlíková, Martina Ličková, Monika Sláviková, Petr Kopacek, Libor Grubhoffer and Joppe W. Hovius
    Parasites & Vectors201912:229

    https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3468-x

    Published: 14 May 2019

Abstract

Hematophagous arthropods are responsible for the transmission of a variety of pathogens that cause disease in humans and animals. Ticks of the Ixodes ricinus complex are vectors for some of the most frequently occurring human tick-borne diseases, particularly Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV). The search for vaccines against these diseases is ongoing. Efforts during the last few decades have primarily focused on understanding the biology of the transmitted viruses, bacteria and protozoans, with the goal of identifying targets for intervention. Successful vaccines have been developed against TBEV and Lyme borreliosis, although the latter is no longer available for humans. More recently, the focus of intervention has shifted back to where it was initially being studied which is the vector. State of the art technologies are being used for the identification of potential vaccine candidates for anti-tick vaccines that could be used either in humans or animals. The study of the interrelationship between ticks and the pathogens they transmit, including mechanisms of acquisition, persistence and transmission have come to the fore, as this knowledge may lead to the identification of critical elements of the pathogens’ life-cycle that could be targeted by vaccines. Here, we review the status of our current knowledge on the triangular relationships between ticks, the pathogens they carry and the mammalian hosts, as well as methods that are being used to identify anti-tick vaccine candidates that can prevent the transmission of tick-borne pathogens.

___________________

**Comment**

In the paragraph before the conclusion (in the full-length document) the following is stated:

Given the current health concerns related to LB, a novel vaccine would most likely be highly welcomed by society. On the other hand, the previously commercially available vaccine against LB was taken off the market for various and questionable reasons [232]. Therefore, efforts are needed to address societal prejudices associated with vaccination, including health benefits, risks, and necessity, especially from a public health perspective.

Well if that isn’t the understatement of the year, I don’t know what is.  The LB (Lyme borreliosis) vaccine was yanked off the market because it CAUSED Lyme symptoms in many people, as well as dogs:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/07/22/why-we-care-so-strongly-about-a-potential-lyme-vaccine/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/07/01/lyme-vaccine-fail-safety-ignored/  Excerpt:  

In reality, the vaccine was pulled off the market to avoid disclosure of Phase IV data that probably would have shown limited efficacy and significant safety concerns related to LYMErix (11-13). That data has never been publicly released.

Regarding dogs:  https://www.vetinfo.com/canine-lyme-disease-vaccine-side-effects.html  Excerpt:

Cornell University found long-term side effects that paint a different picture of the safety of the canine Lyme disease vaccination.

In some cases, dogs develop Lyme disease anyway. It’s believed that the antibodies in the vaccine can develop into Lyme disease. Research finds dogs develop all the symptoms of Lyme disease up to six weeks after receiving the shot. While tests for the Lyme disease bacteria show up as negative, there are many dogs developing all the symptoms. Left untreated more concerning issues develop.

A number of dogs develop rheumatoid arthritis months or years later. However, the development of acute kidney failure is more alarming. Remember that 90 percent of dogs never become sick and that pulling off ticks before 48 hours eliminates any risk. Many vets feel the benefit of the vaccination is often outweighed by the potential risks.

Seems veterinarians are often wiser than general practitioners.

For a history of the entire Lyme vaccine saga:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/06/07/the-lyme-vaccine-russian-roulette/  Excerpt:  

It is believed that a rush to create a Lyme disease vaccine led to the mishandling of the disease. Current antibody tests for Lyme disease were manipulated in 1994 at the Dearborn Conference so as to facilitate vaccine development. The two most important indicators of infection were stripped out of serology tests so that the vaccinated would test seronegative. The vast majority of truly infected patients cannot obtain a timely diagnosis leading to a missed opportunity for successful short term treatment.

The vaccine known as LYMErix was supposed to expose the immune system to the outer surface protein A (OspA) of the spirochete responsible for causing Lyme disease but for some patients, it caused the same crippling effects of the disease itself as reported in the class action lawsuit:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/sodqs3pdeeesktf/Sheller%20Lymerix.pdf?dl=0

EXCERPT FROM THE LAWSUIT:

“The people who have contacted us were, prior to vaccination with LYMErix, healthy, active and energetic. Indeed, the very reason they sought the LYMErix vaccine was their desire to preserve their healthy, active lifestyle. However, what they experienced was a dramatic degradation of their health and quality of life. As will be described below, these previously healthy individuals are now afflicted with painful, at times debilitating arthritic symptoms, including joint pain and swelling, as well as extremely severe Lyme-disease-like symptoms which have persisted to this day.”

I counted at least 20 people who authored this study.  Where are the researchers who are studying better testing, effective treatments, transmission studies on all the ways Lyme/MSIDS can be transmitted, post mortem studies to end the Lyme wars, and answers to how patients can pay for this plague?

Researchers for those issues are no where to be found.  If there are any, they are in their own basements using their own microscopes with limited funding.

 

 

What Role Do Co-infections Play in Lyme Disease Diagnosis?

https://www.bca-clinic.de/en/what-role-do-co-infections-play-in-lyme-disease-diagnosis/

What Role Do Co-infections Play In Lyme Disease Diagnosis?

Chronic Lyme disease is an intimidating enough prospect by itself. Unfortunately, a large number of cases are compounded by Lyme co-infections – additional diseases that are transferred simultaneously with the Lyme-causative Borrelia burgdorferi bacteria. Ticks are responsible for all these transmitted infections; they carry the strains that are passed on to their human hosts. Unfortunately, many patients don’t realise that co-infections even exist, and more crucially, many doctors don’t either. It’s extremely important to test for co-infections at the same time as Lyme disease diagnosis, as they can compound or revitalise the primary debilitating symptoms of the umbrella infection. This makes simultaneous diagnosis an important area of study for Lyme-literate doctors.

The majority of co-infections will exacerbate the symptoms of chronic Lyme itself. They modulate and stymy the immune system, as well as providing resistance to therapy. Chronic Lyme disease diagnosis in itself is a controversial topic, whose waters do not need muddying further. Acute Lyme is relatively straightforward to diagnose, if the distinctive bullseye rash is present. This rash – a red circle surrounded by a larger red circle, forming the shape of a bullseye – will be noticeable in the majority of cases, although it can be easily missed. Once the infection develops to chronic Lyme, however, the process of diagnosis becomes much more difficult, as Lyme is not usually considered among potential diseases.

Lyme is sometimes nicknamed ‘the Great Imitator’, due to its symptoms mimicking the symptoms of other significant diseases. The symptoms themselves bear very little resemblance to the initial ones presented by acute Lyme, instead differing in severity from patient to patient. Broadly, they encompass everything from fatigue, joint pain and muscle pain to depression, neurological issues, headaches and sleep disturbances. These symptoms are so broad that it’s easy to see why under-educated doctors will often reach for something more common, like multiple sclerosis or fibromyalgia. When it comes to Lyme, misdiagnosis rates are estimated to be extremely high, with the full extent unknown. Co-infections can cloud diagnosis by adding more symptoms, presenting new ones, or making others more pronounced. To fully benefit Lyme disease treatment, the full spectrum of issues must be investigated and laid out before the process begins.

The full range of symptoms must be examined during Lyme disease diagnosis.

BCA-lab, who are Lyme specialists based in Augsburg, Germany, understand co-infections very well. They will run a full gamut of tests early on in the treatment process in an effort to understand exactly what the patient is suffering from, and how precisely they’re suffering from it. Some of the main diseases they test for can severely change the way Lyme develops within the body, and how it should be treated. Some co-infections can even revitalise the Lyme disease symptoms after the primary Borrelia infection has been dealt with, leading patients to believe that either they are not fully cured, or that they were never suffering from Lyme in the first place.

One of the most common Lyme co-infections is Bartonellosis. If this co-infection is present in the initial tick bite, and is allowed to run amok within the system, it can be expected to have substantial significance to the overarching Lyme infection. The clinical manifestations of both diseases contain numerous overlaps, and the symptoms presented by both are undeniably broad. Bartonellosis is still not well understood by the medical community at large; it was initially thought to be relatively benign. However, the long-term effects and symptoms of the disease are intimidating, especially if paired with Lyme. They include fever, fatigue, joint pain, muscle ache and brain fog. More alarmingly, the disease can have a range of neurological effects, resulting in symptoms such as panic attacks, seizures, depression, epilepsy and psychosis. Many of these symptoms are extremely similar to the ones presented by chronic Lyme, which makes differentiating them at the diagnostic stage a critical first step.

Another common co-infection is Chlamydophila pneumoniae, the primary manifestation of which is the well-known and well-understood pneumoniae. However, left over a long period of time, Chlamydophila pneumonia can severely compromise the body’s immune system by placing it under extreme stress. Upper respiratory infections can be a huge drain on the immune response, especially if they are recurring. Given the fact that chronic Lyme already sends the immune system haywire, Chlamydophila pneumoniae is a very dangerous co-infection, if left to its own devices. To compound this, the infection is quite hard to both detect and treat, as chlamydia are much smaller than other pathogens. Mixed in with Lyme disease and possible other co-infections, it can often go undetected.

Chlamydophila pneumoniae can be one of the more dangerous Lyme co-infections.

 

Bartonellosis and Chlamydophila pneumoniae are just two examples of co-infections that can cause severe problems for Lyme patients if they are not dealt with adequately. Currently, the answer to the question posed by this article, ‘what role do co-infections play in Lyme disease diagnosis’, is simply ‘not enough’. There needs to be a combined and concerted effort on the part of medical health professionals everywhere to engage with co-infections and recognise the danger they pose to Lyme patients. Diagnosis is often the hardest part of the Lyme battle; it’s the stage where we should strive to get everything right the first time. Correct diagnosis across the Lyme disease spectrum lays a strong foundation for successful patient treatment and subsequent recovery.

___________________

**Comment**

Great article overall, just remember this is written by a lab that does testing for profit, so their first priority is selling tests.

Testing throughout the history of Lyme/MSIDS has been extremely poor.  Most testing is serological testing – utilizing blood, where frankly these pathogens do not hang out.  They are stealth pathogens and burrow deep within the body to avoid the immune system, treatment, AND testing.

LLMD’S (Lyme literate doctors) are educated in the symptomology of these diseases and can diagnose you clinically.  Treatment is often a bit of “Let’s try this and see,” approach as everyone is so different with numerous variables.  This is why mainstream medicine is woefully unprepared and uneducated for all of this.  They simply are ignorant.

To date, nobody has a true bead on what the implications of multiple pathogens fighting synergistically to the body are, but this work is screaming to be done as recent research has borne polymicrobialism out to be true:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/30/study-shows-lyme-msids-patients-infected-with-many-pathogens-and-explains-why-we-are-so-sick/

Mainstream medicine STILL hasn’t acknowledged or dealt with this FACT.

It makes the CDC/IDSA mono-therapy of doxycycline a true joke. As well as their FDA-approved 2-tiered testing which misses half of all cases.

Bartonella, as mentioned in this article, is a HUGE player that up until recently has been considered a benign disease with required of cat exposure, yet any Lyme literate doctor OR patient will tell you Bart is far from benign, and a plethora of case studies have proven you don’t have to be around cats to contract it.  In fact, personally, it is my Achilles heel.  It’s what I deal with – perhaps forever.

Great read on the types of chlamydia:  https://articles.mercola.com/chlamydia/types.aspx The first two are mentioned in the abstract:

  • Chlamydia trachomatis can be passed from one person to another via unprotected sexual intercourse. Pain English: this is a STD.
  • Chlamydia pneumoniae (C. pneumoniae), a nonsexually transmitted disease that infects the lungs and causes bacterial pneumonia.
  • Chlamydia psittaci is another chlamydia strain that can lead to a rare condition called psittacosis, aka “parrot fever.”

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/10/07/chlamydia-like-organisms-found-in-ticks/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/19/first-study-showing-borrelia-chlamydia-mixed-biofilms-in-infected-human-skin-tissues/  Excerpt:  

IN SUMMARY, OUR STUDY IS THE FIRST TO SHOW BORRELIA–CHLAMYDIA MIXED BIOFILMS IN INFECTED HUMAN SKIN TISSUES, WHICH RAISES THE QUESTIONS OF WHETHER THESE HUMAN PATHOGENS HAVE DEVELOPED A SYMBIOTIC RELATIONSHIP FOR THEIR MUTUAL SURVIVAL.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/03/09/researchers-identify-herpes-1-chlamydia-pneumoniae-several-types-of-spirochaete-as-major-causes-of-alzheimers/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/04/04/correlation-of-natural-autoantibodies-heart-disease-related-antibacterial-antibodies-in-pericardial-fluid-mycoplasma-bb-chlamydia/  Excerpt:

Mycoplasma pneumoniae antibody positive patients had significantly higher anti-CS IgM levels. In CABG patients we found a correlation between anti-CS IgG levels and Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Borrelia burgdorferi antibody titers. Our results provide the first evidence that natural autoantibodies are present in the PF and they show significant correlation with certain antibacterial antibody titers in a disease specific manner.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Awareness Webinar – May 30, 2019

https://jhjhm.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_c78Ja46pRpCPAl0B0m1wzA

Webinar banner

 Microsoft (Outlook)

Topic

Lyme Disease Awareness Webinar

Description

Join Center Directors, John Aucott, MD, and Mark Soloski, PhD, for an update on Lyme disease and other tick-borne infections.

Find out what you need to know about Lyme disease and tick-borne illness to help keep you and your loved ones safe while enjoying the outdoors.

Learn what to do if bitten by a tick, how to recognize a Lyme disease rash, and how innovative research is addressing this growing epidemic.

You will not want to miss this informative and timely webinar with Dr. Aucott and Dr. Soloski.

May 30, 2019 12:00 PM in Eastern Time (US and Canada)

Speakers

photo of John Aucott, MD
John Aucott, MD
Director, Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center
John Aucott, MD, is an Associate Professor of Medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Director of the Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center. He has been involved in care of patients and research in Lyme disease since joining the Johns Hopkins faculty in 1996. Dr. Aucott’s research is focused on discovering better diagnostic and prognostic tests for Lyme disease and the development of new treatment strategies for patients with chronic symptoms. He is the Principal Investigator for the SLICE studies, a research program that investigates the impact of Lyme disease on health outcomes and the human immune system. The biorepository of blood samples generated by the SLICE studies are a nationally recognized resource that has become the basis of groundbreaking collaborations studying the microbiology and immune pathophysiology of Lyme disease.
photo of Mark Soloski, Ph.D.
Mark Soloski, Ph.D.
Co-Director, Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center
Mark Soloski, PhD, is a Professor of Medicine in the Division of Rheumatology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and Co-Director for Basic Research for the Johns Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center. Dr. Soloski joined the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine faculty in 1983 and holds joint appointments in the School of Medicine’s Departments of Pathology and Molecular Biology and Genetics as well as the Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology in the School of Public Health. Dr. Soloski is interested in the role that infection plays in setting the stage for chronic immune mediated inflammatory diseases. His work includes investigating the human immune response to infection with Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease. His efforts employ genomic, proteomic, and complex immune phenotyping approaches to understand how the immune system contributes to the symptoms and severity of human Lyme disease.

Tonight: Free Webinar – A Practical Approach to Complex Questions About Lyme Disease – Dr. George Papanicolaou

0-2

Sorry for the late notice on this.  Just found it.  To register:  https://lnkd.in/e6Zb-R3

___________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/02/13/lyme-disease-treatment/