Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

FDA Unveils New Vaccine Injury Tracking System – Is It Any Better Than the Old One?

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-new-vaccine-injury-tracking-system-is-it-better-than-old-one/

FDA Unveils New Vaccine Injury Tracking System — Is It Any Better Than the Old One?

The FDA’s new Adverse Event Monitoring System for drugs and vaccines merges the agency’s previously separate adverse event reporting systems for drugs, vaccines and other products. Some critics told The Defender the new database does little to solve long-standing problems with the federal government’s follow-up and verification of adverse event reports.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.

broken vaccine bottles and words "adverse event"

The new platform merges the FDA’s previously separate adverse event reporting systems for drugs, vaccines and other products.

Some advocates for the vaccine-injured applauded the launch of the FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS). But others said the new database does little to solve long-standing problems with the federal government’s follow-up and verification of adverse event reports.

The FDA said AEMS reports will be updated in real time, not quarterly.

“The FDA’s previous adverse event reporting systems were outdated and fragmented and made important data difficult to access,” FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said in a statement.

Makary described AEMS as “a single, intuitive adverse event platform that will better serve agency scientists, researchers, and the public.”

AEMS includes data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS); the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), which contains reports for drugs, biologics, cosmetics and color additives; and the Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS), which contains reports for animal drugs and foods.

By May, AEMS will also include reports now housed in separate databases, concerning adverse events related to human foods and dietary supplements, tobacco products and medical devices. According to the FDA, these databases together processed 6 million adverse event reports per year.

AEMS will be backed by artificial intelligence (AI), according to Fox News.

Last month, Wired reported that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the FDA, was developing a generative AI tool to identify patterns in vaccine injury reports and “generate hypotheses on the negative effects of vaccines.”

Christopher Dreisbach, legal affairs director for React19, an advocacy group for COVID-19 vaccine injury victims, said AEMS “has the potential to be a meaningful step forward” if it replaces a “Kafkaesque status quo.”

Dreisbach was referring to vaccine injury reports submitted to VAERS that are “frequently dismissed on the grounds that VAERS is ‘unreliable.’”

He said that contradiction “has left injured individuals in an impossible position: told to trust a system that, when it raises questions, is then discounted.”

Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), questioned the new platform’s reliance on AI.

“Supplanting real intelligence with the artificial kind is always a cause for concern,” Jablonowski said. “Decisions made by humans are trackable, accountable and inquirable. With AI, it is not so easy to identify the genesis of decisions, and accountability doesn’t exist.”

VAERS long plagued by transparency concerns

During U.S. Senate confirmation hearings last year, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promised “radical transparency” at federal health agencies. Soon after his confirmation, Kennedy pledged better vaccine injury tracking.

Makary said the FDA’s prior adverse event reporting systems “were outdated and fragmented and made important data difficult to access.”

“These clunky systems also wasted millions of taxpayer dollars and created blind spots in our postmarket surveillance of products ranging from drugs and vaccines to cosmetics,” he added.

According to the FDA, AEMS will save the agency approximately $120 million over the next five years.

VAERS has faced scrutiny over transparency concerns. A 2023 investigation by The BMJ revealed that the federal government operates two VAERS systems — one for the public, and a private back-end system that contains corrections and updates, including deaths that occurred after an initial injury.

The BMJ investigation also identified other deficiencies, including disappearing reports and data.

In 2024, React19 teamed with CHD and OpenVAERS — a website that provides tools for more easily accessing and searching VAERS data — to develop a tool to track VAERS reports.

Citing frequently disappearing reports and widespread errors in VAERS, the organizations said the new tool would enable vaccine-injured people to follow what happens to the reports they submit.

According to Albert Benavides, founder of VAERSaware.com, the FDA’s FAERS database had problems similar to those associated with VAERS. He said the new AEMS does little to address transparency concerns.

“This new AEMS dashboard has all the same functionality, or lack of functionality, as the old FAERS dashboard. It looks like FDA has rebranded FAERS to AEMS but added a couple extra tabs for vaccines and cosmetics,” Benavides said.

In previous interviews with CHD.TV, Benavides suggested that VAERS administrators intentionally undercounted or obscured data on vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

Old systems were difficult to use and inefficient — will AEMS be any better?

Fox News quoted unnamed FDA sources who said the next phase of the AEMS rollout will include a user-friendly front-end system “that makes it easy for reports to be submitted.”

The FDA cited estimates suggesting that 80% of reports were never entered into its databases “due to the complexity of filing a report.” A 2011 Harvard report found that less than 1% of all adverse events were reported to VAERS.

Dreisbach said, “Streamlining is only one piece of what is needed.” He added:

“The bigger issue is follow-up and verification. Right now, individuals who file legitimate adverse-event reports rarely receive meaningful follow-up, and clinicians often assume that reporting leads to some sort of investigation — when in reality, most reports simply become entries in a database.

“Fixing the front end without fixing the back end will not improve safety surveillance in a meaningful way.”

In a 2024 interview with The DefenderDr. Danice Hertz, a retired gastroenterologist injured by Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, said, “It took three years and 11 reports to VAERS for someone to contact me from the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and request my records.”

After submitting her 11th report in late 2023, Hertz said the CDC employee who spoke with her said the agency was “swamped with reports of injury.”

In a follow-up interview today, Hertz welcomed the launch of AEMS, but said reports to the new database “must be permanent and not mysteriously drop out as many reports have done in the old VAERS system.”

She added:

“Patients should be able to update their reports as their condition progresses and more information becomes available. This is not possible with the old systems. … Most importantly, if data is to be collected, the data must be taken seriously and acted upon. VAERS data was largely ignored.”

The lack of follow-up on reports submitted to VAERS was the subject of two 2024 U.S. House of Representatives hearings. At the second of the two hearings, in March 2024, witnesses told Congress that inadequate vaccine safety surveillance systems “jeopardized” Americans’ health during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

Jablonowski noted that a key adverse event database — Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) — is not included within AEMS. He said:

“The VSD is a near-real-time monitoring of about 10 million people — children and adults — that contains data on vaccination, demographics, birth details, medical encounters (visits, diagnoses and lab results), pharmacy records and mortality.

“A publicly available version of the VSD would relieve an enormous burden, and budgetary line item, from HHS. A lot of good science can come from it, and it could bury the uncertainty surrounding hazards of vaccines.”

Design of new AEMS database raises concerns

Benavides said the structure and design of the new AEMS database fall short of the government’s promises of radical transparency. He said AEMS is missing the “free text narrative section” that was “customary in VAERS reports.”

This section displayed the text freely entered by anyone who submitted a VAERS report — text which Benavides said allowed the public to provide information not requested or captured by the other, closed-ended questions in the VAERS submission form.

Benavides said information entered in the free text section typically included “vaccine history, laboratory results, current illness and concomitant medications.”

Certain search options that were available within the VAERS database are also not available in AEMS, according to Benavides.

“In this AEMS data dashboard, there is no longer an adverse event level like ‘Office visit,’ ‘Emergency Room,’ ‘Hospitalization,’ ‘Life Threatening,’ ‘Permanent Disability’ or ‘Death,’” Benavides said.

He said the date of death — customarily included in most VAERS reports — is “non-existent” in the new platform. And the vaccine lot number information is “buried under an additional layer of clicks.”

“The public is only allowed to view the minimal amount of data, like age, gender, vaccination date, onset date, vaccine name,” Benavides said.

Benavides said that, as structured, AEMS will also hamper the efforts of researchers, as it limits the number of reports they can download at one time.

“Worst of all for any intermediate-to-expert user or analyst, queries and raw downloads are capped at no more than 10,000 records,” Benavides said.

Dr. Joel Wallskog, an orthopedic surgeon injured by COVID-19 vaccines and co-chair of React19, said medical providers and healthcare organizations must be required to submit adverse event reports to AEMS for the new platform to succeed.

“Reporting must be mandatory, and there must be a penalty for non-reporting. If all of these issues are not taken into account in a new reporting system, the new system will once again fail,” Wallskog said.

“Patients who experience adverse events want a system that works, not one that merely appears more modern,” Dreisbach said. He called for more transparency in how AEMS operates, greater accessibility for researchers, clinicians and the public, and “accountability in how reports are followed up and classified.”

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

Lyme Disease Coinfections & the Brain

http://

Feb 26, 2026
Clinical Strategies for Neuropsychiatric and Neurological Recovery
Join Dr. Aylin Ozdemir for an expert-led exploration of the neurological and neuropsychiatric complexities of Lyme disease and associated co-infections, based on a recently published peer-reviewed research paper (June 2025).
This webinar examines why Lyme disease is frequently misdiagnosed in patients presenting with cognitive, behavioural, and neurological symptoms, and how expanded diagnostic approaches can reveal underlying immune dysregulation and neuroinflammation when standard testing falls short.
Drawing from real-world clinical cases, viewers will learn about integrative therapeutic approaches to support neurological and neuropsychiatric recovery. We’ll explore practical strategies to better recognise, treat, and support recovery in complex neuro-Lyme presentations:
Why Lyme disease often presents as psychiatric or neurological illness The limitations of standard testing How expanded diagnostics improve detection Clinical insight: Real-world case examples Recognising complex neuropsychiatric presentations Integrative therapeutic approaches: Antimicrobial strategies Immune modulation Neuroprotective and mitochondrial support Long-term maintenance protocols to help reduce relapse Dr. Kunal Garg provides a brief overview of the application of CARE Guidelines, highlighting the importance of rigorous case documentation and high-quality publishing in advancing evidence-informed Lyme disease care.
For more:

H.R. 7879 Puts State Dept in Charge of Organizing Foreign Govs For Next Pandemic ‘Vaccines’ & Drugs

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/new-bill-puts-us-state-department?

New Bill Puts U.S. State Department in Charge of Organizing Foreign Governments for Next Pandemic Vaccines and Drugs: H.R. 7879

U.S. government operatives are preparing and organizing the global vaccine and drug response for the next pandemic before the next pandemic has even occurred.

A new bill introduced earlier this week in Congress would require the United States Department of State to organize foreign governments and international institutions behind the development and commercialization of medical countermeasures for future pandemics.

Pandemic preparedness is normally managed by domestic health agencies, not the State Department, meaning the bill would place the United States Department of State at the center of organizing foreign governments around vaccines, drugs, and other countermeasures for the next pandemic.

The current Secretary of State is Marco Rubio, a former republican senator from Florida (funding).

The Secretary would have the highest level of authority over the international coordination described in the bill.

The new federal legislation, H.R. 7879, was introduced March 9 by California Representatives Mike Levin (D) (funding) and David G. Valadao (R) (funding) and referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Officials within the U.S. government are constructing the worldwide system for distributing pandemic vaccines and treatments before the next pandemic has even begun.  (See link for article and contact information if you wish to express your opposition to pandemic orchestration)

For more:

FREE: ‘Vaccine’ Free QuickStart Guide For Parents

https://www.unvaccinatedchildren.com/vaccine-free-quickstart-guide-for-parents/

Vaccine Free QuickStart Guide for Parents

By Larry Cook

The vaccine topic is very controversial and the amount of information about this topic on both sides (pro & anti) is staggering. I understand that it can be very difficult for you or any parent to sift through mountains of information and make heads or tails of it all. So, on this page I’m going to try and give you the fastest possible, most important points, with links to more information so you can do the in-depth research that you MUST DO in order to come to a conclusion that vaccines are neither safe, nor effective, and therefore, are not needed for your children, and were never needed for children. Let’s begin!

Vaccination & Natural Immunity

  • Vaccines never saved us: DEATH from all infectious diseases dropped over 98% before most vaccines were introduced. Measles deaths dropped 99.96% before the vaccine was introduced. Death from Scarlet Fever also dropped in the same way, and there’s no vaccine for it.
  • Unvaccinated children are healthier than vaccinated children according to numerous studies and the parents who have both (scroll down for more info).
  • Vaccines destroy immune CAPACITY, which is why unvaccinated children recover from illnesses faster than vaccinated children.
  • HEALTHY children do not die from infections – malnourished children do. Vaccines are not the solution – proper nutrition is. Vitamins A & C easily treat measles, for example.
  • HOMEOPATHY was used in the 1800s and early 1900s to stop disease outbreaks, but was stopped in the early 1900s by the allopathic medical lobby to make way for toxic vaccines and drugs.
  • High dose vitamin C – in the form of IVs, IMs and oral use – was used successfully to treat and cure a wide variety of diseases, including polio, since the 1950s, and is still used today by alternative doctors.
  • Vaccines do not confer immunity – meaning, they do not work. When a child winds up with the symptoms the child was vaccinated for, the unvaccinated are blamed, instead of the faulty vaccination PROCESS.
  • Healthy, well nourished children recover from childhood illnesses, and respond well to herbs, homeopathy, nutritional supplements and other safe and effective remedies – see book below.
  • Vaccines SUBDUE immune response, but this is NOT immunity – infections just go deeper into the body.
  • Vaccines aggressively overstimulate the immune system in order to create antibodies to injected antigens, but again, that is not immunity AND that overstimulation of the immune system never dies down entirely, giving rise to chronic health ailments.
  • Children have lived on in spite of being poisoned by vaccines, NOT BECAUSE OF IT (extremely important).
  • Vaccines cause autoimmune disorders, type 1 diabetes, cancer, asthma, allergies, eczema, seizures, autism, death, and dozens of other lifelong damaging ailments. See Vaccine Dangers for full overview.
  • Vaccines ALWAYS cause some harm, and often cause a lot of harm. See my Vaccine Injury Treatment Guide if your child is vaccine injured.
  • VACCINE EXEMPTIONS are available in most states in order for children to attend school or daycare without vaccines. Click either exemption information or California exemption information for details.

(See link for article and resources)

For more:

FDA Lowers Bar For Drugs – While Raising it for Natural Health

https://anh-usa.org/fda-lowers-the-bar-for-drugs-while-raising-it-for-natural-health/

FDA Lowers the Bar for Drugs—While Raising It for Natural Health

FDA Lowers the Bar for Drugs—While Raising It for Natural Health

THE TOPLINE

  • The FDA is moving to approve many new drugs based on just one clinical trial, lowering the evidentiary bar for pharmaceuticals in the name of speeding patient access.
  • At the same time, federal regulators are pressuring supplement companies to support health claims with expensive randomized controlled trials—sometimes even two—creating a far higher standard for natural products than for drugs.
  • Because nutrients and botanicals generally cannot be patented, requiring pharmaceutical-style trials effectively suppresses communication about natural health options and limits consumers’ access to information about their potential benefits.

In a move announced in the New England Journal of Medicine, the FDA says it will drop its long-standing expectation that new drugs be supported by two clinical trials, shifting instead to a “default” of just one trial for many new medications. FDA leadership says the change will cut red tape and accelerate patient access to new drugs.

For advocates of natural approaches to health and healing, this raises an obvious contradiction: while the FDA relaxes standards for drug—new to nature molecules that come with dangerous side effects—federal agencies are simultaneously tightening the screws on the natural health sector, products with long histories of safe use. It is regulatory capture—and crony capitalism—at its peak.

Drugs Get Flexibility—Supplements Get Censorship

In 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), working closely with the FDA, sent hundreds of warning letters to supplement and natural product companies explaining that health claims must be backed by randomized controlled trials (RCTs)—the same expensive standard used for pharmaceuticals.

In some cases, regulators have even suggested two RCTs may be required to substantiate health benefits in advertising.

That’s right: Drugs that can cause serious side effects—even death—may soon be approved with a single clinical trial. Natural products with decades or even centuries of safe use are being forced to meet an even higher bar just to discuss their benefits. It is an outrageous double standard.

A “Backdoor Ban” on Natural Health Information

Clinical trials are incredibly expensive, often costing tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.

Drug companies can afford them because their products are patent-protected monopolies that can be sold for enormous profits. Nutrients and botanical products are different. They generally can’t be patented, meaning the costs of large-scale trials cannot be recouped.

Regulators know this, which means demanding pharmaceutical-style trials for supplement claims functions as a de facto ban on most health claims about natural products. And when companies can’t communicate the science behind their products, consumers are left in the dark about options that could support their health.

A Pattern of Suppression

The government’s crackdown on truthful health speech is part of a long-standing campaign to steer consumers away from natural options in favor of pharmaceutical drugs:

  • Cherry and walnut growers were threatened by the FDA for linking to peer-reviewed studies on their websites.
  • Doctors were silenced during COVID for recommending vitamin D and zinc.
  • Xlear, a nasal spray company, was dragged into litigation for sharing results of over a dozen studies on its product’s potential benefits—litigation the DOJ finally dropped with prejudice in March 2025.

And the problem goes beyond our borders. US regulators are pushing to “harmonize” with the European Union’s oppressive model, where nearly all botanical claims have been banned and only a few vitamin/mineral claims are allowed. We cannot let that happen here.

The Fight for Scientific Integrity

That’s why the Alliance for Natural Health USA (ANH-USA) has filed a petition challenging the FTC’s censorship regime and demanding a return to a “totality of the evidence” standard—one that considers the full body of scientific research, not just expensive clinical trials.

Science doesn’t begin and end with randomized trials.

Epidemiological studies, mechanistic research, observational data, and centuries of real-world use all contribute to scientific understanding—especially when it comes to nutrients and foods.

Consumers deserve access to all the evidence, not just the evidence that benefits pharmaceutical companies.

Stand with ANH in the fight for free speech and health autonomy by donating to our legal war chest!

For more: