Madison Area Lyme Support Group

From journalist Mary Beth Pfeiffer on Facebook:

LYME LAWSUIT UPDATE:
I won’t soft sell this. The Torrey lawsuit plaintiffs have agreed to drop the case against the six so-called physician-panelists who greatly influenced Lyme disease care: Raymond J. Dattwyler, John J. Halperin, Eugene D. Shapiro, Leonard H. Sigal, Allen C. Steere and Gary P. Wormser.

Pending approval by the court of the order shown here, TORREY v. IDSA is now an anti-trust lawsuit against a single defendant: The Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Both sides have agreed to this order, which dismisses claims against the IDSA under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) — but NOT under the anti-trust Sherman Act.

Should the lawsuit survive a pending defense motion to dismiss it, it would proceed on the plaintiffs’ assertions that the IDSA attempted to or did monopolize the Lyme treatment market, in violation of the Sherman Act. The Torrey plaintiffs have asserted:

“The IDSA guidelines are treated as mandatory requirements by the IDSA…by:

(1) denying the existence of chronic Lyme disease,
(2) condemning the use of long-term antibiotics,
(3) allowing doctors who treat chronic Lyme patients to be sanctioned by medical boards, and
(4) using the guidelines as a basis to deny insurance coverage of chronic Lyme treatments. The power of the IDSA…restrains trade, therefore, the IDSA guidelines have significantly reduced the Lyme treatment market …[and its conducts is] sufficiently commercial for Sherman Act purposes.”

Eight insurance companies charged in the lawsuit settled previously.

The proposed order, filed April 22, 2021, awaits a signature by U.S. District Court Judge Robert W. Schrader III. Read it here: Joint-agreement-dismissal.

Mary Beth Pfeiffer, author of “Lyme: The First Epidemic of Climate Change,” maintains a website with information about this lawsuit. Click here to see court filings and other history of this case.

_____________________

**Comment**

While of course disappointing, this action is understandable.  Law is a funny thing and you must do what you must do to have the best case possible even if there are other very real serious issues that need to be dealt with.

On the bright side, by sticking with the IDSA, it will affect all doctors everywhere as that organization is at the top of the pyramid controlling what other doctors do.

This monopolizing of medicine is currently also being blatantly seen with COVID, with the same “disinformation playbook”:

• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/06/02/covid-doctor-big-gov-big-pharma-suppression-of-ivermectin-cost-500000-lives/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/04/27/covid-natural-remedies-banned-as-doj-ftc-seek-to-silence-doctors-promoting-vitamin-d-c-zinc-etc/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/05/07/another-hit-piece-on-ivermectin-in-the-land-of-covid-censorship-madness/

For more on the mishandling of Lyme/MSIDS:

• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/26/cdc-playbook-learning-from-lyme/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/02/22/why-mainstream-lyme-msids-research-remains-in-the-dark-ages/
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/25/why-should-we-care-about-lyme-disease-a-colorful-tale-of-government-conflicts-of-interest-probable-bioweaponization-and-pathogen-complexity/