https://www.lymedisease.org/gabriela-40-practitioners-lyme/

40+ practitioners failed to recognize Lyme disease as root of my ailments

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/chd-sues-the-university-of-california-over-mandatory-flu-vaccine-policy/?

AUGUST 13, 2020

CHD Will Sue the University of California Over Mandatory Flu Vaccine Policy

By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chair, Children’s Health Defense

Dr. Janet Napolitano says mandatory flu shots will “lessen the chance of being infected with COVID.” However, prevailing research suggests that flu vaccines actually raise the risk from coronavirus infection.

A January 2020 US Pentagon study (Wolff 2020) found that the flu shot INCREASES the risks from coronavirus by 36%.

“Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as “virus interference…’vaccine derived’ virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus…”

Many other studies suggest the increased risk of viral respiratory infections, including coronavirus, following vaccination for influenza.
  • A 2018 CDC study (Rikin et al 2018) found that flu shots increase the risk of non-flu acute respiratory illnesses (ARIs), including coronavirus, in children.
  • A 2011 Australian study (Kelly et al 2011) found that flu shots doubled the risk for non-flu viral lung infections.
  • A 2012 Hong Kong study (Cowling et al 2012) found that flu shots increase the risk for non-flu respiratory infections by 4.4 times.
  • A 2017 study (Mawson et al 2017) found vaccinated children were 5.9 times more likely to suffer pneumonia than their unvaccinated peers.

Children’s Health Defense is aware of a contrary study published last month by Gunther Fink et. al. That report appears to conclude that flu vaccines may be prophylactic against coronavirus. The study, of Brazilian populations, has many dubious unexplained outcomes including a 47% death rate among study subjects, raising numerous unanswered questions about the methodology and validity of this research.

UC campuses should not be encouraging flu shots until we have unambiguous science supporting efficacy against COVID.

If you want to join our fight against the “UC Jab” visit CHD and fill out the form. Please include details about your opposition to this mandate. We would like plaintiffs representing all the UC system schools and disciplines.

© [8/13/2020] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

_______________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/07/14/numerous-studies-shows-flu-vaccine-puts-you-at-higher-risk-for-covid-and-other-respiratory-viruses/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/01/flu-shot-nearly-kills-man/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/12/11/ny-senator-passes-away-at-47-after-linking-illness-to-flu-shot-symptoms/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/08/08/brain-injured-girl-in-virginia-diagnosed-with-adem-after-flu-shot/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/12/14/man-blames-flu-shot-for-blindness-partial-paralysis/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/12/07/nevada-man-diagnosed-with-guillain-barre-syndrome-after-getting-flu-shot/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/03/22/vaccines-best-video-yet/

 

https://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0008376

Published: July 30, 2020

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.000837

Summary

We report an 85-year-old white man admitted to the emergency department of the University of Campinas with fever of undetermined origin (FUO) who received antibiotics previously. Initially, the hypothesis was pneumonia. He presented a drug reaction misdiagnosed as staphylococcal desquamation. The follow-up confirmed that prolonged fever was caused by bacterial endocarditis by transthoracic echocardiogram that showed vegetation in the aortic valve. Bartonella henselae etiology was confirmed by PCR.

This case reinforces the difficulty of diagnosing Bartonella sp. infection; this etiology must be considered even in patients with negative serology. The criteria for the diagnosis of bacterial endocarditis should contemplate a molecular positivity investigation for Bartonella spp, such as PCR in blood or serum samples as a major Duke criterion, even if with titers lower than 1 to 800.

__________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/01/05/bartonella-endocarditis-masquerading-as-systemic-vasculitis-with-rapidly-progressive-glomerulonephritis/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/09/05/rare-presentation-of-endocarditis-mycotic-brain-aneurysm/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/08/12/tick-borne-pathogens-bartonella-spp-borrelia-burgdorferi-sensu-lato-coxiella-burnetii-rickettsia-spp-may-trigger-endocarditis/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/08/16/endocarditis-caused-by-bartonella-quintana-a-rare-case-in-the-u-s/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/01/04/endocarditis-consider-bartonella/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/09/28/bartonella-infective-endocarditis-with-dissemination-a-case-report-literature-review/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/07/10/infective-endocarditis-associated-with-bartonella-henselae-a-case-series/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/25/case-of-endocarditis-caused-by-bartonella-after-mitral-valve-repair/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/24/human-bartonellosis-an-underappreciated-public-health-problem/

It doesn’t appear to me that endocarditis caused by Bartonella is rare.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/01/03/bartonella-treatment/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/05/05/good-news-for-bartonella-patients-identification-of-fda-approved-drugs-with-higher-activity-than-current-front-line-drugs/

https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/seventy-post-treatment-lyme-disease-syndrome-ignore-luche-thayer/

Seventy Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome Publications Ignore Infection

By Jenna Luche-Thayer

Senior Advisor – US Government, United Nations, non-profits, corporate social responsibility programs

INTRODUCTION

There is compelling evidence that persistent Lyme infection can cause debilitating and disabling symptoms and even death. Despite this evidence, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention and National Institutes of Health (NIH) continue to support policies and practices that deny persistent infection.

Since the late 1990s, research terms have been introduced and disseminated that claim to represent one patient subgroup, be mechanistically neutral and explore possible reasons for persistent Lyme symptoms. These terms include Post Lyme Syndrome (PLS), Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS), Post Treatment Lyme Disease (PTLD), and Post Lyme Disease Syndrome (PLDS) —referred to as ‘post Lyme’.

The objective of this literature review was to determine whether the broadly used and promoted ‘post Lyme’ terminology is neutral or biased regarding the cause of persistent Lyme symptoms. The findings are based on 103* peer-reviewed publications (PubMed.gov) from 1999 to 2020 that include the terminology PLS, PTLDS, PTLD and PLDS.

*There were 104 publications found by ‘key word searches’; one was excluded because its text could not be accessed.

NEUTRAL OR BIASED?

The post Lyme terms are described by the IDSA, CDC and NIH as symptoms that occur after ‘appropriate infection treatment’ —this infers that infection should be excluded as a cause of persistent Lyme symptoms.

These research terms have also morphed into clinical diagnoses, the most common being PTLDS and PLS. These clinical diagnoses are now commonly assigned to patients who suffer persistent symptoms following the IDSA recommended two-to-four week antibiotic treatment.

The CDC website does not refer to PTLDS as a research terminology. The CDC refers to PTLDS as a medical condition and states PTLDS is not treated with antimicrobials/antibiotics. CDC also links PTLDS to reference articles that use the term medically unexplained symptoms (MUS).

MUS is problematic and disputed. The American Psychiatric Association found MUS to be an overly broad and exploited term, e.g. MUS was being wrongly applied to cases of complex multisystem illness instead of seeking biological causes for illness. For these reasons, it was deleted from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM–5).

The NIH website makes the following statements regarding PTLDS:

·       “In patients who have non-specific symptoms after being treated for Lyme disease and who have no evidence of active infection (patients with PTLDS) studies have shown that more antibiotic therapy is not helpful and can be dangerous”

·       …”results showed no benefit from prolonged antibiotic therapy when compared with placebo in treating those symptoms.”

·       …”study authors concluded that additional antibiotic therapy for PTLDS was not supported by the evidence.”

·       “A [PTLDS] positive response to prolonged antibiotic therapy may be due to the placebo effect.”

Both the CDC and NIH appear to promote a ‘no infection present, no antimicrobial/antibiotic treatment agenda’ for PTLDS and other post Lyme terms.

The CDC, NIH and IDSA also define these post Lyme terms as having ‘subjective symptoms’. Objective symptoms are those that can be proven scientifically, e.g. a fever, and may be due to infectious causes. In contrast, subjective symptoms are based on what ‘the patient thinks/believes they suffer’ and lends itself to the diagnoses of somatic/psychological/psychiatric disorders and causes.

Persons suffering any chronic illness, including persistent Lyme infection, may develop secondary psychosomatic and psychiatric disorders. However, a post Lyme diagnosis in clinical settings often results in treatments limited to the secondary psychosomatic and psychiatric disorders and denial of adequate antimicrobials for the underlying infection.

Post Lyme symptoms are described as “pain, fatigue, or difficulty thinking that lasts for more than 6 months after they finish treatment.” This list largely ignores well documented complications —including cardiac, central nervous system, organ, eye, endocrine and immune system— that arise from under-treated infection and can resolve or improve if treated.

There are also prominent Lyme researchers who promote the neutrality of these post Lyme terms. In many public statements and articles, the former Chair of the Federal Tick Borne Diseases Working Group says, “Notably, PTLD is a mechanistically neutral research definition and the term “post-treatment” refers to the patient’s status of having been previously treated with appropriate antibiotics.”

This statement obviously infers the infection has been adequately treated; indicating PTLD does not include infection causation of symptoms and is therefore not mechanistically neutral.

FINDINGS

The review of the post Lyme literature showed:

·       70 of the 103 publications note post Lyme symptoms exclude infection causes and/or the need for infection treatment. One assesses antibiotic Lyme treatment trials, makes no recommendation for additional antibiotic Lyme treatment and indicates intravenous antibiotics should not be pursued.

·       20 of 103 publications indicate infection is a possible cause of persistent symptoms (one that includes a review of standard serology tests is in this group).

·       Only 13 of 103 publications focus on antimicrobial/antibiotic treatment for infection causing persistent ‘post Lyme’ symptoms.

·       There are very few researchers investigating treatments to address persistent Lyme infection.

·       Only 3 of 103 publications broaden the persistent symptoms to include severe complications, e.g. cardiac and neurological.

·       Among the 70 that exclude infection, there is a focus on psychological/psychiatric disorders and/or post infectious autoimmunity and/or neuroborreliosis that excludes post Lyme.

·       US government funders of post Lyme studies largely ignore infectious causes of persistent symptoms. These funders include: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center for Research Resources and Department of Energy.

·       The numbers of post Lyme publications began to increase rapidly in 2013 and gained more government funding. Prior to 2013, there were only 17 publications; whereas 86 articles were published on PubMed.gov between 2013 and August 13, 2020. Of these 86 publications, 59 excluded infection.

Of note: Seven of the 13 articles focused on infection causality were authored by Professor Ying Zhang of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. In contrast, 15 of the 70 publications that excluded infection were authored by researcher John Aucott of John Hopkins Lyme Disease Research Center. 

Of note: Nine of the post Lyme studies that ignore infectious causes of persistent symptoms were funded by Lyme nonprofits that advocate on behalf of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

It appears the US government has actively denied persistent Lyme infection for decades while spending millions of tax dollars studying this stealth pathogen that can evade the immune system and resist antimicrobials (research funding readily available on https://grantome.com/).

What could be driving this contradictory behavior?

A 1998 Congressional Record on Amendment No. 3020 Sec.708 provides some clues.

The Congressional Record states ”long term treatment expenses can exceed $100,000 per person [approximately $158,950 in 2020] —a phenomenal cost to society”. It was then recommended to expand DOD’s research into preventing and treating Lyme Disease and other tick-borne illnesses as these infections are recognized as a threat to our military readiness. (See records below.)

Cost containment and liability may be a forceful reason behind the government downplay of persistent infection that requires ongoing care. There are many hundreds of thousands of military personnel and other government employees who are at risk for Lyme infection as a result of their employment requirements.

These government employees include all military/United States Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Energy, Department of the Interior, Department of State, Department of Transportation, Department of Health and Human Services/CDC/NIH, Department of Agriculture, Indian Health Service, Appalachian Regional Commission, Delaware River Basin Commission, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Agricultural Research Service, Foreign Agricultural Service, Forest Service, Farm Service Agency, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Rural Utilities Service, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Bureau of Reclamation, and United States Geological Survey.

This may explain why government funds flow towards those post Lyme studies that focus on psychosomatic/psychiatric disorders and can be contained within inexpensive palliative care models. The powerful insurance industry also show quarterly profits when persons suffering from persistent infection are shunted into palliative care.

It is obvious that post Lyme terms are not neutral and that they have a strong ‘anti-infection causality bias’. The IDSA, CDC, NIH and other government entities actively promote a ‘no infection present, no antimicrobial/antibiotic treatment agenda’ through post Lyme research terms and clinical diagnoses.

The clear majority of post Lyme publications:

·       have not advanced treatments for a persistent infection that debilitates, disables and kills

·       encourages symptom management or palliative care, as opposed to infection treatment

·       promotes treatment limited to psychological/psychiatric disorders

Post Lyme research has not served the patient community well and should be abandoned by all those committed to the welfare of this vulnerable, marginalized and rapidly increasing patient population.

…………………………………………………………………………………………

© Copyright 2020. Global Network on Institutional Discrimination, Inc. All rights reserved.

Jenna Luché-Thayer. 35+ years working globally on the rights of the marginalized. Former Senior Advisor to the United Nations and the US Government. Director, Ad Hoc Committee for Health Equity in ICD11 Borreliosis Codes. Founder, Global Network on Institutional Discrimination, Inc. —Holding institutions accountable for political and scientific solutions.

Author of $Lyme. Email jennaluche@gmail.com website: www.gnid.world

___________________

**Comment**

And this, right here, is why the Lyme community is similar to Alice in Wonderland –complete with the Queen of Hearts, the Mad Hatter, the Cheshire Cat, and the March Hare.

We find ourselves in an alternate reality with people who are quite content to keep us there and will lie, cheat, and steal to make it happen.

And, similarly to Alice, all the Lyme community has to do to get out of Wonderland is to WAKE UP and stand up to the figures in authority.  

iu-73

http://  Approx. 3 Min

I-Team Deaths Incorrectly Attributed to COVID-19 in Palm Beach County

More questions about the accuracy of the [COVID-19] death count after the CBS12 News I-Team uncovers several cases of people listed as COVID deaths but clearly died of something else.

  • A 90-year-old man who fell and died from complications of a hip fracture.
  • A 60-year-old man dead from a gunshot wound to the head.

These are some of the deaths in Palm Beach County recently and incorrectly labeled as COVID deaths in medical examiner records. 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/600000-mistakenly-told-theyve-had-covid-i-have-not-been-tested?

600,000 Mistakenly Told They’ve Had Covid: ‘I Have NOT Been Tested’

Humana Military has since apologized over the “confusion” caused by the email error

In a mass email sent on July 17, 2020
Excerpts:
…more than 600,000 Tricare users in the military health system’s East Region were asked to consider donating blood for research based on their supposed status as COVID-19 “survivors,” Military.com reported last week. As noted in the report, “31,000 persons affiliated with the U.S. military have been diagnosed with the coronavirus,” showing a clear error in the mass email.
Errors by other health care entities have likewise caused confusion at times about individuals’ COVID-19 status as well as infection rates.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/covid-19-data-reporting-system-gets-off-to-rocky-start-

Covid-19 Data Reporting System Gets Off to Rocky Start

New data system run by Health and Human Services faces delays, quality-control issues

Public release of hospital data about the coronavirus pandemic has slowed to a crawl, one month after the federal government ordered states to report it directly to the Department of Health and Human Services and bypass the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  (See link for article)

____________________

**Comment**

While the bias of this article is clear (they feel the CDC should be the hub) I assure you, there were control issues when they ran the show as well, for a number of reasons including the fact testing is abysmal and can not be trusted, as well as the issue of hospitals getting kickbacks to labeling everything COVID even when it isn’t:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/10/cdc-director-acknowledges-hospitals-have-a-monetary-incentive-to-overcount-coronavirus-deaths/

Then there’s this:

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/california-public-health-director-suddenly-quits-after-massive-virus-data-error

California Public Health Director Suddenly Quits After Massive Virus Data Error Discovered

The director of the California Department of Public Health has abruptly resigned just days after the discovery of a computer system failure that resulted in the massive undercounting of COVID-19 cases.

Dr. Sonia Angell who had been in the position for less than a year (and had previously served as deputy commissioner for prevention and primary care at the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene from 2014 to 2019) reportedly resigned via an email sent to the California Health and Human Services Agency. (See link for article)

_____________________

**Comment**

‘Authorities’ continue to use flawed data to keep schools, businesses, churches, etc. closed, except Gov. Newsom’s PlumpJack winery, of course: https://newsomwatch.com/2020-07-04-newsom-orders-churches-stop-singing-plumpjack-winery-open

Newsome was also caught wiring half a billion dollars to China in a face mask money laundering scheme:  https://www.newsomwatch.com/2020-07-07-newsom-wired-half-billion-communist-china-face-mask-money-laundering

This means that mortality rate is likely much lower than what we’ve been told and it means Newsom is completely and utterly corrupt.

Authorities in Sweden continue to say COVID mortality is .12%.  Even Bill Gates says it’s .14%.  Both numbers are nearly the same as seasonal influenza.

I posted this before but it’s worth repeating:

NURSING HOMES SHOCKED AT ‘INSANELY WRONG’ CMS DATA ON COVID-19

— ONE FACILITY SUPPOSEDLY HAD EIGHT CORONAVIRUS DEATHS FOR EACH BED

When the administrator of the Saugus Rehab and Nursing Center in Saugus, Massachusetts, heard that a new Medicare website reported her facility had 794 confirmed cases of COVID-19 — the second highest in the country — and 281 cases among staff, she gasped.

“Oh my God. Where are they getting those numbers from?” said Josephine Ajayi. “That doesn’t make any sense.”

Those weren’t the numbers that her facility reported to the CDC’s National Healthcare Safety Network, under new rules from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), she said. (Please see link for article)

320d998ab0c9a529df81223db5885468
How can we trust numbers coming from hospitals when they have been getting thousands of dollars by labeling things COVID – without even attempting to test?  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/10/cdc-director-acknowledges-hospitals-have-a-monetary-incentive-to-overcount-coronavirus-deaths/
  • If it’s a COVID admission, you get $13,000
  • If the patient goes on a ventilator you get $39,000