https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6382/9/12/868

“Repurposing” Disulfiram in the Treatment of Lyme Disease and Babesiosis: Retrospective Review of First 3 Years’ Experience in One Medical Practice

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2020, 9(12), 868; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120868 (registering DOI)
Received: 7 August 2020 / Revised: 19 November 2020 / Accepted: 3 December 2020 / Published: 4 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Evidence Base for Treatment of Tickborne Infections)
A total of 71 patients with Lyme disease were identified for analysis in whom treatment with disulfiram was initiated between 15 March 2017 and 15 March 2020. Four patients were lost to follow-up, leaving 67 evaluable patients. Our retrospective review found patients to fall into a:
  • “high-dose” group (≥4 mg/kg/day)
  • “low-dose” group (<4 mg/kg/day)
  • 62 of 67 (92.5%) patients treated with disulfiram were able to endorse a net benefit of the treatment with regard to their symptoms.
  • 12 of 33 (36.4%) patients who completed one or two courses of “high-dose” therapy enjoyed an “enduring remission”, defined as remaining clinically well for ≥6 months without further anti-infective treatment.
  • The most common adverse reactions from disulfiram treatment in the high-dose group were fatigue (66.7%), psychiatric symptoms (48.5%), peripheral neuropathy (27.3%), and mild to moderate elevation of liver enzymes (15.2%).
  • We observed that although patients on high dose experienced a higher risk for adverse reactions than those on a low dose, high-dose patients were significantly more likely to achieve enduring remission. View Full-Text

_____________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/30/patients-can-respond-very-differently-to-disulfiram-be-cautious/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/11/19/if-disulfiram-is-the-cure-for-lyme-disease-should-it-be-prescribed-to-all-lyme-disease-patients/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/26/potential-patient-reported-toxicities-with-disulfiram-treatment-in-late-disseminated-lyme-disease/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/01/study-shows-dsm-works-for-lyme-reduces-inflammatory-markers-antibody-titers/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/07/14/disulfiram-breakthrough-drug-for-lyme-other-tick-borne-diseases/

http://  Approx. 14 Min

Nov. 26, 2020

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, research scientist, author, president and CEO for the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK) speaks on numerous topics including important information on the COVID-19 vaccine:

  • Condemns the politicization/commodization of citizens’ health.
  • Coronavirus vaccines historically have a terrible safety record.
  • Coronavirus vaccinated animals got more serious disease and many died.
  • His research has shown that all but one of the proteins in the SARS-CoV2 Virus have “unsafe epitopes” which can cause autoimmunity against proteins in our own body.
  • Research has shown SARS-CoV2 affects many tissues within the body (it’s not just upper respiratory symptoms).
  • People appear to be gravely concerned about getting infected with COVID-19 but have an amazing lack of concern about getting vaccinated with something that will inject these same proteins in the body which can cause autoimmunity.
  • Not a single vaccine manufacturer removed these unsafe epitopes after Weiler notified them.
  • The FDA has allowed COVID vaccine manufacturers to skip the most important safety step of animal testing to see if there is “pathogenic priming.”
  • They are also combining phase 1 & 2 trials speeding the process up further.
  • The only results in are from the Moderna trial were 21% had serious side-effects.
  • He talks about treatments that are working for COVID.
  • He states that tens of thousands and soon hundreds of thousands of medical doctors around the world are coming together to condemn the politicization of coronavirus & public health in general, including vaccines.
  • He states public health officials can not just regurgitate what the CDC has to say.
  • Why do we not hear good news about effective COVID treatments from public health officials?  They are intentionally keeping people in fear.
  • Forced, mandatory vaccinations is a disproportionate response considering COVID-19’s low mortality rate.  If you are not over 70 years old, you have less of a chance of dying from COVID than from influenza.
  • According to Paul Offit, 75% of the population is required to get the vaccine in order for a 50% efficacy rate for herd immunity.  Already 51% of the population states it will not get the vaccine.
  • It is imperative we do not discount prior immunity in the population from prior exposure to corona viruses as well as COVID-19.
  • We have memory B and T cells in response to coronavirus so we don’t have to carry around antibodies expressing proteins all the time.
  • The fact our public officials are not reducing concern is political and their response to the virus is far worse than the virus itself.
  • He briefly takes on the faulty PCR test. Regardless of being faulty, these tests are being used to shut down businesses.
  • He discusses cleaners used in schools are causing reproductive issues in mice.  
  • He finishes by stating that the national vaccine compensation program is completely corrupt.  He was an expert in that program previously but resigned after someone attempted to bribe him.  HHS determines which vaccines injuries are real but are also the defendant in the case. (The wolf guarding the hen house)

**UPDATE**  Dec. 7, 2020

Weiler just sent a letter to the ACIP, the committee that chooses whether any vaccine and which vaccines are recommended for children, and more recently, for adults.  He warns them of coronavirus vaccines causing “disease enhancement,” or worse health outcomes upon viral infection:  https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/12/06/susceptibility-of-people-to-pathogenic-priming-is-a-prime-reason-to-eschew-covid19-vaccine-mandates/

______________________

click

**Comment**

While not mentioned in the video, two sources are now saying the COVID-19 vaccine can cause sterility in women:  

Article on QUATS:  https://www.womensvoices.org/2018/05/08/what-are-quats-and-why-are-they-on-our-list/

For more on the COVID vaccine:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/05/covid-19-vaccine-explained/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/14/community-and-world-united-we-say-no/

Sign the petition against mandatory vaccinations:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/30/say-no-to-forced-covid-19-vaccination-sign-petition/

Vaccine information is important for everyone but Lyme/MSIDS patients are more vulnerable to adverse reactions than the general population due to being infected with numerous things that impair their immune systems.  Please learn all you can before you make a vaccine decision.

https://www.foundmyfitness.com/episodes/how-to-grow-broccoli-sprouts?  Go here for a FREE 15 page guide & many other resources

How to Grow Broccoli Sprouts

http://

By Dr. Rhonda Patrick

Nearly 30 years ago, scientists at the Johns Hopkins University discovered that sulforaphane, a compound derived from broccoli, induces a host of cellular enzymes that protect our bodies from a wide range of diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. They soon learned that sulforaphane is an artifact of isolation – the byproduct of a chemical reaction between an enzyme called myrosinase and a precursor molecule called glucoraphanin.

But it was a later discovered –that broccoli sprouts contain 10 to 100 times more glucoraphanin than mature broccoli – that catapulted these diminutive plants into the limelight of the nutrition world and sent many nutrition-minded people on a quest to sprout their own.

Sprouting is the natural process by which seeds germinate. Seeds in the wild do it all the time with little effort. Sprouting for the purpose of consuming sprouts, however, requires a bit of finesse and some time and dedication. It also requires a big dose of food safety awareness. That’s because seeds are organic products and inherently dirty.

In this instructional episode, we show you all the basics of sprouting broccoli, including:

  • The supplies you need to grow broccoli sprouts, like sprouting jars and lids
  • How to prepare broccoli seeds, especially when it comes to sterilization
  • The steps involved in sprouting broccoli seeds, such as soaking and rinsing, how long you should wait before harvesting broccoli sprouts, and how you should store them.

You can apply these basics to sprouting nearly any kind of seed. But it’s important to note that some seeds, such as oats, are nearly impossible to sprout, and others, such as those of tomatoes, peppers, and related plants, yield toxic sprouts that should not be eaten. (See top link for article)

_____________________

**Comment**

I learned how to sprout years ago and pretty much only needed a small paperback book for directions. This book included how to sprout many different types of seeds, all of which require different sprouting times. I used the mason-jar method and essentially after allowing for an overnight soak to soften the outer shell, rinsed the seeds a few times daily, tipping the jar on a plate with an elevated edge in between rinsing so they could drain (skipping this invites mold). There are special lid adaptors for the jars you can purchase with various sized holes for use with different sized seeds so water will drain properly. You cover the mason jar while it’s draining with a towel to keep it dark to emulate the conditions seeds get by being buried under ground.

Sprouts are tasty, nutritious, and can be eaten alone, in salads, smoothies, sandwiches or put in soups, etc. As with all living foods, eating them raw gets you the most nutrients.

Another good article on it:

https://www.culinarynutrition.com/how-to-sprout-guide/

I also found sprouting seeds like almonds helped me digest them more easily.  They have to be whole and uncooked.  You essentially use the same mason-jar technique as above – the only difference is the time it takes after the initial overnight soak.  

https://biologixcenter.com/uncategorized/new-discovery-may-explain-treatment-resistance-in-chronic-lyme-disaease/

Lyme-lab-test-tube

New Discovery May Explain Treatment-Resistance in Chronic Lyme Disease

By

New, more sensitive, and precise testing reveals a troubling finding in the treatment of Lyme disease. As this study reveals, many doctors may often be prescribing the incorrect antibiotics, due to the narrow focus on B. burgdorferi. In twenty-seven people from sixteen states, 96% were found to have other Borrelia strains than B. burgdorferi, many of which cannot be treated with the same antibiotics.

Limitations of Conventional Lyme Testing

Treatment-resistant, chronic and apparent relapsing Lyme disease (borreliosis), with its oft associated co-infections which worsen the illness, though once debated, is now well-documented in the scientific literature. Chronic Lyme disease has reached the true status of a global pandemic, though largely unappreciated by the media and mainstream medicine.

Conventional iagnostic lab testing, such as Western Blot, ELISA, and Conventional Bacteria PCR testing for the dectectin of Borrelia spirochete of Lyme disease has had limited success. Most types of conventional tests having high false-negative results, with as little as 30% sensitivity, meaning as much as 70% of people tested, actually have the infection, but never get treatment due to their lab test coming back negative. These people fall between the cracks of medicine as their body and lives fall apart as doctors do not know what is wrong with them, assuming the tests were correct. (See Fig. 1)

image001-e1600465037956

Fig. 1

The painful reality is that conventional labs which are not focused solely on testing for Lyme disease, often are not as diligent in their testing, not getting paid more to find the bacteria or not, and seeming to forget that there is a real and desperate person at the other end of the blood test. Unfortunately beyond this, the medico-political environment regarding the existence of chronic Lyme disease also gets in the way of getting many, if not most conventional physicians to order the test, even at the pleading of their patients.

New Testing Pinpoints Acute and Chronic Infections

In 2019 a new, highly sensitive test (See Fig. 1 Phage Test) was developed by the University of Leicester, in England, and performed by the R.E.D Laboratory, for the diagnosis of Borrelia infections. This test is so sensitive and the testing process so rigorous, that the test is nearing 100% accurate, at >80% sensitivity to detecting not just the presence of Borrelia burgdorferi, but all of the 20 types of Borrelia that can cause tick-borne and vector-borne illness. This test is call the Phelix Borrelia-Phage Test, and is such a breath of fresh air in that the test results come back not with encrypted, hard to determine bands, as in Lyme Western Blot tests, but instead clearly state, Positive or Negative and the exact type of Borrelia infection or multiple types of Borrelia strains that you have, without needing your doctor to interpret the results. Doctors in the United States or any other country can order this test.

Testing from Many Regions and States in the U.S.

The world is a much smaller place than many appreciate. It is commonly, although mistakenly thought that some of the twenty Borrelia bacteria strains are only in Europe, or only in Asia, or only in certain regions of the U.S. As this study demonstrates, only one person had B. burgdorferi in the group of 27 people in this study.

Armed with the newest and most sensitive Borrelia test, we undertook a retrospective study of 27 people from 16 different states (see Fig. 2) to achieve a wide view of what types of Borrelia infections people actually had in the different parts of the country. The results were unexpected, as the graphs and figures in this article demonstrate. The pre-study expectation was that people with chronic Lyme disease, especially in the U.S., would be infected with Borrelia burgdorferi.

Phelix-test-results-by-state-graph

Fig. 2

Results of 27 People with Positive Borrelia-Phage Tests

As seen in Fig. 3 below, many people had one or multiple strains of Borrelia. The vast majority, 52% (14 people) had Borrelia miyamotoi, followed by 42% (11 people) having Borrelia strains that fall under the category of Relapsing Fever group. Relapsing Fever group is illness from one or more of the following strains of Borrelia, B. hermsii, B. recurrentis, B. crocidurae, B. duttonii. After the Relapsing Fever group, 19% (5 people) had Borrelia hermsii, and only one person in the group had B. burgdorferi.

Phelix-test-results-graph

Fig. 3

Conclusion

The implications of this review are that Borrelia burgdorferi is likely not the primary culprit in many cases of chronic Lyme disease in the United States, as was previously thought. The other huge takeaway from this study is that many if not most people are not receiving the correct treatment, since the antibiotics typically used for B. burgdorferi are not the same as those used for other strains of Borrelia.

The specific strain of Borrelia bacteria cannot reliably be determined using bands on a Western Blot test. Any lab test that is focusing only upon B. burgdorferi, will miss the true diagnosis of other strains of Borrelia.

The Phelix Borrelia-Phage test is just one of a new breed of phage-based lab tests that will likely become the gold-standard of all bacterial testing. It would be advisable for anyone who suspects that they have or had Lyme disease, yet have either been told they are negative, or who have lingering symptoms to be tested again with the Phelix test.

Our view of what symptoms are typical of classic Lyme disease, based upon the B. burgdorferi model, needs to be expanded to include the symptoms that are unique to the other strains of Borrelia, as their presentation can be quite different, as well as their vectors not being always a tick.

Phage-based Testing and Now Phage-based, Strain-Specific Treatment

Treatments for B. burgdorferi, should be expanded to include the actual type or multiple types of Borrelia actually infecting a person. Although antibiotics, which can be likened to carpet-bombing, killing many bad bacteria, the Borrelia always causes the bad bacteria to mutate. This means the all types of bacteria lose some of their aspects that make it vulnerable to the antibiotics, not to mention the fact that antibiotics are notorious damaging to irreparably upset the populations of the friendly flora (microbiome) of the body, and cause prolonged and severe suffering through Jarische-Herxheimer reactions (Herx). A new Borrelia-phage-based targeted treatment has been developed that has been documented by repeated Phelix Borrelia-Phage testing, to rapidly eliminate only the types of Borrelia a person has been found positive, with no harm to the body, with minimal Herx reactions, and no harm to good bacteria.

Ruling out False-Positives and False-Negatives with Phelix Borrelia-Phage Testing

The Phelix Borrelia-Phage test is the premier, newest, most sensitive Borrelia lab test available. The Phelix test is statistically the most accurate test, as each blood sample undergoes quadruplicate real-time PCR tests for 3 different targets (B. burgdorferi sl, B. miyamotoi, Relapsing fever) for a total of 12 assessments. All positive-like samples are submitted to confirmatory sequencing to rule out false positive results. Before the Phage real-time PCRs, each sample is submitted to 2 rounds of QC to rule out false-negative results that would relate to the technical flaws: (i) to assess the quality of extracted DNA by performing low cycles actin PCR, and (ii) to assess the absence of PCR inhibitors by doing a real-time PCR for IAC (internal amplification control).

Ongoing Development of INPT at the Biologix Center

INPT was developed by Phagen Corp. and is being used at the Biologix Center for Optimum Health, as a part of an IRB study, to go beyond Borrelia and target any microbial issue, including all of the co-infections associated with Lyme disease, as well as Candida sp., mold, and parasite infections, however at this time the only lab test for detecting bacteria-specific phages is for Borrelia strains.

The future of INPT includes intravenous and injectable forms of application, in addition to the oral medication, through doctors only. INPT is not projected to be sold directly to the public at this time.

To Get Treatment:

If you would like to participate in our one to two week INPT programs please contact us at www.biologixcenter.com/get-treatment/. Financial assistance is available for those with chronic illness of any type, who desire treatment at Biologix Center and are struggling financially.

A more detailed report of these findings are presently being edited for publication in peer-reviewed article submission.

Bartonella Research Collaboration

The Biologix Center is collaborating with researchers who are working to develop phage lab tests for Bartonella and other types of microbes. The Phelix Bartonella-Phage Test is hoped to be offered before the end of 2020. If you have been diagnosed with Bartonella and would like to contribute a blood sample for the development of this new test, please let us know. Offer available only to patients of the Biologix Center who have been pre-qualified by our testing.

To learn more about Bacteriophages and INPT please click on the hyperlink.

*INPT is a patent-pending innovation developed by Phagen Corp, and is being researched at the Biologix Center for Optimum Health, in Franklin, Tennessee. A patient-funded, Retrospective Registry IRB is in place to publish peer-reviewed articles as this clinical work progresses. Approximately 98% of funds go to support the ongoing research.

There are no financial or academic conflicts to be reported between Biologix Center for Optimum Health and RED Laboratories.

_____________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/30/neglected-infections-gastrointestinal-issues-in-patients-with-late-vector-borne-infections/  The Borrelia-phage test is discussed within this link as well as the research showing:

  • Among positive ticks, 60% were for B. miyamotoi.
  • Testing on over 2,000 humans (mainly late stage/chronic patients) showed 30% negative results and 70% positive, among which over 60% indicated the presence of specific Borrelia miyamotoi phages.
It appears Borrelia Miyamotoi is far more prevalent than thought, and is yet another example of something our public ‘authorities’ have labeled ‘rare’ that isn’t.

 

https://www.lookingatlyme.ca/resource/

CANLYME INITIATIVE

Educators’ resource

CanLyme is excited to announce the launch of our resource for educators who teach in the outdoor classroom. Whether you are new to outdoor education or a seasoned wilderness guide, this teaching resource provides information through engaging learning experiences. Students can learn how to identify ticks and tick habitats so that they can avoid tick bites and recognize signs and symptoms of Lyme disease.

Virtual focus groups – call for educators

Download the Educator Resource and accompanying slidedeck…we would love to get your feedback! 

We are seeking educators who are willing to pilot and provide feedback through two virtual focus groups. This feedback will be incorporated into the second draft that is scheduled for release in winter 2021. We are offering a stipend to educators who participate in both virtual focus groups. 

Please email canlymeeducation@gmail.com if you are interested able to commit to participating in the two focus groups in January and February. Email us for more details.

Lyme Education Awareness and Prevention (LEAP). Educator’s resource:

https://www.lookingatlyme.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/CanLyme-Educators-Resource-2020.pdf

Downloadable Slide deck Zip File: Leap-Master-Slide-Deck-2020

For more information:  https://canlyme.com