https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-new-vaccine-injury-tracking-system-is-it-better-than-old-one/

FDA Unveils New Vaccine Injury Tracking System — Is It Any Better Than the Old One?

The FDA’s new Adverse Event Monitoring System for drugs and vaccines merges the agency’s previously separate adverse event reporting systems for drugs, vaccines and other products. Some critics told The Defender the new database does little to solve long-standing problems with the federal government’s follow-up and verification of adverse event reports.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.

broken vaccine bottles and words "adverse event"

The new platform merges the FDA’s previously separate adverse event reporting systems for drugs, vaccines and other products.

Some advocates for the vaccine-injured applauded the launch of the FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS). But others said the new database does little to solve long-standing problems with the federal government’s follow-up and verification of adverse event reports.

The FDA said AEMS reports will be updated in real time, not quarterly.

“The FDA’s previous adverse event reporting systems were outdated and fragmented and made important data difficult to access,” FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said in a statement.

Makary described AEMS as “a single, intuitive adverse event platform that will better serve agency scientists, researchers, and the public.”

AEMS includes data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS); the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), which contains reports for drugs, biologics, cosmetics and color additives; and the Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS), which contains reports for animal drugs and foods.

By May, AEMS will also include reports now housed in separate databases, concerning adverse events related to human foods and dietary supplements, tobacco products and medical devices. According to the FDA, these databases together processed 6 million adverse event reports per year.

AEMS will be backed by artificial intelligence (AI), according to Fox News.

Last month, Wired reported that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the FDA, was developing a generative AI tool to identify patterns in vaccine injury reports and “generate hypotheses on the negative effects of vaccines.”

Christopher Dreisbach, legal affairs director for React19, an advocacy group for COVID-19 vaccine injury victims, said AEMS “has the potential to be a meaningful step forward” if it replaces a “Kafkaesque status quo.”

Dreisbach was referring to vaccine injury reports submitted to VAERS that are “frequently dismissed on the grounds that VAERS is ‘unreliable.’”

He said that contradiction “has left injured individuals in an impossible position: told to trust a system that, when it raises questions, is then discounted.”

Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), questioned the new platform’s reliance on AI.

“Supplanting real intelligence with the artificial kind is always a cause for concern,” Jablonowski said. “Decisions made by humans are trackable, accountable and inquirable. With AI, it is not so easy to identify the genesis of decisions, and accountability doesn’t exist.”

VAERS long plagued by transparency concerns

During U.S. Senate confirmation hearings last year, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promised “radical transparency” at federal health agencies. Soon after his confirmation, Kennedy pledged better vaccine injury tracking.

Makary said the FDA’s prior adverse event reporting systems “were outdated and fragmented and made important data difficult to access.”

“These clunky systems also wasted millions of taxpayer dollars and created blind spots in our postmarket surveillance of products ranging from drugs and vaccines to cosmetics,” he added.

According to the FDA, AEMS will save the agency approximately $120 million over the next five years.

VAERS has faced scrutiny over transparency concerns. A 2023 investigation by The BMJ revealed that the federal government operates two VAERS systems — one for the public, and a private back-end system that contains corrections and updates, including deaths that occurred after an initial injury.

The BMJ investigation also identified other deficiencies, including disappearing reports and data.

In 2024, React19 teamed with CHD and OpenVAERS — a website that provides tools for more easily accessing and searching VAERS data — to develop a tool to track VAERS reports.

Citing frequently disappearing reports and widespread errors in VAERS, the organizations said the new tool would enable vaccine-injured people to follow what happens to the reports they submit.

According to Albert Benavides, founder of VAERSaware.com, the FDA’s FAERS database had problems similar to those associated with VAERS. He said the new AEMS does little to address transparency concerns.

“This new AEMS dashboard has all the same functionality, or lack of functionality, as the old FAERS dashboard. It looks like FDA has rebranded FAERS to AEMS but added a couple extra tabs for vaccines and cosmetics,” Benavides said.

In previous interviews with CHD.TV, Benavides suggested that VAERS administrators intentionally undercounted or obscured data on vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

Old systems were difficult to use and inefficient — will AEMS be any better?

Fox News quoted unnamed FDA sources who said the next phase of the AEMS rollout will include a user-friendly front-end system “that makes it easy for reports to be submitted.”

The FDA cited estimates suggesting that 80% of reports were never entered into its databases “due to the complexity of filing a report.” A 2011 Harvard report found that less than 1% of all adverse events were reported to VAERS.

Dreisbach said, “Streamlining is only one piece of what is needed.” He added:

“The bigger issue is follow-up and verification. Right now, individuals who file legitimate adverse-event reports rarely receive meaningful follow-up, and clinicians often assume that reporting leads to some sort of investigation — when in reality, most reports simply become entries in a database.

“Fixing the front end without fixing the back end will not improve safety surveillance in a meaningful way.”

In a 2024 interview with The DefenderDr. Danice Hertz, a retired gastroenterologist injured by Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, said, “It took three years and 11 reports to VAERS for someone to contact me from the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and request my records.”

After submitting her 11th report in late 2023, Hertz said the CDC employee who spoke with her said the agency was “swamped with reports of injury.”

In a follow-up interview today, Hertz welcomed the launch of AEMS, but said reports to the new database “must be permanent and not mysteriously drop out as many reports have done in the old VAERS system.”

She added:

“Patients should be able to update their reports as their condition progresses and more information becomes available. This is not possible with the old systems. … Most importantly, if data is to be collected, the data must be taken seriously and acted upon. VAERS data was largely ignored.”

The lack of follow-up on reports submitted to VAERS was the subject of two 2024 U.S. House of Representatives hearings. At the second of the two hearings, in March 2024, witnesses told Congress that inadequate vaccine safety surveillance systems “jeopardized” Americans’ health during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

Jablonowski noted that a key adverse event database — Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) — is not included within AEMS. He said:

“The VSD is a near-real-time monitoring of about 10 million people — children and adults — that contains data on vaccination, demographics, birth details, medical encounters (visits, diagnoses and lab results), pharmacy records and mortality.

“A publicly available version of the VSD would relieve an enormous burden, and budgetary line item, from HHS. A lot of good science can come from it, and it could bury the uncertainty surrounding hazards of vaccines.”

Design of new AEMS database raises concerns

Benavides said the structure and design of the new AEMS database fall short of the government’s promises of radical transparency. He said AEMS is missing the “free text narrative section” that was “customary in VAERS reports.”

This section displayed the text freely entered by anyone who submitted a VAERS report — text which Benavides said allowed the public to provide information not requested or captured by the other, closed-ended questions in the VAERS submission form.

Benavides said information entered in the free text section typically included “vaccine history, laboratory results, current illness and concomitant medications.”

Certain search options that were available within the VAERS database are also not available in AEMS, according to Benavides.

“In this AEMS data dashboard, there is no longer an adverse event level like ‘Office visit,’ ‘Emergency Room,’ ‘Hospitalization,’ ‘Life Threatening,’ ‘Permanent Disability’ or ‘Death,’” Benavides said.

He said the date of death — customarily included in most VAERS reports — is “non-existent” in the new platform. And the vaccine lot number information is “buried under an additional layer of clicks.”

“The public is only allowed to view the minimal amount of data, like age, gender, vaccination date, onset date, vaccine name,” Benavides said.

Benavides said that, as structured, AEMS will also hamper the efforts of researchers, as it limits the number of reports they can download at one time.

“Worst of all for any intermediate-to-expert user or analyst, queries and raw downloads are capped at no more than 10,000 records,” Benavides said.

Dr. Joel Wallskog, an orthopedic surgeon injured by COVID-19 vaccines and co-chair of React19, said medical providers and healthcare organizations must be required to submit adverse event reports to AEMS for the new platform to succeed.

“Reporting must be mandatory, and there must be a penalty for non-reporting. If all of these issues are not taken into account in a new reporting system, the new system will once again fail,” Wallskog said.

“Patients who experience adverse events want a system that works, not one that merely appears more modern,” Dreisbach said. He called for more transparency in how AEMS operates, greater accessibility for researchers, clinicians and the public, and “accountability in how reports are followed up and classified.”

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

http://

Feb 26, 2026
Clinical Strategies for Neuropsychiatric and Neurological Recovery
Join Dr. Aylin Ozdemir for an expert-led exploration of the neurological and neuropsychiatric complexities of Lyme disease and associated co-infections, based on a recently published peer-reviewed research paper (June 2025).
This webinar examines why Lyme disease is frequently misdiagnosed in patients presenting with cognitive, behavioural, and neurological symptoms, and how expanded diagnostic approaches can reveal underlying immune dysregulation and neuroinflammation when standard testing falls short.
Drawing from real-world clinical cases, viewers will learn about integrative therapeutic approaches to support neurological and neuropsychiatric recovery. We’ll explore practical strategies to better recognise, treat, and support recovery in complex neuro-Lyme presentations:
Why Lyme disease often presents as psychiatric or neurological illness The limitations of standard testing How expanded diagnostics improve detection Clinical insight: Real-world case examples Recognising complex neuropsychiatric presentations Integrative therapeutic approaches: Antimicrobial strategies Immune modulation Neuroprotective and mitochondrial support Long-term maintenance protocols to help reduce relapse Dr. Kunal Garg provides a brief overview of the application of CARE Guidelines, highlighting the importance of rigorous case documentation and high-quality publishing in advancing evidence-informed Lyme disease care.
For more:

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/1/209

Bartonella and Borrelia-Related Disease Presenting as a Neurological Condition Revealing the Need for Better Diagnostics

by Marna E. Ericson1, B. Robert Mozayeni1, Laurie Radovsky2 and Lynne T. Bemis3,*
1T Lab Inc., Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA
2Laurie Radovsky, M.D. LLC., St. Paul, MN 55102, USA
3Department of Biomedical Sciences, Medical School Duluth Campus, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 202412(1), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010209
Submission received: 21 December 2023 / Revised: 16 January 2024 / Accepted: 18 January 2024 / Published: 19 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bartonella and Bartonellosis: New Advances and Further Challenges)

Abstract

The diagnostic tests available to identify vector-borne pathogens have major limitations. Clinicians must consider an assortment of often diverse symptoms to decide what pathogen or pathogens to suspect and test for. Even then, there are limitations to the currently available indirect detection methods, such as serology, or direct detection methods such as molecular tests with or without culture enrichment. Bartonella spp., which are considered stealth pathogens, are particularly difficult to detect and diagnose. We present a case report of a patient who experienced a spider bite followed by myalgia, lymphadenopathy, and trouble sleeping. She did not test positive for Bartonella spp. through clinically available testing. Her symptoms progressed and she was told she needed a double hip replacement. Prior to the surgery, her blood was submitted for novel molecular testing, where Bartonella spp. was confirmed, and a spirochete was also detected. Additional testing using novel methods over a period of five years found Bartonella henselae and Borrelia burgdorferi in her blood.
This patient’s case is an example of why new diagnostic methods for vector-borne pathogens are urgently needed and why new knowledge of the variable manifestations of Bartonellosis need to be provided to the medical community to inform and heighten their index of suspicion.
_____________
**Comment**
You will recognize Marna Ericson’s name as her son had a severe bartonella infection.  She managed to take advanced imaging techniques on samples and found Bartonella alive and well in tissues surrounding where a PIC line had been removed.  She has teamed up with other researchers investigating Bartonella.  We can be extremely thankful for their work.
For more:

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/new-bill-puts-us-state-department?

New Bill Puts U.S. State Department in Charge of Organizing Foreign Governments for Next Pandemic Vaccines and Drugs: H.R. 7879

U.S. government operatives are preparing and organizing the global vaccine and drug response for the next pandemic before the next pandemic has even occurred.

A new bill introduced earlier this week in Congress would require the United States Department of State to organize foreign governments and international institutions behind the development and commercialization of medical countermeasures for future pandemics.

Pandemic preparedness is normally managed by domestic health agencies, not the State Department, meaning the bill would place the United States Department of State at the center of organizing foreign governments around vaccines, drugs, and other countermeasures for the next pandemic.

The current Secretary of State is Marco Rubio, a former republican senator from Florida (funding).

The Secretary would have the highest level of authority over the international coordination described in the bill.

The new federal legislation, H.R. 7879, was introduced March 9 by California Representatives Mike Levin (D) (funding) and David G. Valadao (R) (funding) and referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Officials within the U.S. government are constructing the worldwide system for distributing pandemic vaccines and treatments before the next pandemic has even begun.  (See link for article and contact information if you wish to express your opposition to pandemic orchestration)

For more:

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-alzheimers-scam-and-the

The Great Alzheimer’s Scam and The Proven Cures They’ve Buried for Billions

Decades of neglect in understanding the actual causes of dementia have transformed it into one of the most costly diseases in existence.

• Alzheimer’s disease is commonly thought to result from abnormal plaque buildup in the brain that gradually destroys brain tissue. As a result, almost all Alzheimer’s research has been directed toward eliminating amyloid, even after the basis for much of this work was shown to stem from fraudulent research.

•As such, despite decades of research and billions of dollars spent, this model has completely failed to produce useful results. The costly “groundbreaking” Alzheimer’s drugs only slightly slow dementia progression—at the expense of causing brain bleeding and swelling in over a quarter of those treated.

•In contrast, numerous affordable treatments have been developed for Alzheimer’s disease that target the root causes of the disorder, producing significant benefits at a fraction of the cost and without any toxicity.

•One neurologist, for example, proposed that amyloid serves a protective function in the brain and treats Alzheimer’s by identifying the underlying process causing dementia (which can often be diagnosed through symptoms). Remarkably, despite the method being proven in clinical research, awareness of it or the fact there are completely different types of “Alzheimer’s disease” which require different treatments remains almost nonexistent.

•Likewise, a strong case can be made that impaired cerebral circulation, along with impaired venous and lymphatic drainage, plays a pivotal role in Alzheimer’s disease.

•This article will review the common causes of cognitive impairment and dementia (e.g., cells becoming trapped in a shocked state where they no longer function) along with the forgotten treatments for neurodegenerative disorders—some of which, like DMSO, have extensive evidence supporting their use.

Dr. Dale Bredesen detailed in The End of Alzheimer’s, a few pivotal conclusions:

  • Amyloid protein is a protective mechanism the brain uses to protect itself from other stressors that endanger brain tissue.
  • Rather than there being one type of Alzheimer’s, there are actually three with different symptoms, and it is essential to recognize which type someone has before initiating treatment.
    • Type 1: Inflammatory – often metabolic or infectious
      • Type 1.5 Glycotoxic (hybrid of types 1&2) insulin resistance and chronically elevated blood sugar
    • Type 2: Atrophic – deficiences in nutrients, hormones, and other factors
    • Type 3: Toxic – exposure to mold, chronic infections such as Lyme disease, Herpesvirus, cytomegalovirus, fungal infections, etc. heavy metals, and household chemicals
    • Type 4: Vascular – hypertension, atherosclerosis, or anything causing chronic restriction of cerebral blood flow
    • Type 5: Traumatic – brain injury
  • The brain is designed to be able to adapt to the needs of life, so it is always creating or pruning neural connections and brain cells. Alzheimer’s, in turn, results from the loss of signals that sustain brain cells, and the dismantling of neural connections outweighing the formation of new ones, gradually compounding over the decades.

As such, his formula was fairly straightforward: identify the type of Alzheimer’s someone has, eliminate its causes, and gradually wait for the physiological momentum to shift from neurodegeneration to neurodevelopment.  (See link for article)

____________

**Comment**

Many anecdotal reports of using DMSO successfully for dementia are given in the article.

For more: