Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

**UPDATE** On Governor Evers’ 9 Month Lock-Down Plan

I just heard back from a Wisconsin representative that the Department of Human Services (DHS) withdrew the emergency rule scope statement and that publishing a scope statement is the first required step in the administrative rule making process.  It is possible that DHS will create a revised version in the near future.

We are advised to call DHS at (608) 226-1865 and email them at DHSwebmaster@wisconsin.gov to voice our thoughts on whether DHS should move forward with a new emergency rule and if so what that rule should look like.

Please see:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/18/governor-evers-plan-to-shut-down-wisconsin-another-9-months/  Within this link is a sample email with information you may use as well as a sample script you may use for phone calls. We need to contact DHS immediately or Wisconsinites could find themselves quarantined for 9 more months. Please also still contact the 10 members on JCRAR (Joint Committee for Review on Administrative Rules):  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/18/governor-evers-plan-to-shut-down-wisconsin-another-9-months/  (Contact info in link)

https://nationalhealthfreedom.org/uncategorized/save-our-health-freedom-pass-a-law-in-your-state-to-protect-your-liberty

NHFA RECOMMENDS THAT STATES ADOPT THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE

May 13, 2020

HEALTH TREATMENT; NOTICE, REFUSAL, CONSEQUENCE.

Subdivision 1. Refusal of treatment. Notwithstanding laws, rules, or orders made or promulgated in response to an emergency, including but not limited to a national security emergency, state-wide emergency, health emergency, or any peacetime emergency, individuals have a fundamental right to refuse medical treatment or procedures, testing, physical or mental examination, vaccination, participation in experimental procedures and protocols, collection of specimens, and preventive treatments or programs, including but not limited to vaccines, tracing and tracking programs.  An individual who has been directed or ordered by a government or its designees, or a public or private business or entity, including but not limited to a commissioner of health or its designee to submit to a directive or order of that nature may choose to decline to comply, respond to, or participate with said directive or order.  For purposes of Subd. 1, 2, and 3, “individual” and “person” includes adults and minor children.

Subdivision 2.  Persons Needing Care.  A person who is infected with or reasonably believed to be infected with or exposed to a toxic agent that can be transferred to another individual or a communicable disease, and the agent or communicable disease is the basis on which the emergency has been declared, and who refuses to submit to a directive or order, may be ordered by the government or its designees to abide by quarantine according to parameters set forth in sections  xxxxxxx [insert citation to your state’s quarantine law].  Said quarantine must be of the least restrictive means possible, and include due process, and be protective of the right of the individual to remain in their home, live with consenting family members or friends and significant others at all times, and utilize the treatments of their choice for their recovery. Quaratine may not take away or alter the legal or medical custody of a person who is under a parent or legal guardian. A minor child may not be forcibly removed from their parent or home.  A person in quarantine has the right to have a consenting person of their choice with them and attending their needs at all times.  A person in quarantine and the consenting persons living with them, have the right to remain in their home as is, without further requirements by government such as additional bathrooms.

Subd. 3. Information given. Before a health care provider performs treatment, testing, physical or mental examination, vaccination, participation in experimental procedures and protocols, collection of specimens, or preventive treatments or programs including but not limited to vaccines, tracing and tracking programs, on or for an individual during a declared emergency, a health care provider shall notify the individual in writing and by reading the above Subd.1 and Subd. 2 to the person or the person’s parent or legal guardian, of the right to refuse the services and the consequences of declining, including rights and conditions of quarantine, upon refusal.  The health care provider shall also obtain a signature of acknowledgement of receipt of notification of a person who declines.

We are happy to support your efforts in can any way that we can.   Click Here for our advocacy e-learning booklet to get started.  If you have a committed group of individuals wanting to change the laws in your state to protect your rights to health freedom please reach out to us via email to set up an exploratory conversation.

Minnesota passed a law in 2002 that protects the right of citizens to decline treatments in the event of a health emergency.  You can do it in your state too!!!

California Health Coalition Advocacy has drafted a Resolution that they are promoting to their legislators that alerts legislators about the right to refuse vaccines and the underlying international liberty and bodily autonomy principles including, in part,:

“…WHEREAS,  the ethical principle of informed consent to medical treatment is recognized internationally under The World Medical Association (WMA) Declaration on the Rights of the Patient, WMA Medical Ethics Manual, WMA Declaration of Helsinki of 1964, The United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) of 1948, and the Nuremberg Code (1947) as a human right requiring the voluntary consent by individuals and parents or guardians of minor children prior to medical treatment; …”

Broad laws exist in many states that give federal and state government expansive powers in the case of a health emergency or bioterrorism emergency.  Don’t let those laws take away your freedoms now.  Make your laws look like what you want America to look like!  Change your laws if it is needed!

[i] Audio of Monica Miller, 1998, archived hard copy by National Health Freedom Coalition, accessible 2018.

 

 

FDA Orders Bill Gates-Funded Program to HALT At-Home COVID-19 Self-Testing

https://www-rt-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.rt.com/usa/488589-gates-scan-coronavirus-testing-fda/amp/

FDA orders Bill Gates-funded program to HALT at-home Covid-19 self-testing

13 May, 2020 
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has ordered a Seattle-based Covid-19 testing project funded by Bill Gates to stop screening for the virus, putting the program on ice as it provided hundreds of at-home test kits each day.

The billionaire Microsoft icon announced the initiative in a blog post this week – dubbed the Seattle Coronavirus Assessment Network, or SCAN – which he said was already distributing some 300 test kits on a daily basis. As of Wednesday, however, all links to the project’s website redirect to a notice stating its operations are “currently paused” due to a conflict with the FDA.

“SCAN has been operating under an emergency use authorization (EUA) from the Washington State Department of Health,” the notice says, adding that while the FDA has allowed states to approve new Covid-19 tests, “we have been notified that under revised guidance issued on May 8th, a separate federal EUA is now required” to continue testing.  (See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

I’m sure Gates will iron this all out by infusing money somewhere and all will be forgiven.  He’s done this before:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/06/wheres-the-evidence-supporting-the-drastic-measures-against-covid-19/

To read about the inaccuracy of COVID-19 testing:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/18/coronavirus-covid-19-antibody-tests-do-you-really-want-one-think-hard-about-it-maybe-not/

Please remember that COVID-19 testing is as bad as Lyme disease testing. Authorities are basing everything upon this faulty testing, just like they do for Lyme – but it’s all a mirage.

 

 

 

 

Association Between Coronavirus and Kawasaki Disease Debunked in 2005


Strawberry tongue caused by Kawasaki Disease.

Recently, media outlets have reported on children ill with a Kawasaki-like illness and are connecting it to COVID-19:  

“I will caution that there are many things that look similar to Kawasaki disease, It could be that what they’re calling Kawasaki is not Kawasaki but an inflammatory disease caused by the coronavirus.” Dr. Frank Esper, a physician at the Cleveland Clinic Children’s Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases.

But here we are told it’s a “done deal,” and that the only way you can diagnose it is through antibody testing.

Oh really?

You mean the PCR test that the president of Tanzania proved is worthless, the PCR creator stated was never to be used for diagnosis, and the PCR test David Crowe points out isn’t binary (negative/positive), has an arbitrary cutoff, and that people went from positive to negative and back to positive again – sometimes several times over?  

That PCR test?

Crowe also points out that what we are experiencing is an epidemic by definition, and are in a massive delusion based on the belief that a test for RNA is a test for a deadly new virus. Remember,

“If the [COVID-19] virus exists, then it should be possible to purify viral particles. From these particles RNA can be extracted and should match the RNA used in the test. Until this is done it is possible that the RNA comes from another source, which could be the cells of the patient, bacteria, fungi etc. There might be an association with elevated levels of RNA and illness, but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus. Without purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted that an RNA test is proof that a virus is present.”  David Crowe

When I quizzed Crowe about what they have found, he stated that they took impure material, called it ‘virus’ added it to a cell culture and observed cell death. This is not the same as having a purified virus.

If you read about COVID-19 at all, you realize quickly that it seemingly has none of its own symptoms. Uncountable viruses, bacteria, and environmental toxins cause fever, cough, and abnormal lung images. They also keep adding to a never ending list of symptoms that have nothing to do with coronaviruses such as heart issues, stroke, body-wide buzzing sensations, and DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation). Now they are trying to push a Kawasaki-like disease into the tsunami.

COVID-19 is quickly becoming like the historical diagnosis of Consumption.

If you don’t know what it is – blame COVID-19.  COVID-19 does everything, don’t you know?

This informative article states doctors are calling the new inflammatory syndrome, “pediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome”(PIMS) and that these children are displaying some symptoms (fever, rash and eye redness) that are generic not just to KD but also to many childhood illnesses and to vaccine reactions.  Interestingly, package inserts for both rotavirus vaccines licensed in the U.S. list KD as a serious adverse event.

That’s an inconvenient truth for authorities wanting to blame everything on COVID-19.

The connection between at least one coronavirus and KD was debunked in 2005.

https://kdfoundation.org/nl63/

Kawasaki Disease & Coronavirus (HCoV-NL63)

We’ve learned that some of our community members have expressed concerns about a past coronavirus and Kawasaki disease. Some of you may recall several years ago researchers, Esper et al.’s announced a link between a different coronavirus (HCoV-NL63) and KD (source 1).

The study identified 53 children who had received a diagnosis of KD between October 2001 and April 2004. Of the 11 children studied, 10 met the criteria for classic KD, of whom 8 tested positive for HCoV-Nl63. The human coronavirus HCoV-NL63 or the “New Haven coronavirus” was detected in patients suffering from respiratory disease, with a frequency of up to 7% in January 2003 (source 2). HCoV infections may account for ≈35% of common colds in adults and ≈2% of influenza-like illnesses in patients of all age groups consulting their general physician (source 3).

The study suggesting an association between the “New Haven coronavirus” and Kawasaki disease was subsequently debunked.

In fact, a study conducted by Dr. Jane C. Burns from the University of California San Diego, and other researchers, concluded that there was no association between the detection of HCoV-NL63 genome in the respiratory tract and acute KD. This was found after the study tested a total of 57 samples from 48 KD patients and found that only one of the 48 KD patients (2%) was positive for HCoV-NL63.

“This patient met 4 of 5 classic clinical criteria for KD, but also exhibited symptoms of an upper respiratory tract infection, with cough and coryza which are rare symptoms for KD but common symptoms for HCoV-NL63 infection. Furthermore, although this patient responded with complete defervescence after administration of intravenous gamma globulin and aspirin that are common treatments for KD, his respiratory symptoms persisted. These results suggest that this KD patient was likely co-infected with HCoV-NL63 (source 4).”

An additional study found that the results suggested by Esper et al.’s may be coincidental and that HCoV-NH did not play a dominant role in the etiology or pathogenesis of KD (source 5).

Sources Cited:

  1. Esper, Frank, Shapiro, D., E., Weibel, Carla, … S., J. (2005, February 15). Association between a Novel Human Coronavirus and Kawasaki Disease. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/191/4/499/937208
  2. Hoek, L. van der, Pyrc, K., Jebbink, M. F., Vermeulen-Oost, W., Berkhout, R. J. M., Wolthers, K. C., … Berkhout, B. (2004, March 21). Identification of a new human coronavirus. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/nm1024
  3. Fouchier, R. A. M., Hartwig, N. G., Bestebroer, T. M., Niemeyer, B., Jong, J. C. de, Simon, J. H., & Osterhaus, A. D. M. E. (2004, April 20). A previously undescribed coronavirus associated with respiratory disease in humans. Retrieved from https://www.pnas.org/content/101/16/6212.full
  4. Baker, S. C., Shimizu, C., Shike, H., Garcia, F., Hoek, L. van der, Kuijper, T. W., Burns, J. C. (2006, January 1). Human Coronavirus-NL63 Infection is not Associated with Acute Kawasaki Disease. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-33012-9_94
  5. Ebihara, Takashi, Endo, Rika, Xiaoming, Ishiguro, … Hideaki. (2005, July 15). Lack of Association between New Haven Coronavirus and Kawasaki Disease. Retrieved from https://academic.oup.com/jid/article/192/2/351/858642
Again, this comes to mind:

And the data is in: https://mobile-reuters-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKBN2341N7  Reopening schools in Denmark did NOT worsen the outbreak.  Children are rarely affected by COVID-19.

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Antibody Tests: Do You Really Want One? Think Hard About It. Maybe Not.

https://clearhealthcosts.com/blog/2020/05/coronavirus-covid-19-antibody-tests-do-you-really-want-one-think-hard-about-it-maybe-not/

Coronavirus (COVID-19) Antibody Tests: Do You Really Want One?  Think Hard About It.  Maybe Not.

Jeanne Pinder
Coronavirus testing: It has long been hard to get. Now suddenly in the New York area, tests are freely available.The test will tell me truly if I have had coronavirus and am therefore immune, right? Or if I was exposed to the virus and magically skipped through, with few symptoms?

The expert opinions are in: Maybe. Maybe not.

We’ve been doing a lot of research about coronavirus (Covid-19), and particularly about testing. I live in the center of the pandemic. Also, I recently tested positive for coronavirus antibodies twice, and negative once, and I’ve been exploring what it means.

First: There are two kinds of tests. Both the respiratory test (nasal swab) and the antibody test have problems as far as accuracy. Beyond that, if the results are correct, experts disagree on what the results mean. If you have a positive respiratory test, that’s pretty clear: You’ve got it. But if you test negative, because of the high error rate, if you have with symptoms, most doctors will say you should still act like you have it. With the antibody test, same problem: Positive probably means positive, but false positives are clearly possible. (See Link for Article)

____________________

**Comment**

Best quote:

“I would NOT trust that antibody test. There are about 50 tests, none are validated yet and we know that some give false positives if you have antibodies to the common cold coronaviruses.”  Donald G. McNeil Jr.

I’ve written a lot about the inaccuracy of COVID-19 testing, which is similar to Lyme/MSIDS testing – it’s not to be trusted.  At all.  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/13/president-of-tanzania-punks-who-sending-samples-of-fruit-goats-sheep-even-motor-oil-for-covid-testing-nearly-half-come-back-positive/  (See comment section as well)

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/21/study-shows-covid-19-testing-as-bad-as-lyme-msids-testing/ This Chinese study showed: “nearly half or even more of the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives.” This article was withdrawn due to it being based upon theoretical deduction, not field epidemiology data, which is funny considering they’ve based this entire lock-down on theoretical modeling from one man:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/28/epidemiologist-behind-highly-cited-coronavirus-model-drastically-downgrades-projection/

Thankfully the “immunity passport” idea allowing you to go back to work or resume normal life, based upon COVID-19 testing, has been dropped like a bad habit.  This idea sucked from the get-go and infringes upon our civil rights – regardless of testing accuracy.

The article admits that the FDA’s approval process for testing is deeply flawed.  Amen to that.  “Scientific” data on test performance is SELF-reported to the FDA.  See the problem?

The article asks the very astute question: why do people want tests if the results are not actionable?  

This is a problem I face daily with those suspecting tick-borne illness. One of my toughest jobs is convincing them the testing is worthless and that they need to go outside their insurance network to doctors who understand the flaws in current testing and treatment followed by conventional medicine. Many don’t take my advice but they nearly all come back for help after being passed like a football from doctor to doctor offering ZERO help.

It’s a tough paradigm to accept, but accept it we must. Lyme patients have to go outside of conventional medicine for true help.

The author states:

There are a lot of people trying to make money on coronavirus testing, so you should be cautious. For example, LetsGetChecked.com is promising an at-home test. They don’t have one now. They just raised a ton of money, $71 million to be exact. Would you choose them to test you? Why?

Well put.

I’ve noticed a frightening trend in the past few months. I’ve seen what I thought were respectable people turn into prostitutes selling their products and promoting things without any respectable science backing them up.

Why let a perfect “pandemic” go to waste?  There’s money to be made!
Just remember the inevitable principle: “You reap what you sow.”

 

 

Letter To Wisconsin Representatives on Moving Forward From ‘Shelter At Home’ Order

May 15, 2020

Dear Wisconsin Representatives,

First of all, thank you to those who fought for freedom and rescinded Governor Ever’s “Safer at Home Order.” This is not about politics. This is about Civil Liberties and everyone on both sides of the isle should be in agreement that forcing healthy people to quarantine is not normal or healthy. Quarantining the sick makes scientific sense and has historical precedent.

In my last letter I explained how COVID-19 has yet to be isolated and proven solely to cause illness – making all testing inaccurate. This was hilariously proven by the President of Tanzania (PhD Chemistry) who labeled samples from goats, fruit, and motor oil with human names and sent them to the WHO for COVID-19 testing. Half came back positive!

In this astutely written historical piece, the creator of the PCR test states it was never intended to diagnose patients. Another bio-chemist and protease developer states: “I’m skeptical that a PCR test is ever true.” When asked his advice for people wanting to be tested for COVID-19, he answered, “Don’t Do it, No Healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable.”

Testing for COVID-19 has false positives, false negatives, and even people going from one to the other within days.  It’s a complete joke – similar to Lyme/MSIDS testing.

If Governor Evers is relying upon testing to make any decisions – he’s woefully uninformed.
Recently a few things have come to light that show what this is really about.
  • House Resolution 6666 a TRACE funded program, due to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, gives government officials and approved entities including foreign governments the right to obtain private health information without the knowledge or consent of the individual. Our inalienable rights are not protected and there’s no specified end date. 
  • Project Jumpstart, Rapid USA, and Operation Warp Speed further this huge government overreach by “bagging and tagging” all Americans and then monitoring them.
  • The Rockefeller Foundation’s April 2020 white paper lays out the plan to test, track, and trace all Americans, and is clearly intended to be permanent surveillance and social control.  Investigative journalist Harry Vox warns us in 2014, and backs up his claims by reading from The Rockeller Foundation’s “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development” report.
  • And now we learn that the FBI can look at our web browsing history without a warrant allowing law enforcement to easily crack down on activists, labor organizers, or anyone else the government deems a threat.
Authorities want to test everyone (even though it’s been proven to be faulty). 
Authorities want to vaccinate everyone (even though researchers and the FDA are worried about safety)

Researchers warn that previous upper respiratory vaccines caused severe side-effects and even death. They caused “paradoxical immune enhancement issues” and the FDA warns there’s potential risks due to oncogenicity and infectivity, chronic inflammation, problems with DNA mutation and replication, autoimmune responses and cancer-causing genes. Many of these vaccines are made with PER C6 Ad5 technology which utilizes aborted fetal cell lines.

On top of all the safety concerns, Dr. Fauci states they may not work at all and in fact may make people sicker.

Authorities want to monitor everyone (even though this is completely unconstitutional).

‘Contact tracers’ besides making a hefty paycheck, are given unrestrained power to punish “violators” with civil and criminal penalties based upon a useless test.

The Bill of Rights Cannot be Suspended during a “Public Health Crisis.”

In The United States Statement of Interest in Support of Plaintiffs, filed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) in a case last month in which church goers attending a drive-in sermon were issued citations for violating an executive order in Mississippi, the DOJ stated:

“There is no pandemic exception, however, to the fundamental liberties the Constitution safeguards. Indeed, “individual rights secured by the Constitution do not disappear during a public health crisis.” In re Abbott, — F.3d —, 2020 WL 1685929, at *6 (5th Cir. Apr. 7, 2020). These individual rights, including the protections in the Bill of Rights made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, are always in force and restrain government action.”

Social Distancing and mask wearing is Pseudoscience.
  • It was recently reported in NY that 66% of new hospitalizationshave been among those sheltering at home, and social distancing increases deaths. According to Dr. Kettner, former Medical Director of the International Centre for Infectious Diseases, the CDC imposed social distancing came from a couple of weak reviews.
  • Face Masks are immunosuppressive, ineffective against viruses and cloth masks are breeding grounds for them.  In the case of COVID-19 they are actually harmful due to hypoxia. Masks cause you to rebreathe exhaled air, lowering oxygen levels.

Looking forward, the National Health Freedom Association recommends adopting language ensuring freedom for all.  Protections must be put in place now to safeguard that this never happens again.

Lastly, these “authorities” Governor Evers is utilizing to make decisions are riddled with conflicts of interest, fraud, and collusion. 

For details:

Name

Address

Phone number