Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

THE BIG VACCINE SPIN & Coming COVID Catastrophe

https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-big-vaccine-spin/  4 Min Video Here

THE BIG VACCINE SPIN

May 3, 2021

The mainstream media spin is in full effect now with headlines declaring unvaccinated people are the cause of #Covid19 outbreaks among the fully vaccinated. It has to make you wonder, do they realize their attempts to scare people into getting the shot is only helping to prove it does not even prevent the infection?

The Coming COVID Catastrophe

https://thehighwire.com/videos/a-coming-covid-catastrophe/  1 Hour long, but first 3 minutes are crucial 

March 11, 2021

World renown vaccine specialist, Geert Vanden Bossche, gave a groundbreaking interview risking his reputation and his career by bravely speaking out against administration of #Covid19 “vaccines”. In what may be one of the most important stories ever covered by The Highwire, the vaccine developer shared his extreme concerns about these vaccines in particular and why we may be on track to creating a global immunity catastrophe.

  • Bossche states mass vaccination drives viral immune escape.
  • In the countries whom have undertaken mass vaccination, (UK, Israel, USA), they will initially experience a drop in infectivity rates, but they will inevitably suffer from a steep incline in severe COVID cases in the weeks to come.

UPDATE:  Bossche has been proven to be completely correct.

Nations participating in the “Zero COVID” movement with draconian edicts and mass vaccination campaigns have had explosions in COVID-19 cases across the board.

There are no longer any “success stories” involving nations using tyrannical means in an attempt to stop a virus. Source

click

For more:

There is a concerted effort to suppress this important information that defies the accepted narrative:

Please understand what “vaccine passports” are and take action to protect your privacy:

Here is another resource on how to protect yourself from mandated vaccines: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/04/28/i-do-not-consent-forms-to-print-give-to-your-employer-and-political-representatives/

The Complicated Reason There’s No Lyme Vaccine & 2 Promising Treatments in the Works

https://www.mindbodygreen.com/articles/lyme-disease-vaccine

The Complicated Reason There’s No Lyme Vaccine + 2 Promising Treatments In The Works

By Stephanie Eckelkamp

April 9, 2021

Warm weather brings ticks, and with ticks comes Lyme disease, the fastest-growing vector-borne disease in the U.S. In fact, around 476,000 Americans are diagnosed and treated for Lyme every year—a stat that’s frightening enough to make any of us tuck our pants into our socks before hitting the hiking trail.

While Lyme disease is finally getting some visibility as a major health threat that can lead to chronic and debilitating symptoms if undetected, there’s no great way to prevent it other than to not get bitten by the tiny ticks that carry it. And so, every spring and summer people begin asking the same question: Why the heck don’t we have a Lyme vaccine yet? After all, your dog can get vaccinated, so why can’t you?

The answer is complicated—turns out, there was a Lyme vaccine called LYMErix available for a hot minute about 20 years ago, but it was pulled from the market amid concerns of side effects, and nothing came to replace it. That is, until now. Separate groups of researchers are actively studying two preventive treatments: a new Lyme vaccine and a Lyme pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) shot, both of which could be available within two to four years. (See link for article)

_______________________

**Comment**

This is one of the more balanced article on this topic I’ve read in a long time. Dr. Rawls and Dr. Phillips are both interviewed and BOTH are wary of these developing injections, and rightly so – there were many people adversely affected by the last Lyme vaccine and while the article doesn’t mention it – DOGS have been negatively impacted from the Lyme vaccine as well.

The point raised by Dr. Rawls is the serious concern of possible autoimmunity caused by these injections, and Dr. Phillips says he continues to hear from patients who say they still haven’t recovered from their LYMErix injuries nearly 20 years later.

You won’t hear this information from the vaccine manufacturers and mainstream media, which is completely bought-out, so this clinical experience should be taken very seriously.

For more on Lyme vaccines:

TAKE ACTION: Two US Senators Call For Censorship of Health Freedom Leaders & 12 Attorneys General Want To End Free Speech on Vaccine Information

Two US Senators Call for Censorship
of Health Freedom Leaders

Send Congress Your Outcry
Take Action Here

PROTECT FREEDOM OF SPEECH
Senator Ben Ray Luján informed the public on April 19, 2021 that he, along with his Minnesota colleague, Senator Amy Klobuchar, sent a letter to Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg urging them “to remove the accounts that have been identified by experts as responsible for producing the majority of this disinformation on social media platforms. A recent report from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) identified a dozen specific content producers as the original sources of an estimated 65 percent of coronavirus disinformation online.As Luján and Klobuchar called for Dorsey and Zuckerberg to remove the 12 individuals from their social media platforms, their justification for censorship of constitutional speech was the promotion of their own public policy preferences in their statement: “A crucial step to increase vaccine confidence is to address primary spreaders of this vaccine disinformation, including the twelve accounts — referred to as the “Disinformation Dozen” and are responsible for a majority of disinformation — in a swift and decisive manner.”

The Senators failed to note that the individuals targeted for censorship are highly respected professionals, researchers, and health freedom leaders in our country who are trusted by a large number of citizens for providing valuable sources of information often not available by other sources.  The 12 trusted leaders are: Joseph Mercola, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Ty and Charlene Bollinger, Sherri Tenpenny, Rizza Islam, Rashid Buttar, Erin Elizabeth, Sayer Ji, Kelly Brogan, Christiane Northrup, Ben Tapper, and Kevin Jenkins.

The Senators are well aware that there are laws against fraud, and that truth is a defense to fraud.  They use the terms “disinformation” and “misleading”.  Yet they do not solicit an avenue where truth as a defense can be heard.  They do not call for a Congressional hearing or public forum that would include a time for leaders to answer any questions they might have about the content of their work and messaging.  They do not discuss the profound impact of Senators calling for censorship in the face of a constitutional issue of freedom of speech.   Instead, they want to prohibit the conversation of truth as a defense and are calling for outright censorship.

The great strength of America is our Constitution, including our sacred Bill of Rights.  The Bill of Rights includes the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution.  The 1st Amendment protects free speech.  Protecting freedom of speech and of the press is our powerful shield, essential in preventing abuse of power by any government.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”  U.S. Const. Amend. 1.

Without freedom of speech, a single source of government-endorsed information (whether from legislators, government agencies, or government-endorsed corporations) could eliminate truth and cause the takeover of our country and the hearts and minds of its people.  We must protect our First Amendment Freedom of Speech!!!

Tell your elected members of Congress to stop any requests for censorship and acknowledge that the 12 leaders listed above have First Amendment rights that deserve to be protected!  Click here now.

TAKE ACTION
to STOP Censorship

________________________

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/12-state-attorneys-general-demand-facebook-twitter-crack-down-on-vaccine-misinformation

12 state attorneys general demand Facebook, Twitter crack down on vaccine ‘misinformation’

Given ‘anti-vaxxers’ reliance on your platforms, you are uniquely positioned to prevent the spread of misinformation about coronavirus vaccines that poses a direct threat to the health and safety of millions of Americans in our states and that will prolong our road to recovery.’
Tue Apr 27, 2021 
Featured Image

April 27, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — The attorneys general of twelve states have signed a joint letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, calling on the world’s top social networks to do more to suppress negative claims about COVID-19 vaccines.

“The people and groups spreading falsehoods and misleading Americans about the safety of coronavirus vaccines are threatening the health of our communities, slowing progress in getting our residents protected from the virus, and undermining economic recovery in our states,” declares the letter, spearheaded by Connecticut Attorney General William Tong and co-signed by his counterparts in Delaware, Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia.

Specifically, the attorneys general want Facebook and Twitter to “remove from all their platforms the accounts of prominent ‘anti-vaxxers’ who have repeatedly violated the companies’ terms of service”; “consistently apply misinformation labels and popups on Facebook pages and groups that discuss vaccines or COVID-19”; and to stop allowing so-called “anti-vaxxers” to “skirt its policy of removing misinformation that health experts have debunked, by failing to prevent them from using video and streaming tools like Facebook Live and sites like Bitchute, Rumble, and Brighteon to evade detection.”  (See link for article)

_______________________

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/05/04/removing-articles-related-to-vitamin-d-c-and-zinc

Why I’m Removing All Articles Related to Vitamins D, C, Zinc and COVID-19

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
May 4, 2021

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Over the past year, I’ve been researching and writing as much as I can to help you take control of your health, as fearmongering media and corrupt politicians have destroyed lives and livelihoods to establish global control of the world’s population, using the COVID-19 pandemic as their justification
  • Through it all, I have refused to succumb to these relentless attacks. I have been confident and willing to defend myself in the court of law
  • Unfortunately, threats have now become very personal and have intensified to the point I can no longer preserve much of the information and research I’ve provided to you thus far. So, effective immediately, much of the information on my website will be permanently removed  (See link for article)
________________________

**Comment**

Hopefully it’s abundantly clear how dangerous censorship is.  Experienced and knowledgable professionals in the health field are have been banned and censored at an unprecedented rate. These are people with training, education, and experience – but it doesn’t matter because they are defying the accepted narrative. Science should be subject to healthy debate and opinions.  This is how Science evolves. It’s rarely “settled.”  Public ‘authorities’ insist that the Science on Lyme/MSIDS is settled, but anyone who takes more than a minute to dig into this discovers what research has been done has been tightly controlled, flawed, biased, and extremely damaging to sick patients.

Lastly, people should be free to share their personal experiences with others without being censored.

If it wasn’t for the personal experiences of others, many Lyme/MSIDS patients wouldn’t be here today.  It’s this personal, one on one, communication that can often save lives.

The article also rightly points out that the “government’s” own actions have led to widespread mistrust due to their continued contradictory guidance on every aspect of the ‘pandemic.’

In addition to this flip-flopping guidance, these experimental, fast-tracked injections are only available to the public due to EUA authorization (Emergency use authorization), which means clinical trials were performed in less than a year when historically it takes a minimum of 2-4 years.  To state they were rushed would be an understatement.  And the reports of harm and death continue to pour in.  Those getting injected are effectively test subjects in an ongoing clinical trial.

There are ethical concerns as well.

Please also sign the PETITION: Say ‘No’ to COVID ‘Vaccine Passports’

(Click on “Petition” to sign)

COVID Vaccines: Necessity, Efficacy, and Safety

https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/covid-vaccines-necessity-efficacy-and-safety

Due to baseless censorship by Medium, go here:  https://doctors4covidethics.org/covid-vaccine-necessity-efficacy-and-safety/  This group comprises of hundreds of doctors and experts from around the globe, who are far more qualified than figure-heads or magazines who blindly follow an accepted narrative.

COVID Vaccines: Necessity, Efficacy and Safety

By Doctors for COVID Ethics

April 30, 2021

Abstract:

COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have been exempted from legal liability for vaccine-induced harm. It is therefore in the interests of all those authorising, enforcing and administering COVID-19 vaccinations to understand the evidence regarding the risks and benefits of these vaccines, since liability for harm will fall on them.

In short, the available evidence and science indicate that COVID-19 vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe.
  • Necessity: Immunocompetent individuals are protected against SARS-CoV-2 by cellular immunity. Vaccinating low-risk groups is therefore unnecessary. For immunocompromised individuals who do fall ill with COVID-19 there is a range of medical treatments that have been proven safe and effective. Vaccinating the vulnerable is therefore equally unnecessary. Both immunocompetent and vulnerable groups are better protected against variants of SARS-CoV-2 by naturally acquired immunity and by medication than by vaccination.
  • Efficacy: Covid-19 vaccines lack a viable mechanism of action against SARS-CoV-2 infection of the airways. Induction of antibodies cannot prevent infection by an agent such as SARS-CoV-2 that invades through the respiratory tract. Moreover, none of the vaccine trials have provided any evidence that vaccination prevents transmission of the infection by vaccinated individuals; urging vaccination to “protect others” therefore has no basis in fact.
  • Safety: The vaccines are dangerous to both healthy individuals and those with pre-existing chronic disease, for reasons such as the following:
    • risk of lethal and non-lethal disruptions of blood clotting including bleeding disorders,
    • thrombosis in the brain
    • stroke and heart attack
    • autoimmune
    • allergic reactions
    • antibody-dependent enhancement of disease
    • vaccine impurities due to rushed manufacturing and unregulated production standards

The risk-benefit calculus is therefore clear: the experimental vaccines are needless, ineffective and dangerous. Actors authorising, coercing or administering experimental COVID-19 vaccination are exposing populations and patients to serious, unnecessary, and unjustified medical risks.

1. The vaccines are unnecessary
  1. Multiple lines of research indicate that immunocompetent people display “robust” and lasting cellular (T cell) immunity to SARS-CoV viruses [1], including SARS-CoV-2 and its variants [2]. T cell protection stems not only from exposure to SARS-CoV-2 itself, but from cross-reactive immunity following previous exposure to common cold and SARS coronaviruses [1,3–10]. Such immunity was detectable after infections up to 17 years prior [1,3]. Therefore, immunocompetent people do not need vaccination against SARS-CoV-2.
  2. Natural T-Cell immunity provides stronger and more comprehensive protection against all SARS-CoV-2 strains than vaccines, because naturally primed immunity recognises multiple virus epitopes and costimulatory signals, not merely a single (spike) protein. Thus, immunocompetent people are better protected against SARS-CoV-2 and any variants that may arise by their own immunity than by the current crop of vaccines.
  3. The vaccines have been touted as a means to prevent asymptomatic infection [11], and by extension “asymptomatic transmission.” However, “asymptomatic transmission” is an artefact of invalid and unreliable PCR test procedures and interpretations, leading to high false-positive rates [12–15]. Evidence indicates that PCR-positive, asymptomatic people are healthy false-positives, not carriers. A comprehensive study of 9,899,828 people in China found that asymptomatic individuals testing positive for COVID-19 never infected others [16]. In contrast, the papers cited by the Centre for Disease Control [17,18] to justify claims of asymptomatic transmission are based on hypothetical models, not empirical studies; they present assumptions and estimates rather than evidence. Preventing asymptomatic infection is not a viable rationale for promoting vaccination of the general population.
  4. In most countries, most people now have immunity to SARS-CoV-2 [19]. Depending on their degree of previously acquired cross-immunity, they will have had no symptoms, mild and uncharacteristic symptoms, or more severe symptoms, possibly including anosmia (loss of sense of smell) or other somewhat characteristic signs of the COVID-19 disease. Regardless of disease severity, they will now have sufficient immunity to be protected from severe disease in the event of renewed exposure. This majority of the population will not benefit at all from being vaccinated.
  5. Population survival of COVID-19 exceeds 99.8% globally [20–22]. In countries that have been intensely infected over several months, less than 0.2% of the population have died and had their deaths classified as ‘with covid19’. COVID-19 is also typically a mild to moderately severe illness. Therefore, the overwhelming majority of people are not at risk from COVID-19 and do not require vaccination for their own protection.
  6. In those susceptible to severe infection, Covid-19 is a treatable illness. A convergence of evidence indicates that early treatment with existing drugs reduces hospitalisation and mortality by ~85% and 75%, respectively [23–27]. These drugs include many tried and true antiinflammatory, antiviral, and anticoagulant medications, as well as monoclonal antibodies, zinc, and vitamins C and D. Industry and government decisions to sideline such proven treatments through selective research support [24], regulatory bias, and even outright sanctions against doctors daring to use such treatments on their own initiative, have been out of step with existing laws, standard medical practice, and research; the legal requirement to consider real world evidence has fallen by the wayside [28]. The systematic denial and denigration of these effective therapies has underpinned the spurious justification for the emergency use authorisation of the vaccines, which requires that “no standard acceptable treatment is available” [29]. Plainly stated, vaccines are not necessary to prevent severe disease.
2. The vaccines lack efficacy
  1. At a mechanistic level, the concept of immunity to COVID-19 via antibody induction, as per COVID-19 vaccination, is medical nonsense. Airborne viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 enter the body via the airways and lungs, where antibody concentrations are too low to prevent infection. Vaccine-induced antibodies primarily circulate in the bloodstream, while concentrations on the mucous membranes of lungs and airways is low. Given that COVID-19 primarily spreads and causes disease by infecting these mucous membranes, vaccines miss the immunological mark. The documents submitted by the vaccine manufacturers to the various regulatory bodies contain no evidence that vaccination prevents airway infection, which would be crucial for breaking the chain of transmission. Thus, vaccines are immunologically inappropriate for COVID-19.
  2. Medium to long-term vaccine efficacy is unknown. Phase 3, medium term, 24-month trials will not be complete until 2023: There is no medium-term or long term longitudinal data regarding COVID-19 vaccine efficacy.
  3. Short term data has not established prevention of severe disease. The European Medicines Agency has noted of the Comirnaty (Pfizer mRNA) vaccine that severe COVID-19 cases “were rare in the study, and statistically certain conclusion cannot be drawn” from it [30]. Similarly, the Pfizer document submitted to the FDA [31] concludes that efficacy against mortality could not be demonstrated. Thus, the vaccines have not been shown to prevent death or severe disease even in the short term.
  4. The correlates of protection against COVID-19 are unknown. Researchers have not yet established how to measure protection against COVID-19. As a result, efficacy studies are stabbing around in the dark. After completion of Phase 1 and 2 studies, for instance, a paper in the journal Vaccine noted that “without understanding the correlates of protection, it is impossible to currently address questions regarding vaccine-associated protection, risk of COVID-19 reinfection, herd immunity, and the possibility of elimination of SARS-CoV-2 from the human population” [32]. Thus, Vaccine efficacy cannot be evaluated because we have not yet established how to measure it.
3. The vaccines are dangerous 
  1. Just as smoking could be and was predicted to cause lung cancer based on first principles, all gene-based vaccines can be expected to cause blood clotting and bleeding disorders [33], based on their molecular mechanisms of action. Consistent with this, diseases of this kind have been observed across age groups, leading to temporary vaccine suspensions around the world — The vaccines are not safe.
  2. Contrary to claims that blood disorders post-vaccination are “rare”, many common vaccine side effects (headaches, nausea, vomiting and haematoma-like “rashes” over the body) may indicate thrombosis and other severe abnormalities. Moreover, vaccine-induced diffuse micro-thromboses in the lungs can mimic pneumonia and may be misdiagnosed as COVID-19. Clotting events currently receiving media attention are likely just the “tip of a huge iceberg” [34] — The vaccines are not safe.
  3. Due to immunological priming, risks of clotting, bleeding and other adverse events can be expected to increase with each re-vaccination and each intervening coronavirus exposure. Over time, whether months or years [35], this renders both vaccination and coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom without vaccination COVID-19 poses no substantive risk.

Since vaccine roll-out, COVID-19 incidence has risen in numerous areas with high vaccination rates [36–38]. Furthermore, multiple series of COVID-19 fatalities have occurred shortly after the onset vaccinations in senior homes [39,40]. These cases may have been due not only to antibody-dependent enhancement but also to a general immunosuppressive effect of the vaccines, which is suggested by the increased occurrence of Herpes zoster in certain patients [41]. Immunosuppression may have caused a previously asymptomatic infection to become clinically manifest. Regardless of the exact mechanism responsible for these reported deaths, we must expect that the vaccines will increase rather than decrease lethality of COVID-19 — The vaccines are not safe.

4. The vaccines are experimental by definition.

They will remain in Phase 3 trials until 2023. Recipients are human subjects entitled to free informed consent under Nuremberg and other protections, including the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe’s resolution 2361 [42] and the FDA’s terms of emergency use authorisation [29]. With respect to safety data from Phase 1 and 2 trials, in spite of initially large sample sizes the journal Vaccine reports that, “the vaccination strategy chosen for further development may have only been given to as few as 12 participants” [32]. With such extremely small sample sizes, the journal notes that, “larger Phase 3 studies conducted over longer periods of time will be necessary” to establish safety. The risks that remain to be evaluated in Phase 3 trials into 2023, with entire populations as subjects, include not only thrombosis and bleeding abnormalities, but other autoimmune responses, allergic reactions, unknown tropisms (tissue destinations) of lipid nanoparticles [35], antibody-dependent enhancement [43–46] and the impact of rushed, questionably executed, poorly regulated [47] and reportedly inconsistent manufacturing methods, conferring risks of potentially harmful impurities such as uncontrolled DNA residues [48]. The vaccines are not safe, either for recipients or for those who administer them or authorise their use.

5. Initial experience might suggest that the adenovirus-derived vaccines (AstraZeneca/Johnson & Johnson) cause graver adverse effects than the mRNA (Pfizer/Moderna) vaccines. However, upon repeated injection, the former will soon induce antibodies against the proteins of the adenovirus vector. These antibodies will then neutralize most of the vaccine virus particles and cause their disposal before they can infect any cells, thereby limiting the intensity of tissue damage.

In contrast, in the mRNA vaccines, there is no protein antigen for the antibodies to recognize. Thus, regardless of the existing degree of immunity, the vaccine mRNA is going to reach its target — the body cells. These will then express the spike protein and subsequently suffer the full onslaught of the immune system. With the mRNA vaccines, the risk of severe adverse events is virtually guaranteed to increase with every successive injection. In the long term, they are therefore even more dangerous than the vector vaccines. Their apparent preferment over the latter is concerning in the highest degree; these vaccines are not safe.

4. Ethics and legal points to consider
  1. Conflicts of interest abound in the scientific literature and within organisations that recommend and promote vaccines, while demonising alternate strategies (reliance on natural immunity and early treatment).
  2. Authorities, doctors and medical personnel need to protect themselves by evaluating the sources of their information for conflicts of interest extremely closely. Authorities, doctors and medical personnel need to be similarly careful not to ignore the credible and independent literature on vaccine necessity, safety and efficacy, given the foreseeable mass deaths and harms that must be expected unless the vaccination campaign is stopped.
  3. Vaccine manufacturers have exempted themselves from legal liability for adverse events for a reason. When vaccine deaths and harms occur, liability will fall to those responsible for the vaccines’ authorisation, administration and/or coercion via vaccine passports, none of which can be justified on a sober, evidence-based risk-benefit analysis.
  4. All political, regulatory and medical actors involved in COVID-19 vaccination should familiarise themselves with the Nuremberg code and other legal provisions in order to protect themselves.

References

  1. Le Bert, N.; Tan, A.T.; Kunasegaran, K.; Tham, C.Y.L.; Hafezi, M.; Chia, A.; Chng, M.H.Y.; Lin, M.; Tan, N.; Linster, M.; Chia, W.N.; Chen, M.I.; Wang, L.; Ooi, E.E.; Kalimuddin, S.; Tambyah, P.A.; Low, J.G.; Tan, Y. and Bertoletti, A. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls. Nature 584:457–462
  2. Tarke, A.; Sidney, J.; Methot, N.; Zhang, Y.; Dan, J.M.; Goodwin, B.; Rubiro, P.; Sutherland, A.; da Silva Antunes, R.; Frazier, A. and al., e. (2021) Negligible impact of SARS-CoV-2 variants on CD4+ and CD8+ T cell reactivity in COVID-19 exposed donors and vaccinees. bioRxiv -:x-x
  3. Anonymous, (2020) Scientists uncover SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in recovered COVID-19 and SARS patients.
  4. Beasley, D. (2020) Scientists focus on how immune system T cells fight coronavirus in absence of antibodies.
  5. Bozkus, C.C. (2020) SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells without antibodies. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20:463
  6. Grifoni, A.; Weiskopf, D.; Ramirez, S.I.; Mateus, J.; Dan, J.M.; Moderbacher, C.R.; Rawlings, S.A.; Sutherland, A.; Premkumar, L.; Jadi, R.S. and al., e. (2020) Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals. Cell 181:1489–1501.e15
  7. Mateus, J.; Grifoni, A.; Tarke, A.; Sidney, J.; Ramirez, S.I.; Dan, J.M.; Burger, Z.C.; Rawlings, S.A.; Smith, D.M.; Phillips, E. and al., e. (2020) Selective and cross-reactive SARS-CoV-2 T cell epitopes in unexposed humans. Science 370:89–94
  8. McCurry-Schmidt, M. (2020) Exposure to common cold coronaviruses can teach the immune system to recognize SARS-CoV-2.
  9. Palmer, S.; Cunniffe, N. and Donnelly, R. (2021) COVID-19 hospitalization rates rise exponentially with age, inversely proportional to thymic T-cell production. J. R. Soc. Interface 18:20200982
  10. Sekine, T.; Perez-Potti, A.; Rivera-Ballesteros, O.; Strålin, K.; Gorin, J.; Olsson, A.; Llewellyn-Lacey, S.; Kamal, H.; Bogdanovic, G.; Muschiol, S. and al., e. (2020) Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19. Cell 183:158–168.e14
  11. Drake, J. (2021) Now We Know: Covid-19 Vaccines Prevent Asymptomatic Infection, Too.
  12. Bossuyt, P.M. (2020) Testing COVID-19 tests faces methodological challenges. Journal of clinical epidemiology 126:172–176
  13. Jefferson, T.; Spencer, E.; Brassey, J. and Heneghan, C. (2020) Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectivity assessment. Systematic review. Clin. Infect. Dis. ciaa1764:x-x
  14. Borger, P.; Malhotra, R.K.; Yeadon, M.; Craig, C.; McKernan, K.; Steger, K.; McSheehy, P.; Angelova, L.; Franchi, F.; Binder, T.; Ullrich, H.; Ohashi, M.; Scoglio, S.; Doesburg-van Kleffens, M.; Gilbert, D.; Klement, R.J.; Schrüfer, R.; Pieksma, B.W.; Bonte, J.; Dalle Carbonare, B.H.; Corbett, K.P. and Kämmer, U. (2020) External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results.
  15. Mandavilli, A. (2020) Your Coronavirus Test Is Positive. Maybe It Shouldn’t Be.
  16. Cao, S.; Gan, Y.; Wang, C.; Bachmann, M.; Wei, S.; Gong, J.; Huang, Y.; Wang, T.; Li, L.; Lu, K.; Jiang, H.; Gong, Y.; Xu, H.; Shen, X.; Tian, Q.; Lv, C.; Song, F.; Yin, X. and Lu, Z. (2020) Post-lockdown SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid screening in nearly ten million residents of Wuhan, China. Nat. Commun. 11:5917
  17. Moghadas, S.M.; Fitzpatrick, M.C.; Sah, P.; Pandey, A.; Shoukat, A.; Singer, B.H. and Galvani, A.P. (2020) The implications of silent transmission for the control of COVID-19 outbreaks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117:17513–17515
  18. Johansson, M.A.; Quandelacy, T.M.; Kada, S.; Prasad, P.V.; Steele, M.; Brooks, J.T.; Slayton, R.B.; Biggerstaff, M. and Butler, J.C. (2021) SARS-CoV-2 Transmission From People Without COVID-19 Symptoms. JAMA network open 4:e2035057
  19. Yeadon, M. (2020). What SAGE got wrong. Lockdown Skeptics.
  20. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2020) Global perspective of COVID‐19 epidemiology for a full‐cycle pandemic. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 50:x-x
  21. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2021) Reconciling estimates of global spread and infection fatality rates of COVID‐19: An overview of systematic evaluations. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. -:x-x
  22. CDC, (2020) Science Brief: Community Use of Cloth Masks to Control the Spread of SARS-CoV-2.
  23. Orient, J.; McCullough, P. and Vliet, E. (2020) A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment.
  24. McCullough, P.A.; Alexander, P.E.; Armstrong, R.; Arvinte, C.; Bain, A.F.; Bartlett, R.P.; Berkowitz, R.L.; Berry, A.C.; Borody, T.J.; Brewer, J.H.; Brufsky, A.M.; Clarke, T.; Derwand, R.; Eck, A.; Eck, J.; Eisner, R.A.; Fareed, G.C.; Farella, A.; Fonseca, S.N.S.; Geyer, C.E.; Gonnering, R.S.; Graves, K.E.; Gross, K.B.V.; Hazan, S.; Held, K.S.; Hight, H.T.; Immanuel, S.; Jacobs, M.M.; Ladapo, J.A.; Lee, L.H.; Littell, J.; Lozano, I.; Mangat, H.S.; Marble, B.; McKinnon, J.E.; Merritt, L.D.; Orient, J.M.; Oskoui, R.; Pompan, D.C.; Procter, B.C.; Prodromos, C.; Rajter, J.C.; Rajter, J.; Ram, C.V.S.; Rios, S.S.; Risch, H.A.; Robb, M.J.A.; Rutherford, M.; Scholz, M.; Singleton, M.M.; Tumlin, J.A.; Tyson, B.M.; Urso, R.G.; Victory, K.; Vliet, E.L.; Wax, C.M.; Wolkoff, A.G.; Wooll, V. and Zelenko, V. (2020) Multifaceted highly targeted sequential multidrug treatment of early ambulatory high-risk SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19). Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 21:517–530
  25. Procter, {.B.C.; {APRN}, {.C.R.{.; {PA}-C, {.V.P.; {PA}-C, {.E.S.; {PA}-C, {.C.H. and McCullough, {.{.P.A. (2021) Early Ambulatory Multidrug Therapy Reduces Hospitalization and Death in High-Risk Patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). International journal of innovative research in medical science 6:219–221
  26. McCullough, P.A.; Kelly, R.J.; Ruocco, G.; Lerma, E.; Tumlin, J.; Wheelan, K.R.; Katz, N.; Lepor, N.E.; Vijay, K.; Carter, H.; Singh, B.; McCullough, S.P.; Bhambi, B.K.; Palazzuoli, A.; De Ferrari, G.M.; Milligan, G.P.; Safder, T.; Tecson, K.M.; Wang, D.D.; McKinnon, J.E.; O’Neill, W.W.; Zervos, M. and Risch, H.A. (2021) Pathophysiological Basis and Rationale for Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) Infection. Am. J. Med. 134:16–22
  27. Anonymous, (2020) Real-time database and meta analysis of 588 COVID-19 studies.
  28. Hirschhorn, J.S. (2021) COVID scandal: Feds ignored 2016 law requiring use of real world evidence.
  29. Anonymous, (1998) Emergency Use of an Investigational Drug or Biologic: Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators.
  30. Anonymous, (2021) EMA assessment report: Comirnaty.
  31. Anonymous, (2020) FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine.
  32. Giurgea, L.T. and Memoli, M.J. (2020) Navigating the Quagmire: Comparison and Interpretation of COVID-19 Vaccine Phase 1/2 Clinical Trials. Vaccines 8:746
  33. Bhakdi, S.; Chiesa, M.; Frost, S.; Griesz-Brisson, M.; Haditsch, M.; Hockertz, S.; Johnson, L.; Kämmerer, U.; Palmer, M.; Reiss, K.; Sönnichsen, A.; Wodarg, W. and Yeadon, M. (2021) Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns.
  34. Bhakdi, S. (2021) Rebuttal letter to European Medicines Agency from Doctors for Covid Ethics, April 1, 2021.
  35. Ulm, J.W. (2020) Rapid response to: Will covid-19 vaccines save lives? Current trials aren’t designed to tell us.
  36. Reimann, N. (2021) Covid Spiking In Over A Dozen States — Most With High Vaccination Rates.
  37. Meredith, S. (2021) Chile has one of the world’s best vaccination rates. Covid is surging there anyway.
  38. Bhuyan, A. (2021) Covid-19: India sees new spike in cases despite vaccine rollout. BMJ 372:n854
  39. Morrissey, K. (2021) Open letter to Dr. Karina Butler.
  40. Anonymous, (2021) Open Letter from the UK Medical Freedom Alliance: Urgent warning re Covid-19 vaccine-related deaths in the elderly and Care Homes.
  41. Furer, V.; Zisman, D.; Kibari, A.; Rimar, D.; Paran, Y. and Elkayam, O. (2021) Herpes zoster following BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccination in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a case series. Rheumatology -:x-x
  42. Anonymous, (2021) Covid-19 vaccines: ethical, legal and practical considerations.
  43. Tseng, C.; Sbrana, E.; Iwata-Yoshikawa, N.; Newman, P.C.; Garron, T.; Atmar, R.L.; Peters, C.J. and Couch, R.B. (2012) Immunization with SARS coronavirus vaccines leads to pulmonary immunopathology on challenge with the SARS virus. PLoS One 7:e35421
  44. Bolles, M.; Deming, D.; Long, K.; Agnihothram, S.; Whitmore, A.; Ferris, M.; Funkhouser, W.; Gralinski, L.; Totura, A.; Heise, M. and Baric, R.S. (2011) A double-inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus vaccine provides incomplete protection in mice and induces increased eosinophilic proinflammatory pulmonary response upon challenge. J. Virol. 85:12201–15
  45. Weingartl, H.; Czub, M.; Czub, S.; Neufeld, J.; Marszal, P.; Gren, J.; Smith, G.; Jones, S.; Proulx, R.; Deschambault, Y.; Grudeski, E.; Andonov, A.; He, R.; Li, Y.; Copps, J.; Grolla, A.; Dick, D.; Berry, J.; Ganske, S.; Manning, L. and Cao, J. (2004) Immunization with modified vaccinia virus Ankara-based recombinant vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome is associated with enhanced hepatitis in ferrets. J. Virol. 78:12672–6
  46. Czub, M.; Weingartl, H.; Czub, S.; He, R. and Cao, J. (2005) Evaluation of modified vaccinia virus Ankara based recombinant SARS vaccine in ferrets. Vaccine 23:2273–9
  47. Tinari, S. (2021) The EMA covid-19 data leak, and what it tells us about mRNA instability. BMJ 372:n627
  48. Anonymous, (2021) Interview with Dr. Vanessa Schmidt-Krüger.

_______________________

For more on liability see: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/04/28/i-do-not-consent-forms-to-print-give-to-your-employer-and-political-representatives/

Miami School Asks Staff NOT to Take COVID Jab; Global Media Assault Follows; Pfizer Trial May Support School’s Concerns

Miami School Asks Staff Not to Take COVID Jab; Global Media Assault Follows; Pfizer Trial May Support School’s Concern

© [4/29/21] GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here //www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.”

Centner Academy, a private school in Miami, has made international headlines for directing its employees who have not yet received the experimental COVID-19 vaccine, to wait until the end of the school year, as a precautionary step to protect the health of their school community, given both concerning new anecdotal reports that the vaccinated can adversely affect the health of the un-vaccinated, and that that clinical safety and efficacy data for the mRNA vaccines will not be completed until sometime in 2023.

Thus far, mainstream media reporting has focused and railed against the following statement made by Leila Centner, co-founder and CEO of Centner Academy, to her employees (in an internal email later leaked to the press) as being the most controversial and contestable: 

“Tens of thousands of women all over the world have recently been reporting adverse reproductive issues simply from being in close proximity with those who have received any one of the COVID-19 injections, e.g., irregular menses, bleeding, miscarriages, post-menopausal hemorrhaging, and amenorrhea (complete loss of menstruation).

No one knows exactly what may be causing these irregularities, but it appears that those who have received the injections may be transmitting something from their bodies to those with whom they come in contact. Until more is known, we must err on the side of caution when it comes to the welfare of our students and the school team.”

You can read Leila’s entire letter and comment which she posted to Instagram here.

Leila Centner’s private communication, now a matter of global public scrutiny, even reaching the White House press secretary for comment on April 27th,1 came under fire by a number of conventional allopathic physicians, including Dr. Aileen Marty, a physician and infectious disease specialist with Florida International University’s Wertheim College of Medicine, who commented as follows: 

“But there’s not one citation, there’s not one physician or scientist whose name is spelled out in there. There’s no references. There’s nothing. There is no scientific evidence provided. Rumor is the only thing that’s there, and if you look at the reality, there’s zero, zero science behind those allegations.” “If they believe it, and they then share this big lie, it has a horrific impact on our entire community,” she said.

While these comments by Dr. Marty, and now hundreds of other mainstream media reports have attempted to dismiss Leila Centner’s statements as a ‘source of misinformation, without basis in science,’ we believe they have significant merit, and are at the least worth exploring further. 

Fact #1: Vaccines Make Some Sick; Sick People Are More Likely to Compromise the Health of Others

Whereas the mainstream media and government health authorities have been dogmatically pushing the unequivocal narrative that the Covid-19 (and all) vaccines are “safe and effective” a priori, it is undeniable that the Covid-19 vaccines are presently only approved for distribution to the public under an Emergency Use Authorization, in lieu of proper clinical safety and efficacy trial data being available, and which are not estimated to be completed until April 2023 for the Pfizer vaccine.2

This makes Covid-19 vaccines, by definition, experimental, as Leila Centner has repeatedly offered as an explanation for her precautionary stance as to their unintended, adverse effects they may have to the health and well-being of her school staff, faculty, children and larger community.

Human medical experimentation, as defined by the Nuremberg code of medical ethics (1947), must not only be voluntary, but the participant needs to be fully informed of both the risks and benefits, in order to be able to give their full legal consent. Also, if the medical experimenter has reason to believe an intervention may cause harm, disability, or death he or she must suspend the experiment immediately.

In the case of the experimental mRNA Covid-19 vaccine rollouts, government data reveals the Covid-19 vaccines are having profound, adverse health effects on a subpopulation of recipients, as documented in the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), which as of April 28th, 2021, lists a total of 85,926 reports of the vaccinated experiencing adverse effects, ranging from death to hundreds of other symptoms and life-threatening conditions.  Moreover, VAERS is known to be highly ineffective in capturing the true extent of the actual number of vaccine adverse events, due to its highly passive, post-marketing surveillance methodology. Peer-reviewed research indicates that the rate of report capture is as low as 1% for thrombocytopenic purpura (low blood platelet related bleeding disorder) following the MMR vaccine and hypotonichyporesponsive (bluish skin; reduced consciousness) episodes following the DTP vaccine.3

The implication is that the actual scale of adverse effects within the vaccinated, which include immune dysregulation and suppression, may be several orders of magnitude higher than the already alarming scale of events reported through the conservative numbers offered by VAERS — which are almost universally ignored by the very same media attempting to discredit, defame, and make an example out of the Centner Academy.

Given that those who are experiencing immune dysfunction as a result of being vaccinated are more likely to express virus reactivation, such as a cluster of cases recently reported for vaccine-induced Herpes Zoster, or may also experience a disrupted microbiome leading the the overgrowth of opportunistic bacteria, fungi, virusess, i.e. so-called “pathogens,” the health risks to those around them may also increase significantly. It should be noted that this phenomenon of vaccine-induced adverse health effects is not solely associated with the Covid-19 or mRNA vaccines.

Greenmedinfo.com has a database of over 1300 studies indicating over 150 potential adverse health effects from vaccines presently in the CDC vaccine schedule. Therefore any vaccine could, in theory, weaken or disrupt the immune system of a vaccine recipient, increasing the likelihood that they may transmit infection or disease-provoking aspects of either their microbiome or cell contents (mediated via extracellular vesicles) to those around them, which will be explained in greater detail in section #3. 

Fact #2: The Pfizer mRNA Vaccine Clinical Trial Study Design Warns Against Proximity (Shared Air Inhalation or Skin Contact) Between Vaccine Participants and the Unvaccinated As A Possible Vectors of Harm

Titled, “A Phase 1/2/3 Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of RNA Vaccine Candidates Against COVID-19 in Healthy Individuals,” the Pfizer Covid-19 mRNA vaccine study protocol document explicitly identifies in section 8.3.5. the need for monitoring what it calls “Exposure During Pregnancy or Breastfeeding, and Occupational Exposure.” A concern they take seriously enough that they require any incident to be reported within 24 hours to the Pfizer Safety system. 

According to the document an EDP [environmental exposure during pregnancy] occurs if, for example: “a male vaccine recipient exposes a female partner prior to or around the time of conception.”

Exposure to the study intervention is defined as “inhalation or skin contact,” indicating that physical proximity between the vaccinated and unvaccinated is recognized by the Pfizer study protocol to be a cause for concern for transmission of potential side effects of the vaccine.

The document also gives the following example of an EDP scenario: “A male family member or healthcare provider who has been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact then exposes his female partner prior to or around the time of conception.” Clearly, in this case Pfizer is acknowledging that something as simple as a healthcare provider or family member who has been exposed to an mRNA vaccine recipient through “inhalation or skin contact” (i.e. physical proximity) could generate an adverse event and/or affect the study outcomes. 

Another example provided in section 8.3.5.2 titled, “Exposure During Breastfeeding,” gives the following example of what constitutes such an exposure: 

“ An example of environmental exposure during breastfeeding is a female family member or healthcare provider who reports that she is breastfeeding after having been exposed to the study intervention by inhalation or skin contact.”

Finally, in section 8.3.5.3., an “Occupational Exposure” occurs,

“when a person receives unplanned direct contact with the study intervention, which may or may not lead to the occurrence of an AE. Such persons may include healthcare providers, family members, and other roles that are involved in the trial participant’s care.” 

Clearly, the Pfizer mRNA vaccine protocol design reveals that concerns for how the vaccinated may adversely affect the health, and even reproductive outcomes, of the unvaccinated simply by being within physical proximity, are being taken extremely seriously by the manufacturer of the vaccine itself. In light of this, Leila Centner’s expressed concerns quoted at the beginning of this article are, in fact, backed by the most authoritative document we have on the experimental vaccine, and the nature of the human experiments being conducted on their behalf. So far, there has been no acknoweldgment or reporting on this fact by the global mainstream media, the vaccine manufacturers, nor government health authorities. It will be up to the reader to share this article, and get the word out. 

Fact #3: There is a Plausible Epigenetic Molecular Mechanism in Biology Whereby the Vaccinated May Affect the Health Status of the Unvaccinated  

The third major substantiating factor behind identifying the potential harm the vaccinated may have on the unvaccinated concerns the discovery of so-called horizontal information transfer within biological systems mediated by extracellular vesicles (EVs), which include a virus-like phenomenon known as microvessicle shedding and/or exosome-mediated transfer of nucleic acids. This falls within the category of epigenetics, which the apologists and shills for the mRNA vaccines’ purported safety and efficacy conveniently ignore in order to make their claim that was debunked in 1970 with the discovery of the enzyme reverse transcriptase. Reverse transcriptase is able to transcribe RNA to DNA, essentially destroying the fundamental dogma of molecular biology, namely, the undirectional flow of information from the cell nucleus to mRNA to protein can not be reversed. This dogma is still being used half-a-century later to make the false claim that the only health risk a genetically modified vaccine has worth discussing is the possibility that it may affect the structure or function of nuclear, protein-coding genes. We’ve even seen, through the discovery of exosomes, that the Weismann barrier has been penetrated, and somatic cells can communicate heritable information to the germline cells in what amounts to real-time, essentially devalidating the risk models presently used by vaccine manufacturers and regulators which do not account for the power epigenetic processes have to amplify the unintended adverse effects of genetically modified technologies and interventions. 

While mRNA vaccines are designed using genetically modified processes not dependent on live cell substrates, thereby precluding conventional problems with shedding associated with first generation vaccines like the MMR, it is possible that they do, in fact, contribute to microvessicle shedding,4 which represents an even greater, more persistent threat than live-cell vaccine shedding when it comes to the persistent biological impact the vaccinated can have on the un-vaccinated. Microvessicles, which range in size between 0.1–1.0 μm  are a type of extracellular vesicle (EVs), that are secreted by many different cell types within the body, both in times of health and disease, and are known to reflect the antigenic content of the cell of origin.5 They have stunningly similar characteristics to viruses. For instance, like SARS-COV-2, microvessicles have a lipid bilayer formed from the budding off from host cell membranes, and they can incorporate and reproduce aspects of a vaccinated or infected cells’ immunogenicity, such as including functional mRNA, viral proteins, and other nucleic acids capable of profoundly altering the structure and function of the cells to which they are transmitted. For instance, it is theoretically feasible that a vaccine recipient’s cells expressing COVID-19 spike protein as a result of transfection with mRNA from a Covid-19 vaccine may secrete microvesicles containing components “originally alien to the cell, such as proteins and nucleic acids that are transiently or constitutively expressed via plasmid or viral vector. “7  These microvessicles, like viruses, and other extracellular vessicles known as exosomes, can be transmitted to other individuals (inter-individual transmission) through both normal or diseased physiological processes.8 Extracellular exosomes have even been found to transfer nucleic acids cross kingdoms (plant > animal, fungal > bacterial), affecting the phenotypal expression of the target species. Therefore, it is plausible that microvessicles can transmit mRNA from a recently vaccinated individual to those within close proximity, and therefore could, in fact, “shed” mRNA and related biomolecules induced from the mRNA vaccination process to non-vaccinated individuals, inducing symptoms similar to those experienced by the vaccinated. Indeed, microvessicles may have a profound affect on the immune status of those who both produce them, and are exposed to them. A recent study concluded that research “strongly suggests that MVs may function as strong regulator of both innate and adaptive immune systems.”9 Microvessicles and exosomes have also been researched and developed as vaccine candidates, further indicating that they are already being looked at by the scientific community as potential vectors of immunogenicity and carriers of viral-like and disease-modulating if not also disease-promoting bio-information. 

Given the plausible mechanism through which a COVID-19 vaccine recipient’s body produces vaccine antigen (e.g. spike protein), and can package and transmit these antigens through viral-like microvessicles (and perhaps also exosomes) to others, Leila Centner’s statement “it appears that those who have received the injections may be transmitting something from their bodies to those with whom they come in contact,” has a plausible mechanism of action. Especially considering the afforementioned fact that Pfizer’s study protocol itself acknowledges that an unknown factor or mechanism may cause the unvaccinated to be adversely affected by the vaccinated. 

Either way, Leila Centner’s decision was made in the spirit of the precautionary principle, and her call for further investigation and information on the vaccines before proceeding with what amounts to a reckless human medical experimentation should not be identified as “fringe,” “irrational,” nor “crazy.” To the contrary, the medical establishment and would-be government regulators should themselves be raising the red flag over the tens of thousands of adverse effects that have already been reported to the government VAERS database.  

We live in a time and age where protecting our children from coerced and increasingly mandatory medical interventions that carry the risk of death and disability, is perhaps the most important advocacy of our lives. It takes great courage, conviction, and love to stand up and make a decision that is in the best interest of your community, and not your bottom line or public relations image. The Centner Academy’s prioritization of the precautionary principle, and Leila Center’s call for more research into the exploding number of adverse events that the mainstream media either ignores or actively covers up, is extremely honorable and worth everyone who follows our work and advocacy getting behind in support. 

Please support the Centner Academy through the following actions:
  1. Share this artcile with friends and family, in order to support our health freedom advocate, Leila Center, who is undergoing unprecedented media attack. 
  2. Do you have an experience to report of an adverse effect from the Covid-19 vaccines, or being exposed to someone who had it? 
  3. Support Instagram Leila Centner (send her some love). Comment here at Leila’s instagram account.
  4. Learn more about the incredibly positive philosophy of the Centner Academy, focusing on happiness as the centerpiece of a child’s success, and cultivating leaders with HEART.  

Also, please join us at www.StandforHealthFreedom.com, as we build a grassroots army of millions who believe in informed consent, parental rights, human and medical rights, for everyone. 


References

https://miami.cbslocal.com/2021/04/27/white-house-position-centner-academy-covid-vaccine/

https://fullfact.org/health/covid-19-vaccines/

3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1615747/pdf/amjph00450-0108.pdf

4 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5680703/

5 https://www.nature.com/articles/2404132

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3233125/

7 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3764926/

8 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5816030/

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02723/full