Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

U.S. Officially Withdraws From WHO

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/america-officially-withdraws-from

America Officially Withdraws from the World Health Organization

With the Pandemic Treaty in place, the Gates Foundation and GAVI now fill the power vacuum as top funders — putting WHO member states in danger.
Jan 22, 2026

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an executive order initiating the U.S. withdrawal from the WHO, citing its COVID-19 failures, lack of reforms, and disproportionate U.S. funding.

Today, that one-year notice period has officially expired — and the United States has formally withdrawn from the WHO, leaving the Gates Foundation and GAVI to fill the power vacuum as top funders:

My heart goes out to all remaining WHO member states… now answering directly to the vaccine cartel.

It’s important to remember that in May 2025, the WHO officially approved the WHO Pandemic Agreement — setting the stage for fast-tracked experimental vaccines, top-down emergency mandates, digital vaccine passports, expanded cross-border surveillance, and coordinated censorship of dissenting scientists and physicians under the banner of “misinformation.”

Last month, the WHO exposed just how degraded it has become by releasing an embarrassingly weak autism-vaccine report. The McCullough Foundation — with ~0.007% of the WHO’s budget — produced a far more comprehensive and scientifically grounded analysis.

We can chalk up this official withdrawal as a major win for the public health of America.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

AAP Hit With RICO Lawsuit for Vaccine Safety Fraud

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-american-academy-of-pediatrics?

BREAKING: American Academy of Pediatrics Hit With Federal RICO Lawsuit for Vaccine Safety Fraud

AAP accused of operating a decades-long racketeering scheme that deceived America about vaccine safety for maximum profit.
Jan 21, 2026

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

For decades, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has been treated like an untouchable authority on child health — the gold standard that parents, doctors, schools, and lawmakers were told to trust without question. But today, that image collapses. Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and multiple plaintiffs just filed a federal lawsuit alleging the AAP spent decades running a racketeering operation that sold parents false safety assurances about the childhood vaccine schedule.

This isn’t another “vaccine debate” lawsuit. It’s a RICO fraud case—the same legal weapon used against organized crime and the tobacco industry. The allegation is blunt and devastating: the AAP allegedly manufactured false certainty around vaccine schedule safety, shut down legitimate scientific scrutiny, and promoted sweeping assurances that were never validated through rigorous real-world safety testing—while operating within a system shaped by vaccine-manufacturer funding and financial incentives tied to high pediatric vaccination rates.

One of the most explosive points in the complaint is what it forces into the open. The cumulative childhood schedule has never been safety-tested the way any reasonable parent would assume it has. The lawsuit points to Institute of Medicine findings from 2002 and 2013 calling for more research and acknowledging the lack of proper vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparisons. Yet the AAP continued portraying the schedule as thoroughly tested and unquestionably safe, shaping pediatric care nationwide through repetition, authority, and pressure—not proof.

The complaint also describes what parents have learned the hard way. This system doesn’t merely recommend vaccines. It demands compliance. Physicians who questioned the schedule or deviated from AAP protocols were professionally targeted, disciplined, and financially crushed. The message was clear: follow the script, or lose your career.

The lawsuit further argues that the AAP’s public reassurances were built on “theoretical” talking points that became institutional doctrine, including the infamous claim that infants could tolerate an extreme number of vaccines at once. According to the plaintiffs, this wasn’t evidence—it was marketing disguised as medical authority, repeated in clinics to silence questions and keep the assembly line moving.

Then there’s the part that makes it all make sense: money. The complaint highlights conflicts of interest and financial entanglements with vaccine manufacturers and aligned institutions. The AAP presents itself as independent and science-first, while operating in a world of corporate sponsorships, incentives, and industry relationships that would be unacceptable in any genuinely transparent public health organization.

This is why the lawsuit matters. It’s not about a single product. It challenges the entire protection racket that has propped up the pediatric vaccine industry for decades. AAP’s model has relied on one rule: the schedule is safe because we say it’s safe—and anyone who demands real proof gets smeared, censored, or destroyed.

The lawsuit seeks financial damages for the families and physicians harmed, demands disclosure of the lack of comprehensive safety testing behind the cumulative schedule, and aims to stop the AAP from making blanket, unqualified claims that the schedule is “safe and effective” as if that question has already been settled.

If this case advances, discovery alone could expose what the public has been denied for decades—and that would be a historic victory for medical transparency, informed consent, and accountability in pediatrics. For years, parents were told to “trust the experts,” while legitimate safety questions were mocked, censored, or punished. Now those questions are headed to the one place the system can’t silence them with talking points: federal court.  (See link for article)

____________

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Another Inconvenient Study Retracted While 19 States Reject New Vaccine Schedule

The ‘vaccine’ war is hot and heavy

The Medical Industrial Complex, including the AAP is suing HHS and Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr – demanding that a federal court force the government back to ‘business as usual,’ with a blanket vaccine schedule for all and assembly-line medicine where:

  • patient/doctor relationship is trumped by a ‘one size fits all’ medical model
  • there is a lack of informed consent
  • the emphasis is on Big Pharma profit, not patient health
There is no evidence the U.S. Childhood ‘vaccine’ schedule saves lives.

The entire US childhood vaccine schedule has no credible evidence of a mortality or morbidity benefit even though they’ve had 30 years to do the study and failed every time to show a benefit.

There is a long history of health agencies manipulating, obfuscating and even destroying ‘vaccine’ data and of doctors getting financial kickbacks for vaccinating.

How is this unbiased science?

Go here to sign petition to defund the AAP

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/preprint-server-retracts-infant-mortality-study-childrens-health-defense-chd-scientists-censorship/

‘Act of Censorship’: Preprint Server Retracts Infant Mortality Study by Children’s Health Defense Scientists

Preprints.org on Wednesday retracted a paper by Children’s Health Defense scientists who analyzed data from the Louisiana Department of Health. The analysis showed that infants vaccinated in their second month of life were more likely to die in their third month than unvaccinated infants.

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
January 15, 2026
screenshot of withdrawn article and word "Censored"

Editor’s note: Since this article was published, the study retracted by Preprints.org has been published here, on the preprint server Zenodo.

Preprints.org on Wednesday retracted a paper by Children’s Health Defense (CHD) scientists. The research showed that infants vaccinated in their second month of life were more likely to die in their third month than unvaccinated infants.

Lead author Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., called the retraction “an act of censorship.” He told The Defender:

“There are 318 members of the Advisory Board for Preprints. Not a single one of them has published on vaccine safety. Not a single one of them has published on infant mortality. Not a single one of them would have been chosen to peer-review our article. Its retraction, therefore, cannot be a peer-reviewed nor a scientific decision.”

Retraction is an important tool for the scientific community, which needs the ability to edit itself, especially when “negligent or bad actors are at work,” Jablonowski said. “But retracting is also a tool of the censors, by those who muzzle scientific discourse,” he said.

The paper, published on the preprint server last month, analyzed data obtained from the Louisiana Department of Health.

The data revealed that depending on which vaccines they received, vaccinated children were between 29%-74% more likely to die than unvaccinated children. Vaccinated Black infants were 28%-74% more likely to die, and vaccinated female infants had a 52%-98% greater risk of death.

Overall, children who received all six vaccines recommended for 2-month-olds were 68% more likely to die in their third month of life, the data showed.

The paper represents one of the first studies on the cumulative effect of vaccines at age 2 months, when the vaccines are administered according to the pre-January 2026 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended schedule.

Since the paper was published, the CDC has revised the childhood schedule, reducing the number of routine vaccines recommended for infants and children. (See link for article)

__________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-states-reject-new-cdc-childhood-vaccine-schedule/

Growing Number of States Reject New Childhood Vaccine Schedule

Since Jan. 5, when the CDC pared down the number of routinely recommended childhood vaccines, at least 19 states have announced they won’t follow the new CDC schedule.

by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
January 15, 2026
child with vaccine bandage and american flag

A growing number of states say they won’t follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) new childhood vaccine recommendations.

On Jan. 5, the CDC reduced the number of routinely recommended childhood vaccines from 17 to 11. The agency moved several vaccines to a “shared clinical decision-making” category that encourages discussion between the doctor and patient or parent about whether to get the vaccine.

The recategorized vaccines include rotavirus, COVID-19, influenza, meningococcal disease, hepatitis A and hepatitis B.

Since the CDC’s Jan. 5 announcement, 19 states have said they won’t follow the new CDC schedule:  California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon,  Pennsylvania,  Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.

Most plan to follow the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) vaccine guidance released in August 2025, the Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy (CIDRAP) reported.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Press Secretary Emily G. Hilliard criticized states that refuse to follow the CDC’s updated vaccine schedule. She told The Defender:

“Democrat-led states that imposed unscientific school closures, toddler mask mandates, and vaccine passports during the COVID era are the ones who destroyed public trust in public health and should not be guiding policy.

“The updated CDC childhood schedule continues to protect children against serious diseases while aligning U.S. guidance with international norms. Many peer nations achieve high vaccination rates without mandates by relying on trust, education, and strong doctor-patient relationships.”  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

It’s important to recognize the AAP is completely bought out by Big Pharma and not to be trusted.  It supports water fluoridation which has been shown to lower IQ in children, and it hasn’t updated advice on cellphone radiation in nearly a decade, of which clear evidence has been found that it increases cancer risk.  Now the corrupt agency is suing RFK for simply reducing vaccines that are federally recommended.

This proves that ‘recommendations’ are far, far more than recommendations.

Similarly to Lymeland where treatment ‘guidelines’ serve as literal mandates, ‘the powers that be’ know well and good that ‘recommendations’ will be used to mandate vaccines if you want to attend public school, obtain higher education, work in the health field, see grandma in the hospital, and basically anything else a free person should be able to do without submitting to a medical device/treatment.

I just spoke with someone yesterday that reiterated that science changes depending upon what is known at the time.  She, like the 19 states listed above like to tritely say this, but only follow it when it matches their pre-determined belief.

Time and time again, people have been maimed and killed by vaccines yet many people refuse to admit this very real, verifiable fact.

Any medical treatment should be a personal decision between the patient and their doctor.  A ‘one size fits all’ approach to medicine will never and can never work, and the mantra, ‘for the greater good,’ should be eradicated from speech. COVID proved beyond a shadow of doubt that ‘vaccinating’ for other people doesn’t work. The tyranny used with COVID needs to be admitted and refused for the present and future or history WILL repeat.

Refuse to comply.

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines

Deadly Hospital Protocols Caused Nearly Half a Million Excess Deaths in 2020

Deadly Hospital Protocols Caused Almost 20% Excess Deaths in 2020

By John Beaudoin

In this 10 minute video, John Beaudoin explains CDC mortality data from 2018 – 2023. The largest increase in death happened between 2019 and 2020 – nearly a 20% increase in mortality before the gene therapy injection rollout.

Almost none of these deaths were caused by Covid but by deadly hospital treatment protocols that Covid patients were subjected to. These protocols were issued as guidelines by the NIH and heavily incentivized by the federal health agencies with lavish reimbursements and extravagant bonus payments.

The system that made these hospital murders they declared ‘COVID deaths’ possible, is still in place today.

Ken McCarthy‘s book, ‘What the Nurses Saw: An Investigation into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospital During the COVID Panic and the Nurses Who Fought Back to Save Their Patients,’ gives a first hand accounts by nurses that stated they didn’t see a SINGLE patient die from COVID.

Instead of effective treatments like vitamin C, D, HCQ, ivermectin, and steroids for cytokine cascades they were given Remdesivir which is ineffective, and previously pulled for high death rates, and were intubated, which caused 70% of COVID deaths alone.

“Specifically in the US, they incentivized a protocol which virtually guaranteed that people that came to the hospital with respiratory problems were going to die. Not everyone died, but over a million people died in US hospitals.”

And he adds: “It was systematized and it was incentivized by the federal government of the United States.” ~ Ken McCarthy

Then in 2021 when 70% of the population received toxic gene therapy injections, excess mortality went up more, but it’s virtually impossible to parse out how much was due to hospital protocols or how much was from the COVID gene therapy shots due to the CDC’s inaccurate coding of death certificates.

The CDC systematically misclassified COVID as the underlying cause of death (UCod) even when a different condition was listed.

And the code issued by the WHO in January 2021 to be used exclusively for COVID ‘vaccine’ caused death wasn’t used at all by the CDC.  

This is how health officials got away with proclaiming there was not a single COVID ‘vaccine’ death.

The only reason some COVID ‘vaccine’ deaths are even coded is due to some brave doctors who dared to list the nmRNA shots as the cause of death on the death certificate.

Further mudding the waters, such deaths are coded with Y59.0., which is meant to be used for adverse events of viral vaccines, which the mRNA vaccines are not, so death by the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines were thrown in with viral vaccines, making it impossible to distinguish whether death was caused by a viral vaccine or an mRNA gene therapy injection.

Please see this video: The Uncounted COVID-19 Vaccine Injuries 

“More people died in excess from pneumonia in the third wave of Covid than in the first or the second. How does that make any sense? Because they wrecked their immune systems with a vaccine that goes into your bone marrow and your lymph and destroys your ability to create appropriate white cells that will attack a disease. It reprograms your immune system to fight something that doesn’t even exist anymore in society, an old variant of COVID.” ~ John Beaudoin

No wonder nobody wants to talk about this. This cannot be buried. People must know.  Those responsible must be held accountable.

If not, way more people are going to be killed next time.

It’s important to note that infant deaths to vaccines are NEVER listed on death certificates because a specific ICD code doesn’t exist.  They’ve been misclassifying vaccine deaths as SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) for decades.  The CDC lists 131 causes of childhood deaths but omits vaccines.

Another way the CDC obfuscates vaccine data is by classifying 95% of measles cases as ‘unvaccinated or unknown’ – two fundamentally different categories.

Truth be told, measles cases with unknown vaccination status may in fact be vaccinated.

The CDC purposely merges unknown cases with unvaccinated ones maximizing the association between measles cases and non-vaccination while obscuring uncertainty in the data.  It purposely does not apply the same logic in reverse – merging ‘unknown cases with vaccinated cases maximizing the association between measles cases and vaccination, which very well could be true.

This allows them to smugly reinforce a predetermined narrative.

The MMR vaccine contains a live measles virus that was created through a laboratory process U.S. military biodefense experts state “could be considered, by current definitions, gain-of-function research.”  Peer-reviewed studies further document vaccine-strain replication and shedding, measles-like illness following vaccination, and frequent inability to distinguish vaccine-strain illness from wild measles in symptomatic cases.

For more:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines, Viruses

U.S. Military Uses AI to Accelerate Viral Outbreak Modeling & Funds Intranasal Spray Self-Replicating sa-mRNA H5N1 Bird Flu Vax

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/darpa-uses-ai-to-push-viral-pandemic?p

DARPA Uses AI to Push Viral Pandemic Outbreak Modeling From Weeks to Days

Speed is being prioritized over scrutiny, with AI-generated models designed to justify interventions before they can be meaningfully challenged.

Jon Fleetwood
Jan 09, 2026

The U.S. military is funding artificial intelligence (AI) systems designed to drastically accelerate viral outbreak modeling—compressing a process that typically takes weeks into something that can be produced in days, then used to steer real-world interventions.

In other words, the faster the model, the less time there is to question whether the response is justified at all.

This acceleration follows DARPA’s already-documented pre-COVID pandemic infrastructure  designed to turn digital genetic sequences into synthesized viruses and mass-produced mRNA countermeasures on a fixed timeline. (See link for article)

_______________

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/us-military-funds-intranasal-spray?

U.S. Military Funds Intranasal Spray Self-Replicating sa-mRNA H5N1 Bird Flu Vaccine Built From Chimeric Viral Constructs: Journal ‘Nature Communications’

U.S. government is not slowing its push toward intranasal self-replicating RNA vaccine technology.

Jon Fleetwood
Jan 15, 2026

A U.S. military–funded research program has developed an intranasal, self-replicating RNA (sa-mRNA) vaccine targeting H5N1 avian influenza, built using chimeric viral constructs assembled through reverse genetics.

The work was disclosed in a 2026 Nature Communications paper and explicitly funded through a U.S. Army–administered biodefense contracting mechanism.

The vaccine is said to force cells to produce H5N1 bird flu antigen while simultaneously producing viral replication enzymes that copy the self-amplifying RNA inside the cell.

The U.S. government is funding the creation of next-generation bird flu vaccines while funding the creation of purported chimeric “Frankenstein” bird flu viruses.

Congress, the White House, the Department of Energy, the FBI, the CIA, and Germany’s Federal Intelligence Service (BND) have confirmed that the COVID-19 pandemic was likely the result of lab-engineered pathogen manipulation.

Why is the government making the bird flu pandemic problem and solution at the same time, just like it was doing with coronaviruses before the COVID-19 outbreak?  (See link for article)

____________

What could possibly go wrong?

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses