Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

New Court Created for COVID Vaccine Injuries

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/10/20/coronavirus-vaccine-injury-court.

New Court Created for COVID Vaccine Injuries

Analysis by Dr. Joseph MercolaFact Checked
coronavirus vaccine injury court
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • A new COVID vaccine court, which includes compensation for covered “countermeasures” for COVID-19, such as a vaccine, has been established by the federal government
  • Not only will pharmaceutical companies developing and marketing COVID-19 vaccines be shielded from what should be their liability in the civil court system, but federal compensation will likely be difficult to obtain, as it is in the existing vaccine court created under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986
  • The establishment of a preemptive COVID vaccine court could be a sign that the government foresees many lawsuits related to this fast-tracked vaccine in the near future
  • The expansion of a federal vaccine court to include makers of experimental COVID-19 vaccines allows the irresponsible sale and marketing of vaccines that have been poorly tested and formulated because the manufacturers have no liability and “nothing to lose”

Buried in the March 17, 2020, Federal Register — the daily journal of the U.S. government — in a document titled, “Declaration Under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act for Medical Countermeasures Against COVID-19,”1 is language that establishes a new COVID-19 vaccine court — similar to the federal vaccine court that already exists for injuries and deaths caused by federally recommended vaccines for children and pregnant women.

The U.S. vaccine industry operates under a liability shield unlike any other in existence. In most cases, if a product injures or kills a person, its manufacturer can be held accountable in a civil court of law. With FDA-licensed and CDC-recommended vaccines, however, this is not the case.

In the U.S., there is a federally operated vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) that Congress created under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. The U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, D.C., handles contested vaccine injury and death cases in what has become known as “vaccine court.”

The newly established COVID-19 vaccine court appears largely the same, except instead of focusing on injuries or deaths related to the recommended vaccines for children and pregnant women, it will be centered on those stemming from a new COVID-19 vaccine.

Just for Those Injured or Killed by a COVID ‘Countermeasure’

Journalist Jon Rappoport highlighted the section in the document, which reveals the establishment of the new COVID vaccine court, which includes compensation for covered “countermeasures” for COVID-19, such as a vaccine:2,3

“Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program … Section 319F-4 of the PHS Act, 42 U.S.C. 247d-6e, authorizes the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP) to provide benefits to eligible individuals who sustain a serious physical injury or die as a direct result of the administration or use of a Covered [COVID] Countermeasure [e.g., a vaccine].

Compensation under the CICP for an injury directly caused by a Covered Countermeasure is based on the requirements set forth in this Declaration, the administrative rules for the Program, and the statute. To show direct causation between a Covered Countermeasure and a serious physical injury, the statute requires ‘compelling, reliable, valid, medical and scientific evidence.’”

At face value, it sounds reasonable to establish a way for those who are injured by what will inevitably be a fast-tracked experimental vaccine to be compensated. However, not only will the vaccine makers be shielded from what should be their liability, but compensation will likely be difficult to obtain, as it is in the existing vaccine court. Rappoport wrote:4

“A quick piece of important history. In the mid-1980s, vaccine manufacturers were facing a blizzard of law suits from parents of vaccine-injured children. The very nervous manufacturers told the government they were going to get out of the vaccine business. The financial hit was going to be too deep.

The government said WAIT. Meetings were held. A plan was devised. A law was passed exempting the manufacturers from financial liability. Instead, for any of the recommended childhood vaccines, parents had to go to a government court to file a claim for compensation, after their children had been injured or killed by a vaccine.

And the government made this court a VERY tough place to win compensation. That’s the precise model for this new COVID vaccine court. And it’s based on the same unstated confession that existed in the 1980s: there are MANY vaccine injuries.”

Is the Government Expecting Significant Vaccine Injuries?

Is the establishment of a preemptive COVID vaccine court a sign that the federal government foresees many lawsuits related to this fast-tracked vaccine in the near future? Rappoport thinks so. “Bottom line,” he says, “the government expects many COVID vaccine injuries. That’s what they aren’t saying. They’re just preparing. With a new vaccine court. To handle injury and death of children and adults. That should not give you a warm secure feeling. Quite the opposite.”5

You may also be interested in “Operation Warp Speed,”6 which is a partnership among U.S. health organizations, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Defense (DoD) and others. Its goal is to produce and deliver 300 million doses of “safe and effective vaccines” with the initial doses being rolled out by January 2021.

Operation Warp Speed is part of a broader strategy aimed at accelerating the development, manufacture and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics, which collectively are known as countermeasures (the same countermeasures referred to in the Federal Register document).7

So far, as part of Operation Warp Speed, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has supplied

  • $456 million in funds for Johnson & Johnson’s candidate vaccine
  • up to $483 million for Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine
  • up to $1.2 billion available for AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 vaccine8

Severe Adverse Events Already Seen With Moderna’s Vaccine

Moderna partnered with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci to create its vaccine. In February 2020, its stock price increased 78.1% when it announced that its messenger RNA vaccine was ready for clinical trials.9 “The company’s CEO has become a new billionaire overnight,” wrote Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC).

It began human trials of its experimental mRNA vaccine in March 2020, and its stock soared again in May, hitting $29 billion, even though the company currently doesn’t sell any products,10 when it released early results from its Phase 1 study of 45 healthy volunteers between the ages of 18 and 55 — the first released from a study involving human volunteers.

Moderna’s press release11 stated that 25 participants who received two doses of its low or medium dose vaccine had levels of binding antibodies — the type that are used by the immune system to fight the virus but do not prevent viral infections — at levels approximating or exceeding those found in the blood of patients who recovered from COVID-19.12

Data for the more significant neutralizing antibodies, which stop viruses from entering cells, was reported for only eight people, with Moderna stating that levels in each of these initial participants met or exceeded antibody levels seen in recovered COVID-19 patients.

Four study subjects experienced a “Grade 3” adverse event, which is described by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as “severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; limiting self-care” such as “bathing, dressing and undressing, feeding self, using the toilet, taking medications.”13

During Phase 2 trials, 600 people will receive the vaccine, while the expanded Phase 3 trial began July 27, 202014 — an unprecedented move in terms of typical vaccine development timelines. Signs of trouble continue to mount, including reports that Moderna has no legal rights to a key patent for its vaccine delivery system, and that company executives have been dumping their stocks.

AstraZeneca Halted Vaccine Trials Due to Side Effects

As part of Operation Warp Speed, AstraZeneca agreed to make available at least 300 million doses of their experimental COVID-19 vaccine for the U.S., according to HHS, “with the first doses delivered as early as October 2020.”15 A large-scale Phase 3 clinical trial began on August 31, 2020, but was temporarily halted September 8 after “a suspected serious and unexpected adverse reaction” in a British participant.16

The participant reportedly suffered from transverse myelitis, which is inflammation of the spinal cord, and related neurological symptoms.17 Transverse myelitis has previously been linked to vaccination.18 By September 15, 2020, AstraZeneca had resumed clinical trials of its COVID-19 vaccine in the U.K.,19 but trials remained on hold in the U.S. as of October 1, where the FDA is investigating the patient’s “unexplained illness.”20

Results from AstraZeneca’s Phase 1 and 2 studies also revealed side effects, including fatigue, headache, malaise, chills and fever, in a significant number of participants:21

“Fatigue and headache were the most commonly reported systemic reactions. Fatigue was reported in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 [COVID-19 vaccine] group by 340 (70%) participants without paracetamol and 40 (71%) with paracetamol and in the MenACWY [meningococcal conjugate vaccine, which acted as a control] group by 227 (48%) participants without paracetamol and 26 (46%) with paracetamol, whereas headaches were reported in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group by 331 (68%) participants without paracetamol and 34 (61%) with paracetamol and in the MenACWY group by 195 (41%) participants without paracetamol and 21 (37%) participants with paracetamol.

Other systemic adverse reactions were common in the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group: muscle ache (294 [60%] participants without paracetamol and 27 [48%] with paracetamol), malaise (296 [61%] and 27 [48%]), chills (272 [56%] and 15 [27%]); and feeling feverish (250 [51%] and 20 [36%]).

In the of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 group, 87 (18%) participants without paracetamol and nine (16%) participants with paracetamol reported a temperature of at least 38°C, and eight (2%) patients without paracetamol had a temperature of at least 39°C.”

The fact that the COVID-19 vaccine was tested against another vaccine instead of a true placebo is also in and of itself problematic, as trying to measure safety of a vaccine against the safety profile of another vaccine that can also cause side effects can yield skewed results.

Vaccine Makers Have Nothing to Lose

The expansion of federal vaccine court to include makers of experimental COVID-19 vaccines allows the irresponsible sale and marketing of vaccines that have been poorly tested and formulated because the manufacturers have no liability and “nothing to lose.” Ruud Dobber, a senior AstraZeneca member, even told Reuters that fast-tracking a COVID-19 vaccine to market necessitates that makers be shielded from liability:22

“This is a unique situation where we as a company simply cannot take the risk if in … four years the vaccine is showing side effects. In the contracts we have in place, we are asking for indemnification. For most countries it is acceptable to take that risk on their shoulders because it is in their national interest.”

As noted, it’s via the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, passed in the U.S. in 2005, that the U.S. has established the new COVID vaccine court, to secure freedom from liability for manufacturers of COVID-19 vaccines. Children injured by vaccines are supposed to be able to receive swift and just compensation from the existing federally operated vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) created in 1986 under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act.

However, this program was gutted by Congressional amendments and by the HHS and Department of Justice under rule making authority within years of the 1986 law’s enactment and has only gotten worse over the years, again protecting vaccine manufacturers’ interests more than anything else.

If and when a COVID-19 vaccine is rolled out, even with all the potential pitfalls remaining — for instance, the vaccines are relying on novel mRNA technology that has never been used in vaccines before23 — be aware that the vaccine makers have nothing to lose by marketing their experimental shots, even if they cause serious injury and death. As Rappoport’s tongue-in-cheek statement suggests:24

“‘We know — and don’t ask us how — that millions of you are going to get headaches. To prevent that, we’re going to hit all of you on the head with a very heavy sledgehammer. If, ahem, a few of you happen to sustain an injury or die, we have a court where your relatives can try to get money out of us. By the way, in this court, we’ll do everything we can to deny you money. Good luck.’

Yes, the government knows exactly what’s coming when they approve a COVID vaccine. And now, so do you.”

– Sources and References

Kentucky Woman Misdiagnosed with COVID-19. Had Tick-borne Illnesses

https://www.wkyt.com/2020/10/19/wkyt-investigates-covid-confusion/  News Video Here

WKYT Investigates | COVID confusion

Initial coronavirus symptoms are common signs for other illnesses, too. That can cause problems for patients.
Published: Oct. 19, 2020 

CARLISLE, Ky. (WKYT) – Lakyn Reid has always spent a lot of time in the woods, hiking, hunting and just enjoying nature. Now, though, she’s hesitant to go out.

“My life drastically changed,” she said. “Forever.”

(See link for article and new video)

______________________

**Comment**

I’m far more worried about tick-borne illnesses than COVID-19.

I highly doubt this woman is alone.  With the hyper-attention being given to COVID-19, doctors are even less likely to think about TBI’s.

This poor woman has both Lyme and Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever, which also isn’t uncommon:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/30/study-shows-lyme-msids-patients-infected-with-many-pathogens-and-explains-why-we-are-so-sick/

Important quote from news story:

“We’re having patients that are tested several times for COVID, and then later on finding that it was Lyme Disease,” Vicki Petsy, president of the Kentucky Lyme Disease Association told WKYT’s Garrett Wymer. “And this is happening too much.”

My prediction: this will continue to happen.

Also important to note is the CDC’s statement that RMSF and Ehrlichiosis are the most common tick-borne illnesses in Kentucky and that Lyme used to be less common but is increasing, but then illogically state cases are ‘rare.’

With testing that misses over 70% of cases, I think we can surmise many are going undiagnosed:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/01/study-cdcs-2-tier-lyme-testing-inaccurate-in-more-than-70-of-cases/

It took Reid two weeks before getting a correct diagnosis.  This is actually pretty good considering many patients go YEARS without knowing they are infected with things that can kill them out right.  

It’s beyond time for accurate testing.

Dr. Sunetra Gupta Takes on Herd Immunity Nay-Sayers

https://unherd.com/2020/10/matt-hancock-is-wrong-about-herd-immunity/

Matt Hancock is wrong about herd immunity

Confusion about the Covid-19 science is hampering debate — and costing lives

BY

Yesterday in parliament, Matt Hancock explained to the house why, “on the substance”, the central claim of the Great Barrington Declaration was “emphatically not true”.

“Many diseases never reach herd immunity – including measles, malaria, AIDS and flu…” he said. “Herd immunity is a flawed goal – even if we could get to it, which we can’t.”  (See link for article)

___________________

**Comment**

Dr. Sunetra Gupta succinctly takes Hancock and other herd immunity nay-sayers to task.  She and two other epidemiologists have come up with The Great Barrington Declaration: HTTPS://GBDECLARATION.ORG

  • She points out that natural infection with measles provides life-long immunity and keeps risk of infection low.
  • Regarding malaria, we obtain some immunity when first infected so as to not suffer severe disease and death when further attacked, which she points out is probably also common with COVID-19.
  • Regarding AIDS she states rates of infection will slow as the virus runs out of hosts.
  • While the flu finds ways around herd immunity, it is unlikely for coronaviruses – including COVID-19.  If it can, it poses a serious problem for vaccine development.  
  • There is enough of the population with some level of immunity to coronaviruses to keep risk of infection low, and that being infected with one coronavirus will probably offer some protection against others.
  • There is no way to know how many have been exposed or resistant to COVID-19 but that attainment of the herd immunity threshold does not lead to disease eradication. It merely means we have reached an equilibrium state in which infections linger at low levels in the community. This is the situation we tolerate for most infectious diseases.
  • The Great Barrington Declaration proposes a solution in this face of uncertainty. It suggests that we exploit the fact COVID-19 does not cause much harm to most, and allows them to resume normal lives, while shielding those who are vulnerable.  Immunity will then build so there is a low enough risk of infection to the vulnerable population that they may resume their normal lives. All of this can happen over a period of six months.  Focused protection does not involve the permanent segregation of the vulnerable from the rest of the population.
  • Directing hospital and care homes is one obvious priority.
  • Gupta points out the GBD has been attacked by the media, including Wikipedia & Google (no shocker) but that serious scientists from top institutions suggests it has merit, but that good faith disagreements must be aired and discussed.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/06/covid-experts-there-is-another-way-please-sign-the-declaration/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2020/10/14/the-great-barrington-declaration-herd-immunity-strategies-for-coronavirus-overlook-8-problems/

Disulfiram for Lyme Update

https://www.treatlyme.net/guide/antabuse-disulfiram-chronic-lyme-disease-treatment  Go here for video

Updated: 10/9/2020

Marty Ross MD Discusses Disulfiram for Lyme Disease

About Disulfiram for Lyme

For many with chronic Lyme disease, disulfiram is a game changer. This is a medicine historically used to treat people with alcoholism. Ground-breaking research from Dr. Rajadas’ Stanford University lab in 2016 showed disulfiram can kill persister forms of Lyme disease… (See link for article and video)

____________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/01/study-shows-dsm-works-for-lyme-reduces-inflammatory-markers-antibody-titers/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/11/19/if-disulfiram-is-the-cure-for-lyme-disease-should-it-be-prescribed-to-all-lyme-disease-patients/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/07/14/disulfiram-breakthrough-drug-for-lyme-other-tick-borne-diseases/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/26/potential-patient-reported-toxicities-with-disulfiram-treatment-in-late-disseminated-lyme-disease/

FOI Asking UK Officials For Proof of Isolation of SARS-CoV 2 Virus. They Can’t Give it

https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/679566/response/1625332/attach/2/872%20FOI%20All%20records%20describing%20isolation%20of%20SARS%20COV%202.pdf?

page1image624Public Accountability Unit Wellington House 133-155 Waterloo Road London SE1 8UG

 

T 020 8327 6920 http://www.gov.uk/phe

20 August 2020

request-679566-e6380751@whatdotheyknow.com

Our ref: 24/07/hf/872

Dear Andrew Johnson,

Re: Documents held showing SARS-COV2 has been isolated and Causes COVID-19

Thank you for your email dated 24 July 2020. In accordance with Section 1(1)(a) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (the Act), I can confirm that Public Health England (PHE) does not hold the information you have specified.

Your Request

All records in the possession, custody or control of Public Health England describing the isolation of a SARS-COV-2 virus, directly from a sample taken from a diseased patient, where the patient sample was not first combined with any other source of genetic material (i.e. monkey kidney cells aka vero cells; liver cancer cells).

Please note that I am using “isolation” in the every-day sense of the word: the act of separating a thing(s) from everything else. I am not requesting records where “isolation of SARS-COV-2” refers *instead* to:

• the culturing of something, or
• the performance of an amplification test (i.e. a PCR test), or • the sequencing of something.

Please also note that my request is not limited to records that were authored by the PHE or that pertain to work done by the PHE. My request includes any sort of record, for example (but not limited to) any published peer-reviewed study that the PHE has downloaded or printed.

Please provide enough information about each record so that I may identify and access each record with certainty (i.e. title, author(s), date, journal, wherethe public may access it).”

Response

PHE can confirm it does not hold information in the way suggested by your request.

Under section 16 of the Act, public authorities have a duty to provide advice and assistance. I have signposted you to the below links which contain information on taking COVID-19 swabs.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/covid-19-guidance-for-taking-swab- samples https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/types-and-uses-of-coronavirus-covid- 19-tests/types-and-uses-of-coronavirus-covid-19-tests

Additionally, the below publication contains some information on virus isolation:

https://www.eurosurveillance.org/content/10.2807/1560- 7917.ES.2020.25.32.2001483

If you have any queries regarding the information that has been supplied to you, please refer your query to in writing in the first instance. If you remain dissatisfied and would like to request an internal review, then please contact us at the address

above or by emailing foi@phe.gov.uk.

Please note that you have the right to an independent review by the InformationCommissioner’s Office if a complaint cannot be resolved through the PHE complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner’s Office can be contacted by writing to Information Commissioner’s Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow,Cheshire, SK9 5AF.

Yours sincerely, FOI Team

___________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/16/does-the-coronavirus-exist/

This house of cards has been pointed out by Crowe, Torsten, and Engelbrecht decades ago: https://www.torstenengelbrecht.com/en/virus-mania/

From my lay-man’s understanding, somewhere along the line, viral research took a left turn and no longer singularly isolates and purifies virus from all else. According to Crowe, what’s being picked up are bits and pieces they are labeling “virus,” which may not be infective or causative of disease at all. Yet based upon this house of cards, governors and politicians are forcing people to wear masks (which don’t work), social distance, and fear a phantom that has yet to be clearly identified.

It’s imperative virologists address this foundational issue because until they do, “virus mania” isn’t going away and will be used repeatedly in the future just as it has been used in the past.

I highly, highly recommend Torsten/Engelbrecht’s book as it reveals how this foundational issue goes back to HIV, Ebola, Swine Flu, and others. 

Important to note: without this isolation/purification from all else, accurate tests and/or vaccines will never occur.  Products are only as sensitive/effective as the material from which they are derived from. This article reveals how arbitrary thresholds are used in testing (to either inflate or deflate case numbers):  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/30/coronavirus-cases-plummet-when-pcr-tests-are-adjusted/  In the case of COVID, these arbitrary thresholds inflate case numbers, as shown by this article that the test can’t distinguish between virus and viral fragments:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/14/tests-for-sars-cov-2-in-south-korea-cant-distinguish-virus-from-viral-fragments/

This issue has long been a thorn in the sides of Lyme/MSIDS patients:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/01/study-cdcs-2-tier-lyme-testing-inaccurate-in-more-than-70-of-cases/  In the case of Lyme/MSIDS, arbitrary thresholds have notoriously deflated case numbers.  The CDC has finally recognized this severe underreporting of cases; however, little has been done about it and the abysmal reliance on faulty testing continues on unabated. Due to CDC direction, doctors and authorities malign smaller CLIA-certified labs that specialize in virology and bacteriology for Lyme/MSIDS testing, and actually call them “home brewed.”  Please see:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/26/cdc-playbook-learning-from-lyme/

Another important read about the creator of the PCR:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/  Excerpt:

One time, in 1994, when I called to talk to him about how PCR was being weaponized to “prove,” almost a decade after it was asserted, that HIV caused AIDS, he actually came to tears.

Kary Mullis was a scientist. He never spoke like a globalist, and said once, memorably, when accused of making statements about HIV that could endanger lives: “I’m a scientist. I’m not a lifeguard.” That’s a very important line in the sand. Somebody who goes around claiming they are “saving lives,” is a very dangerous animal, and you should run in the opposite direction when you encounter them. Their weapon is fear, and their favorite word is “could.” They entrap you with a form of bio-debt, creating simulations of every imaginable thing that “could” happen, yet hasn’t. Bill Gates has been waiting a long time for a virus with this much, as he put it, “pandemic potential.” But Gates has a problem, and it’s called PCR.