Archive for the ‘Treatment’ Category

Investigations of Medical Cover-Ups & Pharma Scandals

https://rumble.com/v5gv4fd-sharyl-attkisson-my-investigations-of-medical-cover-ups-and-pharma-scandals.html Video Here (Approx. 50 Min)

Sharyl Attkisson: My Investigations of Medical Cover-Ups and Pharma Scandals

Sep-26-2024

Sharyl Attkisson is an investigative journalist and the Emmy Award-winning host of “Full Measure.” She is also the author of several books, including, most recently, “Follow The Science: How Big Pharma Misleads, Obscures, and Prevails.”

“Why am I as a non-medical reporter unearthing stories that this whole industry of medical and science reporters are not unearthing?” she asks.

In this episode, we dive into the problem of scientific and medical corruption, and how Attkisson’s eyes were opened to the dangers of blindly believing every establishment narrative about our health.

“The federal government/pharmaceutical industry have learned how to take our taxpayer money, legally launder them through universities—public and private, who then say they don’t have to reply to your FOIA requests or turn over any data, who then put out studies that are little more than narratives and propaganda that go unchallenged,” says Attkisson.

“The health of the individual and their informed consent is far paramount to what you think you are doing for the good of mankind. You don’t have the right, as a researcher, to say, ‘I can sacrifice this child or I can sacrifice something about informed consent because I think I have a more noble goal.’ That’s not your right.”

For more:

The ‘Remdesivir Papers’: NIH COVID Panel Learned Zilch & 12 Policies Must Be Changed For Health Freedom

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/remdesivir-papers-drug-military-members-941-deaths/?

‘Remdesivir Papers’ Allege Controversial Drug Used to Treat Service Members Led to 601 Deaths

A military whistleblower released a series of documents revealing that the military began “liberally” administering remdesivir to service members who were suspected of having COVID-19 — months before the FDA approved the drug.

remdesivir bottle and stack of files

A military whistleblower released a series of documents revealing 601 deaths of military service members and a high rate of serious adverse events in clinical trials involving remdesivir, an antiviral commonly administered to COVID-19 patients during the pandemic.

According to “The Remdesivir Papers,” some clinical trials were improperly run. In the case of at least one study, results were never made public. The whistleblower also alleged a widespread lack of informed consent for trial participants.

“Data derived from the Department of Defense [DOD] Joint Trauma System … by a military whistleblower offers a stark contrast to results of multiple clinical trials involving the liberal usage of remdesivir in military treatment facilities and other civilian facilities, as well as its potential contribution to, at minimum, hundreds of untimely deaths,” the documents state.

Yet according to the documents, the military began “liberally” administering remdesivir to service members who were suspected of having COVID-19 — months before the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the drug.

The whistleblower, known by the pseudonym Daniel LeMay, shared the documents with investigative journalist J.M. Phelps, who published them last week in The Gateway Pundit.

In interviews with The Defender, LeMay and Phelps discussed the documents and their significance.  (See link for article)

Important excerpt:

Former victims of the COVID-19 hospital protocols, which included administration of remdesivir, and advocates for those victims welcomed the documents’ release.

________________

**Comment**

This needs to go public. Public officials need to be held to account for the fraudulent ‘trials’ of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine in order to preclude their use, making remdesivir the standard of care despite the obvious data showing that it kills people.  More whistleblowers need to come forward.

Gulick et al, published a “lessons learned” paper in Annals of Internal Medicine and missed the point entirely regarding ivermectin which exceeded all other drugs. Doctors and patients are finding success with ivermectin in combination with other nutraceuticals and drugs.  To make matters worse, the NIH guidelines advised against using ivermectin, which impeded doctors on the front line who found it effective and a part of community standard of care.

I highly recommend reading COVID ‘vaccine’ science catching up with ‘conspiracy theorists.’  Important excerpt:

Of course, while the science is starting to catch up, and the lawsuits are continuing apace (source), we’re still being told by our governments and mainstream media to roll up our sleeves, even those of us as young as 6 months. Source and source.

Okay then.

I’m with Dr. Vinay Prasad who once again candidly reiterates ‘mistakes were not made,’ and there should be no amnesty for COVID tyrants who are still lying.

Not only are they still lying, untold numbers of doctors have been persecuted by The Machine for simply doing their jobs and treating people.  Many lost their medical licenses and can no longer practice medicine.  This too has not been admitted or rectified by The Establishment.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/12-policies-need-change-true-health-freedom/?

These 12 Policies Need to Change If We Want True Health Freedom

In a free and moral society, health freedom is not simply a convenience — it’s an imperative.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
statue of liberty and hand holding stethoscope

As a requirement for discussing and appreciating the imperative of health freedom in the U.S., we must first define what is meant by health freedom.

A simple definition is the right of every American to decide what medical interventions to put into or onto one’s body, the right to access and use the medical and healing modalities of one’s choice, the right to maintain one’s health according to one’s conscience and the right to live free of involuntary medication be it via the food supply, the water supply or something airborne.

In a free and moral society, health freedom is not simply a convenience; it’s an imperative.

In this vein, in the event of injury or illness, all Americans must possess the absolute right to choose what medical interventions and treatments to accept and what medical or healing modalities to utilize in order to address illness or injury; Americans must be free to choose how to maintain their health whether that be through nutrition, supplements, herbs, drugs or a myriad of healing modalities; Americans must have access to truthful information regarding how the seeds for plants and animal feed and the food in our food supply has been grown or developed, medicated, processed and packaged; and Americans have the right to exist in a society free of water and airborne medications, insect vectors and chemicals.

Health freedom can only exist in a free and moral society that values each and every member of that society. This prerequisite thus excludes medical mandates of any kind. It is immoral to force another individual to risk their life for the theoretical benefit of another.

Moreover, the government does not have the moral authority or power to dictate what medical products any American puts into or on his or her body. If anyone in government does possess that power, then no American is truly free, nor does he or she possess any meaningful right whatsoever — Americans are merely chattel.

In order to create a society based on true health freedom, the following policy shifts should be implemented, as a first step. There are many more changes that should be implemented as well, but these proposals would address some of the most glaring, pernicious anti-liberty and anti-health aspects of our system as it exists today:

1. Ban all medical mandates

The Declaration of Independence states, “that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Medical mandates are prima facie violations of our founding documents.

Health freedom demands prior voluntary informed consent before a medical treatment or intervention is administered. Medical mandates are thus, by definition, antithetical to voluntary consent and therefore must be prohibited in a free and moral society.

No single individual in government knows the medical history of any American, knows what is best for Americans, or has to live with the repercussions of any choices made by Americans, thus, medical mandates are never justified in any circumstance.

2. Repeal the Bayh-Dole Act

“The Bayh-Dole Act, formerly known as the Patent and Trademark Act Amendments, is a federal law enacted in 1980 that enables universities, nonprofit research institutions and small businesses to own, patent and commercialize inventions developed under federally funded research programs within their organizations.”

Under this program, government scientists may receive up to $150,000 per year on their patents.

In theory, Bayh-Dole incentivizes bright scientists to seek employment at federal health agencies rather than entering more lucrative private industry by allowing these taxpayer-funded scientists and other individuals and entities to retain the patent rights to intellectual property developed during their taxpayer-funded research and development activities.

In practice, this Act forever realigned the interests of taxpayer-funded scientists away from the American people and toward their own interests and profits and the profits of the private industries with which they collaborate.

Dr. Anthony Fauci and his team at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases infamously owned half of the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine patent which incentivized the misguided COVID-19-era policies leading to a colossal violation of the rights of Americans demonstrating the perverse incentives created by Bayh-Dole and the necessity of repealing the act.

3. Repeal the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) of 1992

“The Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) was created by Congress in 1992 and authorizes FDA [U.S. Food and Drug Administration] to collect user fees from persons that submit certain human drug applications for review or that are named in approved applications as the sponsor of certain prescription drug products. Since the passage of PDUFA, user fees have played an important role in expediting the drug review and approval process.”

In 2022 alone, the pharmaceutical industry paid $2.9 billion in user fees amounting to 46% of the FDA’s entire budget including $1.4 billion or 66% for their drug approvers’ salaries and $197 million or 43% of the biologics (vaccines) program budget.

As a direct consequence of PDUFA, the FDA has a vested interest aligned with the profits and success of the pharmaceutical industry rather than the health and well-being of the American people.

4. Repeal the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act) which authorizes the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to issue a PREP Act declaration.

“The declaration provides immunity from liability (except for willful misconduct) for claims:

    • of loss caused, arising out of, relating to, or resulting from administration or use of countermeasures to diseases, threats and conditions
    • determined by the Secretary to constitute a present, or credible risk of a future public health emergency
    • to entities and individuals involved in the development, manufacture, testing, distribution, administration, and use of such countermeasures

“A PREP Act declaration is specifically for the purpose of providing immunity from liability, and is different from, and not dependent on, other emergency declarations.”

The PREP Act desecrates the ethical principle of informed consent by protecting individuals from liability even when they expressly act contrary to patients’ wishes and instructions and must be repealed.

5. Repeal the Affordable Care Act

The Affordable Care Act anchors Americans to the pharmaceutical and drug-based medical paradigm even though a majority of Americans used at least one form of “alternative” medicine in 2021 and spent $30.6 billion in out-of-pocket expenses for those holistic medicine services in 2023 according to Statista.

Instead, implement a health savings program that permits Americans to access the health and medical modalities of their choice which in turn would foster more competition and reduce the exorbitant healthcare costs in the U.S. by breaking the extant monopolies held by the medical and insurance industries.

6. Repeal the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA)

NCVIA shields vaccine makers from liability (except for willful misconduct), creating a perverse incentive to industry to develop a never-ending stream of vaccines which are then mandated by the states.

Further, the NCVIA protects industry and vaccine programs by creating a separate administrative federal court structure lacking due process and discovery, managed by “Special Masters” instead of judges, all in violation of the constitutionally protected right to due process.

While NCVIA contains other provisions designed to protect American families and ensure the safety of the national vaccine supply, Congress is not conducting proper oversight and the promises made in 1986 at the time of the Act’s passage have not been upheld.

As such, Americans who have been injured or killed by vaccines are left with astronomical medical bills and to fend for themselves.

7. Prohibit private donations to government entities

Prohibit private individuals, foundations, corporations, contractors and any other person or entity from donating or otherwise giving money to any agency or entity of the federal government.

The FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) accept money from private actors such as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and Pfizer, thus skewing the interests of the agency in favor of these private actors and away from the American public.

Gates has collaborated with the FDA and the CDC Foundation takes money from the pharmaceutical industry whose products the CDC is responsible for monitoring for safety.

8. Cooling-off period for senior federal employees

Enact a five-year cooling-off period before which agency leadership, deputies and other key officials may depart federal agencies in order to enter the companies they regulate in the private sector.

9. Prevent conflicts of interest

Eliminate conflict-of-interest waivers so that no person serving on a health agency committee, board or other regulatory entity may have a conflict of interest. Disclosure of conflicts of interest is insufficient to ensure the agencies pursue the interests of the American people. Individuals with financial or ideological conflicts of interest should not serve as decision-makers in any capacity.

10. Prohibit government grants to nonprofits

Prohibit the government from allocating taxpayer dollars to nonprofits. Nonprofits exists to serve the public interests and should be funded directly by American citizens. If a nonprofit has a worthwhile mission, the public will gladly support it.

Government exists to protect our rights and should not be in the business of picking winners and losers nor should it be using third parties to pursue policies outside the reach and review of the public.

11. Ban water fluoridation

While water fluoridation programs are widespread, they are not only dangerous from a health standpoint, they are forced medication in violation of the ethical principle of informed consent.

Research comparing the health outcomes and IQs of communities that do and do not fluoridate their water supply reveals that children in the fluoridated water communities have reduced IQs and therefore inferior prospects in life. Other research has documented the health hazards of fluoride, an industrial waste product.

In addition, as fluoride is added to municipal water supplies, residents of those communities have no way to opt out and therefore are subjected to involuntary forced medication. No one should be forced to consume drugged water in order to maintain a biological necessity.

12. Ban the release of genetically modified insects

Two tenets of good health are abundant exposure to sunshine and fresh air; however, in some states, the state governments have collaborated with private businesses to release genetically modified mosquitoes into communities.

While these mosquitoes are often designed to breed with one another and eliminate the dangerous species going forward, the health impacts of humans being bitten by these insects are not well understood. Nor should a person have to risk being bitten by one of these creatures in order to venture outside. This amounts to a form of forced medication absent any form of consent and must be ended.

These recommendations should be understood as necessary first steps to begin correcting the disastrous health policy environment that exists in the U.S. today and to restore true health freedom in the U.S., which would allow all Americans to decide what medical interventions to allow into or onto one’s body, which health and medical modalities to utilize in maintaining their health and the ability to live free of involuntary medication be it via the food supply, the water supply or the air we breathe.

Originally published by Brownstone Institute.

Leslie Manookian is the president and founder of the Health Freedom Defense Fund. She is a former successful Wall Street business executive. Her career in finance took her from New York to London with Goldman Sachs. She later became director of Alliance Capital in London running their European growth portfolio management and research businesses.

Revolutionizing Lyme Disease Care for Patients

https://www.globallymealliance.org/blog/ravel-health?

Ravel Health is revolutionizing Lyme disease care with affordable, virtual, and personalized treatment options for chronic illness patients.

Perhaps you’ve been diagnosed with Lyme or other tick-borne illness. Maybe you’ve been suffering with chronic symptoms for years but have yet to receive a diagnosis. In either case, you want to see a Lyme literate medical provider (often referred to as LLMD), but you find yourself up against several barriers: wait-lists are months to years long. Providers don’t take insurance, and their rates are prohibitively expensive. You can’t find a provider in your area, and don’t have the energy or the means to travel. Sound familiar?

Chronic Lyme patients Kevin Williams and Jaime Intile know first-hand the frustrations that patients face in gaining access to treatment, so they’ve created a better way. Global Lyme Alliance is proud to partner with Williams and Intile’s company, Ravel Health, which specializes in matching patients with affordable, virtual care for Lyme, mold, and complex illness.

Available in ten states with the hope to be nationwide by 2025, Ravel Health offers subscription-based services that quickly match patients to vetted care teams who provide personalized telehealth including testing, treatment plans, prescriptions, and supplements.

“Ravel Health aims to simplify the Lyme journey from start to finish…”

“It can take a long time between onset of symptoms and diagnosis, and then getting a diagnosis is only half the battle,” Williams says. “We wanted to build something that we would have loved to have.” Unlike traditional medical practices, Ravel Health aims to simplify the Lyme journey from start to finish:

  • No medical gaslighting or saying “it’s all in your head”
  • No waitlists to see a vetted Lyme-literate provider
  • Personalized provider/patient matching
  • Conventional, Functional, and Integrative treatment options
  • Affordable 30, 60, or 90-minute monthly appointments with ability to upgrade or downgrade on a monthly basis
  • Significant discounts on labs and supplements
  • Everything done from the comfort of home

How does it work?

Ravel Health providers, including MDs, NDs, and NPs, go through a strict screening process. Each has at least six years of experience treating Lyme and chronic illness and is vetted through Williams and Intile themselves, and then through Ravel’s Chief Medical Officer.

After filling out a short questionnaire, patients are matched with up to three Lyme-literate providers in their state. Williams and Intile review initial questionnaires with the Chief Medical Officer to figure out the best possible fits based on individual patient preferences. Patients then choose from up to three providers. “We want patients to select providers based on fit, such as a provider’s specialties or treatment philosophy,” says Williams.

Patients also choose between affordable monthly subscription plans that offer different appointment lengths and intervals based on individual need. No matter the subscription, patients will always have ready access to providers, with guaranteed monthly appointments and guaranteed portal responses within three business days. “We believe deeply in continuity of care,” says Williams. “When a patient is having a flare, they need to be able to contact their provider or get an appointment booked. We want to make sure patients aren’t left hanging.”

Providers use evidence-supported labs and treatment protocols, personalizing them for each patient. Recommended test kits, lab orders, medications and supplements are sent directly to patient’s homes, with the option of mobile blood draws in certain areas. And Ravel Health’s simple model doesn’t just benefit patients. “We provide wraparound services so providers can focus on treatment,” Williams notes. Providers have a built-in community with whom they can share complex cases and ask questions.

What are patients saying?

Ravel Health ran a pilot from October to March with seven providers and thirty patients. The results were incredibly positive. Knowing that providers are vetted and curated, and knowing that they wouldn’t be medically gaslighted, put patients at ease. Patients know that Williams and Intile understand what they’re going through and have been through it themselves, so they trust they’re in good hands. “That piece is key for patients,” says Williams. He adds that having everything streamlined was refreshing for patients, as well as having options to choose from. Since Lyme and chronic illness strips patients of so much agency, Williams says, “We want to give patients as much choice as possible.”

Why Ravel?

Besides offering affordable, streamlined, and timely care from knowledgeable providers, Ravel focuses on the patient journey to health, as evidenced by the company’s name. With Lyme disease, life often unravels as patients fight for diagnosis, treatment, validation, and their health. Ravel Health helps patients ravel their health back together. “We are changing the way Lyme patients are treated,” says Williams.

To learn more about Williams and Intile, watch their episode on The Tick Chicks.

To learn more about Ravel Health, visit ravel.health

Ravel is available in CO, CT, IA, MN, MT, NE, PA, TX, WA & WI. To become a patient, go to https://ravel.health/get_started.

***

COVID Resistance After Paxlovid Not Found With Ivermectin or HCQ

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2824050?#google_vignette

Abstract

Importance  Previous studies have identified mutations in SARS-CoV-2 strains that confer resistance to nirmatrelvir, yet how often this resistance arises and its association with posttreatment virologic rebound is not well understood.

Objective  To examine the prevalence of emergent antiviral resistance after nirmatrelvir treatment and its association with virologic rebound.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study enrolled outpatient adults with acute COVID-19 infection from May 2021 to October 2023. Participants were divided into those who received antiviral therapy and those who did not. The study was conducted at a multicenter health care system in Boston, Massachusetts.

Exposure  Treatment regimen, including none, nirmatrelvir (paxlovid), and remdesivir.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was emergent SARS-CoV-2 antiviral resistance, defined as the detection of antiviral resistance mutations, which were not present at baseline, were previously associated with decreased antiviral efficacy, and emerged during or after completion of a participant’s treatment. Next-generation sequencing was used to detect low frequency mutations down to 1% of the total viral population.

Results  Overall, 156 participants (114 female [73.1%]; median [IQR] age, 56 [38-69] years) were included. Compared with 63 untreated individuals, the 79 who received nirmatrelvir were older and more commonly immunosuppressed. After sequencing viral RNA from participants’ anterior nasal swabs, nirmatrelvir resistance mutations were detected in 9 individuals who received nirmatrelvir (11.4%) compared with 2 of those who did not (3.2%) (P = .09). Among the individuals treated with nirmatrelvir, those who were immunosuppressed had the highest frequency of resistance emergence (5 of 22 [22.7%]), significantly greater than untreated individuals (2 of 63 [3.1%]) (P = .01). Similar rates of nirmatrelvir resistance were found in those who had virologic rebound (3 of 23 [13.0%]) vs those who did not (6 of 56 [10.7%]) (P = .86). Most of these mutations (10 of 11 [90.9%]) were detected at low frequencies (<20% of viral population) and reverted to the wild type at subsequent time points. Emerging remdesivir resistance mutations were only detected in immunosuppressed individuals (2 of 14 [14.3%]) but were similarly low frequency and transient. Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data analysis showed no evidence of increased nirmatrelvir resistance in the United States after the authorization of nirmatrelvir.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this cohort study of 156 participants, treatment-emergent nirmatrelvir resistance mutations were commonly detected, especially in individuals who were immunosuppressed. However, these mutations were generally present at low frequencies and were transient in nature, suggesting a low risk for the spread of nirmatrelvir resistance in the community with the current variants and drug usage patterns.

_______________

No such resistence has been seen using ivermectin and HCQ.

http://

Functional Pharmacist Analyzes Ivermectin 2024 Update

Dr. Dan Zatarski explains the mechanism of actions of Ivermectin. He reviews the discovery of ivermectin and helps to illustrate the use of ivermectin compared to penicillin.

https://justusrhope.substack.com/p/topical-ivermectin-and-fenbendazole?

Topical Ivermectin & Fenbendazole for Cancer & Disease

Multiple Case Reports & Before and After Photos

Another MSM Hit Piece – Lyme Disease: The ‘Yuppie Virus’ With Dangerous False Diagnoses

https://www.thetimes.com/world/us-world/article/lyme-disease-symptoms-serena-williams-alexis-ohainan-dltvc9pcb

Lyme disease: the ‘yuppie virus’ with dangerous false diagnoses

Half a million Americans say they have it — but a slew of celebrity cases is prompting a post-Covid rethink
Bevan Hurley

The Times

Alexis Ohanian, the co-founder of Reddit and husband of the tennis star Serena Williams, was perplexed.

He was showing no symptoms of Lyme disease, and had not spent much time in the wilderness or northeastern US states where the ticks that carry it are most prevalent. And yet, after a “full battery of health scans”, his doctor had told him that he was infected.

Ohanian, 41, who lives in Florida with Williams and their two children, revealed the diagnosis to his 560,000 followers on Twitter/X last month, saying it had taken him by surprise. He was careful to ensure that his personal experience would not be taken as medical advice. “Please talk to a doctor,” he said.  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

First off the bat, let’s be clear: MSM hasn’t done any thinking revolving anything about COVID.

Second – if you understand ‘controllers,’ you know that intervention is eventually needed when enough people start questioning the narrative.  Since people are talking about the fact there is an estimated 500,000 NEW cases of Lyme/MSIDS per year, it’s time for the spin-doctors to get busy.  Too many are questioning things.  Too many are asking to be tested.  Too many are getting fed up with doctors who gas-light them instead of helping them.

Enter MSM – a monolithic entity paid by Big Pharma which will do anything to protect its vested interests, including lie or distort facts.

Once you’ve seen it often enough you become aware of the thinly veiled journalism designed to make you doubt what you see with your own eyes, hear with your own ears, and even personally experience.

The article starts out by regurgitating well known disputed Lyme dogma:

  • can cause fever, chills, headache, fatigue, and muscle and joint aches
  • between 5-10% descend into PTLDS and get arthritis, chronic pain, heart palpitations, and brain inflammation

Let’s stop here and state emphatically that Lyme/MSIDS can and does kill people.  Let’s also state emphatically that this complex illness can destroy your life, income, family, and all you hold dear.

OK, now that we got that out of the way…..the article then states that ‘celebrity tell-alls and rampant pseudoscience’ is fueling misdiagnoses.

What about the thousands upon thousands that have been misdiagnosed for decades with virtually everything under the sun when they were infected with Lyme/MSIDS and immediate treatment could have made a real or THE difference?

The usual perps are presented for this angle: mainly representation from the American Lyme Disease Foundation (ALDF), who are known Lyme denialists.  This representative states practitioners are ‘unqualified’ because they have no infectious disease experience and are ‘cashing in’ by selling unreliable blood testing products and treatment.

This refrain is as old as time and is shear propaganda by controllers who want you to believe that only the government can protect consumers by monopolizing testing and treatment.  Well, they have done just that for over 40 years.  Let me ask you, ‘how’s that going?’  Nowhere, that’s where.

Particularly attacked were vitamin supplements and ozone therapy – two of the safest, most effective general treatments that help virtually everything!  But since the FDA can’t do any under the table deals with Big Pharma and make money off them, they are verboten!   

The article also hones in on ‘false positives,’ with Lyme but doesn’t utter a peep over the vast false positives with COVID, along with counting all deaths as COVID, that were purposely used to create a the illusion of vast cases and deaths.

Current Lyme testing is so flawed that a statistical analysis by Cook and Puri found that the LD two-tiered testing resulted in 500 times more false-negative outcomes than similar two-tiered tests used in the diagnosis of AIDS.  

The article also pushes the highly politicized climate change agenda when there is great controversy on many issues within this highly controlled paradigm, and independent research has shown it has nothing to do with tick proliferation or transmission.

While the article is at least honest enough to recognize that countries with nationalized health care struggle even more because there’s ‘there’s no system for them to go outside of,’ and that at least in the U.S. you can still find a doctor who is independent and can think for himself/herself.  But, how long will this last?

According to the author, the oft repeated belief that more funding to the same institutions that have denied Lyme/MSIDS from the get-go is somehow the answer, despite all evidence to the contrary.

Article grade: D