Archive for the ‘Treatment’ Category

Hospital COVID Protocols: The Grace Schara Case (WI)

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/hospital-covid-protocols-the-grace?

Hospital COVID Protocols: The Grace Schara Case

IMA Co-Founders Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Joseph Varon are joined by Scott Schara and his attorney Warner Mendenhall to discuss medical advocacy, advance directives, and hospital accountability.
Independent Medical Alliance's avatar
Independent Medical Alliance
Jul 06, 2025

When Grace Schara died in a Wisconsin hospital during the COVID pandemic, her family began asking difficult questions about consent, protocol, and patient rights. This week, IMA Co-Founders Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Joseph Varon are joined by Grace’s father, Scott Schara, and his attorney, Warner Mendenhall of Freedom Counsel, to revisit the case and discuss the broader implications for medical advocacy, advance directives, and hospital accountability.

We’ll explore the concerns raised around medication protocols, Do Not Intubate orders, and access to records—alongside the lessons learned about legal barriers, family involvement, and the importance of independent medical advocates. The conversation is shaped by IMA’s longstanding commitment to restoring the doctor-patient relationship and building safeguards that empower patients and families.

Whether you’re entering the hospital yourself or bringing a loved one for care, the assumption is that medical staff will do everything possible to help. But the tragic story of 19-year-old Grace reveals just how wrong things can go when trust breaks down, protocols fail, and communication vanishes.

Grace Schara entered St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Wisconsin with low oxygen saturation during the COVID pandemic in October 2021. Her father, Scott Schara, believed she would simply receive oxygen therapy and come home safely. Instead, Grace passed away just days later under circumstances that sparked outrage and questions nationwide.

In the years following, Scott’s grief turned to advocacy, ultimately leading to Schara v. Ascension Health, the first COVID-era hospital negligence case in America to reach a jury trial. The landmark lawsuit, concluded on June 19, 2025, lasted three weeks and was passionately argued by a dedicated legal team led by Warner Mendenhall and Freedom Counsel.

Despite compelling expert testimony and a deeply sympathetic case, the jury ruled in favor of the hospital. Still, Scott and Warner remain undeterred. Their fight for justice continues—and so does the urgent conversation their case has sparked. In this powerful webinar, they reflect on what went wrong, what patients and families need to know, and how all of us, providers included, can help prevent tragedies like this from happening again.

Misunderstandings: “Do Not Intubate” (DNI) and “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR)

Regardless of the jury’s verdict, the case has opened the door to vital lessons every patient, family, and provider needs to understand.

IMA co-founders, doctors Joseph Varon and Paul Marik, both experienced critical care physicians at Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), weighed in addressing the shocking failures in Grace’s care. They highlighted systemic misunderstandings around crucial terms like “Do Not Intubate” (DNI) and “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR).

Dr. Marik explained:

“DNR means when a person is dead… not to resuscitate them. That’s what it means. It doesn’t mean do not treat, do not manage. It’s only when a patient is actually dead, heart has stopped beating and they’re clinically dead, that you do cardiopulmonary resuscitation… the DNI part complicates the issue.”

Dr. Varon emphasized the critical role of open, honest communication:

“I’m sure that if somebody told you ‘do not intubate’ means ‘do not resuscitate,’ you would have said ‘go ahead and intubate right now.’”

Under any circumstances, it’s unreasonable to expect patients and families to decode complex medical terminology in moments of crisis. But COVID has made one thing painfully clear: we must be prepared to ask questions, advocate for ourselves and our loved ones, and demand clarity.  (See link for article and video)

______________

For more:

The hospital COVID scam via The CARES Act:

Hospital protocols killed people:

The concerted strategy to ban effective COVID treatment, allowing the clot shots to be deployed:

CDC monopolizes fraudulent COVID testing:

Category:

Activism, Supplements, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Covid Shots Induce Cancer in 17 Distinct Ways According to More Than 100 Studies & ‘Vaccine’ Exemptions Online Talk July 22, 2025

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/modified-mrna-slow-kill-bioweaponvaccines

by Mathilde Debord

Article Excerpts:

Is mass vaccination against COVID causing an explosion in cancer cases, as many scientists claim, some of whom had it prophesied from May 2021 ? A collective of French oncologists published two years ago a platform in which they categorically refute this hypothesis: ” To date, no alert link has been published between an increased incidence or risk of rapid progression of cancer after COVID-19 vaccination or after another vaccination.” Today they claim to be confronted with a tsunami of dazzling cancers, particularly among young people, to which they say they find no rational explanation:

We have a rapid increase in pancreatic cancer without us having the slightest idea of the reason. Something happened? We do not know. The whole world, all of world oncology is asking itself the question. […] The system that allows us to understand cancer is faulty.

Professor Khayat, co-founder of InCA

If Professor Khayat is consistent, he cannot theoretically exclude that vaccination could be at the origin of this explosion of cancer cases since it is (1) extremely recent if we refer to his previous interventions, (2) it affects the entire planet –in particular populations who have been forced to inject to maintain a social life or who have aggressively promoted vaccination (influencers in particular) –, and (3) it seems to respond to an unprecedented logic. As would a substance used for the first time in humans, of which only part of the composition is known and whose impact on cancer has not been assessed before its massive deployment[1].

Epidemiologist Nicolas Huscher listed last March 10 Ways Anti-COVID Messenger RNA Injections Can Cause Cancer. This list, resulting from a study[2] published in December 2023 in the journal Cureus can in our opinion be extended today to 17 items based (non-exhaustive) on more than 100 studies.  (See link for article)

________________

The 17 Ways are as follows:

  1. Genome instability
  2. Immune evasion
  3. Mechanism of repair of altered DNA
  4. Chronic inflammation
  5. Dysregulation of the immune system
  6. RNA disruption
  7. Activation of oncogenic pathways
  8. Tumor microenvironment
  9. Awakening of dormant cancers
  10. Impaired immune monitoring
  11. Frame offset (frameshift)
  12. Multiple injections
  13. DNA contamination of the Pfizer & Moderna shots
  14. DNA sequences of oncogenic SV40 in Pfizer shot
  15. Deregulation of the renin-angiotensin system
  16. Destruction of the microbiota
  17. Increased resistance to treatments

The articles gives the Joe Tippens Protocol for cancer.

For more:

‘Vaccine’ Exemptions

With Mary Holland

Date: July 22, 2025

Time:  8pm ET

Join us as we discuss vaccine exemptions and what you need to know about your legal rights as you navigate the educational school system, at all levels. For this UpClose, I will be joined by Kim Mack Rosenberg, General Counsel for Children’s Health Defense, and Kevin Barry, Esq., who has been advocating and supporting families as they navigate New York vaccine exemptions, which are among some of the most restrictive in the nation. 

As always, we will leave ample time for our experts to answer your questions. However, this month you will have the opportunity to submit questions prior to the event. A link to submit your questions will be provided after you register, with submissions accepted until Friday, July 18th. We hope this format will allow our experts to address more specific questions and concerns. Please note that not all submitted questions will be answered, and any information shared should not be considered legal advice but general guidance. 

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/support/about-chd-upclose3  Register Here

CHD hosts monthly UpClose virtual events and various UpClose InPerson events throughout the year for supporters who donate $10 or more within one year of the event date, or are current recurring donors.

For more:

Category:

Cancer, Treatment, vaccines

Lyme Treatment Explained: Co-infections & Complex Cases

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/lyme-treatment-explained-co-infections

Lyme Treatment Explained: Co-infections and Complex Cases

IMA Senior Fellow Dr. Yusuf (JP) Saleeby hosts Part 3 in a series of Weekly Webinars on diagnosing and treating Lyme Disease.
Independent Medical Alliance's avatar
Independent Medical Alliance
Jun 28, 2025

Speakers: Dr. Yusuf (JP) Saleeby, Dr. Tom Moorcroft, Chris Jackman, FNP

Lyme disease is notoriously difficult to treat, but it’s even more complex than most realize. That’s because Lyme doesn’t always travel alone. Associated tick-borne co-infections like Bartonella and Babesia can mimic or mask Lyme symptoms, requiring different treatments to resolve. This reality turns Lyme treatment into a winding, uncertain road for patients and providers alike.

Luckily, we’ve enlisted some of the world’s top experts in Lyme and chronic disease to help demystify this debilitating condition. Join IMA Senior Fellow Dr. JP Saleeby as he hosts a practical conversation with Lyme specialist Dr. Tom Moorcroft and integrative nurse practitioner Chris Jackman. Together, they’ll break down what makes Lyme so persistent, how co-infections complicate recovery, and what successful treatment protocols can look like in the real world.

This is the third installment in IMA’s Lyme Disease series—an essential session for patients, practitioners, and anyone trying to make sense of this often-misunderstood chronic condition. Catch up with the previous episodes here:  (See link for article and video seminars)

More from IMA on Lyme:

Check out our ever-expanding Lyme Library for more:

_________________

For more:

One things for sure: a multi-drug combination is required for this.  Doctors who still prescribe ONE drug for this are hopelessly in the dark.  I would even add that ONE drug for an acute case isn’t enough and that tinidazole should be pulsed along with daily doxycycyline or minocycline until symptoms are completely gone.  I would also recommend blood ozone – the stronger the better – EBOO preferably.  If other coinfection symptoms arise – then the drugs that are effective for them should be layered in.  This is no joke, and the days of treating this passively are long gone.  Wake up doctors and do the right thing!

Category:

Babesia, Bartonella, Lyme, Treatment

FOIA Reveal: FDA Official Privately Backed Ivermectin Trials – Then Publicly Mocked it As ‘Horse Medicine’

https://blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/top-fda-official-privately-backed

Top FDA official privately backed ivermectin trials—then publicly mocked it as ‘horse medicine’

Newly released FOIA documents reveal the agency’s dramatic U-turn.

Maryanne Demasi, PhD
Jun 18, 2025
Newly released emails obtained under Freedom of Information laws reveal that one of the FDA’s top officials privately supported testing ivermectin for Covid-19—while the agency later publicly dismissed it as “horse medicine.”

At the height of the pandemic in 2020, Dr. Janet Woodcock, then head of the FDA’s drug evaluation division, was appointed therapeutics lead for Operation Warp Speed to help fast-track Covid-19 vaccines and treatments.

At the time, ivermectin had shown significant antiviral potential in lab studies and was being used empirically in countries like Peru and Honduras. It was safe, cheap, already approved for treating parasites—and generating cautious hope as a potential Covid-19 treatment.  (See link for article)

______________

SUMMARY:

  • Woodcock was all in on ivermectin until she became acting commissioner for the FDA, then 7 months into her new role the infamous, ‘You are not a horse, You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it,’  FDA tweet came out, along with a special warning that “you should not use ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19.” The FDA’s statement included words and phrases such as “serious harm,” “hospitalized,” “dangerous,” “very dangerous,” “seizures,” “coma and even death” and “highly toxic.” Any reader would think the FDA was warning against poison pills. In fact, ivermectin is FDA-approved as a safe and effective antiparasitic.
  • This tweet suddenly created a culture war on ivermectin. The media piled on, doctors prescribing it were persecuted, and the AMA and other ‘professional’ medical groups banned it by making it impossible to prescribe or fill the prescription at pharmacies. Of course this had its intended affect: Doctors were suddenly afraid of prescribing a drug that a world famous toxicologist could not find a single case of an ivermectin overdose death from a drug which is on the WHO’s essential list of medicines.
  • This fear created the failure of a ‘get sicker’ policy despite ivermectin’s ability to fight 21 viruses, including SARS-CoV-2, the cause of Covid-19. A single dose reduced the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in cells by 99.8% in 24 hours and 99.98% in 48 hours, according to a June 2020 study published in the journal Antiviral Research.
  • The reason for the war?  Just two days after the tweet, the FDA granted approval to the Pfizer clot shot giving the Biden admin the foundation to enforce ‘vaccine’ mandates where people were forced to get the gene therapy shot or lose their jobs.

For a quick flashback of the tyranny, watch this video of a doctor being forcibly removed by police from a hospital board meeting simply for endorsing ivermectin that he used in his own private practice, and for evidently breaking protocol by whispering a “thanks” to a politician who questioned hospital policy. He shared at about 7:00 that doctors on staff at the hospital would come and see him to get ivermectin, but would not speak their mind or prescribe it for fear of retribution from hospitals or their own medical groups. He states that 99% of doctors now have a contract with the hospital and are beholden to it, and that ‘brutal’ COVID treatment protocols, which one nurse blamed for 90% of hospital deaths, were followed to the letter due to government financial incentives.  Hospitals were simply not interested in early treatment which have saved lives and freed up hospital beds.

There is a little good news:

  • In 2024, in an unprecedented court case, the US FDA led by Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, was forced to take down all of its false and misleading claims on ivermectin. The 3-judge panel ruled the law did not authorize the FDA to give medical advice.  (Remember this factoid for the future because the FDA has not admitted to any wrong doing and has not changed its position)
  • There are now 10 states filing bills to make ivermectin available over the counter.
  • The documentary ‘Epidemic of Fraud‘ exposes the orchestrated efforts to discredit this powerful repurposed medicine and uncovers the influential powers behind the attempted takedown.

Similarly to Lyme/MSIDS, you must go outside the system to obtain true help.  Clinics and hospital monopolies are all in bed with Big Pharma as well as the corrupt medical groups that castrate doctors who do not blindly stay in line and follow the accepted narrative.

Never forget what ‘the powers that be’ did by failing to treat COVID patients early with a safe, effective, cheap drug.

According to Dr. Peter McCullough, this suppression of treatment cost 500,000 lives.

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

How Spike Targets Blood Type A- Patients

https://justusrhope.substack.com/p/how-spike-targets-blood-type-a-patients?

How Spike Targets Blood Type A- Patients

AI Exposes Spike as a Witches’ Brew of Homologous Toxins

Justus R. Hope
Jun 15, 2025

You may know that Spike Protein contains a Galectin-3 sequence or homology. We have written about how this sequence vastly increases risks for cancer and heart disease through biological mimicry.

However, Spike contains many other toxic sequences, many of which are not common knowledge, but should be.

Writing this story today shocked me. AI revealed protein sequences within the Spike that mimic snake venom, tetanus, botulism, measles, prions, and amyloid. This biological mimicry in Spike creates similar harmful biological responses in the person exposed to the Spike.

All of this is supported by peer-reviewed PubMed published studies.

Revising the Spike Protein Blocking Protocol

However, perhaps the most startling revelation is that those with Type A negative blood, which comprise some 7% of the US population, are at up to nearly double the risk of cancer. I discuss why and what one can do about this.

Accordingly, armed with this new information, the SpikeLoc™ Protocol is revised at the conclusion to include eight agents led by Ivermectin.

Why Spike Protein is so Deadly

For all my loyal Pre-Substack readers who have stuck with me since 2020 at a time I wrote mainly in the Desert Review, I dedicate this article. Spike Protein unfortunately appears to be a carefully engineered molecule.

Spike Protein contains various sequences that contain deadly similarities – known as homologies – to highly toxic agents. These similarities play out in the deadly consequences of Spike Protein manifesting the effects of the very agents it mimics.  (see article for important graphs & treatments)

______________

For more:

Category:

Activism, Treatment, Viruses