Archive for the ‘Testing’ Category

Policy Shifts Against the mRNA Platform Rapidly Emerged This Past Week

https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/policy-shifts-against-the-mrna-platform?

Policy Shifts Against The mRNA Platform Rapidly Emerged This Past Week

Major Covid mRNA policy reversals and awakenings occurred this week within a major U.S health system, a large U.S state, a South American country, and in the UK. The dominoes are starting to fall.

This week a nurse reached out with disturbing descriptions of some major changes she has witnessed inside the Ohio State University Medical Center (OSUMC) system.

OSUMC s a large and comprehensive healthcare organization, with a significant presence in Ohio and a strong focus on research, education, and patient care. It is a massive institution with over 23,000 employees, including:

  • Over 2,000 physicians
  • More than 1,000 residents and fellows
  • Nearly 5,000 nurses

Lets start off with this screenshot of a webpage from OSUMC’s website which provides information to the public as to where they can get Covid-19 vaccines. Check out the highlighted sentence at the bottom of the page.  (See link for article)

_______________

SUMMARY:

  • OSUMC is suddenly and quietly NOT offering the clot shot to employees, but they are happy to offer them to the public.
  • Please see and read the story perfectly exemplifying medical blindness. This poor woman with an immune disorder went temporarily blind in both eyes, had a locked jaw, and began vomiting after being forced to get THREE vaccines in order to get medical care.

Personally, I was forced to get a completely worthless PCR test before I could have cancer surgery.  Because of testing fraud I had to drive over 2 hours get at least be able to spit in a cup rather than have a dangerous, heavy metal, graphene and glass saturated swab stuck up my nose.  This is a crime.  Both, that this test is still being used and that everyone was required to take it in order to get medical care.  

Nobody talks about how a public ‘health’ agency monopolizes testing which puts far too much power in the hands of a few.

When will this medial madness end?  When will people be allowed to have medical freedom?  When will authorities admit vaccines can be deadly?

Researchers Say New Lyme Test Can Detect Lyme Within 14 Days of Infection

https://www.lymedisease.org/detecting-lyme-within-14-days/

Researchers say this test can detect Lyme within 14 days of infection

Focus on Lyme and Aces Diagnostics Inc. has announced a breakthrough in Lyme disease diagnosis with a new test that detects the disease at all stages, including the crucial first 14 days post-infection, with over 90% accuracy.

Aces Diagnostics is developing and manufacturing this test, aiming for FDA clearance to make it accessible to all patients.

LymeSeek™, developed through a collaboration between Tulane University and Focus on Lyme, combines advanced biomarker research from Tulane’s Monica Embers and nine years of intensive work funded by Focus on Lyme. Enhanced by machine learning, this innovative diagnostic promises to reshape Lyme disease detection.

“Previous tests have been less than 50% accurate, especially in the early stages,” said Tammy Crawford, CEO of Aces Diagnostics. “This has led to countless patients being misdiagnosed or undiagnosed, resulting in prolonged suffering. LymeSeek will change that, providing a reliable diagnostic tool that can save lives.”

Aces Diagnostics Team

The CDC reports that nearly 500,000 people in the U.S. are diagnosed with Lyme disease each year. Globally, 14.5% of the population is affected, with many suffering from chronic symptoms due to delayed diagnosis. A Johns Hopkins study revealed that 38% of Lyme patients continue to experience symptoms six months post-diagnosis, underscoring the need for improved testing.

Simplifying diagnosis

“Current Lyme testing involves multiple steps, with results taking over a week and requiring subjective interpretation,” said Aces Diagnostics Co-Founder Holly Ahern.

“LymeSeek™ will replace this cumbersome process, enabling earlier diagnosis and reducing chronic illness caused by delayed or missed diagnoses.”

Crawford and Ahern are personally invested in this mission, both having daughters who battled Lyme disease. “An early diagnosis could have spared them years of suffering,” said Crawford.

Aces Diagnostics Inc. brings together a team with over 50 years of combined experience in Lyme disease research, backed by a distinguished advisory board that includes experts from Johns Hopkins UniversityColumbia University, and Tulane University. The company is already advancing development and manufacturing efforts and pursuing early FDA clearance to make LymeSeek™ available to the public by the third quarter of 2026.

SOURCE: Focus on Lyme

______________

**Comment**

Testing has been and continues to be a major problem with Lyme/MSIDS for numerous reasons, one of the biggest being the fact many are coinfected with numerous pathogens that mainstream medicine and research never discuss.  These coinfected patients are some of the sickest but are kicked to the curb because testing doesn’t reveal what’s inside them.

While this new test is a step in the right direction, it still doesn’t address those who have been infected for decades or those who are coinfected.  It’s like comparing apples to oranges and until these issues are addressed, it remains a foreign language to mainstream medicine.

The Johns Hopkins study showing nearly 40% go on to suffer symptoms 6 months post-diagnosis is still low in my opinion due to the fact so many are never diagnosed in the first place and so many are infected with multiple things that are never picked up on testing.

But, one must remain hopeful……

For more:

Scrutinizing Clinical Biomarkers in a Large Cohort of Patients with Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne Infections

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10893018/

 2024 Feb; 12(2): 380.
Published online 2024 Feb 12. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12020380
PMCID: PMC10893018
PMID: 38399784

Scrutinizing Clinical Biomarkers in a Large Cohort of Patients with Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne Infections

David XiConceptualizationMethodologySoftwareFormal analysisInvestigationData curationWriting – original draftWriting – review & editingVisualization,1 Kunal GargConceptualizationMethodologySoftwareFormal analysisInvestigationData curationWriting – review & editingVisualization,2 John S. Lambert,1,3,4 Minha Rajput-RayConceptualizationFormal analysisInvestigationResourcesWriting – review & editingSupervision,5 Anne MadiganConceptualizationFormal analysisInvestigationResourcesData curation,1 Gordana AvramovicConceptualizationMethodologyFormal analysisInvestigationResourcesData curationWriting – review & editingSupervisionProject administration,1 and Leona GilbertConceptualizationMethodologyFormal analysisInvestigationResourcesData curationWriting – original draftWriting – review & editingVisualizationSupervisionProject administration2,*

Abstract

Standard clinical markers can improve tick-borne infection (TBI) diagnoses. We investigated immune and other clinical biomarkers in 110 patients clinically diagnosed with TBIs before (T0) and after antibiotic treatment (T2). At T0, both the initial observation group and patients without seroconversion for tick-borne pathogens exhibited notably low percentages and counts of CD3 percentage (CD3%), CD3+ cells, CD8+ suppressors, CD4 percentage (CD4%), and CD4+ helper cells, with the latter group showing reductions in CD3%, CD3+, and CD8+ counts in approximately 15-22% of cases. Following treatment at the T2 follow-up, patients typically experienced enhancements in their previously low CD3%, CD3+ counts, CD4%, and CD4+ counts; however, there was no notable progress in their low CD8+ counts, and a higher number of patients presented with insufficient transferrin levels. Moreover, among those with negative serology for tick-borne infections, there was an improvement in low CD3% and CD3+ counts, which was more pronounced in patients with deficient transferrin amounts. Among those with CD57+ (n = 37) and CD19+ (n = 101) lymphocyte analysis, 59.46% of patients had a low CD57+ count, 14.85% had a low CD19 count, and 36.63% had a low CD19 percentage (CD19%). Similar findings were observed concerning low CD57+, CD19+, and CD19% markers for negative TBI serology patients. Overall, this study demonstrates that routine standard clinical markers could assist in a TBI diagnosis.

For more:

IGeneX Lyme ImmunoBlot Test Receives FDA Clearance

https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-immunoblot-fda-clearance/

IGeneX Lyme ImmunoBlot test receives FDA clearance

The Lyme ImmunoBlot test first introduced by IGeneX in 2017 has now been converted to a test kit–and has received FDA clearance.

The name of the test is iDart™ Lyme IgG ImmunoBlot Kit.

It’s a stand-alone test for the detection of IgG antibodies against Borrelia-causing Lyme disease.

The iDart ImmunoBlot Kit features 31 Lyme antigen bands, which are more antigen bands than any other Lyme immunoblot test on the market.

Moreover, it is the only immunoblot that includes Osp A (P31) and Osp B (P34). (Note: those are the two bands removed from other Lyme tests in the 1990s because of their use in the development of Lyme vaccines.)

The inclusion of 31 antigens improves the sensitivity of the detection of Lyme-specific IgG antibodies, which in turn will improve the sensitivity of the diagnosis of Lyme disease in suspected patients without sacrificing specificity.

“We are delighted to have received FDA clearance for our Lyme ImmunoBlot Kit,” said Dr. Jyotsna Shah, Ph.D., President and Director of IGeneX Labs.

These kits are not available for sale to consumers, but only to labs who perform Lyme diagnostic testing.

Key features of the iDart Lyme IgG ImmunoBlot kit

  • Results interpretation is based upon new criteria and not CDC criteria.
  • The bands are grouped according to their antigen groups. The test is considered positive if the Lyme Screen Antigen (LSA) band and one or more bands from at least two other groups are present on the ImmunoBlot.
  • Bands 31 and 34 are included, making this the only FDA-cleared Lyme serological test that includes these bands.

SOURCE: IGeneX, Inc.

More PCR Blunders But Finally Some Justice in Canada

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/no-wildlife-is-not-teeming-with-sars?

No, Wildlife is not Teeming with SARS-CoV-2 Virus

A new study claims that wild animals are filled with SARS-CoV-2 virus. Here’s precisely why this is bunk.

The COVID-19 pandemic was met with a high priority on diagnostic testing in managing public health crises. Central to this effort has been the widespread deployment of Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) tests, widely regarded as the gold standard for detecting SARS-CoV-2.

However, the entire testing enterprise is fraught. As the pandemic has progressed, significant concerns have emerged regarding the reliability of these tests, mainly because unacceptably high cycle thresholds (CT values) are employed. These concerns are not just theoretical—they have profound implications for public health, resource allocation, and, critically, the surveillance of wildlife populations.

RT-PCR testing, though powerful, is inherently limited by its sensitivity to even the smallest fragments of viral RNA from off-target nucleotide sources, such as other viruses or bacteria, or the patient’s or animal’s genome. When CT values exceed 35 cycles, the likelihood of detecting clinically irrelevant, off-target viral fragments increases dramatically, leading to false positives. Such results can misinform public health policies, drive unnecessary quarantines, and, as this critique will argue, skew our understanding of the presence of the virus in wildlife. These issues have been addressed in high technical detail from early 2020 (see articles herehere, and here).

Unfortunately, methods like one published by Ceci et al., 2021 are dangerously lax. The implications of misinterpreting RT-PCR results are far-reaching. In human populations, they can lead to inflated infection rates, misdiagnosed cases, and an exaggerated sense of the virus’s spread. In wildlife studies, these false positives can create a misleading narrative that wildlife species are significant reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2, prompting unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions. As I have pointed out, since early 2020, using high CT values without proper validation, such as sequencing to confirm amplicons, has led to an overestimation of viral prevalence, with severe consequences for science and policy.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Weiler’s article dissects flaws in PCR testing in recent studies which are being used to support a narrative that COVID is teeming in wildlife.  I wrote previously about the beloved former president of Tanzania, John Magufuli, RIP, and the fact the man had a PhD in Chemistry.  A bit of a prankster, he punked the WHO and proved the worthlessness of PCR for diagnosing by testing fruit, goats, sheep, and motor oil for COVID.  Nearly half came back positive.  He wouldn’t bow to the ‘powers that be’, went missing and died mysteriously.

It’s also important to remember this test can directly access your brain through CSF and at least two children have died due to injuries caused by COVID PCR tests.

Then there’s the fact that the test swabs used for the PCR test contain the carcinogen ethylene oxide, used to produce chemicals like antifreeze but in smaller quantities is used as a pesticide, which causes cancer, and sterilizing agent in medical settings.  It damages DNA, but the FDA swears it’s safe.

In the Spanish study, “Nanotechnological Investigations on COVID-9 Vaccines: Detection of Toxic Nanoparticles of Graphene Oxide and Heavy Metals,” researchers found graphene oxide in the PCR swabs, masks, and COVID injection vials.

The experimental physicist and biomaterial researcher Dr Antonietta Gatti examined various PCR test rods under the microscope and analyzed their ingredients. The irritating result: the PCR test swabs are made of hard materials and contain a variety of (nano) particles made of silver, aluminium, titanium, glass fibres etc, many of which are undeclared in the package leaflet. When they enter the mucous membrane, they can cause wounds and inflammation, the scientist said. ENT doctors told 2020News  that they are finding more hardened mucous membranes in people who are often tested for SARS-CoV-2. No longer intact mucous membranes can no longer fulfill their task of repelling viruses, bacteria and fungi before they reach the airways, as the pediatrician Eugen Janzen also reports. The germs thus penetrate into the airways without any immune filter.

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-vernon-coleman-how-the-pcr-test?

PCR: Responsible For More Deaths Than Any Test in History

By Dr. Vernon Coleman

8/14/24

The PCR test is responsible for more deaths than any test in history. It was a crucial weapon in misdiagnosing millions of patients. I recently reprinted an article I first wrote three years ago. But there is more to know about the PCR test which I will, in this article, show to be not only worthless but to be responsible for the deaths of millions.

Since the flu of 2019 was selected to be marketed and promoted as a major threat to mankind, and the fake covid pandemic first became a weapon in the manufactured war driving us remorselessly towards Net Zero and the Great Reset, the PCR test has been the weapon of choice for those determined to create fear, to justify pointless and damaging lockdowns, harmful and futile mask wearing and toxic and useless vaccinations.

It was always known that the PCR test didn’t work and wasn’t of any value in detecting the over promoted and oversold version of the annual flu known as covid-19.

Right from the start, the evidence showed that the PCR test was utterly useless in making diagnoses. It was, in fact, worse than useless since it created an epidemic of false positives. No test in history has ever been so misused or used with such malignant intent. And, of course, despite denials there is evidence that the PCR test has killed people. For the evidence please see my article entitled `The PCR Test Can Kill You…’ which was re-published here, on http://www.vernoncoleman.com, just a few days ago.

Everyone who used or promoted the PCR test in the guise of diagnosing covid, or who still uses or promotes the PCR test for that purpose, should be arrested and charged with being part of a conspiracy to deceive, to manipulate and to kill. Anyone who has ever used the PCR test as a diagnostic aid is a criminal and should be regarded as such.  (See link for article)

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/justice-in-canada?

Justice in Canada

With help and advice from Chris Weisdorf, Melani Fernando successfully defended her right of bodily autonomy by rejecting the insertion of a nasal swab for a PCR “test” and winning her appeal.

R. v. Fernando, 2024 ONCJ 336

Excerpts:

Ms. Fernando took an airplane flight to her home in Mississauga, arriving at Pearson Airport on April 9, 2022.  She was apparently vaccinated, but she refused the COVID test, which was randomly selected to be performed on her.

Ms. Fernando was convicted at trial of failing to comply with an order under Section 58 of the Quarantine Act (the “Act”) and fined $5,000 with additional charges, taking it to a fine of $6,255. 

Ms. Fernando appealed to this Court; she was assisted in her appeal by a non-lawyer, Mr. Weisdorf, who was helpful to her and to the Court.

The defence raised an argument before the Justice of the Peace and before me which has merit.  The Justice of the Peace did not address this argument.  The argument, simply put, is that the Act did not authorize a screening officer to use a screening test which involved the entry into the traveller’s body of an instrument or other foreign body.

In my view, a nasal swab is “an instrument” or “foreign body.”  In my view, the Quarantine Act did not permit a screening officer in this case, Mr. Roxas, to require Ms. Fernando to be tested at the airport by insertion into her nasal cavity of a nasal swab.

I do decide that the nasal swab test, which the screening officer in this case required or demanded Ms. Fernando submit to, was an unlawful requirement or demand.  Ms. Fernando’s refusal to comply with the requirement or demand was lawful on her part. 

Because the requirement or demand made of her by the screening officer was not lawful, Ms. Fernando should not have been found guilty by the Justice of the Peace.

I am reversing the Justice of the Peace’s decision and entering a finding of not guilty.

https://canlii.ca/t/k5q3t

(See link for article and videos)

_________________

**Comment**

It’s safe to say nobody should be allowing these toxic swabs to be jammed up their nose.

Further, did you ever ask yourself WHY this is the ONLY test allowedYou should.

I had to travel over two hours to be able to spit in a vial for a mandatory test before I had a procedure done.  Nobody local offered this test.  They are nearly impossible to find but they exist.  This detail was not made public so few know they have a choice about testing.  This is the CDC’s MO and it was followed in lockstep globally.  Again, lots of money to be made.

I also recommend reading Roguski’s article on Nobel Prize winning scientist, Kary Mullis, the creator of the PCR test who emphatically stated this type of test should NEVER be used to diagnose patients.  The CDC has been using PCR ad nauseum for decades to create ‘pandemics’ that aren’t.  The CDC’s centralization of public health and testing has proved deadly and a threat to national security.  This organization must go as it is beyond hope and rehabilitation.

Mullis was an out-spoken critic and opponent of Dr. Fauci and Big Pharma – and was a constant thorn in their sides.  He conveniently died in Aug. of 2019 of supposed complications from pneumonia right before COVID mania.  Conveniently because had he survived, he would have screamed bloody murder over how COVID has been handled – particularly by using the PCR manufacturing test to inflate cases which even the CDC had to admit few deaths are actually caused by COVID despite hospitals being paid by the federal government to list patients as having COVID, getting tested, being put on a ventilator, and being given remdesivir.

It was a huge money-making racket if you blindly followed government edicts.