Archive for the ‘Testing’ Category

Scrutinizing Clinical Biomarkers in a Large Cohort of Patients with Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne Infections

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10893018/

 2024 Feb; 12(2): 380.
Published online 2024 Feb 12. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12020380
PMCID: PMC10893018
PMID: 38399784

Scrutinizing Clinical Biomarkers in a Large Cohort of Patients with Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne Infections

David XiConceptualizationMethodologySoftwareFormal analysisInvestigationData curationWriting – original draftWriting – review & editingVisualization,1 Kunal GargConceptualizationMethodologySoftwareFormal analysisInvestigationData curationWriting – review & editingVisualization,2 John S. Lambert,1,3,4 Minha Rajput-RayConceptualizationFormal analysisInvestigationResourcesWriting – review & editingSupervision,5 Anne MadiganConceptualizationFormal analysisInvestigationResourcesData curation,1 Gordana AvramovicConceptualizationMethodologyFormal analysisInvestigationResourcesData curationWriting – review & editingSupervisionProject administration,1 and Leona GilbertConceptualizationMethodologyFormal analysisInvestigationResourcesData curationWriting – original draftWriting – review & editingVisualizationSupervisionProject administration2,*

Abstract

Standard clinical markers can improve tick-borne infection (TBI) diagnoses. We investigated immune and other clinical biomarkers in 110 patients clinically diagnosed with TBIs before (T0) and after antibiotic treatment (T2). At T0, both the initial observation group and patients without seroconversion for tick-borne pathogens exhibited notably low percentages and counts of CD3 percentage (CD3%), CD3+ cells, CD8+ suppressors, CD4 percentage (CD4%), and CD4+ helper cells, with the latter group showing reductions in CD3%, CD3+, and CD8+ counts in approximately 15-22% of cases. Following treatment at the T2 follow-up, patients typically experienced enhancements in their previously low CD3%, CD3+ counts, CD4%, and CD4+ counts; however, there was no notable progress in their low CD8+ counts, and a higher number of patients presented with insufficient transferrin levels. Moreover, among those with negative serology for tick-borne infections, there was an improvement in low CD3% and CD3+ counts, which was more pronounced in patients with deficient transferrin amounts. Among those with CD57+ (n = 37) and CD19+ (n = 101) lymphocyte analysis, 59.46% of patients had a low CD57+ count, 14.85% had a low CD19 count, and 36.63% had a low CD19 percentage (CD19%). Similar findings were observed concerning low CD57+, CD19+, and CD19% markers for negative TBI serology patients. Overall, this study demonstrates that routine standard clinical markers could assist in a TBI diagnosis.

For more:

IGeneX Lyme ImmunoBlot Test Receives FDA Clearance

https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-immunoblot-fda-clearance/

IGeneX Lyme ImmunoBlot test receives FDA clearance

The Lyme ImmunoBlot test first introduced by IGeneX in 2017 has now been converted to a test kit–and has received FDA clearance.

The name of the test is iDart™ Lyme IgG ImmunoBlot Kit.

It’s a stand-alone test for the detection of IgG antibodies against Borrelia-causing Lyme disease.

The iDart ImmunoBlot Kit features 31 Lyme antigen bands, which are more antigen bands than any other Lyme immunoblot test on the market.

Moreover, it is the only immunoblot that includes Osp A (P31) and Osp B (P34). (Note: those are the two bands removed from other Lyme tests in the 1990s because of their use in the development of Lyme vaccines.)

The inclusion of 31 antigens improves the sensitivity of the detection of Lyme-specific IgG antibodies, which in turn will improve the sensitivity of the diagnosis of Lyme disease in suspected patients without sacrificing specificity.

“We are delighted to have received FDA clearance for our Lyme ImmunoBlot Kit,” said Dr. Jyotsna Shah, Ph.D., President and Director of IGeneX Labs.

These kits are not available for sale to consumers, but only to labs who perform Lyme diagnostic testing.

Key features of the iDart Lyme IgG ImmunoBlot kit

  • Results interpretation is based upon new criteria and not CDC criteria.
  • The bands are grouped according to their antigen groups. The test is considered positive if the Lyme Screen Antigen (LSA) band and one or more bands from at least two other groups are present on the ImmunoBlot.
  • Bands 31 and 34 are included, making this the only FDA-cleared Lyme serological test that includes these bands.

SOURCE: IGeneX, Inc.

More PCR Blunders But Finally Some Justice in Canada

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/no-wildlife-is-not-teeming-with-sars?

No, Wildlife is not Teeming with SARS-CoV-2 Virus

A new study claims that wild animals are filled with SARS-CoV-2 virus. Here’s precisely why this is bunk.

The COVID-19 pandemic was met with a high priority on diagnostic testing in managing public health crises. Central to this effort has been the widespread deployment of Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) tests, widely regarded as the gold standard for detecting SARS-CoV-2.

However, the entire testing enterprise is fraught. As the pandemic has progressed, significant concerns have emerged regarding the reliability of these tests, mainly because unacceptably high cycle thresholds (CT values) are employed. These concerns are not just theoretical—they have profound implications for public health, resource allocation, and, critically, the surveillance of wildlife populations.

RT-PCR testing, though powerful, is inherently limited by its sensitivity to even the smallest fragments of viral RNA from off-target nucleotide sources, such as other viruses or bacteria, or the patient’s or animal’s genome. When CT values exceed 35 cycles, the likelihood of detecting clinically irrelevant, off-target viral fragments increases dramatically, leading to false positives. Such results can misinform public health policies, drive unnecessary quarantines, and, as this critique will argue, skew our understanding of the presence of the virus in wildlife. These issues have been addressed in high technical detail from early 2020 (see articles herehere, and here).

Unfortunately, methods like one published by Ceci et al., 2021 are dangerously lax. The implications of misinterpreting RT-PCR results are far-reaching. In human populations, they can lead to inflated infection rates, misdiagnosed cases, and an exaggerated sense of the virus’s spread. In wildlife studies, these false positives can create a misleading narrative that wildlife species are significant reservoirs of SARS-CoV-2, prompting unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions. As I have pointed out, since early 2020, using high CT values without proper validation, such as sequencing to confirm amplicons, has led to an overestimation of viral prevalence, with severe consequences for science and policy.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Weiler’s article dissects flaws in PCR testing in recent studies which are being used to support a narrative that COVID is teeming in wildlife.  I wrote previously about the beloved former president of Tanzania, John Magufuli, RIP, and the fact the man had a PhD in Chemistry.  A bit of a prankster, he punked the WHO and proved the worthlessness of PCR for diagnosing by testing fruit, goats, sheep, and motor oil for COVID.  Nearly half came back positive.  He wouldn’t bow to the ‘powers that be’, went missing and died mysteriously.

It’s also important to remember this test can directly access your brain through CSF and at least two children have died due to injuries caused by COVID PCR tests.

Then there’s the fact that the test swabs used for the PCR test contain the carcinogen ethylene oxide, used to produce chemicals like antifreeze but in smaller quantities is used as a pesticide, which causes cancer, and sterilizing agent in medical settings.  It damages DNA, but the FDA swears it’s safe.

In the Spanish study, “Nanotechnological Investigations on COVID-9 Vaccines: Detection of Toxic Nanoparticles of Graphene Oxide and Heavy Metals,” researchers found graphene oxide in the PCR swabs, masks, and COVID injection vials.

The experimental physicist and biomaterial researcher Dr Antonietta Gatti examined various PCR test rods under the microscope and analyzed their ingredients. The irritating result: the PCR test swabs are made of hard materials and contain a variety of (nano) particles made of silver, aluminium, titanium, glass fibres etc, many of which are undeclared in the package leaflet. When they enter the mucous membrane, they can cause wounds and inflammation, the scientist said. ENT doctors told 2020News  that they are finding more hardened mucous membranes in people who are often tested for SARS-CoV-2. No longer intact mucous membranes can no longer fulfill their task of repelling viruses, bacteria and fungi before they reach the airways, as the pediatrician Eugen Janzen also reports. The germs thus penetrate into the airways without any immune filter.

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-vernon-coleman-how-the-pcr-test?

PCR: Responsible For More Deaths Than Any Test in History

By Dr. Vernon Coleman

8/14/24

The PCR test is responsible for more deaths than any test in history. It was a crucial weapon in misdiagnosing millions of patients. I recently reprinted an article I first wrote three years ago. But there is more to know about the PCR test which I will, in this article, show to be not only worthless but to be responsible for the deaths of millions.

Since the flu of 2019 was selected to be marketed and promoted as a major threat to mankind, and the fake covid pandemic first became a weapon in the manufactured war driving us remorselessly towards Net Zero and the Great Reset, the PCR test has been the weapon of choice for those determined to create fear, to justify pointless and damaging lockdowns, harmful and futile mask wearing and toxic and useless vaccinations.

It was always known that the PCR test didn’t work and wasn’t of any value in detecting the over promoted and oversold version of the annual flu known as covid-19.

Right from the start, the evidence showed that the PCR test was utterly useless in making diagnoses. It was, in fact, worse than useless since it created an epidemic of false positives. No test in history has ever been so misused or used with such malignant intent. And, of course, despite denials there is evidence that the PCR test has killed people. For the evidence please see my article entitled `The PCR Test Can Kill You…’ which was re-published here, on http://www.vernoncoleman.com, just a few days ago.

Everyone who used or promoted the PCR test in the guise of diagnosing covid, or who still uses or promotes the PCR test for that purpose, should be arrested and charged with being part of a conspiracy to deceive, to manipulate and to kill. Anyone who has ever used the PCR test as a diagnostic aid is a criminal and should be regarded as such.  (See link for article)

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/justice-in-canada?

Justice in Canada

With help and advice from Chris Weisdorf, Melani Fernando successfully defended her right of bodily autonomy by rejecting the insertion of a nasal swab for a PCR “test” and winning her appeal.

R. v. Fernando, 2024 ONCJ 336

Excerpts:

Ms. Fernando took an airplane flight to her home in Mississauga, arriving at Pearson Airport on April 9, 2022.  She was apparently vaccinated, but she refused the COVID test, which was randomly selected to be performed on her.

Ms. Fernando was convicted at trial of failing to comply with an order under Section 58 of the Quarantine Act (the “Act”) and fined $5,000 with additional charges, taking it to a fine of $6,255. 

Ms. Fernando appealed to this Court; she was assisted in her appeal by a non-lawyer, Mr. Weisdorf, who was helpful to her and to the Court.

The defence raised an argument before the Justice of the Peace and before me which has merit.  The Justice of the Peace did not address this argument.  The argument, simply put, is that the Act did not authorize a screening officer to use a screening test which involved the entry into the traveller’s body of an instrument or other foreign body.

In my view, a nasal swab is “an instrument” or “foreign body.”  In my view, the Quarantine Act did not permit a screening officer in this case, Mr. Roxas, to require Ms. Fernando to be tested at the airport by insertion into her nasal cavity of a nasal swab.

I do decide that the nasal swab test, which the screening officer in this case required or demanded Ms. Fernando submit to, was an unlawful requirement or demand.  Ms. Fernando’s refusal to comply with the requirement or demand was lawful on her part. 

Because the requirement or demand made of her by the screening officer was not lawful, Ms. Fernando should not have been found guilty by the Justice of the Peace.

I am reversing the Justice of the Peace’s decision and entering a finding of not guilty.

https://canlii.ca/t/k5q3t

(See link for article and videos)

_________________

**Comment**

It’s safe to say nobody should be allowing these toxic swabs to be jammed up their nose.

Further, did you ever ask yourself WHY this is the ONLY test allowedYou should.

I had to travel over two hours to be able to spit in a vial for a mandatory test before I had a procedure done.  Nobody local offered this test.  They are nearly impossible to find but they exist.  This detail was not made public so few know they have a choice about testing.  This is the CDC’s MO and it was followed in lockstep globally.  Again, lots of money to be made.

I also recommend reading Roguski’s article on Nobel Prize winning scientist, Kary Mullis, the creator of the PCR test who emphatically stated this type of test should NEVER be used to diagnose patients.  The CDC has been using PCR ad nauseum for decades to create ‘pandemics’ that aren’t.  The CDC’s centralization of public health and testing has proved deadly and a threat to national security.  This organization must go as it is beyond hope and rehabilitation.

Mullis was an out-spoken critic and opponent of Dr. Fauci and Big Pharma – and was a constant thorn in their sides.  He conveniently died in Aug. of 2019 of supposed complications from pneumonia right before COVID mania.  Conveniently because had he survived, he would have screamed bloody murder over how COVID has been handled – particularly by using the PCR manufacturing test to inflate cases which even the CDC had to admit few deaths are actually caused by COVID despite hospitals being paid by the federal government to list patients as having COVID, getting tested, being put on a ventilator, and being given remdesivir.

It was a huge money-making racket if you blindly followed government edicts.

National Committee Creates New Acronym for Lyme: IACI

Lyme IACI, pronounced “Lyme eye-ACK-ee” is the latest fantasy dreamt up by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine – the congressionally chartered organization that serves as the ‘collective’ scientific national academy of the U.S., which proudly deploys the climate, health, and equity propaganda pushed by globalists.  The sponsors of the organization are none other than:

AstraZeneca
Burroughs Wellcome Fund
Grantham Foundation
JPB Foundation​
McCall MacBain Foundation
Rockefeller Foundation

Are you getting this yet?

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/

Inquiry to the Deputy Director of the Vector-Borne Diseases Division at the CDC

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Jul 31, 2024

Notice to everyone who has signed this petition:

The following so-called “National Committee” has been established turning persistent Lyme symptoms into a new acronym: Lyme Infection-Associated Chronic Illness (Lyme IACI)

Medscape

‘Doesn’t Fit Anything I Trained for’: National Committee Examines Treatment for Chronic Illness Following Lyme Disease

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/doesnt-fit-anything-i-trained-national-committee-examines-2024a1000dru

So now, Chronic Lyme will be swept under the rug for more decades to come despite the mountain of evidence that we have been dealing with an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug!

I don’t think this committee is looking to solve (expose) the chronic Lyme epidemic …. it seems more likely this is an opportunity to exploit the chronically infected with money making pharmaceuticals to treat the symptoms of an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug.

“Lyme IACI” conveniently sweeps chronic Lyme under the rug.

Please see the email below addressed to Dr. Ben Beard of the CDC with carbon copy to all members of this committee. I ask that everyone demand a response from Beard. You can copy all email addresses below and send a private email or post a comment to the NASEM Committee’s website: https://www8.nationalacademies.org/pa/feedback.aspx?type=project&key=HMD-HSP-23-07

Inquiry to Ben Beard:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “cbb0@cdc.gov” <cbb0@cdc.gov>
Cc: “jjohnson@genevausa.org” <jjohnson@genevausa.org>, “theerhisamariee@gmail.com” <theerhisamariee@gmail.com>, “jaucott@jhmi.edu” <jaucott@jhmi.edu>, “cbb0@cdc.gov” <cbb0@cdc.gov>, “jraitt1@stanford.edu” <jraitt1@stanford.edu>, “dclauw@med.umich.edu” <dclauw@med.umich.edu>, “john.leong@tufts.edu” <john.leong@tufts.edu>, “avindra.nath@nih.gov” <avindra.nath@nih.gov>, “charles.chiu@ucsf.edu” <charles.chiu@ucsf.edu>, “elliot.cowan@partnersindiagnostics.com” <elliot.cowan@partnersindiagnostics.com>, “beth.jaworski@nih.hhs.gov” <beth.jaworski@nih.hhs.gov>, “roger@lundquist.org” <roger@lundquist.org>, “rachele.hendricks.sturrup@duke.edu” <rachele.hendricks.sturrup@duke.edu>, “info@lymebiobank.org” <info@lymebiobank.org>, “lorrainejohnson@outlook.com” <lorrainejohnson@outlook.com>, “wendyadams1@gmail.com” <wendyadams1@gmail.com>, “Leith.States@hhs.gov” <Leith.States@hhs.gov>, “tindall.matt@gmail.com” <tindall.matt@gmail.com>, “stacie.hudgens@clinoutsolutions.com” <stacie.hudgens@clinoutsolutions.com>, “raymond_dattwyler@nymc.edu” <raymond_dattwyler@nymc.edu>, “timothy.sellati@globallymealliance.org” <timothy.sellati@globallymealliance.org>, “nklimas@nova.edu” <nklimas@nova.edu>, “kester@genevausa.org” <kester@genevausa.org>, “nicole@nicolemalachowski.com” <nicole@nicolemalachowski.com>, “marcom@genevausa.org” <marcom@genevausa.org>, “stephen.gluckman@pennmedicine.upenn.edu” <stephen.gluckman@pennmedicine.upenn.edu>, “epocratesMedia@athenahealth.com” <epocratesMedia@athenahealth.com>, “epocrates@athenahealth.com” <epocrates@athenahealth.com>
Date: 07/31/2024 7:40 AM EDT
Subject: Inquiry to the Deputy Director of the Vector-Borne Diseases Division at the CDC

Charles B Beard
Deputy Division Director, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Dear Dr. Beard,

In 1991 the Lyme disease organism, Borrelia burgdorferi, was grown from the cerebrospinal fluid of patient Vicki Logan at the Centers for Disease Control in Fort Collins, Colorado despite prior treatment with intravenous antibiotics. The patient died when the insurer refused additional IV antibiotics. I have attached a copy of Logan’s positive culture report for your review:

Logan CDC Fort Collins Positive CSF Culture Report (Personal Dropbox storage area)
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/agca4ynn9ok2ykgw6484q/Logan-CDC-Fort-Collins-Positive-CSF-Culture-Report.JPG?rlkey=krhiecm1xdmqs6ubhvjxuzzeo&dl=0

In 1995 the following publication identified treatment-resistant neuroborreliosis:
 
European Neurology 1995
Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis
https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/117104

In 2018 all patients were culture positive even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics. Barbour-Stoener-Kelly (BSK) medium was used and is the same complex medium used in the NIH funded Klempner antibiotic trials.

Persistent Borrelia Infection in Patients with Ongoing Symptoms of Lyme Disease
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/6/2/33

A recently published autopsy study for a young Lyme patient who committed suicide identifies chronic Lyme disease in the patient’s brain which was responsible for his neurological symptoms.

Concurrent Infection of the Human Brain with Multiple Borrelia Species
Published in MDPI Nov. 29, 2023
https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/24/23/16906

Excerpt:

The diverse strategies used by spirochetes to avoid the host immune system and persist in the host include active immune suppression, induction of immune tolerance, phase and antigenic variation, intracellular seclusion, changing of morphological and physiological state in varying environments, formation of biofilms and persistent forms, and, importantly, incursion into immune-privileged sites such as the brain. Invasion of immune-privileged sites allows the spirochetes to not only escape from the host immune system but can also reduce the efficacy of antibiotic therapy. 

In addition, there are 700 peer reviewed publications identifying persistent infection and more evidence of seronegative disease.

Question:

As Deputy Director of the Vector-Borne Diseases Division at the CDC, why has all the evidence indicating Borrelia as an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug been ignored for decades?

A response to this inquiry is requested.

Please hit reply all when responding.

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

_______________

**Comment**

When reading the Medscape article, please notice the following:

The committee will not make recommendations on specific approaches to diagnosis and treatment when it issues a report in early 2025 but will instead present “consensus findings” on treatment for chronic illness associated with Lyme disease, including recommendations for advancing treatment.

There have been only a few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted on what the committee is calling Lyme Infection-Associated Chronic Illness (Lyme IACI) for now, and no National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded RCTs in the past 20 years or so. It’s an area void of the US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies, void of any consensus on the off-label use of medications, and without any current standard of care or proven mechanisms and pathophysiology, said John Aucott, MD, director of the Johns Hopkins Medicine Lyme Disease Clinical Research Center, Baltimore, one of the invited speakers at a public meeting held by the NASEM in Washington, DC, in July.”

The best way to look at this illness is not from the silos of infectious disease or the silos of rheumatology; you have to look across disciplines,” Aucott, also associate professor of medicine in the Division of Rheumatology, told the committee. “The story doesn’t fit anything I trained for in my infectious disease fellowship. Even today, I’d posit that PTLD is like an island — it’s still not connected to a lot of the mainstream of medicine.”

COVID showed the world the devastating impact of ‘consensus-based medicine,’ which a report has deemed ‘shocking and immortal.’ In this Communist-type paradigm doctors are told by bureaucrats how to treat, what they can use to treat, and what they can’t use to treat.  Anything outside the lines of this monolith simply aren’t allowed.  Doctors who dare to think for themselves are persecuted and ostracized – with the full weight of the government pressing down upon them –  often times losing their medical license.

This is the world Lyme literate doctors (LLMDs) have lived in for forty years.

The article also regurgitates that only 10-20% go on to suffer with persistent symptoms after treatment, when the actual percentages are approximately 60% as many are not diagnosed or treated until much later – often years later.

Lyme/MSIDS will never fit into RCTs because there are too many variables to fit into a nice four-cornered research box.  Many never test positive on the CDC-2-tiered testing, many never get an EM rash, numerous coinfections are involved, not to mention the fact there are multiple strains of borrelia that testing will not pick up, and symptoms are wildly variable.  No two patients look alike.

HHS ‘Declaration of Emergency’ for Bird Flu Paves Way for PCR Testing and More EUA Vaccines, Critics Say

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/hhs-declaration-of-emergency-bird-flu-pcr-testing-eua-vaccines/

HHS ‘Declaration of Emergency’ for Bird Flu Paves Way for PCR Testing and More EUA Vaccines, Critics Say

Public health authorities have taken a series of actions in recent weeks to facilitate the possible future distribution of bird flu testing and vaccines, even as the CDC maintains the current public health risk from bird flu is low.

chicken and pcr test

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) this month issued a declaration of emergency, announcing that some flu viruses — including H5N1 bird flu — could cause a pandemic and threaten national security.

The announcement by HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra amended a 2013 section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act, which allows the agency to extend the availability of medical countermeasures to pandemic influenza A viruses, including the currently circulating H5N1 strain of bird flu.

Prior to the amendment, the declaration covered only the previous H7N9 strain of bird flu.

The announcement specified that current circumstances justify the emergency use authorization (EUA) of in vitro diagnostics such as RT-PCR tests to detect bird flu and other pandemic influenza A viruses.

“This paves the way for more EUA vaccines, devices and products to possibly be effective against these new and unknown viruses,” attorney Ray Flores told The Defender.

He added:

“Just as EUA PCR tests exaggerated the COVID-19 pandemic, the detection of avian influenza and influenza A viruses with pandemic potential via unlicensed PCR tests is destined to justify lockdowns, masking, invasive nasal swabs, and wide-scale vaccination with experimental mRNA technology.

“The stage is set for RT-PCR tests to take the pivotal role of determining false positives with amped up cycle thresholds designed to declare asymptomatic, otherwise healthy people to be infected — just like last time.”

Under the FD&C Act, HHS can take steps to facilitate countermeasures only after the secretary of either the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Department of Defense or HHS determines there is an emergency or potential for an emergency involving a chemical, biological, radiological or nuclear agent that may threaten the national or health security of U.S. citizens.

After that determination, the HHS secretary can declare that existing circumstances justify an EUA that would allow the FDA to authorize previously unlicensed drugs or vaccines or previously unapproved uses of licensed drugs.

The amendment covers animal or human flu viruses — circulating in wild birds, humans, or domestic animals — that may infect humans, may have caused pandemics in the past or may mutate to cause a pandemic in humans for which they have no prior immunity.

Becerra said in the amendment that the bird flu viruses may pose a public health threat, despite acknowledging that it “may initially only be occasionally transmitted to or between humans.” However, he added that bird flu viruses may “have the potential to become highly transmissible in humans and can cause significant morbidity and mortality.”

The currently circulating H5N1 virus is one in a series of bird flu viruses that pose such a threat, although the virus is not easily transmissible to humans and none of the human cases reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) involved severe disease, the announcement said.

“We cannot be sure,” Becerra said, that the mild cases associated with dairy cattle represent the full spectrum of the disease, “nor can we be assured that the virus will not mutate to cause more severe disease and/or to become more transmissible.”

The CDC reports the current public health risk is low and that surveillance shows “no indicators of unusual influenza activity in people, including avian influenza A(H5).”

There have been a total of 14 reported human cases since 2022, according to the agency. Four occurred after exposure to dairy cows, 10 after exposure to poultry and none have been serious.

Hand in glove holding vaccine

The Vaccine Safety Project

AMA updates vaccine codes for potential EUA vaccine

The day after Becerra’s announcement, on July 19, the American Medical Association (AMA) announced an update to its Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to include a new code for bird flu vaccines, should they receive EUA from the FDA.

CPT codes are used by providers to report healthcare procedures and services and to update medical records.

The AMA said it is publishing the code update now “to ensure electronic systems across the U.S. health care system are prepared in advance for the potential FDA authorization.”

The update included new codes for administering the potential bird flu vaccine to both children and adults.

The new code is for a cell-culture-derived vaccine adjuvanted for intramuscular use, which refers to an inactivated flu virus grown in cultured mammalian cells.

Cell-culture vaccines are a newer technology developed to replace the traditional egg-based vaccine production for flu vaccines. It is said to be cleaner, faster and more scalable than its predecessor.

Vaccine producer contracted to produce millions of doses of bird flu vaccines

The creation of the codes also follows an agreement, announced May 30, between the U.S. government and CSL Seqirus — one of the largest vaccine producers in the world — to complete 4.8 million doses of a “pre-pandemic vaccine that is well-matched to the H5 of the currently circulating H5N1 strain,” as part of the U.S. National Pre-Pandemic Influenza Vaccine Stockpile program.

HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response Dawn O’Connell told reporters some of those shots could be available as early as this month, Reuters reported.

This was the fourth contract awarded to CSL Seqirus under a multi-year agreement with the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), which largely pays for the vaccines.

Marc Lacey, CSL Seqirus global executive director for the pandemic, said in the press release that the CDC maintains that bird flu poses a low risk to public health. However, “This agreement, building upon prior agreements with BARDA, will help support the U.S. government’s ability to respond swiftly in the event that the current avian flu situation changes.”

Seqirus manufactures the vaccines in Holly Springs, North Carolina, at a $1 billion facility built in 2009 and opened in 2013 through a partnership between Novartis and BARDA that was in part facilitated by grants and tax incentives from local government.

CSL Seqirus’ parent company acquired Novartis’ facility in 2014.

The facility is the largest producer of cell-based vaccines in the world, with the capacity to deliver up to 150 million flu vaccines within six months of an emergency pandemic declaration. Then it could continue to produce large quantities of vaccines.

Their massive vaccine production capacity, the company said, is dependent on continued research and development along with seasonal vaccine manufacturing, which provides a “warm base” for pandemic production. That means the production of seasonal vaccines makes it possible for the company to maintain the materials and personnel necessary to produce massive vaccine quantities.

CSL Seqirus’ H5N8 avian influenza vaccine received the European Union’s marketing authorization in April. The vaccine requires a two-dose series, with the second dose administered at least three weeks after the first.

The European Commission Health Emergency Preparedness and Response (HERA) program in June announced the purchase of 665,000 doses of CSL Seqirus’ H5N8 avian influenza vaccine, with an option to acquire another 40 million doses over the next four years.

Finland already plans to offer the CSL Seqirus H5N8 bird flu vaccine to approximately 10,000 people deemed at high risk of exposure to the virus.

WHO announces project to fast-track mRNA bird flu vaccines

The World Health Organization (WHO) today announced a new project to speed up the “development and accessibility” of an mRNA bird flu vaccine for manufacturers in low- and middle-income countries as part of the mRNA Technology Transfer Programme.

The same program was used to help develop and transfer the mRNA platform for COVID-19 to the developing world.

Earlier this month, BARDA awarded $176 million to Moderna to develop and test its pre-pandemic mRNA vaccine against H5N1.

Late-stage testing would begin in 2025, pending results from the Phase 1/2 trial of five different mRNA vaccine options testing on about 1,500 people that concluded last week.

The contract includes options to speed up the development timeline if there is an increase in the number of human cases, the severity of the virus or if human-to-human transmission becomes possible, Reuters reported.

The U.S. government is also in talks with Pfizer about possibly supporting its development of an mRNA vaccine targeting the H5 family of bird flu viruses, according to the Financial Times.

‘Mock-up’ vaccines allow industry to roll out experimental shots with little testing

Becerra’s declaration offered a brief overview of previous bird flu viruses that threatened public health, citing the 2009 A/H1N1 influenza pandemic and the H7N9, in 2013-2014.

High mortality rates allegedly associated with these strains were offered as justification for concern that although the current bird flu strain does not easily transmit to humans and is not particularly virulent, it could become so.

Discussing this hypothesis and the possible reasons behind it with Children’s Health Defense (CHD) Chief Scientific Officer Brian Hooker, Ph.D., on a recent episode of his CHD.TV show “Doctors & Scientists,” internist Dr. Meryl Nass said:

“The people who make their money by warning us about pandemics, by selling pandemic products, people who get promotions because they have developed pandemic vaccines or been involved in some way in tests or other, the pandemic industry has been very interested for over 20 years in figuring out ways to give experimental vaccines that they develop very quickly to an entire population without having to test them. Because if you test them, it takes months longer before you can give them out, and your pandemic is likely to be over at that point.

“You need to roll them out fast if you’re going to use them. And if you’re going to cause a nation to spend millions or billions of dollars buying them, you’re going to have to come up with them quickly.”

Nass explained how the industry can quickly create and roll out new pandemic vaccines in the U.S. by creating “mock-up” vaccines that are later used as platforms for new vaccines. Drugmakers use existing vaccines as substrates and can insert new antigens into them when a new virus strain appears in what Nass called a “plug and play” approach to making new vaccines.

Nass reviewed the three currently approved bird flu vaccines, raising serious questions about the small size of the clinical trials and serious adverse events in the trials, including fatalities.

For example, she said, Sanofi Pasteur’s bird flu vaccine was licensed in 2007 for the national stockpile based on a clinical trial of only 103 subjects. One of those subjects died and three others experienced a serious adverse event, including cancer.

In trials for GSK’s vaccine, licensed in 2013, 0.5% of subjects experienced serious adverse events, including thyroid cancer and cerebral vascular events. In the trials for Audenz, CSL Seqirus’ H5N1 vaccine, serious adverse events occurred in all age groups, including deaths in older adults.

These vaccines, she said, are prototypes for vaccines that could be emergency authorized for the current virus.

According to Nass, the media are telling people — referring to a May 2024 article in The Guardian — “the only question is when do we pull the trigger on these vaccines?”Nass added that the U.S. government in May relaxed the rules for handling bird viruses so they could be examined in regular hospital labs rather than high-security labs.

“So the U.S. government is trying to imply that this is a deadly virus, but they’re acknowledging it is basically a nothing burger virus for humans at this time,” she said.

However, she warned, the vaccines themselves could be dangerous.