Archive for the ‘Lyme’ Category

Regaining Control Of Your Day, Life – Why Agency is Important For Lyme Warriors

https://globallymealliance.org/regaining-control-day-life-agency-important-lyme-warriors/

Copy-of-MyLymeLife_2-4-1


by Jennifer Crystal

Agency—or, having a voice, having the power to make free choices about issues related to you or your body—has been a big buzzword in the news lately. I’ve been thinking about the word in the context of my own life.

For nine months, I was in a serious relationship with a man who seemingly understood and supported my needs as a chronic Lyme patient. And then, suddenly and without warning, I wasn’t. He decided he was done and simply informed me of his choice; I had no say in the matter.

Had the breakup happened mutually, or at least over time—with the discussion and effort we’d promised each other—it still would have been difficult, but at least I would have had some agency. And for a patient of chronic illness, that’s not a small thing.

Having the bottom drop out on my personal and emotional life was a sad reminder of the ways it had dropped out on me physically, many times. The chronically ill, and people who suddenly become sick or injured, are stripped of agency. It happens when we get sick without warning, when we can’t control how or if we’ll get better, when we’re dismissed by medical professionals. As a result, it’s that much more frustrating when we can have a say about something, but aren’t granted it.

Everyone deserves a voice. I learned this years ago as a summer camp counselor. During counselor meetings we would discuss issues campers were having due to behavioral challenges. A wise colleague taught us that every child needs four things: love, safety, fun, and power. When one of those basic needs is threatened, kids act out. I readily understood why children need love, safety, and fun. But I realized they need power, too, because they are often told what they can and cannot do; they don’t feel like they have a say over their lives. Giving them agency makes them feel more in control. Campers were less likely to break cabin rules if they helped create them.

When a Lyme Literate Medical Doctor (LLMD) finally put the pieces of my medical puzzle together and made an accurate diagnosis of Lyme disease—in addition to the co-infections babesia and ehrlichia—I at last felt I was heard and validated. Treatment was long and arduous and I had little control over how I felt day to day, but as I regained strength, I also regained agency. Over time, I could rely on my body more. I eventually knew when I would have good energy and when I wouldn’t, and learned habits to promote the good energy. I learned to speak up for my needs. Tick-borne illnesses were no longer completely running my life.

Then the bottom dropped out again: I relapsed. I fell into a pit of despair, not only because I was physically back at ground zero, but because I’d had no say in getting there. Sure, I’d taken on a lot and gotten overly stressed, factors that I now know can play a role in relapse. But the relapse itself was not my doing. That was up to the spirochetesthat ran rampant in my body. I hated that I was once again at the whim of my illnesses, not of my own free will. I couldn’t work, live independently, exercise or do anything I wanted to do, and I railed against that loss of freedom.

Cognitive behavioral therapy helped me to take control over little things, even though so much was out of my hands. I had no say as to whether the antibiotics would work, how long it would take for me to get well, or if I even would. But I could control choices that would help my chances of my achieving remission. I could parse out my energy. I could limit screen time that riled up my neurological symptoms. I could eat healthy foods. I could say no to going somewhere or doing something when I didn’t feel well enough to do so.

And I could say no even if I did feel well enough to do something. One night during my recovery, my parents invited me out to dinner. It was a sweet and generous offer. They were surprised when I declined, because I seemed to have good energy that night. Why wouldn’t I go out if I could? But I didn’t want to go out to dinner. I wanted to stay home and have a little time to myself, maybe call a friend. Making decisions about what I wanted to do, instead of feeling like I had to do something just because I could, was an important way of maintaining agency.

We can’t always guard against the bottom dropping out in life. But sick or healthy, it’s important that we allow ourselves agency over those small things we can control. And it’s especially important for us to respect others enough to give them a say over matters that pertain to them or their bodies. We all want to take part in our own lives, not have life just happen to us. Everyone deserves that power!


Opinions expressed by contributors are their own.

Jennifer Crystal is a writer and educator in Boston. She has written a memoir, One Tick Stopped the Clock, for which she is seeking representation. Contact her at: lymewarriorjennifercrystal@gmail.com. 

 

 

 

A Man Went to the Optometrist With Something Stuck in His Eye. The Doctor Pulled Out a Tick

https://www.cnn.com/2019/07/16/us/kentucky-man-tick-in-eyeball-trnd/index.html

A man went to the optometrist with something stuck in his eye. The doctor pulled out a tick.

Prater didn’t originally think anything of the irritation before the diagnosis. It must’ve been the sawdust that got caught in his eyeball, he thought, and he could easily flush it out later.
Flush he did, but the discomfort persisted. Prater begrudgingly saw an optometrist who broke the news — a deer tick had taken up residence in his cornea.
Before Prater could wrap his head around it, the doctor numbed his eye and plucked the pest out with tweezers.
The tick made a “little popping sound” as it was pulled out, he said.
The doctor sent him off with antibiotics and a prescription for steroid eye drops. And Prater left with one less living thing sharing his body.

Forget why ticks are terrible? Let’s review

When it comes to finding new ways to freak people out, the bloodsucking disease-spreading parasite just won’t quit.
Prater’s tick-in-the-eye isn’t even the first reported: an eye doctor recounted yanking a live tick out of a man’s eye in a 2011 report from the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
And they’re not partial to eyeballs, either. A 9-year-old boy in Connecticut returned from a romp at the playground to find a tick embedded in his ear, feeding on the blood from his eardrum tissue. If it hadn’t been removed, doctors said the tick’s tissue-munching might’ve impaired his hearing.
Oh, and researchers recently discovered that a species that has learned to clone itself and is predicted to “soon occupy a large swath of eastern North America.”
In short: thank you, ticks, for absolutely nothing.
___________________
For more:
So, here’s the question to entomologists who claim ticks don’t drop from trees…..how did this man get a tick in his eye while cutting a tree?
https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/07/13/tv-anchor-speaks-out-about-lyme-disease/  I met Mike in person and he stands by his story that he was bit by a nymphal tick that dropped from a tree onto him when he was at a garden party on a deck.
Again, I’ve personally had ticks on my basement screens after a local farmer cut grass and blew them toward my house. Some even made it inside onto my basement walls, where they were promptly crucified.

Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/24834661?

Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis

JUL 17, 2019 — 

The letter below was forwarded to the Tick-Borne Disease Working Group as a follow-up to the first letter sent to Auwaerter which can be viewed here: https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/24825076

Lyme Bumper Stickers (Public Service Announcement)
https://www.ebay.com/itm/123659578861

WAKE UP AMERICA!

 

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: tickbornedisease@hhs.gov, chris.smith@mail.house.gov
Cc: (98 Undisclosed recipients)
Date: July 17, 2019 at 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: Lyme disease often misdiagnosed, resulting in unnecessary antibiotics

To the Tick-Borne Disease Working Group,

Please see my second letter below (and attachment) to Dr. Auwaerter referencing Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis. 

-Carl Tuttle

2nd Letter to Auwaerter:

——- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: Paul Auwaerter <pauwaert@jhmi.edu>
Cc: psax@bwh.harvard.edu, jli@bwh.harvard.edu, cbusky@idsociety.org, tkobaya5@jhmi.edu, jmstiglich@healio.com, infectiousdisease@healio.com
Date: July 17, 2019 at 11:41 AM
Subject: Re: Lyme disease often misdiagnosed, resulting in unnecessary antibiotics

Lyme disease often misdiagnosed, resulting in unnecessary antibiotics
Kobayashi T, et. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz299.

July 17, 2019

The IDSA Foundation
1300 Wilson Boulevard Suite 300
Arlington, VA 22209
Attn:  Paul Auwaerter, vice chair of the IDSA Foundation

Dear Dr. Auwaerter,

While you contemplate your response to my inquiry requesting grant money for the purpose of proficiency testing of direct detection methods for Borrelia (DNA Sequencing). I would like to point out the following 1995 case study from Stony Brook Lyme Clinic.

I understand the patient received thirteen spinal taps, multiple courses of IV and oral meds, and relapsed after each one, proven by CSF antigens and/or PCR. The only way this patient (said to be a physician) remained in remission was to keep her on open ended clarithromycin- was on it for 22 months by the time of publication.

Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis.  
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7796837

Lawrence C.a · Lipton R.B.b · Lowy F.D.c · Coyle P.K.d

aDepartment of Medicine, bDepartment of Neurology, and cDivision of Infectious Diseases, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and dDepartment of Neurology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York, NY., USA

Eur Neurol 1995; 35:113–117  (DOI:10.1159/000117104)

Abstract

We report an unusual patient with evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi infection who experienced repeated neurologic relapses despite aggressive antibiotic therapy. Each course of therapy was associated with a Jarisch-Herxheimer-like reaction. Although the patient never had detectable free antibodies to B. burgdorferi in serum or spinal fluid, the CSF was positive on multiple occasions for complexed anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies, B. burgdorferi nucleic acids and free antigen.

________________________

This is not the only case where a negative antibody response was identified. In fact I have attached the following document referencing:

Seronegativity in Lyme borreliosis and Other Spirochetal Infections

https://www.dropbox.com/s/3d6m45jzlhhwalu/Seronegativity.pdf?dl=0

“If false results are to be feared, it is the false negative result which holds the greatest peril for the patient.”

Your publication in Open Forum Infectious Diseases and the Healio article is suggesting that a patient couldn’t possibly have Lyme if they don’t test positive on the outdated two-tier testing algorithm. This is misleading to the reader and the medical community.

Please see the following article regarding the difficulty in diagnosing Lyme disease:

The Staggering Cost of Lyme Disease and Other Tick-Borne Illnesses

PR Newswire July 10, 2019

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/staggering-cost-lyme-disease-other-123600606.html

According to the survey:

-45% of patients needed more than three years to obtain the proper diagnosis

-65% of patients were forced to quit a job or cut back on their hours due to their symptoms

-24% of patients saw more than ten doctors before receiving a proper diagnosis

-86% of patients suffer from long-term side effects from not having been diagnosed sooner

Researchers hope that the survey will help educate the public on the risks associated with delaying testing or relying on old testing techniques. “In our view, many patients are missed because much of the testing recommended by general practitioners is based on technology from 25 years ago,” says Dr. Shah. “Science has progressed, and we can now give patients a much more accurate diagnosis than was available years ago.”

_________________________________

Dr. Auwaerter, how many Lyme patients were turned away from your clinic and left untreated because they did not test positive through unreliable serology?

It is time to move forward and find a better approach. Please stop this nonsense.

Sincerely,

Carl Tuttle

Lyme Endemic Hudson, NH

____________________

**Comment**

One of the best quotes on abysmal serology testing:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/07/09/idsa-founder-used-potent-iv-antibiotics-for-chronic-lyme/

“Setting arbitrary level of antibodies to diagnose a disease that has not been amenable to Koch’s postulates seems open to question.  By the same token, ignoring antibody results unless they meet arbitrary levels seems suspect. The vast majority of patients in this series showed some WB antibody exposure, but many did not meet the arbitrary limits set….in our present state of knowledge, the diagnosis of chronic Lyme disease is a clinical one.  Many of the patients in this series have suffered serious ‘hurts’ when they have been told that they could not have LD because their WB did not meet arbitrary limits.”  – Dr. Waisbren (RIP)

 

Symptom Resolution in Pediatric Patients With Lyme Disease

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30060012/

2019 May 11;8(2):170-173. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piy067.

Symptom Resolution in Pediatric Patients With Lyme Disease.

Abstract

We performed a retrospective study to determine the time frame for symptom resolution in 78 pediatric patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed early-disseminated or late-stage Lyme disease. The vast majority of the patients improved promptly after receiving appropriate antibiotics. Patients with a longer duration of arthritis before the institution of therapy experienced a longer time to recovery.

________________

**Comment**

The difference between a prospective study vs a retrospective study:  https://www.statsdirect.com/help/basics/prospective.htm

Prospective:  A prospective study watches for outcomes, such as the development of a disease, during the study period and relates this to other factors such as suspected risk or protection factor(s). The study usually involves taking a cohort of subjects and watching them over a long period. 

Retrospective:  A retrospective study looks backwards and examines exposures to suspected risk or protection factors in relation to an outcome that is established at the start of the study. Most sources of error due to confounding and bias are more common in retrospective studies than in prospective studies. You should take special care to avoid sources of bias and confounding in retrospective studies.

In this retrospective study, there is going to be bias as they again use “laboratory-confirmed” testing, which is going to be that same-o-same-o CDC two-tiered serology that misses over half of all cases.  A chunk of patients are omitted right from the get go.

The “vast majority” of patients improving, again is a biased statement as a multitude were excluded from the study. And while it’s true that many improve promptly with treatment, treatment failures have existed from the beginning of time: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/02/22/why-mainstream-lyme-msids-research-remains-in-the-dark-ages/

The only redeeming statement is that those with longer duration of arthritis before treatment required a longer recovery.  Unfortunately, due to bias, so many patients are omitted, so many symptoms were not accepted, and therefore this study only regurgitates previous studies done by The Cabal:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/01/13/lyme-science-owned-by-good-ol-boys/

Many scientists have been ostracized for not following the party line.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/01/13/lyme-science-owned-by-good-ol-boys/

 

Lyme Neuroborreliosis: Clinical Outcomes, Controversy, Pathogenesis, and Polymicrobial Infections

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30536421/

2019 Jan;85(1):21-31. doi: 10.1002/ana.25389.

Lyme Neuroborreliosis: Clinical Outcomes, Controversy, Pathogenesis, and Polymicrobial Infections.

Abstract

Lyme borreliosis is the object of numerous misconceptions. In this review, we revisit the fundamental manifestations of neuroborreliosis (meningitis, cranial neuritis, and radiculoneuritis), as these have withstood the test of time. We also discuss other manifestations that are less frequent. Stroke, as a manifestation of Lyme neuroborreliosis, is considered in the context of other infections. The summary of the literature regarding clinical outcomes of neuroborreliosis leads to its controversies. We also include new information on pathogenesis and on the polymicrobial nature of tick-borne diseases. In this way, we update the review that we wrote in this journal in 1995. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:21-31.

_______________

**Comment**

The reason the “summary of the literature” has led to controversies is those studies were nearly all done by “The Cabal” whom have patents on the organism itself, test kits, and vaccines:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/06/28/who-owns-the-elisa-patents/, and ConflictReport

As long as researchers continue to utilize ancient, flawed research done by those with conflicts of interest, we will continue to go no where.

I am encouraged that they admit the controversy as well as the polymicrobial nature of Lyme (more than one pathogen). This admission is more than many researchers make.  Also, please note the serious manifestations of neuroborreliosis: meningitis, cranial neuritis, radiculoneuritis, and stroke.

Please, researchers, do your own work and keep an open mind.