Archive for the ‘Lyme’ Category

Amendments to Increase Lyme Disease Funding Passes House

https://lymediseaseassociation.org/uncategorized/breaking-lyme-news-today/

Breaking Lyme News

The Lyme Disease Association is pleased to announce that Congressman Chris Smith (NJ-4) has been successful in having 2 bipartisan amendments to increase Lyme disease funding by $8 M pass the House today. The Amendments are part of the House consideration of Labor HHS and Education and Related Agencies Appropriations Act.

One amendment enables the Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) to redirect funds from one of its accounts to its CDC’s Emerging Zoonotic and Infectious Disease account for Lyme disease activities.  The other directs the  Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to spend $5 million of its funding on the LymeX Innovation Accelerator—a new public-private partnership with the Steven & Alexander Cohen Foundation which would spur innovative research through a prize competition. The Lyme disease amendments were co-sponsored by a group of bipartisan Lyme Caucus members.

Congressman Smith also had $10 M increase in autism funding pass the House today.

Next stop Senate

Language to enhance research for Lyme disease research which was supported by bipartisan members of the Lyme caucus was also contained in the Report language of the HHS Labor Appropriations more than a week ago. The Lyme Disease Association Inc. had input into the development of that language.

_____________________

**Comment**

It is my opinion that nothing will be done at the governmental level regarding Lyme/MSIDS for numerous reasons, one of which is that they very well could be behind it all.  Also, CDC employees own patents on nearly every aspect surrounding Lyme/MSIDS.  See: ConflictReport  Even agency scientists have exposed a long litany of corruption.  For yet another example, go here.

These conflicts make them unfit to make any decisions about public health.

Call me crazy, but I never stand behind a horse or cow that’s kicked me once let alone hundreds of times.
The CDC/NIH/IDSA has done nothing but kick patients and the doctors who dare treat them for over 40 years.

Time for a CDC/NIAID/FDA walkaway movement.

ILADS Conference Update

ILADS-Orlando-Header2-copy-1024x282

Registration is Now Open for the 22nd Annual Scientific Conference

Save $250 with Early-Bird Pricing — Through August 27, 2021

 

Reasons to Attend the ILADS Annual Conference
1. Connect in-person with today’s headline-makers such as Nicole Baumgarth, DVM, PhD; Dan Kastner, MD, PhD; Pierre Kory, MD, MPA; Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH and others.

2. Engage one-on-one with experts on topics vital to your patient’s health and well-being such as COVID, autoimmunity and chronic inflammation.

3. Learn the tools for early diagnosis and treatment of COVID variants and how to provide individualized care for our patient base.

4. Hear critical developments presented that will require interpersonal interactions, formally and informally.

5. Relax and reconnect with colleagues at the spacious Hyatt Regency Grand Cypress, ranked #1 on Conde Nast 2019 Reader’s Choice Awards.

 

COVID is with us to stay, as we’ve learned from the recent uptick in cases caused by the Delta variant. Even so, after over a year of limited physical business interaction, the pandemic has confirmed the unparalleled value of live events.

We are carefully monitoring the situation in Florida and are cautiously optimistic that things will improve by the time our event takes place in October.

Re-energize your education, your network and your spirit in Orlando. Get out your suitcase and let’s get back together!  

Conference schedule:  https://www.ilads.org/ilads-conference/ilads-annual-conference-2021-3/#

To Register:  https://www.ilads.org/ilads-conference/ilads-annual-conference-2021-3/

Rhode Island Lyme Resolution Passed By Senate

https://legiscan.com/RI/text/S0711/2021

Bill Text: RI S0711 | 2021 | Regular Session | Amended


Bill Title: Senate Resolution Respectfully Requesting That The Rhode Island Department Of Health

  • Increase Public Awareness Of Activities That Expose People To Ticks
  • Better Educate The Public About The Symptoms Of Lyme Disease And The Importance Of Early Detection
  • Update Their Findings, Data, And Physician Protocols With Regards To The Early Detection And Treatment Of Lyme DiseaseSpectrum: Partisan Bill (Democrat 1-0)

    Status: (Introduced – Dead) 2021-06-01 – Senate passed as amended (floor amendment) [S0711 Detail]

    Download: Rhode_Island-2021-S0711-Amended.pdf

Next TBDWG Meeting – August, 2021

https://www.hhs.gov/ash/advisory-committees/tickbornedisease/meetings/2021-08-26/index.html

August 26, 2021, TBDWG Meeting (online)

August 26, 2021

During this meeting, TBDWG members will focus on plans to develop the next report due December 2022 on federal tick-borne activities and research, taking into consideration the 2018 and 2020 reports.

Federal Register Notice


Meeting Registration

https://kauffmaninc.adobeconnect.com/meeting19tbdwg/event/event_info.html exit disclaimer icon


Public Comment – Information and Instructions

The public will have an opportunity to present their views to the TBDWG during the meeting’s public comment session or by submitting their views in writing. Comments should be pertinent to the meeting discussion.

Verbal Public Comment:

Verbal remarks will be provided by the public over the phone during the live webcast and become part of the archived recording and meeting summary posted on this website.

Date and time: Thursday, August 26 (Exact time forthcoming)

To sign-up for verbal public comment:

  • Submit an email request to tickbornedisease@hhs.gov
  • Use the email subject line: Verbal Public Comment – August 26
  • Deadline: All sign-up requests must be received by 11:59 p.m., ET, Tuesday, August 17

Next steps: If more requests to provide verbal public comment are received than can be accommodated during this meeting, speakers will be randomly selected. You will receive notification on the status of your request on Monday, August 23.

  • If you are selected to provide verbal public comment at the meeting, you will be asked to confirm that you are still available to speak during the assigned time. Upon confirmation, you will receive a call-in number and time to provide your comment. Each person will be limited to 3 minutes in order to accommodate as many speakers as possible. If you are no longer able to provide verbal public comment, HHS will randomly select another speaker.
  • If you are not selected, you are welcome to submit your name for consideration in a future meeting of the Working Group once the meeting information is posted.
  • Please note that after this meeting, preference will be given to individuals who have not provided verbal comments at a meeting of the 2022 Working Group.

Written Public Comment:

Written public comments are shared with Working Group members and posted on this webpage and made accessible to the public in advance of the meeting.

To submit a written public comment:

  • Submit an email to tickbornedisease@hhs.gov
  • Use the email subject line: Written Public Comment – August 26
  • Deadline: All written comments must be received by 11:59 p.m., ET, Tuesday, August 17
  • Provide your preferred identification: Tell us how you prefer to be identified with your comment. We cannot post your comment without this information. You may choose one or more of the following options:
    • Use your name
    • Be listed as anonymous
    • Include your city and/or state
    • Provide comments on behalf of an organization (please include the organization’s full name)

Writing your public comment:

  • Format: Comments must be in the body of your email or in an attached Word document.
  • Page Limit: Comments must not exceed four (4) pages in Calibri or Times New Roman, 11 point font (text that exceeds four pages will be deleted).
  • Graphics: Do not include graphics, images, text boxes, or tables. If included, they will not be retained.
  • Links: Hyperlinks will only be added for “.gov” sites (local, state, or federal). For all other reference sites, please insert the full URL (e.g., http://learn.genetics.utah.edu/content/epigenetics).
  • Attachments: Do not include any attachments. We are also unable to include attachments as supporting documentation to written comments.

Next steps: Your written comment will be posted to this website before the meeting. If you have any questions or concerns about submitting your comment, contact us at tickbornedisease@hhs.gov

__________________

**Comment**

It is my strong opinion that the Lyme/MSIDS community will only move forward by doing the work ourselves, independently from the government and institutions/researchers that own patents on products relating to tick-borne illness.  We have tried working with the government for over 40 years with no measurable positive results. Productive help has only occurred by independent researchers and ILADS trained doctors who are clinically treating patients.

I DO NOT SUPPORT OR PROMOTE ANY MORE LYME/MSIDS/TICK RESEARCH FUNDING TO THE NIH/CDC/NIAID/IDSA WHO HAVE ONLY REPEATEDLY PROVEN THEY ARE AGAINST PATIENTS.

For more:  

Doctors Warn CDC, “It’s Not All COVID” And Anchoring Bias is Causing Doctors To Miss Tick-Borne Infections

https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/27/8/21-1107_article

Volume 27, Number 8—August 2021
Research Letter

COVID-19 and the Consequences of Anchoring Bias

Harold W. HorowitzComments to Author , Caren Behar, and Jeffrey Greene
Author affiliations: Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA (H.W. Horowitz)New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA (H.W. Horowitz)New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York (C. Behar, J. Greene)

Abstract

Suspicion of coronavirus disease in febrile patients might lead to anchoring bias, causing misdiagnosis of other infections for which epidemiologic risks are present. This bias has potentially severe consequences, illustrated by cases of human granulocytic anaplasmosis and Lyme disease in a pregnant woman and human granulocytic anaplasmosis in another person.

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) took the United States by force during the first quarter of 2020, affecting the economy, societal norms, and the delivery of medical care (1,2). As fear of COVID-19 has spread, diagnosing COVID-19 in febrile persons has been prioritized, and patients may be presumed to have COVID-19 pending results of testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). This mindset has had unintended consequences, including delaying of evaluations for other infectious diseases, potentially leading to adverse outcomes. We describe 2 cases that illustrate this point.

In the first case, a 35-year-old man left New York, New York, USA, to go hiking in Maryland during June 5–June 7, 2020. He experienced fever, body aches, and fatigue during June 10–13 that resolved but left him fatigued and weak. He was seen on June 19; laboratory results were unremarkable, but lymphopenia was detected. He tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 on June 19 and June 25 by PCR. On June 25, ELISA for Lyme disease was positive, and reflex to Western blot revealed IgM 41-kD, 39-kD, and 23-kD bands but no IgG bands. Fever up to 38°C recurred on June 22 and lasted until June 29; he also experienced persistent fatigue and myalgia. Further testing on July 6 revealed serologic results for Lyme similar to results from June 25 and Anaplasma phagocytophilum titers of IgM 1:320 and IgG 1:1260. Anaplasma PCR was negative on that date. He was treated with doxycycline for 10 days and recovered.

In the second case, a 31-year-old woman who was 6 months pregnant left New York at the end of May 2020 to rent a house in Ulster County, New York. On June 3, she removed a tick from her neck. On June 9, she experienced severe headaches and the next day had low-grade fever, chills, and body aches. She had no cough, shortness of breath, or sore throat. On June 10, she tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by PCR. She continued to have extreme fatigue, myalgia, and low-grade fever. She was prescribed oseltamivir by her obstetrician on June 11. On June 14, she felt better. Repeat PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2 on June 15 was negative. She continued to improve until June 23, when she experienced recurrent fever up to 38.9°C, chills, and lethargy. She contacted her obstetrician and was told she had a presumptive diagnosis of COVID-19. On June 30, she saw her internist and underwent laboratory testing for tickborne illnesses; she was treated empirically with amoxicillin because of her risks for Lyme disease. PCR for A. phagocytophilum was positive, as was a second test on July 8. Serologic results for Lyme were positive for 41-kD, 39-kD, and 23-kD bands with no IgG bands. Platelets were 140,000 (previously 336,000), aspartate aminotransferase was 95, and alanine aminotransferase was 81. Several weeks later, studies revealed anaplasma IgM 1:256 and IgG 1:1,280. Lyme disease C6 antibody was positive. After discussion, the patient and her physicians chose not to treat for anaplasmosis because she was clinically improving. The patient has remained well, and the child was born healthy by normal spontaneous vaginal delivery.

COVID-19 has had devastating effects on the medical system and led to widespread changes in the practice of medicine. We believe that the imperative to rule out COVID-19 led to diagnostic anchoring bias in these cases. Such biases are among the most common in the heuristic decision-making process (3,4). Of note, in these 2 cases (case 1, human granulocytic anaplasmosis [HGA]; case 2, co-infection with Lyme disease and HGA), COVID-19 was ruled out without considering other diagnoses, even though the patients were visiting areas to which tickborne diseases are endemic. Given the incidence of such diseases in these areas and widespread attempts to educate healthcare providers about these diseases, failure to evaluate for tickborne infections would be difficult to imagine before COVID-19. Although both of these patients have done well, serious consequences to the fetus could have occurred if Lyme disease had gone undiagnosed and untreated (5). Although transmission of A. phagocytophilum during pregnancy has been reported (6) and treatment during pregnancy in a limited number of cases has possibly prevented transmission (7), in this instance the patient cleared the anaplasma without treatment, and the child was born disease-free. Clearance of infection without treatment has been reported in other studies, but we are unaware of cases describing the outcome of pregnancy in untreated women with acute HGA (8).

We appreciate the devastating effects that a missed COVID-19 diagnosis can have on a person, as well as the epidemiologic implications thereof. However, failing to diagnose tickborne illnesses and other infections also can have serious consequences. Healthcare providers must keep an open mind to diagnoses other than COVID-19 in febrile patients and not fall prey to misdiagnosis because of current pressures to evaluate for COVID-19.

Dr. Horowitz is clinical professor of medicine at Weill Cornell Medicine and chief of infectious diseases at New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital. He has been involved in clinical practice for the past 38 years, and his research has focused on immune-suppressed patients, tickborne diseases, and, more recently, antimicrobial stewardship and hospital-acquired infections.

References

  1. CDC. COVID-19 Response Team. Severe outcomes among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)—United States, February 12–March 16, 2020. MMWR Morb Wkly Rep. 2020;69:343–6.
  2. Hollander  JECarr  BGVirtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19. N Engl J Med2020;382:167981DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  3. Sapersnik  GRedelmeier  DRuff  CC, et a. Cognitive biases associated with medical decisions: a systematic review. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak2016;16:138DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  4. Ogdie  ARReilly  JBPang  WGKeddem  SBarg  FKVon Feldt  JMet al. Seen through their eyes: residents’ reflections on the cognitive and contextual components of diagnostic errors in medicine. Acad Med2012;87:13617DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  5. Waddell  LAGreig  JLindsay  LRHinckley  AFOgden  NHA systematic review on the impact of gestational Lyme disease in humans on the fetus and newborn. PLoS One2018;13:e0207067. DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  6. Horowitz  HWKilchevski  EHaber  Set al. Brief report: Perinatal transmission of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis agent. N Engl J Med1998;339:3758DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  7. Dhand  ANadelman  RBAguero-Rosenfeld  MEHaddad  FStokes  DHorowitz  HWHuman granulocytic anaplasmosis in pregnancy: case series and review of literature. Clin Infect Dis2007;45:58993DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link
  8. Bakken  JSHaller  IRiddell  DWalls  JJDumler  JSThe serological response of patients infected with the agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis. Clin Infect Dis2002;34:227DOIExternal LinkPubMedExternal Link

DOI: 10.3201/eid2708.211107

Original Publication Date: July 01, 2021