Teresa will discuss a simple, effective, and well researched approach to utilizing herbals in the management of Lyme disease, bartonella, and babesia. Participants will leave the presentation with treatment options that are easy to implement.
Upon completion of Teresa’s presentation, participants will be aware of the following:
• Unique signs and symptoms to help differentiate between borrelia, bartonella, and babesia by history and physical exam
• What causes microbial persistence and how to address these difficulties
• Awareness of clinical studies comparing several antibiotic protocols to herbal products
• Review the properties of the most efficacious herbs for the treatment of Lyme disease, bartonella and babesia.
This webinar will be recorded and sent to all registered attendees.
Available through ILADS
To access the FREE 1.5 hour ILADS December webinar titled “At the Frontlines of Chronic Illness: A Conversation with ILADS Experts”,go here.
Another ill-conceived effort to reform the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) pathway directly threatens access to countless safe supplements and natural products. Action Alert!
THE TOPLINE
Rep. Pallone’s GRAS reform bill would eliminate the self-affirmed GRAS pathway and replace it with an FDA pre-approval system—raising costs, reducing competition, and threatening access to many safe, natural supplement ingredients.
The bill gives FDA broad new powers to retroactively challenge existing ingredients and to reassess GRAS substances without considering dose, opening the door to EU-style bans on nutrients essential for health.
While transparency reforms are needed, abolishing the “self-GRAS” pathway entirely would overwhelm FDA and harm consumers, all while failing to address the real problem: the risk assessment approach used by the agency itself that has allowed many dangerous food additives to remain on the US market.
Over the last few months, we’ve been telling you about federal bills aimed at reforming how food and supplement ingredients come to the market through the “Generally Recognized as Safe” (GRAS) pathway. These bills have come on the heels of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. identifying the elimination of dangerous food additives as a priority, asking the FDA to explore eliminating the “self-GRAS” pathway, whereby companies certify an ingredient as GRAS and add it to food without notifying the agency.
We’ve argued that many of these proposals, however well-intentioned, are misguided. Yes, we all want safer food. Yes, some unscrupulous companies may take advantage of the self-GRAS pathway to sneak bad ingredients into food. But the truth is that the US GRAS system is the primary mechanism used to get micronutrients—like vitamins, minerals, amino acids, and thousands of botanicals—as well as food additives like dyes, preservatives, thickeners and a whole host of other additives that have technological, rather than nutritional, functions, onto the US market.
This means that if you set up roadblocks and pre-market approvals for the food additives that any health-conscious consumer might have concerns about, you also threaten consumer access to thousands of entirely safe, natural ingredients which come to the market as GRAS—including many of the ingredients in supplements you care about. Changing the entire regime into a de facto pre-market approval system, with the FDA as the gatekeeper, is, as we wrote in our white paper on this topic, like throwing the baby out with the bathwater. It will have the effect of reducing consumer access to some of the healthiest ingredients that are both know to be safe and proven to be of benefit to health. It will also impact the smaller, more innovative manufacturers and suppliers the most by creating regulatory barriers that are only accessible to big players. This is exactly what we don’t want because it ends up depriving citizens of choice.
A Push for Reform That Misses the Mark
A bill introduced by Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) to reform the GRAS system makes many of the same mistakes as the other bills we’ve covered previously (here and here). Rep. Pallone’s bill proposes eliminating ‘self-GRAS’ entirely, requiring companies to submit detailed notifications to the FDA on new GRAS substances; only after the FDA has issued a written statement to not object to the GRAS notice can that ingredient be used. This is a pre-approval system for GRAS ingredients, plain and simple, which will increase costs, decrease competition, and eliminate many safe, healthy ingredients from the marketplace.
Speaking to the problems with this bill, ANH General Counsel Jonathan Emord said, “Regrettably, Congressman Frank Palone’s bill eliminates all future self-GRAS but grandfathers all prior self-GRAS determinations, leaving in the market the very subset of unsafe food additives in need of removal. The bill is underinclusive and overinclusive, failing to direct government to target demonstrably unsafe food additives for market removal, whether FDA approved or self-GRAS—the approach ANH advocates in our white paper on the subject).”
A Dangerous Expansion of FDA Power
Further, the FDA is handed the authority to require a GRAS notice for any ingredient considered GRAS before the enactment of the bill, giving the agency arbitrary authority to go after ingredients it doesn’t like. You can bet that natural substances and supplements that compete with drugs are on the hit list.
The Precautionary Principle Problem
The bill also requires the FDA to reassess 10 GRAS ingredients every three years, looking at, among other things, whether the ingredient is carcinogenic or can cause reproductive or developmental issues—without specifying that the assessment should be based on the intended use and dose. This pushes us directly into the problems caused by relying on the precautionary principlewhich dominates assessments by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), thatwe wrote about previously, that have been catastrophic for consumer choice in Europe.
Emord also spoke to this issue: “This bill invites all new food additives to be assessed for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity without regard to dose. That undermines the historic toxicological basis for adulteration law—in effect, the Paracelsian Principle—wherein dose determines toxicity. Without that limitation on the exercise of government power, FDA may well adopt the Precautionary Principle as used in the EU, which gives essentially unbridled discretion to the government to remove food additives on cancer or birth defect grounds without having to prove those effects result from the form or dose levels actually being recommended. That approach would, if applied to existing food additives and other GRAS ingredients, cause many to be banned that are health enhancing, such as those containing selenium. That is because many substances we commonly consume, and are essential for good health, become carcinogenic or mutagenic at high dose levels. It is a foundational truism of toxicology that everything—even water—is toxic at some dose level.
The upshot is, under bills like Rep. Pallone’s, we risk losing access to safe, health-promoting ingredients due to a misapplication of the precautionary principle. This is a principle that gathered momentum decades back as a means of limiting exposure to environmental chemicals like pesticides and air pollutants to which exposure has no benefits, only the potential for risk. So when regulators now apply this same principle to substances like nutrients that have distinct benefits, they risk using the inevitable uncertainty in the science to eliminate exposure (altogether or at least a beneficial levels), so depriving us of benefits.
Transparency Is Needed—But This Isn’t It
None of this is to say that there aren’t problems with the current GRAS system. We’ve laid out these issues in detail in our recent white paper, Reforming GRAS: Food Safety Without Sacrifice. Notably, the drive towards more transparency is crucial. It is not acceptable that companies can self-certify an ingredient as safe and add it to our food without any transparency or accountability. That’s why, among other recommendations in our white paper, we call for the creation of a GRAS Transparency Register, making all GRAS determinations public for review by independent experts, consumer groups, and researchers.
The Real Source of Harmful Additives: FDA Approvals
There’s a common misconception that the self-affirmed GRAS pathway is the main culprit behind the flood of harmful ingredients in our food supply. But many of the additives most often cited by critics—Red 40, Yellow 5, titanium dioxide, potassium bromate, aspartame, sodium nitrite, and BHA—have actually been reviewed and approved by the FDA, either as food or color additives or through the GRAS process itself. These substances were greenlit despite substantial evidence of health risks. The real issue, then, is that most harmful additives were approved through official FDA channels—not industry exploitation of loopholes.
A Better Path Forward
Abolishing the self-GRAS pathway altogether, as proposed by Rep. Pallone’s bill as well as other bills, would wreak havoc on the food and dietary supplement industries and create an enormous workload for the FDA, which the agency would likely be unable to manage given current staffing. Creating another de facto pre-market approval system undermines the original purpose of the GRAS pathway: to streamline the introduction of safe ingredients, including many natural ingredients, into food.
We need lawmakers to hear from YOU, their constituents, that real reform means not throwing the nutrient baby out with the GRAS bathwater.
I continue to marvel at the many silver linings of the disastrous COVID era. One such silver lining is the plethora of information not only about successful cancer treatments but the truth about the very nature of it. Since a recent paper shows that chemotherapy the current poison treatment of choice that oncologists get a direct cut from, has a 97.9% failure rate in the U.S. over five years, these treatments are just in time as the American Cancer Society Projects diagnoses to exceed 2 MILLION in 2025.
Due to the fact ‘the powers that be’ have proven to be unbelievably corrupt hooligans, people have begun to realize that they in fact have a brain they can use for themselves!
This awakening has brought many to the conclusion they can research, learn, and experiment just as well as those in a fraudulent, indoctrinated medical machine for profit which spews out mostly corrupt people with a few letters after his or her name. (There are always rare exceptions and thank God for them!)
The world has already been regaled with the success of the Joe Tippen’s Protocol, Dr. Marik’s success, Dr. Makis’ success, Mel Gibson’s testimony of 3 friends healed of stage four cancer, a major review paper showing high dose IV vitamin C (75-100g, 2-3X week for 6-8 cycles) as a promising anti-cancer agent, and entire websites dedicated to high level guidance based on research for the layman who is interested in cancer treatments. (COVID mania also exposed the ‘good guy’ doctors who were and continue to be tenaciously persecuted for daring to think for themselves)
Fast for 42 days, consuming nothing but water and occasional coffee or tea
Take 1,000mg of aged garlic(scientists believe it’s responsible for 30% of his recovery). Go here for research on how aged garlic:
reduced stomach cancer by 52% due to reducing IGF-1, activating autophagy, suppressing a master switch controlling inflammation & cancer stem cell survival, and enhancing Natural Killer Cells by up to 300%.
even 17 years after stopping it, subjects still had a 34% lower cancer mortality
has an anti-aging effect, slows heart disease progression, improves brain health, and beats EGCG and curcumin due to its bioavailability, clinical results, and track record.
causes blood levels peak within hours but clinical benefits usually appear:
2-4 weeks – improved blood pressure and inflammation markers
3 months – max cardiovascular benefits
6-12 months – cancer prevention and longevity benefits
Tenenbaum continues to take aged garlic now with meals for better absorption. After his drastic self- experiment his PSA dropped from 58 to 0.1 and scans showed his bone metastases were healing. Six years later, he remains cancer-free.
It’s important to note that aged garlic is quite different from regular garlic or even odorless garlic due to the proprietary aging process which converts harsh compounds into gentle, beneficial ones, which have no odor and cause no irritation. It would require 10-20 cloves of raw garlic a day to achieve 1,000mg. I must add as a personal side note that I actually took 16 cloves of crushed garlic daily, broken down into 4 doses when I first got Lyme/MSIDS, based on the advice of a Master Herbalist. I did it for 2 weeks and it nearly killed me. First, I smelled like I came straight out of Shanghai (the kids banned me from the car), and second my stomach revolted toward the end. It was just too harsh. I will state it made me herx initially, so it gave some benefit.
Due to Tenenbaum’s success, there are now two clinical trials now in the works testing prolonged fasting and fasting-mimicking diets in prostate cancer patients.
The following tables are helpful comparing autophagy effectiveness:
This seminal work has shown there there appears to be an autophagy threshold for cancer suppression, growth factor starvation, insulin suppression, Warburg effect reversal, and sustained immune activation, which the 42 day fast meets but the 16 hour intermittent fast doesn’t.
This analysis demonstrates that dose-response matters dramatically in fasting-induced autophagy:
Milder Ways to Induce Autophagy for the average Joe
Let’s say you don’t have cancer but you want to incorporate helpful aspects of Tennenbaum’s protocol in a more sustainable manner for prevention or other issues?
“Autophagy can be upregulated by fasting and calorie restriction [2], especially if protein is reduced [3]. Autophagy in many instances does not require the complete cessation of food intake (protocols are available at https://COVID19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/, accessed on 15 April 2023). Sharply decreasing protein intake can upregulate autophagy pathways [4], and this can be accomplished while still eating, which makes this more approachable as a protocol. Regular fasting was also associated with better outcomes from acute COVID-19 [5]. Source
For Average Risk Individuals
Daily: 16:8 Time-Restricted Eating
Fast 16 hours (e.g., 8pm – 12pm)
Eat 8 hours (12pm – 8pm)
Quarterly: 4-5 Day Fasting-Mimicking Diet
Every 3 months (4x per year)
1,100 cal day 1; 500 cal/day days 2-5
Expected Results:
✅ Cancer risk reduction: 40-60%
✅ Sustainability: Excellent (85-95%)
✅ Evidence level: Strong (multiple human RCTs)
For High-Risk Individuals (Family History, Genetic Risk)
Daily: 18:6 Time-Restricted Eating
Fast 18 hours (6pm – 12pm)
Eat 6 hours (12pm – 6pm)
Monthly: 48-72 Hour Water Fast
Once per month
Water, tea, coffee only
Quarterly: 4-5 Day FMD
Every 2-3 months
Expected Results:
✅ Cancer risk reduction: 50-70%
✅ Sustainability: Good-Excellent (70-85%)
✅ Evidence level: Very Strong
Optimal Combined Protocol (50-70% Prevention)
DAILY FOUNDATION:
✅ 16:8 Time-Restricted Eating (minimum)
✅ 18:6 TRE for high-risk individuals
✅ Eating window: 12pm – 6pm or 10am – 6pm
✅ Black coffee, tea, water allowed during fast
QUARTERLY INTENSIVE:
✅ Fasting-Mimicking Diet 4 times per year
✅ Day 1: 1,100 calories (plant-based)
✅ Days 2-5: 500 calories/day
✅ ProLon kit or DIY version
✅ Schedule: Jan, April, July, October
OPTIONAL MONTHLY BOOST (High Risk):
✅ 48-72 hour water fast once per month
✅ Or extend one FMD to 7 days
SYNERGISTIC ADDITIONS:
✅ Aged Garlic Extract 2.4g/day
✅ Green tea 3+ cups/day (especially lung cancer prevention)
✅ Curcumin 500mg BID with piperine
✅ Whole food, plant-based diet during eating windows
Bioengineering Without Boundaries: Why Lyme Disease Belongs in the GMO Debacle
Michelle Perro, MD
Published: October 20, 2025
Lyme disease is not simply an infection. It is a lens into the consequences of manipulating biology without accountability. As we confront the obfuscated crisis of Lyme and other chronic infections, it becomes evident that bioengineering in pathogens and genetic engineering in food are part of the same continuum of unregulated biotechnology. Both alter life’s blueprints, both evade oversight, and both are creating a legacy of ecological and human suffering.
In her groundbreaking book, Bitten: The Secret History of Lyme Disease and Biological Weapons, science journalist Kris Newby details how US biowarfare research programs, including work at the Rocky Mountain Laboratories in Hamilton, Montana, experimented with spirochetes to alter virulence and transmission. The intention of these manipulations, although unclear, likely spawned Borrelia burgdorferi, the stealth pathogen now linked to millions of chronic infections worldwide. The same recombinant DNA methods used in agricultural GMOs were being applied in microbial genetics at the time.
“When we manipulate genes for profit or power, the consequences ripple through ecosystems, our children, and future generations.”
Lyme rarely acts alone. It often coexists with Bartonella, Babesia, Ehrlichia, Mycoplasma, Rickettsiae, and viruses such as Powassan, all of which exacerbate inflammation and neuroimmune dysfunction. These infections disrupt the immune system through biofilm formation, cytokine storms, and molecular mimicry, while simultaneously impairing gut barrier integrity; a condition known as ‘leaky gut.’ This state of immune chaos parallels the chronic inflammation seen in individuals exposed to genetically engineered foods and glyphosate residues.
Despite their shared roots in biotechnology, genetically modified foods and engineered pathogens are regulated separately by the USDA, EPA, FDA, NIH, and DOD, none of which coordinate holistic biosafety. This fragmented oversight allows both agricultural and biomedical engineering to advance without unified accountability. The same regulatory capture that shields agri-tech corporations has also protected infectious disease gatekeepers, such as the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), whose restrictive guidelines have left millions of chronic Lyme patients untreated.
Just as the FDA dismisses independent research on GMO toxicity, the IDSA dismisses clinicians and patients suffering from persistent Lyme. Both systems denied chronic exposure or chronic infection, labelled dissenting experts as “fringe,” protecting corporate and institutional interests over public health. The pattern created is systemic and taken directly from the GMO playbook: create complexity, deny chronicity, and suppress those questioning the government/corporate narrative.
Lyme Mythology
Lyme Disease is the modern plague that never shouldn’t have been. It is now one of the fastest-growing infectious diseases in the United States, with the CDC estimating up to 3 million cases annually when underreporting is considered.
Although black-legged ticks (Ixodes scapularis and I. pacificus) are the best-known carriers, Borrelia DNA has been detected in a variety of other insects, suggesting other forms of transmission. This fact is little known in mainstream medicine and leaves those with Lyme disease unclear as to how they were infected when consulting with their physicians who just believe that the tick is the only vector of Lyme.
The Multi-Vector Reality: Beyond the Tick
The following graph demonstrates that there are many other potential vectors of Lyme disease which should increase our awareness when facing those with multi- system complaints and health challenges.
Insect
Evidence ofBorreliaDNA
Proven Transmission to Humans
Comments
Ticks (Ixodes scapularis, I. pacificus)
Strong
Yes
Primary vector
Mosquitoes (Aedes, Culex)
Moderate
No
Possible mechanical transmission
Horseflies / Deer flies
Moderate
No
Possible mechanical role
Fleas
Detected
No
Reservoir role in pets/rodents
Mites
Rare
No
Wildlife vector potential
Lice (Pediculus humanus)
Different Borrelia)
Yes (B. recurrentis, relapsing fever)
Demonstrates Borrelia versatility
Sources: Schotthoefer & Frost, 2015; Franke et al., 2020; Eisen et al., 2017; Jaenson et al., 2019.
Integrative Framework
Healing requires more than antibiotics or symptom management. It demands restoration of biological integrity. Integrative and terrain-based approaches rebuild the immune system through microbial, nutritional, and energetic balance.
The gut-immune axis is central to Lyme’s chronicity. Dysbiosis from antibiotics, poor diet, and/or environmental toxins (e.g., glyphosate, heavy metals) compromises the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT). Over 70% of immune function resides in the gut creating conditions where infections persist and autoimmunity originates.
Supporting terrain integrity is essential though the use of an organic regenerative diet with strict avoidance of glyphosate-contaminated foods (which destroy beneficial gut flora). Additionally, a whole foods based diet composed of increased polyphenols, flavonoids, healthy fats, and fiber are paramount to healing.
An integrative approach is necessary when helping those with Lyme disease and treatments stem from a multimodal tool box with suggestions outlined in article (See top link).
Lyme literate doctors (LLMDs) have learned to track symptoms and then use treatment that works on given symptoms (that change). This requires different drugs. Also, once you beat back Lyme enough, it is quite normal for coinfections to become evident. These also require different drugs. Further, dosage matters. Then, there’s the issue of pulsing and cycling – both techniques that experienced LLMDs use – precisely due to needing a judicious approach since treatment is often protracted. Throwing antibiotics at this indiscriminately is unwise.
Treatment must be fluid to adapt to the ever changing symptoms.
Also, besides congenital transmission, sexual transmission is highly likely:
For decades we’ve been told that nicotine is as addictive as heroine, cocaine, amphetamines and alcohol, but a 2015 Harvard study confirmed nicotine alone is not addictive. The true perps are the added pyrazines, acetaldehyde, anabasine, nornicotine, anatabine, cotinine, and myosomine. These addictive derivatives potentiate 5-HT binding to receptors in the CNS which results in enhanced dopamine release independently of nicotine.
People have a hard time separating nicotine from cigarettes and chewing tobacco, which ARE laden with cancer causing chemicals and addictive substances. But they are not one and the same.
The FDA still allows the tobacco industry to add 599 different man-made chemicals, of which 15 are pyrazines, to tobacco products causing the known damage from cigarettes and other tobacco products. This corrupt agency has been involved in a 30 year coverup regarding the incredible healing powers of nicotine and is currently in the process of attempting to reduce nicotine in cigarettes – not the actual harmful substances.
Read on to discover the many healthy attributes of nicotine…..
Nicotine is also a potential candidate for treating ulcerative colitis, IBD, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, multiple sclerosis, and myocarditis.
Nicotine is considered the most reliable cognitive enhancer that we currently have.
A 2010 meta‑analysis of 41 double‑blind, placebo‑controlled trials confirmed significant improvements in alerting and orienting attention as well as memory tasks following nicotine administration. As mentioned above, nicotine selectively activates nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), particularly those containing the α4β2 and α7 subunits, which in turn modulate dopamine, glutamate, serotonin, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), and acetylcholine pathways associated with enhanced cognitive processing.
Nicotine affects the adaptive immune system, influencing T cell differentiation and function. This could influence how the body recognizes and eliminates infected cells, affecting COVID-19 progression and severity.
Nicotine is Considered a Nutrient by Some
Nicotine is a naturally occurring organic alkaloid compound, not a man-made chemical. It is present in all the nightshade vegetables as well as egg plant/aubergine, potatoes, tomatoes, celery, cauliflower, and the tobacco plant.
Many tissues in the human body have nicotine receptors including in the brain. Nicotine is an energizer that makes cells work better.
On average, a person absorbs 1-1.5mg of nicotine from a single cigarette. Potatoes contain about 15 mg of solanine, the glycoalkaloid structurally similar to nicotine – which is roughly the equivalent of smoking a cigarette.
If nicotine alone was addictive, then we would be inundated with folks addicted to cauliflower, tomatoes, potatoes, and other vegetables. Sadly, this is far from the case.
Nicotine Benefits
Nicotine has been found to help with neurological disorders like Parkinsons and Alzheimers, as well as with Myocarditis, tinnitus, long covid, and mild cognitive impairment.
Nicotine and COVID
Recently, Dr. Bryan Ardis has stated that not only is nicotine not addictive, research shows smokers have lower COVID infection rates. In 2020, French researchers isolated the spike protein genes which are identical to the toxins from snakes of the Ophiophagus (cobra) and Bungarus genera. The benefits of nicotine in the smokers’ bodies was protecting the nicotine receptors from allowing venom spike proteins from binding to the nACHR receptors. The authors acknowledge that ivermectin was successful for the same reason.
No one in their right might would recommend smoking cigarettes, but again, don’t conflate nicotine with cigarettes.
The authors suggest nicotine as a potential preventative against COVID infection as both the epidemiological/clinical evidence and the in silico findings suggest that COVID is a nAChR disease that could be prevented and controlled by nicotine as it competes with the SARS-CoV-2 binding to the nAChR. Other research has also suggested nicotine as a COVID treatment.
In 2023 the NIH funded and published a study confirming that the venomous spike proteins of COVID target alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (not ACE2 receptors).
Then in the same year, a study was published of 4 case studies of long-haul COVID patients and their miraculous recovery in only 6 days of using 7mg nicotine patches. The authors state:
The transcutaneous administration of nicotine ensures constant serum levels without peak levels. Thus, we did not see any development of nicotine dependence in the context of nicotine patch therapy. From the author’s point of view, this is not be be expected.
Others have found that there doesn’t seem to be any abuse liability whatsoever in taking nicotine by patch in nonsmokers.
Go here for an article on how nicotine patches are made as well as what raw materials are used in them. Some patches may use pure nicotine or mixed with entities such as hydrochloride, dihydrochloride, sulfate, tartrate, bitartarate, zinc chloride, and salicylate to form derivatives. A carrier layer is made from a variety of plastics as well as a occlusive backing layer, adhesive such as acrylate ester/vinyl pyrrolidone copolymers, dimethyl silicone polymers, and acrylate polymers. Other ingredients, such as pigments, dyes, inert fillers, and processing aids, may be mixed in with the drug. Certain types of patches also include permeation enhancers to improve drug penetration and some contain anti-itch agents like bisabolol, oil of chamomile, chamazulene, allantoin, D-panthenol, glycyrrhetenic acid, corticosteroids, and antihistamines.
Dr. Merritt gives examples of how nicotine gum immediately helped numerous patients.
Click Dr Bryan Ardis to hear more. And here for his slide show on nicotine which is quite informative.
In this video, Ardis recommends starting low and slow on TOLEVITA brand nicotine patches, which uses a natural nicotine extract. He recommends starting with 1mg daily and over time, depending upon how you feel to titrate up to 3mg. He takes 7mg but only after being on lower dosages for 4 years.
He also discusses how historically nicotine has been used for cancer, and to remit neurodegenerative diseases, etc. A study used 15mg nicotine patches for 6 months showed improvement for 100% of patients with early dementia. They were all contacted after stopping the study and NO patients were still using it and NO patients struggled with any addictive behaviors from using it. (We’ve been lied to again, friends)
The following information is for educational purposes only and not meant to diagnose and treat. Make sure to discuss any and all treatments with your health practitioner.
Purchase 14mg size Nicotine Patches and cut into 6 equal pieces and wear one small size patch daily, on rib cage or upper arm. (This is what Dr. Ardis does daily since November of 2022 to prevent all future virus/venoms or variant exposures).
Long-Hauler COVID Sufferers
Purchase and wear one 7 mg Nicotine Patch daily for 1 week minimum and then continue until symptoms abate. Go here to read one person’s successful usage of 7mg nicotine patch for Long COVID.
Purchase 2mg size Nicotine Gum and chew 1 gum tablet for at least 10 minutes, twice a day. (This is what Dr. Ardis’s wife Jayne does daily to prevent all future virus/venoms or variant exposures).
Long-Hauler COVID Sufferers
Purchase 2mg Nicotine Gum (do NOT buy 4mg nicotine gum), and chew one 2 mg gum tablet for 10 minutes, 4 times per day for 2 weeks or until symptoms resolve and then continue until symptoms abate.
C19 Vaccine Injured
Follow Long-Hauler COVID protocol above.
According to Ardis there are nicotine receptors in the gut and a few people when chewing and swallowing nicotine gum get nauseous and vomit or get loose stools. He states this is because so much of the venom spike proteins are attached to the nicotine receptors that line the bowel that when nicotine is present the massive amount of venom in the bowel gets released, and the body is created to expel poisons. If this is a problem for you, switch to nicotine patches which by pass the bowels. Nicotine from patches are absorbed into your blood stream via the skin in less than 30 seconds.
He also mentioned getting organic tobacco leaf and then boiling the leaves and soaking the feet for 20-30 min several times a week.