Author Archive

Mayo Clinic: Same Lyme Disease Clap-Trap Just in Time For Summer

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/33704283?

Tomorrow’s Cure: New frontiers in Lyme disease detection — just in time for summer

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
Jul 14, 2025

What has been presented here in Tomorrow’s Cure is the same old dogma propagated for decades by those who have controlled this false public heath narrative.

Dr. Allen Steere would be doing us all a favor by retiring.

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “tomorrowscure@mayo.edu” <tomorrowscure@mayo.edu>
Cc: “newsbureau@mayo.edu” <newsbureau@mayo.edu>, “cwurzer@mpr.org” <cwurzer@mpr.org>, “asteere@mgh.harvard.edu” <asteere@mgh.harvard.edu>, “Pritt.bobbi@mayo.edu” <Pritt.bobbi@mayo.edu>
Date: 07/13/2025 3:00 PM EDT
Subject: Tomorrow’s Cure: New frontiers in Lyme disease detection — just in time for summer

Tomorrow’s Cure: New frontiers in Lyme disease detection — just in time for summer

Deb Balzer July 2, 2025
https://newsnetwork.mayoclinic.org/discussion/tomorrows-cure-new-frontiers-in-lyme-disease-detection-just-in-time-for-summer/

“Dr. Steere identified Lyme disease in 1976 while investigating a cluster of children in Lyme, Connecticut, who were experiencing unexplained arthritis. His research ultimately led to the discovery and naming of the disease. Since then, researchers have devoted their efforts to advancing diagnostic tools, treatments and vaccine development.”

Mayo Clinic “Tomorrow’s Cure” podcast
Attn: Cathy Wurzer, Host

Dear Cathy,

Thirty-five  years ago Dr. Allen Steere identified chronic Lyme disease which should have set off a red flag prompting an immediate search for better antimicrobials but then did a 180° as he became principal investigator (PI) of the Phase 3 clinical trial for the first Lyme disease vaccine. So all the eggs were put into the vaccine basket while a campaign was orchestrated to discredit the sick and disabled patient population along with the courageous clinicians attempting to help these patients. Apparently, a chronic relapsing seronegative disease did not fit the business model of patent royalties, vaccine development and pharmaceutical profits. That rush to create a Lyme vaccine early in the discovery phase (of the Lyme epidemic) eliminated the research desperately needed to find a cure for an infection that was not responding to antibiotic treatment as reported by Dr. Allen Steere in 1990 and the disabled Lyme community ever since.

Here is Dr. Steere’s 1990 publication summary for your review:

The New England Journal of Medicine 

Published November 22, 1990

Chronic neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199011223232102

This is what Steere was reporting in 1977:

Lyme arthritis: an epidemic of oligoarticular arthritis in children and adults in three connecticut communities. (1977)
Steere AC, Malawista SE, Snydman DR, Shope RE, Andiman WA, Ross MR, Steele FM.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/836338

Excerpt:

“The best treatment for this illness is not clear. Some physicians have reported that penicillin or tetracycline results in disappearance of the skin lesion (41,42), but others find antibiotics ineffective. Four of the patients with expanding skin lesions received penicillin but still developed arthritis.”

__________________________

In 1991 the Lyme disease organism, Borrelia burgdorferi, was grown from the cerebrospinal fluid of Lyme patient Vicki Logan at the Centers for Disease Control in Fort Collins, Colorado despite prior treatment with intravenous antibiotics. The patient died when the insurer refused additional IV antibiotics. Here is a copy of Logan’s CDC positive culture report for your review.

(Vicki Logan’s Chronic Lyme Autopsy results Page #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7)

The destructive nature of Borrelia is evident in Vicky Logan’s liver (nutmeg liver), kidneys, heart, lungs and brain. The patient died after the insurer refused additional IV antibiotic therapy.

There are 700 peer-reviewed publications referencing persistent infection and in a 2018 study all patients were culture positive even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics.

Quotes from the Tomorrow’s Cure podcast

Lyme disease testing:

Quote from Dr Pritt @ 15:11min into the podcast…

“…but later on, the antibody tests that we have are quite good at detecting those late-stage manifestations…”

1. Serology is so unreliable that in 2013 Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell signed HB1933 into law requiring healthcare providers to notify those tested that current laboratory testing can produce false negatives.

2. Governor Chris Sununu’s 2020-2021 commission to study diagnostic testing for Lyme disease  concluded that the FDA approved two-tier serologic immunoassay for Lyme was not reliable in all stages of disease; no better than a coin toss.
 
3. Peer-reviewed evidence of “Seronegativity in Lyme borreliosis and Other Spirochetal Infections” 16 September 2003  https://www.dropbox.com/s/3d6m45jzlhhwalu/Seronegativity.pdf?dl=0

4. I would like to point out the following case study from Stony Brook Lyme clinic. I understand the patient received thirteen spinal taps, multiple courses of IV and oral meds, and relapsed after each one, proven by CSF antigens and/or PCR. The only way this patient (said to be a physician) remained in remission was to keep her on open ended clarithromycin- was on it for 22 months by the time of publication.

Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7796837

Lawrence C.a · Lipton R.B.b · Lowy F.D.c · Coyle P.K.d

aDepartment of Medicine, bDepartment of Neurology, and cDivision of Infectious Diseases, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and dDepartment of Neurology, State University of New York at Stony Brook, New York, NY., USA

Eur Neurol 1995; 35:113–117 (DOI:10.1159/000117104)

Abstract

We report an unusual patient with evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi infection who experienced repeated neurologic relapses despite aggressive antibiotic therapy. Each course of therapy was associated with a Jarisch-Herxheimer-like reaction. Although the patient never had detectable free antibodies to B. burgdorferi in serum or spinal fluid, the CSF was positive on multiple occasions for complexed anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies, B. burgdorferi nucleic acids and free antigen.

Lyme disease vaccines:

Quotes from Dr Steere:

@ 26:41min: “I think we’ve had an effective and save vaccine for Lyme disease for over twenty years.”

@ 27:49 min: “From antivaccine movements the manufacturer decided it just was not worth the risk.”

This was not an “antivaccine movement” as there was substantial risk of serious harm to public health!

REPORT ON LYlMErix
Prepared by: SHELLER, LUDWIG & BADEY
Submitted to: VACCINES AN-D RELATED BIOLOGICAL PRODUSTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE   Jan 31, 2001

Excerpt:

The people who have contacted us were, prior to vaccination with LYMErix, healthy, active and energetic. Indeed, the very reason they sought the LYMErix vaccine was their desire to preserve their healthy, active lifestyle. However, what they experienced was a dramatic degradation of their health and quality of life. As will be described below, these previously healthy individuals are now afflicted with painful, at times debilitating arthritic symptoms, including joint pain and swelling, as well as extremely severe Lyme-disease-like symptoms which have persisted to this day.

LymeRix Vaccine Victim’s Stories and Related- Articles
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/0jxjhg58v4zey5bl3s1xj/LYMErix-Vaccine-Victims-Stories-FDA-Jan-2001.pdf?rlkey=vmicwpln1e850otvtal0mw9y6&dl=0

JUDGEMENT, FINAL ORDER AND DECREE GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT:
https://www.lymedisease.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/2003-Vaccine-Judgement.pdf

What has been presented here in Tomorrow’s Cure is the same old dogma propagated for decades by those who have controlled this false public heath narrative.

Mark Twain once said, “It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

Has the wool been pulled over your eyes Cathy Wurzer?

Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH
 
Letter to the editor published in BMJ June 10, 2020
Re: Lyme borreliosis: diagnosis and management
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1

Category:

Activism, Lyme, vaccines

Hospital COVID Protocols: The Grace Schara Case (WI)

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/hospital-covid-protocols-the-grace?

Hospital COVID Protocols: The Grace Schara Case

IMA Co-Founders Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Joseph Varon are joined by Scott Schara and his attorney Warner Mendenhall to discuss medical advocacy, advance directives, and hospital accountability.
Independent Medical Alliance's avatar
Independent Medical Alliance
Jul 06, 2025

When Grace Schara died in a Wisconsin hospital during the COVID pandemic, her family began asking difficult questions about consent, protocol, and patient rights. This week, IMA Co-Founders Dr. Paul Marik and Dr. Joseph Varon are joined by Grace’s father, Scott Schara, and his attorney, Warner Mendenhall of Freedom Counsel, to revisit the case and discuss the broader implications for medical advocacy, advance directives, and hospital accountability.

We’ll explore the concerns raised around medication protocols, Do Not Intubate orders, and access to records—alongside the lessons learned about legal barriers, family involvement, and the importance of independent medical advocates. The conversation is shaped by IMA’s longstanding commitment to restoring the doctor-patient relationship and building safeguards that empower patients and families.

Whether you’re entering the hospital yourself or bringing a loved one for care, the assumption is that medical staff will do everything possible to help. But the tragic story of 19-year-old Grace reveals just how wrong things can go when trust breaks down, protocols fail, and communication vanishes.

Grace Schara entered St. Elizabeth’s Hospital in Wisconsin with low oxygen saturation during the COVID pandemic in October 2021. Her father, Scott Schara, believed she would simply receive oxygen therapy and come home safely. Instead, Grace passed away just days later under circumstances that sparked outrage and questions nationwide.

In the years following, Scott’s grief turned to advocacy, ultimately leading to Schara v. Ascension Health, the first COVID-era hospital negligence case in America to reach a jury trial. The landmark lawsuit, concluded on June 19, 2025, lasted three weeks and was passionately argued by a dedicated legal team led by Warner Mendenhall and Freedom Counsel.

Despite compelling expert testimony and a deeply sympathetic case, the jury ruled in favor of the hospital. Still, Scott and Warner remain undeterred. Their fight for justice continues—and so does the urgent conversation their case has sparked. In this powerful webinar, they reflect on what went wrong, what patients and families need to know, and how all of us, providers included, can help prevent tragedies like this from happening again.

Misunderstandings: “Do Not Intubate” (DNI) and “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR)

Regardless of the jury’s verdict, the case has opened the door to vital lessons every patient, family, and provider needs to understand.

IMA co-founders, doctors Joseph Varon and Paul Marik, both experienced critical care physicians at Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), weighed in addressing the shocking failures in Grace’s care. They highlighted systemic misunderstandings around crucial terms like “Do Not Intubate” (DNI) and “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR).

Dr. Marik explained:

“DNR means when a person is dead… not to resuscitate them. That’s what it means. It doesn’t mean do not treat, do not manage. It’s only when a patient is actually dead, heart has stopped beating and they’re clinically dead, that you do cardiopulmonary resuscitation… the DNI part complicates the issue.”

Dr. Varon emphasized the critical role of open, honest communication:

“I’m sure that if somebody told you ‘do not intubate’ means ‘do not resuscitate,’ you would have said ‘go ahead and intubate right now.’”

Under any circumstances, it’s unreasonable to expect patients and families to decode complex medical terminology in moments of crisis. But COVID has made one thing painfully clear: we must be prepared to ask questions, advocate for ourselves and our loved ones, and demand clarity.  (See link for article and video)

______________

For more:

The hospital COVID scam via The CARES Act:

Hospital protocols killed people:

The concerted strategy to ban effective COVID treatment, allowing the clot shots to be deployed:

CDC monopolizes fraudulent COVID testing:

Category:

Activism, Supplements, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Deadline to Reject IHR July 19, 2025

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/interview-with-clayton-morris?

Interview with Clayton Morris

The DEADLINE for nations to REJECT the the amendments to the International Health Regulations is fast approaching n(July 19, 2025). NOW is the time to speak up, take action and spread the word.

 
James Roguski
Jul 09, 2025

For complete details, visit:

https://RejectTheAmendments.com

TO ALL WORLD LEADERS:

I strongly encourage you to formally exercise your authority under Article 61 of the International Health Regulations and IMMEDIATELY notify the World Health Organization that you have decided to REJECT the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations on behalf of the people of your nation.

July 19, 2025 is the deadline for heads of state of the 192 of the 196 nations that are parties to the International Health Regulation to reject the 2024 amendments.

Because 4 nations (The Islamic Republic of Iran, Netherlands, New Zealand and Slovakia) rejected the 2022 amendments to the IHR (which shortened the time period to reject future amendments from 18 to 10 months), the deadline for these 4 nations to reject the 2024 amendments is March 19, 2026.

Click on the following link for the top 10 reasons to reject the IHR Amendments:  Top_Ten_Reasons_To_Reject_The_Amendments_To_The_Ihr

A special note to President Donald J. Trump of the United States of America:

Dear President Trump,

On the very first day of your Presidency (January 20, 2025) you signed Executive Order 14155 which began the 1-year process of having the United States terminate its membership in the World Health Organization.

Sec. 4. Global System Negotiations. While withdrawal is in progress, the Secretary of State will cease negotiations on the WHO Pandemic Agreement and the amendments to the International Health Regulations, and actions taken to effectuate such agreement and amendments will have no binding force on the United States.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-the-worldhealth-organization/

HOWEVER, YOU HAVE NOT YET OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION THAT YOU WISH TO REJECT THE 2024 AMENDMENTS TO THE INTERNATIONAL HEALTH REGULATIONS.

PLEASE TAKE OFFICIAL ACTION TO FORMALLY AND PUBLICLY REJECT THE 2024 AMENDMENTS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BEFORE THE JULY 19, 2025 DEADLINE AND ENCOURAGE OUR ALLIES TO JOIN YOU IN THIS ACTION.

Also, on February 4, 2025 you signed Executive Order #14199 which directed the State Department to conduct a review of “all conventions and treaties to which the United States is a party.”

(b) Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary, in consultation with the UN Ambassador, shall conduct a review of all international intergovernmental organizations of which the United States is a member and provides any type of funding or other support, and all conventions and treaties to which the United States is a party, to determine which organizations, conventions, and treaties are contrary to the interests of the United States and whether such organizations, conventions, or treaties can be reformed. Upon the conclusion of that review, the Secretary shall report the findings to the President, through the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs, and provide recommendations as to whether the United States should withdraw from any such organizations, conventions, or treaties.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/02/withdrawing-the-united-states-from-and-ending-funding-to-certain-united-nations-organizations-and-reviewing-united-states-support-to-all-international-organizations/

The deadline for the above review is August 3, 2025 (180 days after February 4, 2025). Unfortunately the deadline to reject the 2024 amendments to the IHR (July 19, 2025) will pass before the State Department is obligated to deliver their report to you.

I humbly request that you direct the State Department to prioritize their review of the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations in order to prepare an official letter notifying the World Health Organization of your decision to REJECT the 2024 amendments AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, but definitely before the July 19, 2025 deadline.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

James Roguski

James.Roguski@gmail.com

310-619-3055

 

Category:

Activism

Covid Shots Induce Cancer in 17 Distinct Ways According to More Than 100 Studies & ‘Vaccine’ Exemptions Online Talk July 22, 2025

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/modified-mrna-slow-kill-bioweaponvaccines

by Mathilde Debord

Article Excerpts:

Is mass vaccination against COVID causing an explosion in cancer cases, as many scientists claim, some of whom had it prophesied from May 2021 ? A collective of French oncologists published two years ago a platform in which they categorically refute this hypothesis: ” To date, no alert link has been published between an increased incidence or risk of rapid progression of cancer after COVID-19 vaccination or after another vaccination.” Today they claim to be confronted with a tsunami of dazzling cancers, particularly among young people, to which they say they find no rational explanation:

We have a rapid increase in pancreatic cancer without us having the slightest idea of the reason. Something happened? We do not know. The whole world, all of world oncology is asking itself the question. […] The system that allows us to understand cancer is faulty.

Professor Khayat, co-founder of InCA

If Professor Khayat is consistent, he cannot theoretically exclude that vaccination could be at the origin of this explosion of cancer cases since it is (1) extremely recent if we refer to his previous interventions, (2) it affects the entire planet –in particular populations who have been forced to inject to maintain a social life or who have aggressively promoted vaccination (influencers in particular) –, and (3) it seems to respond to an unprecedented logic. As would a substance used for the first time in humans, of which only part of the composition is known and whose impact on cancer has not been assessed before its massive deployment[1].

Epidemiologist Nicolas Huscher listed last March 10 Ways Anti-COVID Messenger RNA Injections Can Cause Cancer. This list, resulting from a study[2] published in December 2023 in the journal Cureus can in our opinion be extended today to 17 items based (non-exhaustive) on more than 100 studies.  (See link for article)

________________

The 17 Ways are as follows:

  1. Genome instability
  2. Immune evasion
  3. Mechanism of repair of altered DNA
  4. Chronic inflammation
  5. Dysregulation of the immune system
  6. RNA disruption
  7. Activation of oncogenic pathways
  8. Tumor microenvironment
  9. Awakening of dormant cancers
  10. Impaired immune monitoring
  11. Frame offset (frameshift)
  12. Multiple injections
  13. DNA contamination of the Pfizer & Moderna shots
  14. DNA sequences of oncogenic SV40 in Pfizer shot
  15. Deregulation of the renin-angiotensin system
  16. Destruction of the microbiota
  17. Increased resistance to treatments

The articles gives the Joe Tippens Protocol for cancer.

For more:

‘Vaccine’ Exemptions

With Mary Holland

Date: July 22, 2025

Time:  8pm ET

Join us as we discuss vaccine exemptions and what you need to know about your legal rights as you navigate the educational school system, at all levels. For this UpClose, I will be joined by Kim Mack Rosenberg, General Counsel for Children’s Health Defense, and Kevin Barry, Esq., who has been advocating and supporting families as they navigate New York vaccine exemptions, which are among some of the most restrictive in the nation. 

As always, we will leave ample time for our experts to answer your questions. However, this month you will have the opportunity to submit questions prior to the event. A link to submit your questions will be provided after you register, with submissions accepted until Friday, July 18th. We hope this format will allow our experts to address more specific questions and concerns. Please note that not all submitted questions will be answered, and any information shared should not be considered legal advice but general guidance. 

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/support/about-chd-upclose3  Register Here

CHD hosts monthly UpClose virtual events and various UpClose InPerson events throughout the year for supporters who donate $10 or more within one year of the event date, or are current recurring donors.

For more:

Category:

Cancer, Treatment, vaccines

Hawai’i County Passes Law Keeping Cell Towers Away From Homes and Schools

https://ehtrust.org/hawaii-county-passes-law-keeping-cell-towers-away-from-homes-and-schools/?

Hawai’i County Passes Law Keeping Cell Towers Away from Homes and Schools

Jul 5, 2025

By Environmental Health Trust

Hawai’i County, commonly known as the Big Island, has passed an ordinance limiting how close cell towers may be constructed to homes and schools. The ordinance is the first of its kind in the island state, and Debra Greene, founder of Safe Tech Hawaii, said this “paves the way for other local jurisdictions in Hawaii to follow suit and implement similar ordinances.”

The legal team at EHT has been working with Big Island residents and Safe Tech Hawaii for months to help push this new regulation over the finish line. “The passage of Bill 24 is a notable victory because, to my knowledge, Hawai’i County, with a population of over 200,000, is the largest community in the U.S. with 600-foot installation setbacks,” said Environmental Health Trust legal fellow, Zoe Berg.

The unanimous passing of the bill on June 19, 2025 marks a clear victory for residents, many of whom don’t feel that more wireless coverage on the island is needed, and who have fought hard to keep new cell towers at a safe distance from homes and schools. It’s notable that Hawai’i County passed a resolution in 2020 calling for a halt to 5G deployments until independent testing can determine the safety of RF radiation emissions generated by such infrastructure. And earlier this year, Hawaiian Telcom unveiled an ambitious plan to make Hawaii the first fully fiber-enabled state by 2026, which would allow all Hawaiians to rely on fiber-optic cables rather than wireless networks for internet connectivity.

“The passage of Bill 24 in Hawai’i County acknowledges that buffers between powerful, wireless radiation-emitting technology and sensitive environments like homes and schools are important to protect public safety and public health,” Zoe Berg said. “We thank Debra Greene and all of the residents of Hawai’i County for their hard work in getting Bill 24 passed. We also thank the honorable members of the Hawai’i County Council for supporting more responsible, thoughtful wireless telecommunications infrastructure siting throughout the county.”

Both Verizon and AT&T submitted letters to the council expressing concerns about the setback requirement and requesting waivers, which ultimately were not granted. The final bill nonetheless represents a compromise; the process for telecom companies to get their towers permitted has been simplified, but those towers must be verified to survive winds of 100 mph or more, and in many of the county’s zones placed more than 600 feet from homes and schools (with exceptions for emergency communications facilities) and at a minimum distance of 120% of the height of the tower from all property lines. This is notably safer than the requirements on Oahu, where towers can be at a distance of only one fifth the tower’s height—putting private property at risk from falling towers.

With this new law, Hawai’i County joins dozens of communities across the United States which have passed ordinances regulating size and placement of cell towers with consideration to public safety, including cities and counties in New Hampshire, New York, California, and Massachusetts. Internationally, dozens of countries in the EU and beyond have implemented policies aimed at reducing children’s exposure to cell phones and wireless radiation.

If you would like to take action in your community to promote safer siting of cell towers, protecting vulnerable populations as well as property values, read Environmental Health Trust’s Action Steps on Cell Towers near Homes. This page includes links to scientific evidence, legal precedents, resources for organizing, and more to help win a local campaign for safer cell tower placement.

For more:

Category:

Activism