Author Archive

The Pfizer Job

Before reading the following unbelievably detailed analysis that took the author and his team over 3 years to complete, it’s important to note that ‘the powers that be’ aren’t getting the memo. Bill Gates recently had two meetings at the White House with President Trump and not only wants to inject cows and start putting scary additives into their food to supposedly reduce methane, but he’s funding a new micro-needle patch implant that installs both mRNA and quantum-dot markings into the body. Dr. Jessica Rose has broken it all down here.  Suffice it to say that it’s even worse than the mRNA shots.  In Rose’s words:

[It] involves taking the N1-modified mRNA-LNP technology (Pfizer/Moderna idea) to the next level of crazy, in my opinion.

And, Moderna has just unveiled a new mRNA shot called ‘mNEXSPIKE’ which translated in Latin means ‘violent death, or ‘death spear.’  You seriously can’t make this up.

Does anyone else out there get the distinct impression they want us dead?

https://www.arkmedic.info/p/the-pfizer-job?

The Pfizer Job

How Pfizer carried out the biggest pharma trial heist ever – and the regulators swallowed it hook, line and sinker.

Dr Ah Kahn Syed
Oct 12, 2025
Remember this?

Article Excerpts:

“Pfizer’s vaccine is more than 90% effective”.

Headlines repeated around the world and more importantly by the regulators FDA, TGA, EMA and MHRA.

Just to reiterate – this was about COVID infection. No claims on severity, hospitalisation or death were made by Pfizer.

Given that most of the vaccinated population actually “got COVID” – many of them multiple times, that sounds impossible, right?

That’s because it was.

Yet the trial itself showed 95% reduction in the risk of infection and was published in the infamous New England Journal of Medicine (the same journal that published the fraudulent Surgisphere study) on the 10th December 2020.

….we are going to show that the whole study was a sham and that there never was a benefit – at all, never mind “95% reduction in infection.”  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

I’m eternally grateful that researchers and doctors are now onto the prolific research fraud that has been taking place.  Of course, this fraud has been going on in Lymeland for over 40 years, but now it’s on display for the entire world to see.  Yet another silver lining that came out of COVID mania.

SUMMARY:

  • One of the main Pfizer hustles was mandating all PCR swabs for the trial be sent to their own lab in New York as part of the case definition.  Which means that Pfizer decided whether a swab was positive or negative – the only test that mattered.
  • We only know this is due to a FOIA by attorney Aaron Siri.  Pfizer and the FDA tried to withhold this intel for 75 years.
  • Another hustle concerns dates.  The cut off for the trial was Nov. 14, 2020.  The VRBPAC meeting was on Dec. 10, 2020, the same day the trial was published.  The VRBPAC assessment document for the Pfizer submission was written on Dec. 7, 2020, just two weeks after the submission – having to assess 44,000 participants.  The approval was made on the basis of 47 days of follow-up for most patients, but was also made in ONE DAY, because of the VRBPAC meeting on Dec. 20, 2020 – with EUA declared on Dec. 11, 2020.  Certainly a miracle.
  • The dates demonstrate that all of this was impossible, which implies it was a pre-agreed approval based upon Pfizer showing data that there were less infections in the ‘vaccinated’ group based on a test they controlled – not on clinical symptoms.
  • Evidently, Doran Fink of the FDA presented in the VRBPAC meeting despite having no clinical data and no experience in handling large data sets.  Unblinding in the trial was not allowed to happen until after Nov. 14, 2020, yet somehow Pfizer knew what was in which arm before that date.  Interestingly, Fink was then given a job at Moderna and now is at GSK, demonstrating clearly the revolving door between the FDA and Big Pharma.
  • Even more miraculously Pfizer, the WEF, and mainstream media already knew by the 9th of November that the ‘vaccine’ had ‘worked’ despite the fact the data cut off was Nov. 14.
  • Susan K Wollersheim’s ability to give the statistical presentation for VRBPAC on a 44,000 participant clinical trial is legendary as she has never published a clinical research study7.  
  • There is no way Fink and Wollersheim did the analysis as they don’t have the skill set and they didn’t have the time necessary to do it.
  • The good doctor who authored this article, Dr Ah Kahn Syed, states that it took him and a handful of people with the skillset required 3 years to sift through over 2 MILLION pages of FDA documents to just write this article.
  • Moderna achieved a similar EUA approval only 7 days later due to a similar hustle.
  • The third hustle: they stopped accumulating cases (in the “vaccinated group” only) for a specified time period in order to make the cut.
  • A tactic they probably used, since they solely controlled testing, was to change the Cycle threshold on the machine recording the tests.  A Ct of over 40 will pick up a bunch of false positives and a low Ct of less than 16 will only pick up real cases with a high viral load.  They didn’t know the ‘sweet spot,’ so they had to change Ct as they went along.  The field that should have recorded the Ct on the machine is conveniently missing.
  • Pfizer knew which tests were from the ‘vaccinated’ or the placebo group because they had the blood tests from every person in the study at their lab. Castruita showed in 2023 that even after 4 weeks there was enough circulating RNA (or DNA) from the COVID-19 vaccines to be able to perform genomic sequencing13.  While unlocking the database would create audit flags, they could easily identify who got what without raising audit flags, so they could then adjust the Ct up or down depending upon the number of positive tests they needed.
  • The author proves that if you correct for the fact that, if you’re vaccinated, you have 2.3x less chance of showing N-antibody on a test, the infection rate of the ‘vaccinated’ and of the placebo group is identical.  There was no 95% reduction in infection in the ‘vaccinated’ group at all.  It was a scam.
  • The author also shows from The FDA’s review that there were over 1100 more fevers and over 2000 more reports of chills in the ‘vaccinated’ group.

Sadly, all of this should have been done before ‘Operation Warp-speed,’ but let this be a solid reminder to not take ANYTHING until you are fully convinced it truly works and is safe.  In short, do not believe anything the medical machine for profit says.  Before you take anything they recommend, wait until independent research has been done.

There are probably many, many people who are now living with a lot of regret.

Category:

Activism, Testing, vaccines, Viruses

More Original Independent Research Presented at CHEST 2025 Than Presented by Many Major Institutions

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/ima-at-chest-2025-a-milestone-in?

IMA at CHEST 2025: A Milestone in Independent Medical Research

At CHEST 2025, IMA presented more original research than many major institutions. With over 1,600 peer-reviewed publications between Drs. Varon and Marik, independent science is gaining ground.

 
Independent Medical Alliance
Oct 28, 2025
 
IMA CHEST 2025 hero

CHEST has long been a stronghold of institutional medicine: an annual gathering where pulmonary and critical care physicians from the world’s largest hospital systems and academic centers set the tone for clinical standards and scientific recognition.

At CHEST 2025, something different happened: an independent alliance is outpacing the establishment.

Led by IMA President Dr. Joseph Varon, our team contributed more original research than many of the most well-funded organizations in the country. That isn’t a boast; it’s a measurable step forward in reclaiming scientific spaces that were once closed to independent researchers.

“At CHEST 2025, I was struck by the fact that the IMA—our independent, grassroots organization—had more scientific presentations than some of the largest medical institutions in the country. Proof that dedication and vision often outperform size and bureaucracy.” — Dr. Joseph Varon

CHEST Chicago 2025

What is CHEST and Why Does It Matter

Founded in 1935, the CHEST Annual Meeting is organized by the American College of Chest Physicians. It is one of the most influential global conferences in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Each year, thousands of clinicians, researchers, and policymakers gather to share emerging science, update protocols, and shape future guidelines.

Participation at CHEST is a strong signal of credibility. It’s the place where clinical science is discussed not just in theory, but in terms of its immediate application to patient care. For an independent medical group to be not only present but prominent shows that change in medicine is possible—and already underway.

Independent, Evidence-Driven, and Growing

For decades, CHEST has been the domain of large academic institutions and government-aligned research groups. This year, Dr. Varon, together with several of his researchers and students, presented a dozen original abstracts, including work on:

  • Pulmonary disease

  • Intensive care medicine

  • Optimization of patient care

That kind of presence doesn’t happen by accident. It’s the result of years of persistence, especially at a time when independent research was under immense pressure.

If you followed us during the COVID era, you’ll know that our physicians challenged flawed policies and raised concerns about mRNA vaccine harms. The response was swift: licenses were threatened, voices were censored, and reputations attacked. But the work continued.

The fact that we’re here today—publishing, presenting, and helping shape clinical conversations—is a testament to the strength of our mission. We survived a Goliath-like effort to silence us, and we’re still standing. Still researching. Still delivering solutions for patients.

Joe Varon with researchers at CHEST

Proof in the Medical Literature

Beyond CHEST, IMA researchers continue to publish in respected peer-reviewed journals. Recent examples include:

These studies are recent examples of a much broader trend: our science, once dismissed, is now being examined seriously. The same mainstream institutions that ignored our findings are beginning to revisit the data and ask questions we have been asking for years.

👉 Visit IMA’s Research Center

Our Research Leadership

IMA’s growing influence in medical research reflects leadership grounded in clinical experience, scientific rigor, and long-term commitment.

Dr. Joseph Varon, Co-Founder and Chief Medical Officer of IMA, has authored more than 1,000 peer-reviewed studies while continuing to practice medicine and mentor the next generation of researchers. He also leads the editorial vision of the Journal of Independent Medicine as its Editor-in-Chief, ensuring a continued focus on practical, patient-centered science.

Dr. Paul Marik, Co-Founder and Chief Scientific Officer, has published over 600 peer-reviewed papers and remains one of the most cited intensivists in the world. His recent induction into the Orthomolecular Medicine Hall of Fame recognized both the scope and influence of his scientific contributions.

Together, they’ve helped establish a model for medical research that puts patients first, values real-world outcomes, and refuses to compromise on scientific integrity.

Joe Varon showcasing a study at CHEST

A Journal for Uncensored Science

The Journal of Independent Medicine is preparing to release its fourth edition this November, marking the completion of its inaugural year.

The journal exists for one purpose: to give space to research that asks difficult but essential questions. Many of those questions cannot be raised in pharmaceutical-sponsored publications. Here, they can. It is a platform for physicians and scientists who still believe that medicine must serve patients first and tell the truth, even when it is inconvenient.

Expanding in 2026: Special Editions

Building on the success of its first year, IMA will introduce two new special editions in 2026:

  • “Treating Post-Vaccine Complications”

    • Submission Deadline: December 31, 2025

    • Publication Date: 2026

  • “Repurposed Drugs and Nutraceuticals in the Chronic Disease Epidemic”

    • Submission Deadline: February 28, 2026

    • Publication Date: 2026

These editions will expand opportunities for independent researchers and clinicians to publish meaningful work that drives progress rather than compliance.

👉 Submit your research or learn more here

Looking Ahead

CHEST 2025 was not about arrival or recognition. It was about progress earned through steady, verifiable work.

Through peer-reviewed research, transparent publishing, and the leadership of dedicated physicians, IMA is proving that independent medicine can thrive within the highest levels of scientific discourse.

Our work has always stood on its own merit. What has changed is that the world is finally ready to recognize it. And this is only the beginning.

For more coverage, check out where our globetrotting team of experts has been lately below:

________________

**Comment**

This is wonderful news and another wonderful silver lining to COVID mania.

Independent research has been the only thing moving the Lyme/MSIDS needle, and because it’s such a polarized disease, research is political, not scientific and is purposely designed for a predetermined outcome.

The world is beginning to see what Lymeland has known for over 40 years.

Category:

Activism, research, Uncategorized

Study Links Surge in Children’s Memory Problems to Radiation Exposure

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/kids-memory-problems-surge-wireless-radiation-exposure-study/

Study Links Surge in Children’s Memory Problems to Wireless Radiation Exposure

Children and teens in Sweden and Norway are experiencing an “alarming” rise in memory problems, according to the authors of a new peer-reviewed study that linked the issue to increased exposure to wireless radiation. “Radiation exposure must be reduced, and people must be informed about the associated health risks,” one of the study’s authors said.

by Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.
October 23, 2025This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
boy and cell tower

Children and teens in Sweden and Norway are experiencing an “alarming” rise in memory problems, which the authors of a new peer-reviewed study attributed to increased exposure to wireless radiation.

“The steep increase in memory issues cannot be explained by changes in diagnostic criteria or reporting to the registries alone,” Lennart Hardell, M.D., Ph.D., one of the study’s authors, said in a press release. He added:

“We urge our findings on increasing numbers of children having impaired memory to be taken seriously by public health authorities and consider children’s increasing exposure to wireless radiation as a possible cause.

“Thus, we ask for measures aimed at decreasing exposure to RF radiation [radiofrequency radiation] to protect the brain and general health of children.”

The study was published this month in the Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research.

Hardell, an oncologist and epidemiologist with the Environment and Cancer Research Foundation, has authored more than 350 papers, nearly 60 of which address RF radiation. He is also one of the first researchers to publish reports on the toxicity of Agent Orange.

Hardell and lead study author Mona Nilsson, co-founder and director of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation, examined national health data in Sweden and Norway and found that the number of medical consultations for memory disturbances in Norwegian children ages 5-19 increased roughly 8.5-fold from 2006 to 2024.

In Sweden, the number of children ages 5-19 diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment — a diagnosis that includes memory problems — increased nearly 60-fold from 2010 to 2024.

“The findings must be taken seriously and evaluated,” Hardell told The Defender. “Action must be taken to reduce children’s overall exposure — especially in schools.”

Nilsson agreed. “These alarming trends must be reversed — radiation exposure must be reduced, and people must be informed about the associated health risks,” she said.

Authors link memory problems to wireless radiation

The authors argued in their report that wireless radiation is a leading cause of memory decline in children.

They cited numerous epidemiological and experimental studies showing that very low levels of RF radiation can negatively affect the brain — particularly the hippocampus, which plays a central role in memory and learning.

“There is abundant evidence [dating back] several decades, both on animals and humans, that RF radiation impairs memory,” Nilsson said. “The trends we are observing coincide closely in time with the sharply increasing exposure of children and adolescents to RF radiation.”

Wireless exposure has escalated in the last decade due to the increasing use of cellphones, wireless headsets, Wi-Fi and 5G, Hardell said.

“Other contributing factors can, of course, not be excluded,” he said. “They must, however, be defined and not based on hypothetical discussion.”

New investigation targets ‘biased’ European report on RF radiation

The new study coincides with the European Ombudsman investigation into how the European Commission handled a key report that found no “moderate or strong” evidence linking adverse health effects to chronic or acute RF radiation exposure from existing wireless technologies.

The European Ombudsman, who “investigates complaints about maladministration by EU [European Union] institutions and bodies,” will question the European Commission on how it chose the experts to write the report, said Sophie Pelletier, president of PRIARTEM/Electrosensibles de France, in an Oct. 22 press release.

The report, called the SCHEER Opinion, was adopted in April 2023 by the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks (SCHEER).

The SCHEER Opinion was “clearly biased,” according to an October 2023 critique published by the Council for Safe Telecommunications in Denmark and the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation.

The investigation stems from a complaint filed by several European nonprofits, including the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation, alleging that the authors of the SCHEER Opinion had conflicts of interest due to industry ties or industry-funded research.

The nonprofits also claimed that the European Commission excluded experts critical of wireless radiation’s possible health effects from the report’s working group and that the report authors ignored peer-reviewed studies showing harmful effects from exposure below current limits.

In the U.S., the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has not updated its RF radiation exposure limits since 1996 and bases them largely on a few small sample studies conducted in the 1970s and 1980s.

The FCC has not yet complied with a 2021 court-ordered mandate to explain how it determined that its current guidelines adequately protect humans and the environment from the harmful effects of RF radiation exposure.

Related articles in The Defender

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

________________

**Comment**

Houston, we have a real problem…..

Please also read, “Wired for Harm: The Biological and Spiritual Costs of Wireless Radiation.”

For more:

Category:

Activism, EMF, research, Uncategorized

Bacterial ‘Fingerprints’ Found on COVID ‘Vaccine’ DNA Contamination

https://slaynews.com/news/bacterial-fingerprints-found-covid-vaccine-dna-contamination/

Bacterial ‘Fingerprints’ Found on Covid ‘Vaccine’ DNA Contamination

Frank Bergman

A groundbreaking new analysis has uncovered evidence that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA shots may have contained bacterial DNA fragments with dangerous immune-activating signatures.

The discovery is raising urgent questions about how regulators ever allowed the injections to reach the public.

The findings were revealed in a preprint published by molecular biologist Kevin McKernan.

McKernan used advanced Oxford Nanopore sequencing technology to analyze a Pfizer vaccine lot (FL8095).

His results revealed:

  • Bacterial-style DNA methylation marks (m6A), a fingerprint of contamination from E. coli–derived DNA.
  • Evidence of incomplete linearization, meaning the DNA used to manufacture the shots may not have been fully processed, leaving behind problematic fragments.
  • Signals that the contamination could, in theory, trigger powerful immune responses, potentially leading to harmful side effects.

These findings raise serious questions about the integrity of the health regulatory process during the declared COVID-19 pandemic.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Science show such fragments can set off inflammation and cytokine storms.

So far, the clot shot contains:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines

Dr. Steven Hatfill Fired in Apparent Coup Attempt

UPDATE: Go here to listen to Hatfill speak out after being fired.

Important excerpt:

Hatfill emphasized that he did not believe Kennedy himself had ordered the firing, instead pointing to a small inner circle he described as acting independently of the Secretary’s agenda. He said they have blocked multiple pandemic preparedness and vaccine reform initiatives.

In the interview, both Hatfill and Gray Delany, former Director of MAHA Implementation state their firings coincided with efforts to expose the catastrophic harms of mRNA vaccine technology and the ongoing concealment of safety data within U.S. health agencies.  Source

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-dr-steven-hatfill-senior?

BREAKING: Dr. Steven Hatfill — Senior HHS Advisor Fighting mRNA Corruption — Has Been Fired in Apparent Coup Attempt

Dr. Hatfill says he was fired in “a coup to overthrow Mr. Kennedy,” led by Chief of Staff Matt Buckham.

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Oct 29, 2025

Dr. Steven Hatfill — one of the few men of integrity within HHS — has been fired in what he describes as “a coup to overthrow Mr. Kennedy,” led by Chief of Staff Matt Buckham.

Dr. Hatfill, a highly respected biosecurity expert whose guidance helped inform Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s decision to terminate $500 million in mRNA research contracts, was likely targeted for standing up for the American people against the dangerous transnational Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex.

According to The New York Times, Hatfill refused to resign when pressured by Buckham, who allegedly told him the department “wanted to go in a different direction.” Instead, Hatfill demanded that HHS fire him outright.

The Department justified the firing by claiming Hatfill “misrepresented himself” as Chief Medical Officer — a claim Hatfill refuted by producing official HHS business cards carrying that exact title.

Dr. Hatfill has been one of the few federal insiders openly confronting the immense dangers of mRNA technology and actually trying to Make America Healthy Again. (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Dr. Hatfill is counting the cost for standing for what is right.

For those of you unfamiliar with Dr. Hatfill, please see:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2025/05/15/must-hear-dr-hatfill-interview/

I’m happy to report that everything posted on this website on the dystopian COVID chapter aligns with what Dr. Hatfill says in this interview.  I am indebted to doctors and researchers who shared prolifically on Linkedin early on.  Many of these experts are retired or not employed by the government and could speak freely.  Unfortunately, one by one, Linked in kicked these truth-tellers off the platform until one day I too was ‘disappeared.’  

Shame on platforms for censoring experts sharing information that could have saved lives.

Please listen to the ‘must hear’ interview with Hatfill.

Category:

Activism, Viruses