https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/cdc-flu-pcr-primers-match-human-dna?
CDC Flu PCR Primers Match Human DNA Across the Genome: New BLAST Data
Are we detecting viruses or ourselves?

The CDC’s ‘Influenza SARS-CoV-2 (Flu SC2) Multiplex Assay’ is a real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) laboratory test used to detect influenza A, influenza B, and SARS-CoV-2 in upper or lower respiratory samples.
Mainstream health authorities use PCR tests to quantify how many infection cases there are.
Case numbers are used to declare pandemics and justify pandemic response measures like lockdowns, masking, social distancing, and vaccination campaigns.
But what if these tests aren’t detecting viruses?
What if they’re detecting human DNA?
That would mean the primary justification for pandemic declarations is built on signals that may not represent viral infection at all, but amplified fragments of the human genome—calling into question the scientific basis for case counts, emergency powers, and every downstream policy decision tied to them.
Scrutiny of the PCR test is warranted, given the high likelihood of an incoming bird flu pandemic and the international coordination documented on this website.
A new BLAST analysis of the CDC’s Influenza SARS-CoV-2 (Flu SC2) Multiplex Assay reveals that every variant of the influenza A forward primer, reverse primer (across all ambiguity resolutions), and probe independently produces dozens to over 100 significant partial matches—often perfect over 15–18 bp core segments—scattered across nearly every human chromosome, establishing widespread human genomic homology. (See link for article)
________________
**Comment**
This is not the first person to notice this troubling issue.
The genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed “genome” and even the so-called “target genes” allegedly specific to the “new coronavirus”. The test is worthless and all “positive” results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world’s leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive!
In this report we are going to add the results of a particular research we have done from the data published on the alleged SARS-CoV-2 and on the protocols endorsed by the WHO for the use of RT-PCR as well as the data corresponding to the rest of the “human coronaviruses”. And the conclusions are extremely serious: none of the seven “human coronaviruses” have actually been isolated and all the sequences of the primers of their respective PCRs as well as those of a large number of fragments of their supposed genomes are found in different areas of the human genome and in genomes of bacteria and archaea, such as these: Shwanella marina JCM, Dialister succinatiphilus, Lactobacillus porcine, Lactobacillus manihotivorans, Leptospira sarikeiensis, Bizionia echini, Sanguibacteroides justesenil, Bacteroides massiliensis, Lacinutrix venerupis, Moraxella bovis, Leptospira saintgironsiae, Winogradskyella undariae, Acetobacterium puteale, Chryseobacterium hispanicum, Paenibacillius koleovorans, Tamiana fuccidanivorans, Fontibacillua panacisegetis, Ru bacter ruber , Skemania piniformis, Chryseobacterium shigense, Caloramator peoteoclasticus, Cellulosilyticum ruminicola, Nitrosopumilius evryensis and a long list of others. Go here for research showing that those claiming to have isolated coronaviruses relied on ‘isolates’ of previous ‘human coronaviruses,’ as well a the sequences of covid are found in both humans and numerous microbes.
Read this informative article by Dr. Mullis, the creator of the PCR on how it was never intended to be used to diagnose people.
For more:
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/02/covid19-pcr-a-test-that-tells-you-your-body-is-the-enemy-a-vaccine-would-be-death-by-1000-cuts/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/17/scam-has-been-confirmed-pcr-does-not-detect-sars-cov-2/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/13/president-of-tanzania-punks-who-sending-samples-of-fruit-goats-sheep-even-motor-oil-for-covid-testing-nearly-half-come-back-positive/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/04/29/chinas-chief-epidemiologist-they-didnt-isolate-the-virus-and-that-is-the-problem/ You can’t have an accurate test without a singularly isolated/purified virus.
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2025/11/10/breaking-86-of-pcr-positive-covid-cases-not-real-infections-1st-peer-reviewed-evidence-shows-covid-shots-based-on-faulty-statistics/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/07/07/what-is-in-the-pcr-tests/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2024/08/15/more-pcr-blunders-but-finally-some-justice-in-canada/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2024/07/31/hhs-declaration-of-emergency-for-bird-flu-paves-way-for-pcr-testing-and-more-eua-vaccines-critics-say/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/07/26/cdc-quietly-withdraws-eua-for-covid-pcr-test-it-cant-distinguish-between-covid-the-flu/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/30/coronavirus-cases-plummet-when-pcr-tests-are-adjusted/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/19/visualizing-pcr-amplification/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/14/tests-for-sars-cov-2-in-south-korea-cant-distinguish-virus-from-viral-fragments/
- https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/08/09/gov-mike-dewine-of-ohio-tests-positive-then-negative-for-coronavirus/
