Madison Area Lyme Support Group

Article Excerpts:

In a May 2025 MedPage Today article, physician and bioethicist Dr. Matthew Wynia posed the question directly: Should “no margin, no mission” apply to the AMA? His argument centers on a dilemma. According to Wynia, the AMA may wish to speak out on issues affecting scientific integrity, the welfare of vulnerable communities, and the moral conscience of the medical profession—but doing so might jeopardize the organization’s financial lifeline: its revenue from licensing the CPT (Current Procedural Terminology) code system. Speaking out could invite retaliation, he suggests, and so silence may be regrettable, but prudent.

It’s an honest and transparent claim. And it reveals a far deeper structural problem—one that goes beyond the AMA. Across American healthcare, financial entanglements have quietly reshaped institutional behavior. From lobbying agendas to billing systems to research funding, core ethical commitments are increasingly filtered through revenue considerations. Margin, once a constraint, is now a compass.  (See link for article)

_______________

SUMMARY on AMA illogic:

• A false analogy is made by comparing hospitals to associations.
• A false dilemma is made when the binary stay silent or risk collapse is presented.
• A fallacy of eternal growth is made when revenue is presented as a right.
• An appeal to consequences is made when Wynia suggests silence on federal overreach is prudent due to potential regulatory punishment
• A moral inversion is given when the institution’s survival justifies passivity in the face of systemic harm.
• The fallacy underpinning ‘no margin, no mission’ are reflections of deeper structural forces that shape institutional behavior constrain moral decision making and invert the very purpose of healthcare leadership.
• The AMA’s economic architecture has become conflicted with the very systems it might otherwise critique.  It owns and controls the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code system which generates tens of millions by licensing these codes to federal agencies, payers, and health IT companies.  More codes equals more billing opportunities. More billing means more dependency upon AMA’s intellectual property.  This is why the organization does not defend preventive, holistic, or decommodified models of care – this would reduce profits!
• Regulatory Capture has become normalized in every sector of healthcare:  “hospitals, medical schools, research centers, journals—have come to accept a basic bargain: to function, one must conform. To survive, one must not provoke.”

The AMA instructs doctors to deceive and is a completely corrupt organization that needs to go.  Doctors should boycott this agency which radicalized and persecuted doctors regarding the use of ivermectin for COVID.  The AMA and other professional medical groups not only overstepped their bounds but were willing tools of Big Pharma and globalists who are quite happy to follow ‘consensus based medicine,’ where doctors are little more than controlled robots for control and profit.

If it weren’t for independent doctors, who must completely depart from ‘consensus based medicine’ if they want patient improvement, those with Lyme/MSIDS would have no hope, no life, and no future, and would live a life of misery.  These thinking doctors take on enormous risk to their practice by treating the likes of us due to the politicalization of the disease(s).

Lymeland is COVID part 1 without the red pill awakening.