Madison Area Lyme Support Group

Article Excerpts:

Claims by public health agencies and in top medical journals that childhood vaccination  prevents millions of deaths annually are based on flawed epidemiological models, according to a paper published today by Correlation, a Canadian nonprofit research organization.

The author, all-cause mortality expert Denis Rancourt, Ph.D., argues these claims are based on “tentative and untethered models of epidemiological forecasting” that produce “unlikely results.”

The models depend entirely on invalid estimates of vaccine efficacy and disease prevalence and virulence, none of which are based on real-world data concerning actual deaths, according to Rancourt.

They also fail to account for other complex factors contributing to child mortality — particularly in low-income countries, where most of these millions of infant lives are purportedly saved. These factors include nutritional deficiency, toxic exposures and poverty.

Rancourt also found that, contrary to public health claims, there are no examples in all-cause mortality data of a drop in infant or child mortality temporally associated with the rollout of a childhood vaccination program.

On the contrary, he wrote, independent observational studies have tied vaccine rollouts to increased infant or child mortality and morbidity.

In the paper, Rancourt develops an alternative model using yearly all-cause infant mortality. He estimates that childhood vaccination campaigns since 1974 may have been associated with approximately 100 million vaccine-related deaths.

However, he emphasizes that any true estimate of mortality would also have to account for other factors, such as the shifting political and economic dynamics that drive poverty and its associated health problems.

Children’s Health Defense Senior Research Scientist Karl Jablonowski said, ”Rancourt points out serious flaws in mainstream debates over childhood vaccination that are premised on errors in generalization and lead to childlike black-and-white thinking when it comes to vaccine safety.”

Jablonowski said the paper clearly demonstrates that claims vaccines have saved millions of lives globally, “hang on a few impossible assumptions.” Those include:

• That no human can die from a vaccine (directly or indirectly).
• That children who die from a “vaccine-preventable” pathogen were otherwise perfectly healthy.
• That we understand how diseases spread in all contexts.
• That all children have the same health, diet, exercise habits, access to clean water, toxin and environmental exposures, genetic disposition, etc., as the clinical trial participants.
• That clinical trials accurately represent the risks and benefits of the vaccine.
• That once a vaccine is developed, all other medical interventions suddenly stop working.

Rancourt said he began writing the paper to demonstrate the “ludicrous theoretical modelling exercises” behind the spectacular claims of reduced infant mortality from mass vaccination programs.

“But what I discovered is that the longstanding industry of administering vaccination programmes to save infants in low-income countries from death is scientifically baseless and a fraudulent enterprise that removes resources and attention away from urgently needed development to correct ongoing mass neocolonial exploitation,” he said.

(See link for excellent article)

For more:

• https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/do-vaccines-really-reduce-childhood?

______________

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/sids-maybe-babies-dont-just-suddenly?

As this Substack has been exposing for many years now, the entire (childhood) vaccination program is nothing more than a premeditated depopulation program…

If ALL Vaccines Are Unsafe And Ineffective, Then Why Are They Being Foisted on Humanity?

2nd Smartest Guy in the World

Feb 2

Article Excerpts:

There is not a single vaccine that is safe, effective, or in any way necessary; in fact, all of the major vaccines are actually far worse than the diseases they fraudulently purport to protect against.

…with the Medical Industrial Complex having coined yet another one of their “Safe and Effective” reality inverting coverup terms in Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), except that prior to the perpetually expanding childhood vaccination schedule there was never in human history any “sudden” infanticide by injection…

Syndrome that is characterized by the sudden death of an infant that is not predicted by medical history and remains unexplained after a thorough forensic autopsy and detailed death scene investigation. ~ Wikipedia

The “thorough” SIDS forensic autopsies are deliberately undermined by the very definition itself, which unsurprisingly results in misclassifications that serve as the ultimate deception.

SIDS is a completely manufactured term that functions as a bait and switch for the ongoing eugenics program of vaccine-induced infanticide, and just like with the Modified mRNA slow kill bioweapon “vaccines,” which have been responsible for the hitherto unprecedented Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (SADS).  (See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

The ‘vaccine’ madness must end.

Please see the conclusion from “Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death: An Analysis of the VAERS Database 1990-2019 and Review of the Medical Literature”

5. Conclusion

This study found that a substantial proportion of infant deaths and SIDS cases occurred in temporal proximity to vaccine administration. The excess of deaths during these early post-vaccination periods was statistically significant (p < 0.00001). Several theories regarding the pathogenic mechanism behind these fatal events have been proposed, including the role of vaccine-induced inflammatory cytokines as neuromodulators in the infant medulla preceding an abnormal response to the accumulation of carbon dioxide; fatal disorganization of  respiratory control induced by adjuvants that cross the blood-brain barrier; and biochemical or synergistic toxicity due to multiple vaccines administered concurrently.

There are 130 official ways for an infant to die, as categorized in the ICD, and one unofficial way for an infant to expire: from a fatal reaction to vaccines. When vaccine-related deaths are hidden within the death tables, it is difficult to monitor and prevent these deaths. In addition, parents are denied the ability to ascertain honest vaccine risk-to-benefit ratios and true informed consent to vaccination is not possible. This is why increased effort and transparency toward achieving an accurate account of vaccine-related infant mortality is a desirable goal.

The findings in this paper must be weighed against the strengths and limitations of the available data and study design. While this paper does not prove an association between infant vaccines and sudden infant deaths, it reveals unusual patterns and safety signals highly suggestive of a causal relationship. Additional investigation is warranted. Finding ways to increase vaccine safety, reduce inaccurate or inconsistent cause-of-death certification practices, and support families in their quest to make genuinely informed healthcare decisions, must be top priorities.