https://blogs.webmd.com/webmd-interviews/20190619/fda-expert-interview-hand-sanitizer-safety

FDA Expert Interview: Hand Sanitizer Safety

woman using hand sanitizer

BY BARA VAIDA JUNE 19, 2019

https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/85500?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2020-03- Video here

‘It’s Not the Exact Same Virus Everywhere in the World’

— Preprint manuscript suggests COVID-19 virus has already mutated into multiple strains

A preprint manuscript posted on medRxiv analyzed COVID-19 coronavirus samples from Sichuan province of China for sequence variation and evolution, to determine how rapidly the virus is mutating during its pandemic spread, and the unpredictable effects it is having on containment efforts.

In this exclusive video interview with Harlan Krumholz, MD, of Yale University School of Medicine, he discusses the paper and says “we need to realize this is a moving target.”

________________

**Comment**

I don’t post this to garner fear but rather to show something viruses do naturally – mutate.  I post this to show that this makes testing rather challenging as well as the fact you may have already had this virus and will never know it.  Testing for COVID-19 is abysmal – on par with Lyme/MSIDS testing.  

The following article does a great job of explaining viral shedding as well as the fact many vaccines cause this shedding, thereby infecting others exposed to the individual who got vaccinated.  Nobody seems to be thinking about this with a COVID-19 vaccine, but we sure should:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/08/05/what-is-vaccine-shedding/

In this article we see that the flu vaccine just last year was 9% effective against the current strain that popped up mid-season:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/07/10/cdc-admits-flu-vaccine-failed-91-of-the-time-against-current-flu-strain/  The question begging to be asked is what kind of vaccine effectiveness can be expected IF COVID-19 is mutating all over the place and is a “moving target?”

The numbers of COVID-19 cases are reporting via testing are inflated and based on false premises with arbitrary cut off points.
Research from China has shown the false positive rate to be over 50% and in some cases as high as 80%

Source:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/21/study-shows-covid-19-testing-as-bad-as-lyme-msids-testing/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32133832?

2020 Mar 5;41(4):485-488. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112338-20200221-00144. [Epub ahead of print]

Potential false-positive rate among the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ in close contacts of COVID-19 patients

[Article in Chinese; Abstract available in Chinese from the publisher]

Abstract

Objective: As the prevention and control of COVID-19 continues to advance, the active nucleic acid test screening in the close contacts of the patients has been carrying out in many parts of China. However, the false-positive rate of positive results in the screening has not been reported up to now. But to clearify the false-positive rate during screening is important in COVID-19 control and prevention.

Methods: Point values and reasonable ranges of the indicators which impact the false-positive rate of positive results were estimated based on the information available to us at present. The false-positive rate of positive results in the active screening was deduced, and univariate and multivariate-probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to understand the robustness of the findings.

Results: When the infection rate of the close contacts and the sensitivity and specificity of reported results were taken as the point estimates, the positive predictive value of the active screening was only 19.67%, in contrast, the false-positive rate of positive results was 80.33%. The multivariate-probabilistic sensitivity analysis results supported the base-case findings, with a 75% probability for the false-positive rate of positive results over 47%.

Conclusions: In the close contacts of COVID-19 patients, nearly half or even more of the ‘asymptomatic infected individuals’ reported in the active nucleic acid test screening might be false positives.

________________

**Comment**

Hopefully it is clear from this study that the prevalence of cases is far lower than is being reported if these tests are being used as predictors of infection.

This testing is as bad as Lyme/MSIDS testing and shouldn’t be taken seriously by anyone.  

**UPDATE, March 25, 2020**

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/25/new-dna-sequencing-test-for-covid-20-100-accurate-can-also-test-for-5-strains/

__________________________

Meanwhile, the CDC has developed a new PCR test which is also riddled with problems, intended for labs certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) to perform high complexity tests. (But other CLIA-certified labs doing testing for Lyme/MSIDS are called “home-brewed” by the CDC).  

They are also working on a new test which will detect antibodies https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/testing.html
The Lyme community is well aware of the short comings of antibody testing as this sort of testing has kept thousands from being diagnosed with tick-borne illness.

Regarding the problems with PCR testing, author David Crowe explains:

To use PCR as a test, you assume that you are starting with an unknown number of strands and end up with an exponential multiple after n cycles. From the quantity of materials at termination the starting quantity can be estimated. A major problem with this is that because PCR is an exponential (doubling) process, errors also grow exponentially.

The second problem is that the Coronavirus is believed to be composed of RNA, but this can be solved by converting all RNA into DNA with the Reverse Transcriptase enzyme at the start of the process.

The technology, after these two adaptations, is known as RT-PCR (Reverse Transcriptase PCR).

Now you have the information necessary to understand the numbers from 20-40 on the vertical axis of the graphs above. These are the number of cycles. It implies that it always took at least 20 PCR cycles before any RNA could be detected, and they stopped after a maximum of 37 cycles. The blue line is at cycle 38, and the black dots do not mean RNA was detected after 38 cycles (as clarified in the paper), but that it wasn’t detected by 37 cycles, and so the process terminated. This “Serial Cycle Threshold (Ct)” was the arbitrary definition of a negative result by the authors of reference [24].

We can see that it was arbitrary, because in another paper, reference [13], the authors had two end points: 37 and 40. Anything less than 37 was considered positive and anything 40 or greater was defined as negative. The in-between values were re-tested and re-interpreted. Note that this paper would treat 37 as indeterminate but the Singapore paper would treat it as positive.  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/16/does-the-coronavirus-exist/

His paper goes on to show many people testing positive, then negative, then positive again.  Results were all over the place.  Regarding antibody cut off points, the Lyme/MSIDS community again, is all too aware of how this has kept people from being diagnosed, only instead of false positives as in COVID-19 testing, it’s false negatives that are killing Lyme patients.  False positives only serve those who want to show high numbers of infected people.

Recently I posted a video of Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, pulmonologist, epidemiologist, and past chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee.  He states the following on his website, regarding testing:

Without PCR-Tests there would be no reason for special alarms.

We are currently not measuring the incidence of coronavirus diseases, but the activity of the specialists searching for them.https://www.wodarg.com

BTW, Wodarg is the one who pointed out the Swine flu hoax and states this:

We have experienced similar alarmist actions by virologists in the last two decades. WHO’s “swine flu pandemic” was in fact one of the mildest flu waves in history and it is not only migratory birds that are still waiting for “birds flu”. Many institutions that are now again alerting us to the need for caution have let us down and failed us on several occasions. Far too often, they are institutionally corrupted by secondary interests from business and/or politics.  https://www.wodarg.com

Lastly, he states

It is a well-known fact that in every “flu wave” 7-15% of acute respiratory illnesses (ARI) are coming along with coronaviruses, the case numbers that are now continuously added up are still completely within the normal range.  https://www.wodarg.com

Regarding nucleic acid testing (NAT) used in the study, this article explains the benefits and constraints of such tests:  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3943139/
NAT technique is highly sensitive and specific for viral nucleic acids. It is based on amplification of targeted regions of viral ribonucleic acid or deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and detects them earlier than the other screening methods thus, narrowing the window period of HIV, HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections.
According to the article, these are the downsides of NAT:
  • highly technically demanding
  • high cost
  • dedicated infrastructure facility
  • equipment
  • consumables
  • technical expertise
  • And lastly, at least regarding COVID-19 – the high false positive rate

And then, the latest attention grab is COVID-19 testing is that is supposed to give results within 45 minutes, such as this one from Cepheid:  https://www.cepheid.com/coronavirus.  The problem is, if the test is inaccurate to begin with, getting the results quicker isn’t any more helpful.  We are told here by a Yale MD that COVID-19 is mutating:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/21/its-not-the-exact-same-virus-everywhere-in-the-world/

Current tests only detects SARS-CoV-2.

Recently this frightening article came out on how tests were contaminated WITH COVID-19:  https://www-standard-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.standard.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-test-kits-contaminated-covid-19-a4403021.html?amp

Hopefully this demonstrates that the numbers floating out there are all based upon faulty testing – just like Lyme/MSIDS.  Again, I’m not saying people don’t die of viruses – they do – and they always have and most probably always will.  But, this thing is being blown up to monster proportions when frankly, they haven’t a clue on prevalence.

I hope that the World Health Organization and White House Coronavirus Task Force takes Lee up on his offer to retest borderline or questionable positive coronavirus samples as the high false positive rate is causing undue panic and unconstitutional measures by governments.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32135054

2020 Feb;73(2):68-70.

Mycotic Aneurysm of the Middle Cerebral Artery Leading to Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, as the Initial Presentation of Bartonella henselae Endocarditis.

Abstract

Bartonella species was first reported as a cause of endocarditis in 1993, currently it is thought to account for 3-4 percent of all diagnosed cases. Initial symptoms of Bartonella endocarditis are non-specific like weight loss, fever and fatigue. There are very few reported cases of Bartonella endocarditis causing mycotic aneurysm.

We present a case of a 60-year-old male who presented with subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to mycotic aneurysm. Due to high suspicion of endocarditis leading to mycotic aneurysm he underwent transesophageal echocardiography which showed mitral valve vegetations. His blood cultures were negative, he was eventually diagnosed with Bartonella henselae by elevated IgG titers greater than 1:800. Due to repeated mycotic aneurysms on antibiotics, he underwent surgical mitral valve replacement along with the full course of antibiotics and has been asymptomatic since.

__________________

**Comment**

A mycotic aneurysm is an aneurysm caused by the growth of fungi or bacteria within the vascular wall, usually following impaction of a septic embolus.  https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/mycotic+aneurysm

In this case, Bartonella is the culprit and the patient presented with bleeding in the brain.

Please note the blood culture was negative.

Also note the “repeated mycotic aneurysms on antibiotics.”  I’m not pointing this out to avoid antibiotics but to show that there can be side-effects of treatment.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/category/bartonella-treatment/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/24/human-bartonellosis-an-underappreciated-public-health-problem/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/02/19/bartonella-infection-everywhere-but-we-dont-know-about-it/

 

https://www.healthnutnews.com/the-benefits-to-dry-brushing-and-how-to-do-it/?

The Benefits to Dry Brushing and How to Do It

UPDATE: People kept asking me for an affordable brush and I don’t sell anything, but I found one on Amazon for under 7 dollars.

Many people carefully tend to the skin on their face, regularly exfoliating, cleansing, and moisturizing. But when’s the last time you tended to the skin on the rest of your body?

Your skin is your largest organ, after all, and there is one simple step you can add to your morning routine that can greatly improve its health – dry skin brushing.

I’m not only referring to your skin’s aesthetic appearance, either (although many would agree this is important to). The benefits of dry skin brushing go beyond skin deep, offering whole-body benefits to your health.

Dry Skin Brushing: 7 Key Benefits

Your skin is a complex system made up of nerves, glands, and cell layers that, when healthy, serves as a buffer that helps protect your body from extreme temperatures and chemicals.

It also produces antibacterial substances to protect you from infection and enables your body to produce vitamin D when exposed to the sun. Your skin even contains densely packed nerve cells that act as messengers to your brain, making your skin a crucial part of your interactions with the world around you.

Another crucial role your skin plays is supporting optimal detoxification. But if your skin is overrun with toxins or dead skin cells, it will not be able to eliminate wastes from your body efficiently.

This is where dry skin brushing can be invaluable, not only in brushing off dead skin cells but also in activating waste removal via your lymph nodes. Beyond this, dry skin brushing offers multiple benefits including:

1. Stimulate Your Lymphatic System

In your body, your lymphatic system is the system responsible for eliminating cellular waste products. Hundreds of miles of lymphatic tubules allow waste to be collected from your tissues and transported to your blood for elimination, a process referred to as lymphatic drainage.

When your lymphatic system is not working properly, waste and toxins can build up and make you sick. Lymphatic congestion is a major factor leading to inflammation and disease. By stimulating your lymphatic system and helping it release toxins, dry skin brushing is a powerful detoxification aid.

2. Exfoliation

Dry skin brushing removes dead dry skin, improving appearance, clearing your clogged pores, and allowing your skin to “breathe.”

3. Increase Circulation

When you dry brush your skin, it increases circulation to your skin, which encourages the elimination of metabolic waste.

4. Reduce Cellulite

Dry skin brushing may help to soften hard fat deposits below the skin while distributing fat deposits more evenly. This may help to diminish the appearance of cellulite.

Dry brushing is also said to help reduce cellulite by removing toxins that may break down connective tissue, although some believe the effect is temporary (and mostly a result of skin become more plump and swollen after brushing).1 The Huffington Post reported:2

“When we’d heard dry skin brushing was an effective method for reducing cellulite, we knew we had to include it in our anti-cellulite road test. Sure enough, it was indeed one of the more successful ways to smooth away less-than-perfect spots on your legs.”

5. Stress Relief

The act of dry brushing has been described as meditative (especially if you do it in a quiet space) and may reduce muscle tension, calm your mind, and relieve stress. Many compare it to a light whole-body massage.

6. Improve Digestion and Kidney Function

Dry skin brushing may go even deeper, helping to support your digestion and organ function. According to one skin care and spa expert:3

“…many naturopathic doctors use dry brushing to help with bloating because massaging the lymph nodes helps the body shed excess water and toxins. One of the immediate effects of dry brushing is smoother skin, but it can also help improve digestion, kidney function, and more.”

7. It’s Invigorating

Many people become “addicted” to dry skin brushing (in a good way) because it simply feels so good. Along with glowing and tighter skin, regular dry skin brushers report feeling invigorated after a quick session.

Dry Brushing: How to Do It

First you’ll need a high-quality dry brush. Look for one with bristles made from natural materials. They should feel stiff but not overly so. Ideally, choose a brush with a long handle so you can reach your entire back and other hard-to-reach spots.

Dry skin brushing should be done daily for best results, or even twice a day if you like. Try incorporating it into your normal daily routine, such as doing your brushing before your morning shower and then again after work (avoid doing it too close to bedtime, as it may leave you feeling energized).

When brushing, always brush toward your heart, which is best for circulation and your lymphatic system. You can brush your entire body (including the soles of your feet). Start at your feet and work your way up your legs to your arms, chest, back, and stomach. Avoid brushing your face (unless you have a special brush designed for this delicate skin), your genitals, or any areas with irritations or abrasions (including varicose veins).

The pressure you apply while brushing your skin should be firm but not painful (avoid “scrubbing”). Your skin should be pink after a session (not red or irritated) and you can brush for as long (or as little) as you’d like. An average dry brushing session may last between two and 20 minutes.

Try It… You’ll Probably Get Hooked

The investment in dry skin brushing is small – you can find a high-quality brush for under $20 – but the pay-off is large. If you’ve never tried it, you’re likely to be pleasantly surprised. As one new devotee described in the Examiner:4

“I’ve only been at this for about two weeks, but I’ve already experienced many of the benefits listed above. For one thing, dry skin brushing just feels really good. It’s one of those miraculous practices that manages to be both relaxing and energizing all at the same time. For another, it cured my cellulite! …Dry skin brushing also helped heal some ingrown hairs and some innocuous though unsightly bumps on my arms. My skin is softer and no longer dry or flakey. Additionally, though I’m not sure whether or not it’s related to dry skin brushing, I must say that I’ve been sleeping better and experiencing less ‘brain fog’ throughout the day!”

A Surefire Plan for Flawless Skin

Eating a healthy diet as described in my nutrition plan, which focuses on whole, bioavailable organic foods, is your number one strategy for helping your body detox naturally while supplying the necessary nutrients your skin needs to thrive. Adding dry brushing on top of a healthful diet will only magnify its benefits. That said, certain foods are particularly effective at promoting beautiful, clear, healthy skin, so if you’re not yet eating the following on a regular basis, now is a great time to start:

  •  omega-3 fats
  • Vegetables: Ideally fresh, organic, and locally grown. Fresh vegetable juice is also wonderful for your skin, as are carotenoids, which give red, orange, and yellow fruits their color, and also occur in green vegetables. Studies have shown that eating foods with these deeply colored pigments can make your face actually look healthier than being tanned.
  • Fermented vegetables are even better as they can be made with the same vegetables but are converted by bacteria into superfoods. Fermented vegetables help promote the growth of friendly intestinal bacteria and aid in immune balance and digestion.
  • Astaxanthin—a potent antioxidant—has been found to offer effective protection against sun damage when taken as a daily supplement. Some sunscreens are also starting to use astaxanthin as an ingredient to protect your skin from damage.

Once you’ve addressed the dietary suggestions above, the following routine can help you to remove excess flakes to reveal the glowing skin underneath:

  1. Use a dry body brush to get rid of flakes, stimulate your lymphatic system, and more as described above (do this for a few minutes on your dry skin, before getting wet)
  2. Avoid using soap or use the least amount possible, especially in winter or in dry climates, as this may promote and aggravate dry skin
  3. Instead, apply a natural body scrub to exfoliate your skin (also apply this to your skin before getting wet, and choose one that also contains oil to moisturize)
  4. After your shower, apply a heavy natural body butter or natural moisturizing oil (not mineral oil or baby oil) to help seal in moisture; coconut oil works well for this purpose

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Dr Mercola is the founder of the #1 Natural Health Site for nearly 20 years: Mercola.com

Copyright 2020 – permission to reprint fully granted, WITH links to original story