Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

7 Doctors on Lyme/MSIDS & COVID-19

 Approx. 54 Min.

March 27, 2020

7 Doctors on Lyme/MSIDS & COVID-19

Listen to a panel panel discussion hosted by Dr. Sunjya Schweig, of the California Center for Functional Medicine.

He is joined by Dr. Steven Harris, Dr Jacob Leone, Dr Ilene Ruhoy and Dr. Richard Horowitz.

They discuss some of the basic science about the virus, whether patients with tick-borne infections are at higher risk of infection, and potential treatments based on the present scientific literature.

Dr. Horowitz also briefly recounts his experience treating three COVID-19 patients and what regimens have been working to date. 

 

Coronavirus: Pathogen Could Have Been Spreading in Humans For Years, Study Says

https://www.scmp.com/news/china/science/article/3077442/coronavirus-pathogen-could-have-been-spreading-humans-decades

Coronavirus: pathogen could have been spreading in humans for years, study says

Stephen Chen in Beijing

  • Virus may have jumped from animal to humans long before the first detection in Wuhan, according to research by an international team of scientists
  • Findings significantly reduce the possibility of the virus having a laboratory origin, director of the US National Institute of Health says (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Important quote:

The study, found here:  https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9 is also a topic of Lyme advocate Carl Tuttle’s recent post titled, “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2”:  https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/

Tuttle’s focus is on an article debunking the Nature article claiming COVID-19 definitely wasn’t from a lab.  Article found here:  https://harvardtothebighouse.com/2020/01/31/logistical-and-technical-analysis-of-the-origins-of-the-wuhan-coronavirus-2019-ncov/  (You can also sign a petition in the link asking for a moratorium on all dual-use gain-of-function research.)

The author debunking the Nature article asserts COVID-19 either –

  • “spontaneously mutated and jumped to humans at a wet market or deep in some random bat cave which just so happened to be 20 miles from China’s only BSL-4 virology lab, a virus with an unusually slippery never-before-seen genome that’s evading zoological classification….”

OR

  • “Chinese scientists failed to follow correct sanitation protocols…, something that had been anticipated since the opening of the BSL-4 lab and has happened at least four times previously, and accidentally released this bio-engineered Wuhan Strain – likely created by scientists researching immunotherapy regimes against bat coronaviruses, who’ve already demonstrated the ability to perform every step necessary to bio-engineer the Wuhan Strain COVID-19 – into their population, and now the world....this virus appears to have been bio-engineered at the spike-protein genes which was already done at UNC to make an extraordinarily virulent coronavirus. Chinese efforts to prevent the full story about what’s going on from getting out are because they want the scales to be even since they’re now facing a severe pandemic and depopulation event. No facts point against this conclusion.  

Supporting the second case are Chinese researchers:  https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/04/01/chinese-scientists-think-coronavirus-leaked-from-wuhan-lab.aspx

“In summary, somebody was entangled with the evolution of 2019-nCoV coronavirus. In addition to origins of natural recombination and intermediate host, the killer coronavirus probably originated from a laboratory in Wuhan. Safety level may need to be reinforced in high risk biohazardous laboratories. Regulations may be taken to relocate these laboratories far away from city center and other densely populated places.”

Great video with Dr. Mikovitz explaining Coronavirus:  (She explains numerous issues raised in this article) https://videoplayer.telvue.com/player/0yMvL7SaaePCh8raohYoxsp1MzZ6gHeT/series/2470/media/546082?

Circling back to the Nature article, one of the authors, Ian Lipkin, is known as “The Virus Hunter.”  He’s currently involved in a sex discrimination lawsuit alleging concerning issues that should cause us to question his credibility:  https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2017/05/lawsuit-columbia-university-roils-prominent-chronic-fatigue-syndrome-research-lab (takes credit for others’ work, diverts and misuses funds which delays publication of others’ work, undermines relationships with a colleague’s collaborators and donors, wrongly adds himself as principle investigator to grants, and sex discrimination):  

Also, Lipkin, a staunch critic of Dr. Andrew Wakefield wrote this paper titled, “Anti-Vaccination Lunacy Won’t Stop”:  https://www.mailman.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/pdf/wsj-040416.pdf

Any researcher biased enough to call those who dare to question vaccine safety lunatics has tipped his hand that he is not at all open to new scientific findings

Here, you can read an astute criticism of Lipkin’s CDC-AAP sponsored report, “Lack of Association between Measles Virus Vaccine and Autism with Enteropathy: A Case-Control Study,” and that it actually in the end validated Andrew Wakefield’s findings:  https://www.vaccinationnews.org/content/cdc-sponsored-mmr-study-supports-wakefields-findings

Please also remember that it was none other than NIH’s AIDS czar, Anthony Fauci, who asked his friend Ian Lipkin to settle the claim by microbiologist Judy Mikovitz on whether XMRV is behind chronic fatigue syndrome.  Lipkin blamed a man-made contaminant, despite Lo and Alter’s paper showing 6.8 percent of healthy controls were positive for MLV-related infection:  https://www.pnas.org/content/107/36/15874.short.

For the background:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/10/15/vaccines-and-retroviruses-a-whistleblower-reveals-what-the-government-is-hiding/

Similarly to how research for Alzheimer’s was hijacked for decades by the amyloid beta issue, ME/CHS research studying viruses was hijacked by Lipkin, despite this 2019 article stating that although XMRV has not been proven yet to cause CFS, it has not been ruled out, and that results of research shows that XMRV is a candidate for causing human disease:  https://www.cleveland.com/healthfit/2009/11/top_scientists_to_meet_at_clev.html 

Lipkin is directly involved with research involving cancer, Autism, and vaccines – hot topics tightly controlled by powers that have vested interests.
Hopefully it is clear from the numerous posts on this website that those who depart from the controlled narrative are skewered alive.

But, Lipkin never departs from the accepted narrative.

Tuttle has a valid point not trusting authorities on COVID-19 that have also been involved in a

“thirty-year deception on the American public that Lyme is a simple nuisance disease through its network of paid academics (now defendants in a racketeering lawsuit) [2] how much trust should we lend to your work Dr. Lipkin?”

If you haven’t signed Tuttle’s petition, please do so:  https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/

There is continued resistance by government agencies to acknowledge and provide information pertaining to chronic Lyme disease on their websites and in their programs despite Lyme disease being around 45 years. They also control all testing and suppress any other lab doing Lyme/MSIDS testing.

Doctors Challenging Coronavirus Crisis

 Approx. 15 Min.

Doctor Sucharit Bhakdi Challenges the Coronavirus Crisis

This is a video by Professor Doctor Sucharit Bhakdi with an English voiceover for the German to English translations. You can watch the original video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsExP… 

Bhakdi asks 5 questions of the German Chancellor:

  1. Did your projections differentiate between not or only slightly affected individuals and genuine and severely ill and hospitalized COVID-19 patients?
  2. Do any scientific sound data exist to support the contention that COVID-19 is an exceptionally dangerous virus?  Bhakdi asserts the answer is NO. A French study came out on March 19, 2020 showing that existing Coronaviruses had similar numbers of deaths when compared to COVID-19 deaths.  He does not contend that COVID-19 is as trivial as everyday coronaviruses but nothing indicates the probability that it is much more severe.
  3. Has any attempt been made to determine if the virus already spread through the general population?  He states that a 1-2 week investigation would reveal this all important answer.
  4. Has Germany followed the global trend of unscientifically categorizing and defining  COVID-19 related deaths?  A terrible error is being made that violates a basic principle of medicine. Whenever there is a death and the virus is detected, the virus is automatically assigned as the cause of death giving a false high death rate. 
  5. What efforts are being made to inform society about the basic differences between the situations in Italy and German?  Horrific air pollution exists in Northern Italy and the failing Italian health system may be playing unpredictable roles in COVID-19 outcomes. The scenario in Italy need not be the scenario in Germany.

Lastly, Bhakdi asks the all important question on so many of our minds:

Can the present implementation of measures that curtail essential elements of human rights be legally justified?

This Canadian investigative science reporter shows the answer to that question is a resounding No, as well as the sordid details of what looks to be a pre-designed plannedemic:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/16/does-the-coronavirus-exist/

https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/24/12-experts-questioning-the-coronavirus-panic? Twelve medical experts contradict the official narratives.

https://off-guardian.org/2020/03/28/10-more-experts-criticising-the-coronavirus-panic/ Ten more expert voices, drowned out or disregarded by the mainstream narrative.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/30/how-deadly-is-the-coronavirus-its-still-far-from-clear-everything-is-set-up-to-show-high-numbers/  Written by a retired pathologist, who points out numerous important issues that make COVID-19 numbers all appear high.

Highlights:

  1. As of now COVID-19 deaths are lower than other infectious diseases (such as the flu)
  2. Testing that is based in hospitals will over estimate virulence of infection because sicker people are in the hospital
  3. They have updated the list of notifiable diseases to include COVID-19 which means every positive test for it must be notified in a way that the flu and other infections would not be – making it appear more prevalent and dangerous due to record keeping. Criteria for recording deaths must be tightened.
  4. If anyone with a positive test for COVID-19 dies, staff will record the COVID-19 on the death certificate contrary to usual practice for most infections of this kind. The author astutely points out that there is a big difference between finding something and it directly causing illness or death.
  5. There isn’t any statistical evidence for excess COVID-19 deaths in any part of the world
  6. Policies have been decided without concrete evidence
  7. We must keep an open mind and look for what is, not for what we fear might be

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/17/stunning-insights-into-the-corona-panic-by-dr-wolfgang-wodarg/

Important quote:

We are currently not measuring the incidence of coronavirus diseases, but the activity of the specialists searching for them.  https://www.wodarg.com

0-17

0-18

iu-49“If we had not known about a new virus out there, and had not checked individuals with PCR tests, the number of total deaths due to “influenza-like illness” would not seem unusual this year. At most, we might have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.” John Ioannidis, Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science, at Stanford University School of Medicine and a Professor of Statistics at Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences. 

“AS FOR OUR COMMON DEFENSE, WE REJECT AS FALSE THE CHOICE BETWEEN OUR SAFETY AND OUR IDEALS.” WENDY K. MARINER, GEORGE J. ANNAS & WENDY E. PARMET (all law professors) INAUGURATION ADDRESS OF PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA, JANUARY 20, 2009. MARINER

 

Hydroxychloroquine & Azithromycin in 80 COVID-19 Patients

https://www.mediterranee-infection.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/COVID-IHU-2-1.pdf

Clinical and microbiological effect of a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin in 80 COVID-19 patients with at least a six-day follow up: an observational study

Running title: Hydroxychloroquine-Azithromycin and COVID-19

Philippe Gautret1,2,£ 1,3,$ 1,2 1,2,4, Jean-Christophe Lagier , Philippe Parola , Van Thuan Hoang ,11111Line Meddeb , Jacques Sevestre , Morgane Mailhe , Barbara Doudier, Camille Aubry ,11151Sophie Amrane , Piseth Seng , Marie Hocquart , Julie Finance , Vera Esteves Vieira , Hervé Tissot Dupont1,3 6,7 1,3 1,3, Stéphane Honoré , Andreas Stein , Matthieu Million , Philippe1,3 1,3 8 9 10Colson , Bernard La Scola , Véronique Veit , Alexis Jacquier , Jean-Claude DeharoMichel Drancourt1,3*Didier Raoult .

Abstract

We need an effective treatment to cure COVID-19 patients and to decrease the virus carriage duration. In 80 in-patients receiving a combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin we noted a clinical improvement in all but one 86 year-old patient who died, and one 74 year- old patient still in intensive care unit. A rapid fall of nasopharyngeal viral load tested by qPCR was noted, with 83% negative at Day7, and 93% at Day8. Virus cultures from patient respiratory samples were negative in 97.5% patients at Day5. This allowed patients to rapidly de discharge from highly contagious wards with a mean length of stay of five days. We believe other teams should urgently evaluate this cost-effective therapeutic strategy, to both avoid the spread of the disease and treat patients as soon as possible before severe respiratory irreversible complications take hold.

_________________

**Comment**

The study shows a quick reduction of the viral load. 57.5% presented with at least one risk factor for complication of COVID-19 (Hypertension, diabetes, respiratory disease…) The treatment given was Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate 200 mg PO three times a day for 10 days with Azithromycin 500mg day 1 then 250 mg for the 4 following days. Patients with pneumonia received in addition Ceftriaxone. 79 out of the 80 patients received their treatment on average 4.9 days after the onset of the illness. The results show that 81.3% of patients (65/80) got a clinical improvement that enabled them to be discharged from the hospital.Only 15% required oxygen therapy. 3 patients were admitted in ICU. Only one out of these 3 patients (74 years old) is still in ICU. One death happened in a 86 year old patient. A quick drop of the nasopharyngeal viral load was observed with 83% of negative test at day 7 and 93% of negative tests at day 8. After 10 days, only 2 patients presented with a positive viral test. 97.5% of the viral cultures performed on respiratory samples were negative at day 5.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/27/the-truth-about-hydroxychloroquine-plaquenil-in-the-treatment-of-covid-19/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/25/what-exactly-is-hydroxychloroquine-the-drug-that-is-being-tested-as-the-first-potential-coronavirus-treatment/

 

 

How Deadly is the Coronavirus? It’s Still Far From Clear (Everything is Set Up To Show High Numbers)

This article explains why COVID-19 numbers are so high.  Written by a retired UK pathology professor and NHS consultant pathologist.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/The-evidence-on-Covid-19-is-not-as-clear-as-we-think

Dr John Lee

How deadly is the coronavirus? It’s still far from clear

There is room for different interpretations of the data

In announcing the most far-reaching restrictions on personal freedom in the history of our nation, Boris Johnson resolutely followed the scientific advice that he had been given. The advisers to the government seem calm and collected, with a solid consensus among them. In the face of a new viral threat, with numbers of cases surging daily, I’m not sure that any prime minister would have acted very differently.

But I’d like to raise some perspectives that have hardly been aired in the past weeks, and which point to an interpretation of the figures rather different from that which the government is acting on. I’m a recently-retired Professor of Pathology and NHS consultant pathologist, and have spent most of my adult life in healthcare and science – fields which, all too often, are characterised by doubt rather than certainty. There is room for different interpretations of the current data.  (See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

Important take-aways:

  1. As of now COVID-19 deaths are lower than other infectious diseases (such as the flu)
  2. Testing that is based in hospitals will over estimate virulence of infection because sicker people are in the hospital
  3. They have updated the list of notifiable diseases to include COVID-19 which means every positive test for it must be notified in a way that the flu and other infections would not be – making it appear more prevalent and dangerous due to record keeping. Criteria for recording deaths must be tightened.
  4. If anyone with a positive test for COVID-19 dies, staff will record the COVID-19 on the death certificate contrary to usual practice for most infections of this kind. The author astutely points out that there is a big difference between finding something and it directly causing illness or death.  Ironically, this very fact has been used against Lyme patients for decades as authorities are so careful about stating that finding Bb in a person doesn’t mean it is causing anything let alone death. Bias is clearly evident in how they are handling COVID-19 vs Lyme disease
  5. Taking drastic measures to reduce COVID-19 follows that deaths will go down convincing authorities that they have averted something that was never going to be as severe as feared
  6. If the flu or seasonal viruses were tracked as COVID-19 is, they too would show exponential rises. The flu, according to the CDC states that since September, 38 MILLION Americans were infected which killed 23,000
  7. He states comparing data from different countries is like comparing apples and oranges
  8. With time, most infections tend to decrease in virulence as an epidemic progresses
  9. There isn’t any statistical evidence for excess COVID-19 deaths in any part of the world
  10. Social distancing for the elderly and immune-suppressed is reasonable but there’s no evidence that drastic measures should be taken
  11. TV is not science – no matter how how shocking
  12. When lock-down measures are lifted, there WILL be more cases again but shouldn’t be alarming
  13. It will take months, even years before wider implications can be seen (damaging children’s education, increased suicides, mental health problems, taking resources away, effects on food production and global commerce – will have unquantifiable consequences for people)
  14. Rushed science is almost always bad science
  15. Policies have been decided without concrete evidence
  16. We must keep an open mind and look for what is, not for what we fear might be
Great article!  Please share this as people are being led by the media and do not understand what’s going on with numbers.  Everything is being stacked to make numbers look high – from the inaccurate testing with false positives to the way deaths are being recorded.

For more:  https://www.statnews.com/2020/03/17/a-fiasco-in-the-making-as-the-coronavirus-pandemic-takes-hold-we-are-making-decisions-without-reliable-data/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/27/cdcs-deadly-testing-fiasco-centralization-of-public-health-authority-a-threat-to-national-security/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/21/study-shows-covid-19-testing-as-bad-as-lyme-msids-testing/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/17/stunning-insights-into-the-corona-panic-by-dr-wolfgang-wodarg/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/03/16/does-the-coronavirus-exist/