‘Medical Warfare’: Doctors Who Questioned COVID Shots, Promoted Ivermectin Lose Certification & Canadian Detective Suspended After Investigating Possible COVID Shot Link to SIDS
‘Medical Warfare’: Doctors Who Questioned COVID Shots, Promoted Ivermectin Lose Certification
The American Board of Internal Medicine last week revoked the certifications of Drs. Pierre Kory and Paul Marik, following a two-year investigation into their promotion of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine as treatments for COVID-19 and their statements questioning the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
Two doctors who spoke out about vaccines and alternative treatments for COVID-19 received notice that their medical certifications were revoked, while another doctor said her certification was revoked without her knowledge.
The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) last week revoked the certifications of Drs. Pierre Kory and Paul Marik, following a two-year investigation into their promotion of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine as treatments for COVID-19 and their statements questioning the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines.
According to The Washington Post, the two physicians continued “to promote ivermectin, an anti-parasitic medication, as a treatment for COVID long after the medical community found it to be ineffective.”
Kory and Marik are co-founders of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), which promotes alternative treatments for COVID-19.
Citing unnamed experts, the Post claimed the FLCCC “spread misinformation about the coronavirus pandemic.”
MedPageToday quoted an ABIM spokesperson, who said the organization “does not comment publicly on the reasons for the revocation of certification.”
However, in a summary of the ABIM’s decision reviewed by The Defender, the organization stated that the doctors’ “conduct poses serious concerns for patient safety and undermines the trust that the public and the medical profession place in the meaning of ABIM board certification.”
In a press release, the FLCCC Alliance said it “categorically disagrees” with ABIM’s decision.
“We believe this decision represents a dangerous shift away from the foundational principles of medical discourse and scientific debate that have historically been the bedrock of medical education associations,” the press release states.
Marik told The Defender:
“The bottom line is we’re disappointed because we stand up for the truth. To censor science is to censor progress. Science is based on dialogue and people can have different points of view. That is the principle of science: it’s people having different points of view.
“We’ve never been in a situation before where physicians who have opposing points of view are silenced … It sets a really bad precedent that you can’t really challenge the status quo, and as we know, in medicine, there have been very dramatic changes based on changing understandings of science.”
In the FLCCC Alliance press release, Kory said, “This fight is about more than just our right to speak — it’s about protecting the future of healthcare. When doctors are silenced for questioning the prevailing narrative, we all lose.”
Kory and Marik participated in an ABIM hearing in May, but internist Dr. Meryl Nass, founder of Door to Freedom, told The Defender that ABIM revoked her certification without her knowledge.
Nass said she was blindsided by ABIM’s decision to revoke her license, which she said she found out about only when she searched for herself in the organization’s database of certified physicians.
Nass told The Defender:
“After the Maine Medical Board suspended my license illegally — even though none of my alleged transgressions met the statutory requirement for an immediate suspension — the board later found me guilty of things I had not done and continued the suspension … All of this with never a single patient complaint.
“Now I learn, by chance, that the ABIM has suspended me without ever informing me I was even under an investigation, which is illegal according to the ABIM’s process.”
Dr. Peter McCullough also faced similar difficulties with the ABIM over his positions on COVID-19 vaccines and treatments. According to MedPageToday, ABIM revoked his certifications in 2022 — although, as of today, ABIM lists him as certified.
McCullough told The Defender, “The ABIM is violating principles of equal protection, due process, rules of evidence and has gone ex post facto to find reasons to attack qualified ABIM-certified doctors who innovated and saved lives early in the pandemic.”
Science based on ‘different points of view’
Kory and Marik held ABIM certifications in internal and critical care medicine, while Kory was also certified in pulmonary disease, according to MedPageToday.
They were initially notified about the risk of losing their certification in May 2022. Last year, ABIM’s Credentials and Certification Committee recommended the revocation of their certification for disseminating “false or inaccurate medical information.” A hearing followed in May.
According to the FLCCC Alliance’s press release, Kory and Marik “tirelessly defended their positions.” However, despite “presenting over 170 references in a detailed 60-page response submitted in January 2023, the ABIM has chosen to dismiss these robust scientific contributions in favor of a narrow, ‘consensus-driven’ narrative.”
According to the summary of ABIM’s decision, Kory and Marik’s “statements about the safety and efficacy of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine” as treatments for COVID-19 “are false and inaccurate because they are unsupported by factual, scientifically grounded, and consensus-driven medical information.”
The ABIM also addressed the doctors’ positions on the COVID-19 vaccines:
“[The doctors’] statements about the purported ineffectiveness and dangers of COVID-19 vaccines are false and inaccurate because they are unsupported by factual, scientifically grounded, and consensus-driven medical information. …
“There is extensive factual, scientifically grounded, and consensus-driven medical information demonstrating that the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, and lead to better health outcomes.”
Marik questioned the board’s assertions regarding ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine and the vaccines.
“What they do is, they cherry-pick articles which support their point of view and then they go on to say the vaccine is safe and effective. We know that’s completely not true. There’s overwhelming data to question both the safety and efficacy of the vaccine,” Marik added.
McCullough said:
“ABIM never updated its members on important risks such as fatal vaccine adverse events, including myocarditis, nor failing theoretical efficacy necessitating boosters that skipped human testing altogether.
“Setting a new dark milestone, ABIM is decertifying highly qualified physicians for nonclinical reasons and ignoring the evidence for early therapeutics and COVID-19 vaccine safety.”
ABIM engaging in ‘medical lawfare’
According to the Post, Kory maintains a license to practice medicine in California, New York and Wisconsin, where “there are no disciplinary actions listed against him.” Marik has retired and his medical license expired in 2022.
Revocation of their ABIM certification “effectively prevents them from practicing at large hospitals and academic institutions,” the Post reported.
Marik and Nass outlined the difficulties of practicing medicine without certification.
“It doesn’t affect us directly, but it affects us indirectly because we’re being accused of committing offenses that are just not true,” Marik said. “The indirect impact to our reputation … it’s a slap in the face, basically, for all the hard work we’ve done.”
Accusing the ABIM of being part of the “medical-industrial complex,” Marik said, “They seem more interested in making money than in protecting physicians. There have been a number of lawsuits against ABIM, so they don’t have the best of reputations. But unfortunately, they are the main certifying organization in the U.S., so they have enormous power and leverage.”
“If I get my license back — a big if, without board certification, I would have great difficulty getting hospital privileges and collecting insurance reimbursements. In other words, I would be unemployable, though I could potentially work on my own if patients paid me directly,” Nass said.
In 2021, ABIM and the Federation of State Medical Boards collaborated to draft the statement used to discipline Nass.
Nass said organizations like ABIM are engaging in “medical lawfare.” She said they are:
“Creating crimes that do not exist, using procedures that do not exist, to try and silence people like me. What did I do wrong? I read the literature and told the truth about what it said, publicly. The COVID vaccines are very dangerous. They don’t prevent COVID. Drugs can effectively treat COVID. And I prescribed those drugs and helped hundreds of Maine citizens. That was my crime.”
This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.
__________________
Canadian Detective Suspended After Investigating Possible COVID Shot Link to SIDS
by Rishma Parpia
Published
A police detective in Ottawa, Canada is facing a disciplinary hearing for allegedly investigating a potential link between mothers who had received COVID-19 shots and their babies dying of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) in the Ottawa area.1
Detective Helen Grus was part of Ottawa Police Service’s Sexual Assault and Child Abuse (SACA) unit but was suspended on Feb. 4, 2022 for not complying with the police department’s COVID shot mandate.2 The detective’s responsibility included investigating criminal cases involving children, including newborns and infants, who die in sudden circumstances.3
After Grus was suspended by her employer in February 2022 for declining to get a COVID shot, she was then charged with “discreditable conduct” on July 26, 2022 for attempting to uncover a potential connection between nine SIDS cases and the COVID shot status of the infants’ mothers.4
According to reports, between June 2020 and January 2022, Grus allegedly accessed information about nine child/infant death cases to which she was not officially assigned. On Jan. 30, 2022, Grus also allegedly investigated an infant death case by contacting the child’s father to inquire about the mother’s COVID vaccination status without the lead investigator’s knowledge. After a complaint was filed against the detective, the Ottawa Police Services Board settled the case with the family, whose baby had died in June 2021.5
Detective Maintains That Investigating SIDS Cases Shots Was Appropriate Police Work
Grus maintains that she was acting on legitimate police business when she pursued a hunch that an unusual spike in local SIDS cases could be related to the COVID shots. She testified that in the days before being put on unpaid leave for declining a COVID shot, she told a colleague that the spike in SIDS “should be flagged and monitored.”6
The Ottawa Police Service’s case against Grus is that she violated the code of conduct by using police resources for an “unsanctioned special project” based on her personal beliefs.7 The detective denies that she violated police policy. It is known that Grus had voiced her concerns on the ineffectiveness of facemasks and the safety concerns of the COVID shots at her workplace.8
As a detective in the SACA unit, investigating deaths of infants and children five years old-and-under was part of her job but when immediate superiors forbade her from talking about COVID disease or COVID shots in early 2022, just weeks before the police vaccine mandate deadline, Grus reported her concerns to top ranking officials.9
Grus stated:
My bringing up the increased baby deaths is because babies lost their lives, families lost their babies—innocent families, loving parents, lost their babies. That’s why I brought up the concerning rise in (SIDS) investigations. What I stated is that we need to keep track of what’s going on.
With respect to Ottawa Police Service’s COVID shot mandate, Grus also testified about several officers who suffered adverse events after getting COVID shots and that high-ranking officers were aware of this prior to the mandate deadline. Additionally, she wrote an e-mail in September 2021 asking whether the police force would be liable for any negative health outcomes related to the COVID shots.
Grus said:
We were forced to take the vaccine to keep our jobs. So is it personal? Yes, because I’m losing my livelihood. But in the context of policing, I was an able-bodied police officer ready and willing to work. But I wanted informed consent. I had a right to that. And so I collected this information.10
Political Agendas May Be Affecting Police Investigations in Canada
Prior to the disciplinary hearings, Grus presented the file of her investigation on the SIDS cases to Professional Standards investigator Sergeant Jason Arbuthnot on May 12, 2022. She explained…
These two cases struck a bell suddenly that day because both those babies were sent home healthy. Both those mothers picked them up to feed them, and both of those babies collapsed and went limp in the mother’s arms. I don’t want more babies to die. Whether it’s vaccine-related or not, I want to try to find out why these little babies died. I’m not okay with babies dying and not getting any answers.11
Donald Best, a retired Toronto investigator said the case is an important one to show the world whether Canada is influenced by corrupt regimes whose political agendas are now affecting police investigations. He said:
This case is so important, and nobody gets that critical factor. She shouldn’t have been charged. I think they’re embarrassed that she is charged. But they’re doubling down because they must win. The whole institution circled around itself to protect itself against one person who has integrity.”12
References:
2 Lapierre M. Ottawa police detective faces misconduct charges for allegedly seeking links between COVID vaccine and child deaths. Ottawa Citizen Aug. 8, 2022.
3 Yogaretnam S. Detective tried to uncover vaccine status of dead children’s parents, sources say. CBC Mar. 28, 2022.
4 Harding L. Ottawa detective in uphill battle after investigating possible SIDS link to COVID vax. Western Standard Nov. 23, 2023.
5 Eltherington W. Ottawa police board settles with family over officer who accessed dead child’s vaccine records. CTV News Dec. 7, 2023.
6 Unrau J. Probing infant deaths for vaccine link was proper police work, detective maintains. True North June 5, 2024.
7 Ibid.
8 Yogaretnam S. Detective tried to uncover vaccine status of dead children’s parents, sources say. CBC Mar. 28, 2022.
9 Unrau J. Probing infant deaths for vaccine link was proper police work, detective maintains. True North June 5, 2024.
10 Ibid.
11 Harding L. Ottawa detective in uphill battle after investigating possible SIDS link to COVID vax. Western Standard Nov. 23, 2023.
12 Ibid.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 