Archive for the ‘research’ Category

Scientists Figured Out How to Make a Better Antibiotic With Electricity

https://www.thedailybeast.com/scientists-figured-out-how-to-make-a-better-antibioticwith-electricity?

Scientists Figured Out How to Make a Better Antibiotic—With Electricity

Every year in the U.S., 1.1 million people suffer from burns that need to be medically treated. Surgeries cause more than 100 million wounds. And countless others suffer from various cuts, lacerations, and traumas that land them in the hospital.

Every single one of these is an injury that needs to be protected from infection, but unfortunately a hospital isn’t a great place to do that. Hospital-acquired infection is extremely prevalent (so much so that the Centers for Disease Control has a program aimed at fighting it).

At the moment the best method of treatment is antibiotics—but those come with their own problems.

So Chandan Sen, a physiologist and vice chair of research at the Indiana University School of Medicine, and his team decided to re-invent the antibiotic—using electricity to help stop bacteria from evolving immunity.

“There’s a lot of people developing new antibiotics, let’s not do that,” Sen told The Daily Beast. “Let’s ask a broader question: are there ways of defeating these types of infection that are not pharmacology-based because we know drug resistance is easy to acquire for bugs,” he said.

Defeat meant Sen had to look at how the bacteria attach themselves together.

One of the reasons why infection is difficult to treat is because of the way bacteria congregate to create it. They form what’s called a biofilm—groups of different types of bacteria that join together and secrete a sticky mesh that holds them in place inside a wound. The mesh also helps protect the bacteria from attempts at treatment, making biofilms more resistant to antibiotics then individual bacteria. According to the CDC and the National Institutes of Health, it’s estimated that between 65 and 80 percent of all infections are caused by these difficult-to-treat biofilms.

“When bacteria chooses to become a biofilm there is quorum sensing; they talk to each other and say, ‘We have a quorum let’s form a biofilm,’” Sen said. “They have electrical communication.”

They do this either by connecting to each other using microscopic nanowires or through sending electrical signals in the form of current. But that led Sen and his team to wonder: “If we disrupt this electrical micro-environment can we disrupt them?”

Turns out, yes.

If a small external electrical current passes through a biofilm, the matrix that holds the bacteria together falls apart and the bacteria die, essentially confusing the signal. The bacteria start sending their messages in the wrong direction because their ions and electrons are attracted incorrectly.

“With this system you disintegrate the biofilm and it allows the immune system to come in fight it. It’s a cooperation,” he said.

The amount of electricity needed is minuscule. In fact, according to Sen, it is well below the amount that the FDA says is safe for human exposure. Their ultimate solution is a wound dressing—a piece of fabric—printed with a pattern of silver and zinc dots. When the fabric comes into contact with any type of body fluid, the combination produces enough energy to disrupt the bacteria.

“We have lit up an LED thermometer with that current.,” Sen said. “If you touch the fabric you can’t tell there’s any metal. Visually it looks like polka dots.”

In one of the experiments done with the fabric, the team tested it on an infection that had been allowed to spread untreated for seven days. “Once the biofilms formed we intervened with textiles,” he said. “The data was so convincing the Department of Defense has just started a clinical trial.”

The current version of the fabric creates an electrical field that can treat wounds a few millimeters deep. They have also developed a second version still in testing that uses a hearing aid battery, which provides a larger amount of electricity to silver circuitry on the dressing. This can create a bigger field, allowing for treatment of larger areas.

Sen says he’s excited about how this principle could be developed beyond his wound dressings, noting that they have research they are about to publish that shows its effects on other infections, such as those that come from fungus.

Overall, Sen believes it’s possible after more research this might be able to one day reduce the medical community’s need to rely on antibiotics. “We have not done research on that but I can see a clear path,” he said.

The first generation of the product is already on the market, sold as a wound dressing, but is going through FDA approval to be used as an infection treatment.

Ontario Public Health Officials Called Out on Shoddy, Biased Research Utilizing An Erroneous ‘Climate Change’ Model to Program a Futuristic Tick Problem

iu-18

Ontario Public Health Officials Called Out on Shoddy, Biased Research Utilizing An Erroneous ‘Climate Change’ Model To Program a Futuristic Tick Problem

The following comment by independent Canadian tick researcher John Scott on the article by Schillberg, E., et al; “Distribution of Ixodes scapularis in Northwestern Ontario: Results From Active and Passive Surveillance Activities in the Northwestern Health Unit Catchment Area,” is a fantastic example of why we as patients should care about where and how research dollars are being spent.

Research article found here:  https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30314334.  Comment  here: Scott, 2019, 3 errata, comments on Schillberg et al., 2018

Scott outlines three important corrections (errata) on the research article on various ticks in northwestern Ontario.  Please refer to the Scott link above for the full details, but I highlight the major issues below:

1.  Correction #1 has to do with shoddy research. Scott points out that important details are completely omitted from the study about the proper identification of ticks making one wonder if it’s even true. There are no details on history of travel, collection data, life stage, identification method, and who identified it. There was no molecular analysis (i.e. DNA barcoding) which is important on a foreign tick found in a place it shouldn’t be situated. For example, the Amblyomma cajennense tick has been divided into 6 separate tick species. Then there’s the issue of five years lapsing between tick collection until publication.

2.  Correction #2 has to do with research bias. Researchers always cite previous research that pertains to their work and either correct or build upon it. Schillberg, et al. purposely left out previous published work outlining important history on tick movement, infection rate, ecology, and epidemiology. Then, they go on to state more research is needed when it’s’ already been done, making the reader seriously wonder if they are just looking for further research funding. They underplay the problem by only citing five tick species, when there are nine, eight of which are positive for Lyme disease, and five of which  bite humans. Of particular note and importance to patients, Scott provided key information on the pathological and neurological manifestations of Lyme disease for health care providers. By not citing this work, Schillberg, et al., which are all public officials, are clearly using research bias by flat out ignoring previous work that doesn’t fit their paradigm. It just simply doesn’t fit with what they want people to believe.

3.  Correction #3 has to do with creating an erroneous climate change model to fit their bias. Schillberg, et al., cited references that were hypothetical computer models that had erroneous baseline maps. They completely ignore and dismiss previous published work and instead create their own reality to show a gradual tick expansion northward due to supposed climate change.  The problem is tick populations already existed in those locations. Scott’s most telling statement for patients to be aware of regarding research on climate change and ticks is this theory would,

“explain to the public a reason for not tackling this serious health care issue earlier. The tick problem was programmed for the future. Thus, ill-founded statistical analyses culminated in fabricated erroneous data and, ultimately, resulted in a series of maps that turned out to be flawed science.”

Scott also states the authors’ hypothesis on temperature increase is based on the United Nations International Panel on Climate Change Computer forecasts that have been consistently wrong. And yet, articles & books continue to be pumped out stating that warmer winters mean more ticks, when in fact, Scott has shown that overwinter survival of ticks dropped to 33% when the snow melted in late winter exposing black legged ticks to sudden drops in overnight temperature. This has been substantiated by other researchers as well.  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/11/07/ticks-on-the-move-due-to-migrating-birds-and-photoperiod-not-climate-change/

4.  Lastly, if I had a dollar for every article and book that came across my desk pushing this “warmer winters mean more ticks” mantra due to ‘climate change’, I’d be a millionaire. More research under this false pretense is being done by the minute.

How much does that cost? How many research dollars are being diverted from important issues patients and the doctors treating them really need answers to?

Even well-meaning Lyme advocates/journalists write books on Lyme being a disease driven by climate change.

Meanwhile, in the real world, thousands upon thousands of patients continue to be misdiagnosed with everything from medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), to depression, to MS and fibromyalgia. They are flat-out denied treatment and are told, “It’s all in your head.” The subset of patients (30%-40% of us) that are undiagnosed and untreated for months to years continue to be ignored by research and mainstream medicine. We have no new research on potential modes of transmission, good diagnostics, and effective treatments.

There were 53 troubling points noted throughout this research article.

Schillberg et al., 2018 was created by public officials so desperate to keep their jobs that they will literally fabricate a paradigm and create an alternate reality.

Speak up in your sphere of influence, and insist that your tax dollars go towards research that will help sick people – not line the pockets of dishonest researchers and public officials.

For more: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/13/study-shows-lyme-not-propelled-by-climate-change/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/11/17/uw-madison-phd-in-ecological-climatology-climate-change-computer-models-fudged-except-russian-model/  Dr. Patrick Michaels, director of the Center for the Study of Science at the Cato Institute, provides insight into the debate over climate change and the political games played to create policy.

Political games surrounding Lyme/MSIDS have gone on long enough. Do research on important issues that will help patients.

 

 

 

Study Shows Effectiveness of Factory-Treated Permethrin-Impregnated Clothing Works

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416331/

2015 Feb;114(2):671-8. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-4232-y. Epub 2014 Nov 22.

Pilot study assessing the effectiveness of factory-treated, long-lasting permethrin-impregnated clothing for the prevention of tick bites during occupational tick exposure in highly infested military training areas, Germany.

Abstract

The protective effectiveness of factory-based permethrin-impregnated polymer-coated battle dress uniforms (PTBDUs) against tick bites was evaluated at four military training areas in southwestern and central Germany where tick bite incidence is known to be high. Data were analyzed by comparing tick bite incidence using non-permethrin-treated BDUs (NTBDUs) during 2009 versus PTBDUs during 2010 and 2011, the first two years after their formal introduction for in-country use in the German Bundeswehr. During 2009, 262 individual tick bites were reported at the four training sites, resulting in a tick bite incidence of 8.8 % per exposed person when wearing NTBDUs only. In 2010 and 2011, one tick bite case occurred under field conditions each year that PTBDUs were worn, corresponding to a protective effectiveness of 99.6 and 98.6 %. These data imply an annual tick bite incidence of 0.035 and 0.078 % per exposed person, respectively. Between 2010 and 2011, a 0.8 % decline in the protective effectiveness of PTBDUs was observed. Five tick bite incidents occurred while wearing non-impregnated parkas over correctly worn PTBDUs. Ixodes ricinus ticks were collected by standard tick drags from 2009 to 2011, with high mean annual densities ranging from 28.9 to 106.5 ticks per 100 m(2), while single drags revealed tick densities between zero and 381 ticks per 100 m(2).

Overall, 4596 I. ricinus ticks (54 ♂, 82 ♀, 1776 nymphs, and 2684 larvae) were collected, of which 128 (2.8 %; mean annual range, 0-10.1 %) were Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. positive. The Borrelia genospecies distribution was as follows: 112 (87.5 %) Borrelia afzelii, 10 (7.8 %) B. burgdorferi s.s., and 6 (4.7 %) Borrelia garinii. Neither the tick density means from 2009 to 2011 nor associated B. burgdorferi s.l. prevalences differed significantly among the military locations investigated.

The documented tick bite reductions clearly demonstrate the powerful protective effectiveness of properly worn PTBDUs against tick bites. Nevertheless, all apparel worn over PTBDUs should also be impregnated with permethrin in order to prevent tick infestation and subsequent bites.

__________________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/05/27/study-conforms-permethrin-causes-ticks-to-drop-off-clothing/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/04/12/tick-prevention-2019/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/06/08/ticks-are-out-for-the-summer-how-can-bites-be-prevented/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/04/03/fire-good-news-for-tick-reduction/

Therapeutic Efficacy of Favipiravir Against Bourbon Virus in Mice

https://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1007790

Published: June 13, 2019

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1007790

Abstract

Bourbon virus (BRBV) is an emerging tick-borne RNA virus in the orthomyxoviridae family that was discovered in 2014. Although fatal human cases of BRBV have been described, little is known about its pathogenesis, and no antiviral therapies or vaccines exist. We obtained serum from a fatal case in 2017 and successfully recovered the second human infectious isolate of BRBV. Next-generation sequencing of the St. Louis isolate of BRBV (BRBV-STL) showed >99% nucleotide identity to the original reference isolate. Using BRBV-STL, we developed a small animal model to study BRBV-STL tropism in vivo and evaluated the prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of the experimental antiviral drug favipiravir against BRBV-induced disease. Infection of Ifnar1-/- mice lacking the type I interferon receptor, but not congenic wild-type animals, resulted in uniformly fatal disease 6 to 10 days after infection. RNA in situ hybridization and viral yield assays demonstrated a broad tropism of BRBV-STL with highest levels detected in liver and spleen. In vitro replication and polymerase activity of BRBV-STL were inhibited by favipiravir. Moreover, administration of favipiravir as a prophylaxis or as post-exposure therapy three days after infection prevented BRBV-STL-induced mortality in immunocompromised Ifnar1-/- mice. These results suggest that favipiravir may be a candidate treatment for humans who become infected with BRBV.

_________________

More on Bourbon Virus:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/07/10/bourbon-virus-linked-to-death-of-park-official/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2015/02/22/newly-found-virus-linked-to-kansas-death-after-tick-bite/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/07/01/surveillance-for-heartland-bourbon-viruses-in-eastern-kansas/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/05/23/cdc-warns-about-7-new-tick-viruses/

 

 

Bb Microscopy – A Picture’s Worth 1,000 Words – How Bb Evades the Immune System

 

Used with permission by Dr. Benjamin L. Clark University of Minnesota Medical School  (Image by Chris Little)

Scanning Electron microscope picture of borrelia in green contacting the surface of a macrophage.

Borrelia can move about 50x faster than this immune cell.

Also the macrophage is supposed to attack and engulf pathogens like Borrelia but in this case it is the pathogen attacking the immune system.

When Bb is engulfed it does not immediately trigger the cell’s lysosomes to merge and dissolve the captured bacterium.

In the following 2016 article, the study author states that the ability of a cell-surface adhesion protein called BBK32 in stabilizing and strengthening bacterial-vascular interactions under blood flow with the microbes using bungee-cord like tethers, is what gets borrelia to move through the body to evade the immune system causing persistence.

Similarly to children swinging on monkey bars, borrelia transfer force from one bond to the next without fully detaching, allowing them to move over endothelial surfaces at a constant speed much like leukocytes move through blood vessels.

Based on calculations utilizing the imaging system, researchers also believe that borrelia possibly use flagella to actively migrate along blood vessel walls, exiting the vasculature to reach specific sites against blood flow, much like swimmers in a river using their legs to kick toward trees lining the riverbank, then grabbing the tree branches to slow down, and finally pulling themselves up to exit the water to reach the shore. https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/09/04/how-lyme-spreads/