Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

German Study: “The Vaccination Was and Is a Disaster and Under No Circumstances Good” But New Head of CDC Pushes It Anyway

https://www-manova-news.translate.goog/artikel/die-kontrollgruppe?

The control group

Thanks to the unvaccinated people, a health comparison can be made between people with and without injections two and a half years after the start of the campaign.
Excerpts from article:

Did the vaccinated get better or the unvaccinated?

Those who have been vaccinated have more and more severe complaints. The factor 2 in the overall complaint severity is a clear result. Twice as many and strong complaints, that’s quite a lot.

According to the available data, did the vaccination protect against Covid?

Ultimately not. We asked whether you had a symptomatic Sars-CoV-2 infection and in fact the number of complaints reported was higher in the control group, i.e. the unvaccinated, in 2021. In short: in 2021 there seemed to be some protection, at least in terms of the number of Covid diseases. In 2022, it got closer and closer, was then very close and finally turned around, so that vaccinated people contracted Covid 18 percent more often, and – this is shown even earlier – also more severely.

What were the differences?

The difference in persistent symptoms was even greater than in the severity of the symptoms. The severity of the persistent symptoms was 2.5 times higher in the vaccinated. We also asked if a doctor or therapist had diagnosed a new illness. And here, too, the number of vaccinated was around 2.5 times higher than that of the unvaccinated. Of course, the unvaccinated also had a number of ailments, but the really severe ailments are found in the vaccinated.

Was the vaccination – at least in some cases – beneficial to health?

The vaccination was and is a disaster and under no circumstances good: In all age groups, the vaccinated were worse off than the control groups.

Not even with the vulnerable, which we also interviewed.

What is the future of your study and the data?

We have completed the data collection – as planned – for the time being. Because we will probably not be able to present them in the form of studies and articles in specialist journals, we will process our considerations and findings in book form. This also offers the possibility of not having to concentrate solely on individual aspects, as is the case with articles in specialist journals. We are also considering continuing data collection. It is said that we are primarily concentrating on the question of infertility.


Editorial note: This text was published on July 1, 2023 in the 138th edition of the printed weekly newspaper Demokratischerwiderstand (DW) (4). Hendrik Sodenkamp asked the questions.


Sources and Notes:

(1) https://diekontrollegruppe.de/
(2) https://www.blautopf.net/index.php/politik/politik-corona/item/648-diekontrolle-gruppe-de-erste- Answers-auf-lange- asked-questions
(3) https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/Sentinel/Grippeweb/grippeweb_node.html
(4) https:// Demokratierwiderstand.de/

___________________

https://www.infowars.com/posts/new-biden-cdc-head-pushes-annual-covid-vaccines/

New Biden CDC Head Pushes Annual Covid Vaccines

by Steve Watson

“I was literally suspended from Twitter for predicting this”

The new Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Dr. Mandy Cohen has announced it is expected that COVID vaccines will become annual like flu shots, prompting critics to point out that they were suspended from social media for predicting the same thing two years ago.

Cohen, who become CDC Director at the start of the month told Spectrum News, “We’re just on the precipice of that, so I don’t want to get ahead of where our scientists are here and doing that evaluation work, but yes we anticipate that COVID will become similar to flu shots, where it is going to be you get your annual flu shot, and you get your annual COVID shot.”

“We’re not quite there yet, but stay tuned,” she continued, adding “I think within the next couple of weeks, month we’re going to hear more from our experts on COVID shots.”

(See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

The New York Post cited videos showing Cohen “gloating about implementing COVID lockdowns, inconsistently following her own mitigation guidelines and forcing public schools to have students masked indoors regardless of vaccination status.”

“She was on the wrong side of every pandemic public health intervention, failed to recognize early therapeutics and natural immunity, and to date has not acknowledged the safety disaster unfolding with the COVID-19 mass, indiscriminate, vaccination program.” ~ Dr. Peter McCullough

In a June 2021 video Cohen referenced “definitive data” from the CDC claiming the COVID shots prevented infection or transmission.  She also stated:
“Vaccinations are our way out of the pandemic. Don’t wait to vaccinate.”
Unfortunately, cognitive dissonance and mass psychosis is now prolific as the shots weren’t even tested for preventing transmission and the efficacy study is fraudulent.

Not only do the shots not prevent transmission, they have been found to be less than 1% effective when absolute risk is taken into account, and they are connected to more reports of adverse events and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.  The group Doctors for COVID Ethics declares: the experimental vaccines are needless, ineffective and dangerous.

Not to be undone, Cohen threatened legal action against a school district that wanted to drop quarantines and contact tracing after COVID’s lack of risk to children became apparent.

28 lawmakers sent a letter to President Biden opposing her selection to head the CDC.

According to the letter,

“Dr. Cohen is unfit for the position. Throughout her career, Dr. Cohen has politicized science, disregarded civil liberties, and spread misinformation about the efficacy and necessity of COVID vaccinations … and the necessity of masks” and “has a history of engaging in partisan left-wing politics.”

“Dr. Cohen was a proponent of unnecessary, unscientific COVID restrictions on school children,” the letter added.

The Washington Post reported that “Some CDC staff and alumni bristled … at reports of her planned selection, lamenting that her career had been more focused on managing health programs such as Medicare and Medicaid than on traditional public health.”  Source

Sounds like she will fit in perfectly.

Documentary: Why Am I Still Sick? The Silent Role of Biofilm “Culturing Methods Detect Less Than 5% of all Known Bacteria”

http://  1 hour 30 min

The Silent Role of Biofilm in Chronic Disease

This film explores bacterial biofilm infections and how they cause debilitating illnesses for tens of millions of Americans. People with “sub-clinical infections” suffer for months, years or even decades; others will lose life or limb because of the failure to treat chronic wounds or hospital acquired infections. More than 550,000 patients lose their lives annually because of hospital infections and twice that number will acquire sepsis. The majority of hospital infections involve bacterial biofilms and affect every area of specialized medicine and every part of the human body.

Paradoxically, the applications of biofilm eradication methods are slow to propagate into the many silos of western medicine. With patients and doctors in the dark about what is truly causing chronic diseases, millions of people remain undiagnosed and are denied effective treatments for their medical problems.

This ground-breaking documentary explores a new disease model on a scientific and human level. This film leverages interviews from top clinical experts with patients affected by bacterial biofilms to reach as wide an audience as possible. By breaking down complex topics of biofilm infections to a human level, showing staggering statistics, and using high quality animations, the message becomes accessible, compelling and obvious: biofilm infections are a gargantuan problem that has been overlooked by American society, and we as a nation are paying a terrible price.

However, with the advent of new molecular diagnostics, and a new way to understanding disease, Americans can effectively catalyze credible healthcare change by sharing this information that helps eliminate needless suffering, save lives and reduce the costs of health care.

Why Am I Still Sick? https://whyamistillsick.com/

Please donate to our foundation: https://www.adrsupport.org/donations/

John G. Thomas, MS, Ph.D. International Educator and Global Microbiologist Professor, WVU Dept. of Pathology, School of Medicine Clinical Professor, WVU Dept. of Periodontics, School of Dentistry Director(s) WVU High Complexity Laboratory & Biofilm Research Laboratory for Translational Studies

J. William Costerton, Ph.D. “The Father of Biofilms” Director, Microbial Research, Department of Orthopedics, Allegheny General Hospital Director, Biofilm Research, Center for Genomic Sciences, Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

Dr. Randy Wolcott, MD CWS Medical Director, Southwest Regional Woundcare Center Founder, Pathogenius Laboratories Timothy K. Lu, M.D., Ph.D. Assistant Professor Synthetic Biology Group MIT Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science MIT Synthetic Biology Center

Wilmore C. Webley, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Department of Microbiology University of Massachusetts Amherst

Vincent A. Fischetti, Ph.D. Professor and Chairman Laboratory of Bacterial Pathogenesis and Immunology The Rockefeller University

Michael Wilson, GRSC, MSc, PhD, DSc, FRCPath Professor of Microbiology Eastman Dental Institute, University College London

David C. Kennedy, DDS Past President International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology

Doyle Williams, DDS Chief Dental Officer Delta Dental of Massachusetts

Eva Sapi Ph.D. Associate Professor and University Research Scholar Director of Lyme Disease Program Department of Biology and Environmental Science University of New Haven

Rodney M. Donlan, Ph.D. Research Microbiologist Biofilm Laboratory Clinical and Environmental Microbiology Branch Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

L. Clifford McDonald, MD Senior Advisor for Science and Integrity Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Shirley Gutkowski, RDH, BSDH, FACE Oral Healthcare Expert Founding Member American Academy of Oral Systemic Health

Trisha E. O’Hehir, RDH, MS Editorial Director of Hygienetown Magazine President of Perio Reports Press

Nicolas G. Loebel, Ph.D. Chief Technology Officer & President Ondine Biomedical Inc.

Kris Koss, D.V.M. Doctor of Veterinary Medicine Carlene Patterson, D.V.M. Doctor of Veterinary Medicine Sheep Meadow Animal Hospital Thomas Webster, Ph.D. Associate Professor Division of Engineering and Orthopedic Surgery Director of Nanomedicine Laboratory Brown University

Carolyn Cross Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Ondine Biomedical, Inc.

Steve Holland, MD Chief, Laboratory of Clinical Infectious Diseases Chief, Immunopathogenesis Section National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

Garth D. Ehrlich, Ph.D. Executive Director, Center for Genomic Sciences Allegheny-Singer Research Institute

John P. Kennedy, R. Ph., Ph.D Assistant Professor South University, School of Pharmacy Savannah, Georgia

Dr. “Lon” H. Jones, D.O Retired Osteopathic Family Physician Founder, Xlear, Inc. Author, No More Allergies, Asthma or Sinus Infections Tom Masterson Operations Manager Ondine Biomedical, Inc.

Scot E Dowd, Ph.D. Molecular Microbiologist & Microbial Geneticist Molecular Research LP

__________________

For more:

How the Media is Using Corrupt “Climate Change” Data As the Next “Pandemic-Like” Story that They Will “Beat to Death”

For anyone paying attention, the players in this global cabal are all interrelated and are working in lockstep, which has rightly caused a crisis of trust.  While the unelected fully believe they need to dictate our every move due to our stupidity, they’ve been attempting to rebuild trust as they also attempt to ‘build back better,’ but the public is finally waking up to the fact nothing is back and nothing is better, as their freedoms are being removed one by one under the guise of ‘pandemics,’ ‘public health,’ ‘climate change,’ and ‘equity.’

Many are unaware that the climate narrative is part and parcel of this global endgame and that drastic and irreversible climate engineering worries real scientists who state the endeavor should be relegated to the fantasy realm and science fiction.

But it’s all big, big business.

https://rumble.com/v31zon8-wef-scientist-testifies-man-made-climate-change-is-a-depopulation-scam.html  Video Here (Approx. 10 Min)  Go here for the Project Veritas video on the same subject matter.

CNN Director Admits Once the Public is “Open to it,” the Climate Will Be the next “Pandemic”- Like Story that ‘We’ll Beat to Death”

A top climate change scientist and Nobel Prize winner, Dr. John Klauser, has become the latest expert to blow the whistle on the climate crisis hoax designed to depopulate the world, humiliate the masses, and bolster the coffers of the elite at the expense of ordinary, working people.

Despite fighting a losing battle, mainstream media and a corrupt government spending Trillions on ‘Climate Change” is still trying to keep up appearances and pretend the hoax isn’t falling apart as they are paid by the global elite.

“Warming of the global climate system over the past half-century has averaged 43 percent less than that produced by computerized climate models used to promote changes in energy policy,” the report reads.
“Contrary to media reports and environmental organizations’ press releases, global warming offers no justification for carbon-based regulation.” ~ Roy Spencer, meteorologist

Veteran meteorologist Anthony Watts of the Heartland Institute recently concluded a massive study on the weather and the climate in general. Watts had travelled around the country inspecting meteorological equipment and studying historical weather data from around the globe and has concluded that the claims about warming are completely flawed because 96% of the data is “corrupted.” 

The reason?

The vast majority of thermometers that NOAA relies on are improperly installed and maintained, which leads to the recording of artificially higher temperatures.  

To ensure accuracy, thermometers are supposed to be in natural, “pristine” locations such as fields, forests, or hilltops but are rather placed in parking lots, on buildings, against brick walls, and other artificial environments that trap heat leading to a “warming bias” in collected data. Further, these artificial environments have multiple heat-inducing influences around them such as vehicles, heaters, and air conditioning units.

We’ve been warned before that “climate change” is the newer, fresher concoction since COVID.

Thousands of top scientists have signed the World Climate Declaration stating there is no climate emergency, and Clintel (The Climate Intelligence Foundation) just completed a thorough review of key parts of the IPCC report being used for climate alarmism, which found serous errors and misleading statements or misrepresentations of fact which means there is no reason for a carbon tax or a stringent climate and energy policies being imposed globally.

Greenpeace Founder Dr. Patrick Moore has also testified, “Man-Made Climate Change is a Hoax,” and geologist and expert reviewer for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Gregory Wrightstone, states that the modest warming (less than one degree) we are seeing happened long before man started adding CO2 and is actually benefitting humanity.

And all of this matters if you want to remain free and like to eat real food.

Under the guise of reducing “methane emissions,” 13 WEF-infiltrated nations have agreed to engineer global famine by abolishing agricultural production and shutting down all farms to ‘save the planet.’  The U.S. is one of those nations.

_______________

https://www.projectveritas.com/video/part-2-cnn-director-charlie-chester-reveals-how-network-practices/

CNN Director Reveals How Network Practices ‘Manipulation’

“COVID? gangbuster with ratings, right?  which is why we constantly have the death toll on the side.

Any reporter on CNN, what they are actually doing, is they’re telling the person what to say.  It’s always like leading them in a direction before they even open their mouths.

And the only people that we will let on the air, for the most part, are the people that have a proven track record of taking the bait.“

________________

https://www.projectveritas.com/news/executive-director-of-siemens-energy-admits-green-energy-is-duplicitous/  Video Here (Approx. 4 Min)

Siemens Energy Exec Admits Green Energy Push is “Marketing Fluff”

Siemens Energy is a nearly $33B company which is profiting from the Inflation Reduction Act.

Clark Fangmeier, Executive Director for Siemens Energy:

“Every CEO will lose a job tomorrow if he says, ‘Hey, we’re going to lose money, but we’re going to comply with ESG.‘”

“Internally, you know, where’s our revenue coming from? Gas turbines. Not hydrogen.”

“Siemens Energy is Also Guilty of [Marketing Fluff].”

“Where actually it’s [The Inflation Reduction Act], causing inflation because there is a bunch of money being spent… It’s an oxymoron.”

“Incentives drive behavior.”

This website previously posted Why “Green” Solutions Are a Gigantic Scam, and how energy is being used as a vehicle of control that is increasingly being tied with health, food, banking, technology, war, and the climate. Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) investing is a globalist scam which allows them to promote their own agendas outside the democratic process.  This completely subjective credit score given to corporations (but which could be given to humans in the future) is supposedly centered around sustainability and ethics yet is completely unsustainable and unethical and is given by whomever decides what “ethical, diverse, and sustainable” is.

Companies are changing slogans, censoring content, firing controversial people, and modifying behavior to ingratiate themselves to those in power. ESG score determines how much and how easy it is for a company to secure funds & investments. 

The first rule of ESG?  Don’t talk about ESG.

Who has the highest scores?
MICROSOFT, FOUNDED BY BILL GATES, AND DISNEY.

The corrupt WHO is drunk with power will not be satisfied until it has complete, global control which would give them the ability to issue ‘pandemic’ and climate lockdowns whenever they want to without any accountability.

For more:

Documentary “Take Care of Maya” How Children Are Medically Kidnapped

With a new focus on human trafficking, and with the U.S. government now wanting facial scans of all children to “protect” them, it’s important to realize legal medical kidnapping is happening everyday.

http://  Approx. 8 Min

Review: Take Care of Maya (June, 2023)

When 10-year-old Maya Kowalski was admitted to Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital in 2016, nothing could have prepared her or her family for what they were about to go through. As the medical team tried to understand her rare illness, Dr. Sally Smith, the medical director of the child protection team in Pinellas County, Florida walked into the room and interviewed Maya and the parents for 10 minutes.

Suddenly, Maya was in state custody based on a 10 minute interview

Maya has Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), but it could just as very well have been Lyme/MSIDS.  Both are misunderstood conditions that are severely disabling.

Similarly to parents with Lyme/MSIDS infected children, Maya’s mother, Beata, who just happened to be a nurse, was accused of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy and Maya was removed from her family for 3 months until the court cleared Beata of any mental illness.  Sadly, Beata committed suicide 87 days after she had been separated from her daughter.  Five days after this, Maya was released into her father’s custody.

There have also been other controversies surrounding Smith, including petitions to have her fired and complaints about how she conducts her assessments.

An article on Black Enterprise in 2021 would detail cases of Smith wrongfully accusing parents of abuse and following up on hundreds of cases where parents would be innocent of allegations and traumatized by her interventions. The USA Today Network reportedly investigated hundreds of Dr. Smith’s cases, and:

found more than a dozen instances where charges were dropped, parents were acquitted or caregivers had credible claims of innocence yet suffered irredeemable damage to their lives and reputations.  Source

Yet in the court case after the incident, Smith was not held accountable for anything.

Recent news reports state Smith has retired, but she is still listed on the medical staff of Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital in St. Petersburg, Florida.

http://   Approx. 6 Min

What Happens When Florida Child Abuse Pediatricians Get It Wrong?

Florida families around the state are speaking out about being wrongly accused of child abuse by experts hired by the state to identify abuse.

If you live in Florida and have been a victim of medical kidnapping, the Torn Apart editors are collecting stories to potentially cover during their investigative series.

Producer of “Take Care of Maya”, Caitlin Keating and director Henry Roosevelt, were interviewed by The Wrap where they stated that they hear from other families with similar medical kidnapping stories as the Kowalskis, every single day.

It appears that this corrupt, criminal enterprise known as “child abuse pediatric doctors” is not confined to Florida. The specialty which began around 2010 consists of doctors who are not even practicing medicine but are acting as forensic criminal investigators with ZERO training in law enforcement or forensic evidence.  They are given far too much power for one person that has destroyed families.  According to this, tens of thousands of innocent parents have been falsely accused of abuse.  You can now receive a free book on the subject to educate yourself and others you know.

And it’s happened right here in Wisconsin .

Dr. Barbara Knox, considered a national expert on child abuse who testifies as an expert for prosecutors around the country and who has worked with the FBI, was put on paid leave by The University of Wisconsin after colleagues inside and outside of the hospital accused her of intimidation and retaliation. She also pressured colleagues to report injuries they did not see and left a wake of falsely accused parents, ripped apart families, ruined careers, and incarcerated parents.

A settlement agreement shielded details of her exit from future employers. The hospital gave her $20,000, and the agreement required them to send the Alaska medical board a scripted letter that said her administrative leave “did not relate to dishonesty, clinical skills, medical diagnostic abilities, or incorrect medical diagnoses,” and “no disciplinary action” was taken against her.

She then became the medical director at Alaska Cares in Anchorage.

As of November, 2021, Knox’s devastation continued causing a mass exodus at Alaska CARES, due to accusations against Dr. Knox of bullying, misdiagnosing, and causing a toxic work environment.  According to two people with direct knowledge of clinic operations, Knox was placed on leave pending an investigation but Providence declined to confirm Knox’s employment status. Wisconsin Watch later followed up with this article stating Knox “has chosen to pursue other opportunities and will be resigning,” as of April 1, 2022.

The article also mentioned that one parent spent eight years and $250,000 to clear her name after being wrongly charged by Knox with abusing a boy at her home day care in Mauston, WI.

The article also aptly states that Knox’s resignation does not solve the problems she created.
Who gives back those portions of people’s lives that she took and how many others are falsely accused?

Please learn about this topic as Lyme/MSIDS is greatly under appreciated and controversial.

Chronic Lyme Disease Patients Want to Be Treated, Not “Managed” By Physicians

https://danielcameronmd.com/recommendations-to-clinicians-on-how-to-handle-chronic-lyme-disease-patients/

CHRONIC LYME DISEASE PATIENTS WANT TO BE TREATED, NOT ‘MANAGED’ BY PHYSICIANS

Over the past month, a series of articles, focusing on multiple aspects of Lyme disease, from pediatric Lyme to chronic Lyme to life after Lyme, have been published in the May and June issues of Infectious Disease Clinics of North America and Clinical Infectious Diseases. The articles echo messages that, for the most part, minimize a disease that impacts hundreds of thousands of people each year — many of whom are children.

“Minds are like parachutes. They only function when open.” This particular quote by Thomas Dewar came to mind after reading an article, Chronic Lyme Disease (1) in the June issue of Infectious Disease Clinics of North America.

In it, the author writes, “the scientific community has largely rejected chronic, treatment-refractory Borrelia burgdorferi infection.” This is based on “the failure to detect cultivatable, clinically relevant organisms after standard treatment.”

The intention of the Chronic Lyme Disease article is evident — convince readers that chronic Lyme disease does not exist, and that antibiotics prescribed for more than 14- to 28-days are of no benefit and most patients have no lingering symptoms.

It is particularly troublesome that the author, Paul Lantos, MD, a Duke University Medical Center researcher, is co-chair on a panel responsible for updating the Infectious Disease Society of America’s (IDSA) treatment guidelines for Lyme disease. Dr. Lantos holds a position not to be taken lightly. The IDSA recommendations will determine, for the most part, the types of treatment patients diagnosed with Lyme disease will receive.

Additionally, Dr. Lantos includes a section entitled, “Clinical Approach to Patients with Chronic Lyme Disease Diagnosis,” in which he offers suggestions to physicians on how to ‘manage’ patients complaining they have chronic Lyme disease. Recommendations include listening patiently during the consultation and then explaining to the patient why their symptoms are not related to Lyme disease.

“…a certain amount of time must be spent reviewing past experiences and past laboratory tests … then explaining why Lyme disease may not account for their illnesses.”

“Even if chronic Lyme disease lacks biological legitimacy, its importance as a phenomenon can be monumental to the individual patient,” says Lantos. “Many have undergone frustrating, expensive, and ultimately fruitless medical evaluations. And many have become quite disaffected with a medical system that has failed to provide answers.”

Managing patients, who insist they have chronic Lyme disease can be challenging, he warns. This subset of patients can have “great variation in their ‘commitment’ to a chronic Lyme disease diagnosis. Some patients are entirely convinced they have chronic Lyme disease, they request specific types of therapy, and they are not interested in adjudicating the chronic Lyme disease diagnosis.”

Should a clinician have a patient who believes they have chronic Lyme disease, there are several ways to manage the evaluation, he explains. First, “the physician needs to suppress preconceptions or biases about such patients.”

Second, “the process of clinical information gathering in medicine … is no different in the context of chronic Lyme disease. Even if much discussion is centered on chronic Lyme disease.”

And, lastly, “it is of utmost importance to not seem to be impatient, dismissive, or rushed. Many patients who seek care for chronic Lyme disease already have accumulated frustration. … Each patient’s clinical story and personal history is unique and valid, even if one concludes that they do not have Lyme disease.”

For the patients who do remain chronically symptomatic, Dr. Lantos explains, there has been “little evidence of active infection, and their symptoms do not respond to antibiotics any better than to placebo.”

When dealing with complex, chronic illnesses, physicians need to develop a trusting and understanding relationship with their patients. It is impossible for a clinician to provide the highest level of care to their patients, which includes a thorough evaluation, if they enter into the doctor-patient relationship with preconceived notions, not only about an extremely complex disease but about the patient who is reporting the symptoms, which are often subjective.

Should the patient not have any of the three objective signs of Lyme disease — the bulls-eye rash, swollen knee and/or Bell’s Palsy, identifying the infection is dependent on a strong evaluation. Patients want physicians to provide effective treatments. They don’t want to be ‘managed.’

It is time for a new narrative. One that recognizes the complexity of the Lyme spirochete and acknowledges the ineffective simplicity of the ‘one-size fits all’ treatment approach.

References:

  1. Lantos PM. Chronic Lyme Disease. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 29(2), 325-340 (2015).

___________________

**Comment**

Lantos is obviously unaware of this which showed a 70% complete remission of symptoms:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2023/07/24/paralyzed-by-lyme-they-were-helped-with-combo-treatments/

Also, it’s imperative to point out that coinfections are rarely taken into consideration, yet chronically infected patients are notoriously coinfected with other pathogens.  The fact they don’t improve is most probably due to the fact they are not treating these coinfections which can be as bad if not worse than Lyme.  Bartonella and Babesia are two such pathogens that can knock you off your feet but require very different medications than Lyme meds.  This is simply never discussed.

My husband and I are two chronically infected patients that have improved vastly with extended antimicrobial treatment.  Without this treatment, I’m not sure either of us would be alive.  I know many others in this boat as well.  We don’t make the research papers because none of us fit the criteria to even enter a study:

These parameters that continue to be used will continue to give a preconceived outcome: no chronic/persistent infection.  It’s circular reasoning of the worst kind that hasn’t budged in over 40 years.

Compare this to Dr. Lee Merritt’s informative talk where she describes experiments done on prisoners in the 1900’s that would see them deliberately infected with the Spanish Flu.

The experiments would see some of the prisoners injected with infected lung tissue from sick or deceased patients, have infected tissue dropped in their eyes, and sprayed in the nose and mouth with infectious aerosols. Others would see mucus taken from critically ill patients and put it into the noses and throats of prisoners. In other parts of the trials, experimenters would take the blood of the sick and inject it into the healthy, to see if it was spread through infectious microorganisms in the blood.

As well as the various fluid exchanges mentioned above, a further part of the experiments saw ten healthy prisoners taken into a hospital for patients who were dying of the disease. There, they were asked to stand over the sick and dying, lean over their faces and breathe in heavily while they exhaled. Just to be sure of exposure, the flu patients would cough into the face and mouths of the prisoners.

Ponder this for a moment.  
I mean, what is the likelihood?
Yet, despite this fact, we are told that the Spanish Flu is the most deadly virus on the planet.
According to many experts, this lack of proof of viral infectivity is a big deal but has resulted in a massively lucrative “vaccination” program that only worsens with time – now forcing people to concede to these injections or lose their jobs.
Meanwhile, back in Lymeland, lack of definitive proof stops the show.  Experts claim, “If we can’t see it, smell it, touch it, it doesn’t exist.” 
Anyone with half a brain would see this comparison and acknowledge that something is truly rotten in Denmark.

******