Another Inconvenient Study Retracted While 19 States Reject New Vaccine Schedule
The ‘vaccine’ war is hot and heavy
The Medical Industrial Complex, including the AAP is suing HHS and Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr – demanding that a federal court force the government back to ‘business as usual,’ with a blanket vaccine schedule for all and assembly-line medicine where:
- patient/doctor relationship is trumped by a ‘one size fits all’ medical model
- there is a lack of informed consent
- the emphasis is on Big Pharma profit, not patient health
There is no evidence the U.S. Childhood ‘vaccine’ schedule saves lives.
The entire US childhood vaccine schedule has no credible evidence of a mortality or morbidity benefit even though they’ve had 30 years to do the study and failed every time to show a benefit.
There is a long history of health agencies manipulating, obfuscating and even destroying ‘vaccine’ data and of doctors getting financial kickbacks for vaccinating.
How is this unbiased science?
Go here to sign petition to defund the AAP
‘Act of Censorship’: Preprint Server Retracts Infant Mortality Study by Children’s Health Defense Scientists
Preprints.org on Wednesday retracted a paper by Children’s Health Defense scientists who analyzed data from the Louisiana Department of Health. The analysis showed that infants vaccinated in their second month of life were more likely to die in their third month than unvaccinated infants.
Editor’s note: Since this article was published, the study retracted by Preprints.org has been published here, on the preprint server Zenodo.
Preprints.org on Wednesday retracted a paper by Children’s Health Defense (CHD) scientists. The research showed that infants vaccinated in their second month of life were more likely to die in their third month than unvaccinated infants.
Lead author Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., called the retraction “an act of censorship.” He told The Defender:
“There are 318 members of the Advisory Board for Preprints. Not a single one of them has published on vaccine safety. Not a single one of them has published on infant mortality. Not a single one of them would have been chosen to peer-review our article. Its retraction, therefore, cannot be a peer-reviewed nor a scientific decision.”
Retraction is an important tool for the scientific community, which needs the ability to edit itself, especially when “negligent or bad actors are at work,” Jablonowski said. “But retracting is also a tool of the censors, by those who muzzle scientific discourse,” he said.
The paper, published on the preprint server last month, analyzed data obtained from the Louisiana Department of Health.
The data revealed that depending on which vaccines they received, vaccinated children were between 29%-74% more likely to die than unvaccinated children. Vaccinated Black infants were 28%-74% more likely to die, and vaccinated female infants had a 52%-98% greater risk of death.
Overall, children who received all six vaccines recommended for 2-month-olds were 68% more likely to die in their third month of life, the data showed.
The paper represents one of the first studies on the cumulative effect of vaccines at age 2 months, when the vaccines are administered according to the pre-January 2026 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended schedule.
Since the paper was published, the CDC has revised the childhood schedule, reducing the number of routine vaccines recommended for infants and children. (See link for article)
__________________
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-states-reject-new-cdc-childhood-vaccine-schedule/
Growing Number of States Reject New Childhood Vaccine Schedule
Since Jan. 5, when the CDC pared down the number of routinely recommended childhood vaccines, at least 19 states have announced they won’t follow the new CDC schedule.
A growing number of states say they won’t follow the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) new childhood vaccine recommendations.
On Jan. 5, the CDC reduced the number of routinely recommended childhood vaccines from 17 to 11. The agency moved several vaccines to a “shared clinical decision-making” category that encourages discussion between the doctor and patient or parent about whether to get the vaccine.
The recategorized vaccines include rotavirus, COVID-19, influenza, meningococcal disease, hepatitis A and hepatitis B.
Since the CDC’s Jan. 5 announcement, 19 states have said they won’t follow the new CDC schedule: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Most plan to follow the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) vaccine guidance released in August 2025, the Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy (CIDRAP) reported.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Press Secretary Emily G. Hilliard criticized states that refuse to follow the CDC’s updated vaccine schedule. She told The Defender:
“Democrat-led states that imposed unscientific school closures, toddler mask mandates, and vaccine passports during the COVID era are the ones who destroyed public trust in public health and should not be guiding policy.
“The updated CDC childhood schedule continues to protect children against serious diseases while aligning U.S. guidance with international norms. Many peer nations achieve high vaccination rates without mandates by relying on trust, education, and strong doctor-patient relationships.” (See link for article)
________________
**Comment**
It’s important to recognize the AAP is completely bought out by Big Pharma and not to be trusted. It supports water fluoridation which has been shown to lower IQ in children, and it hasn’t updated advice on cellphone radiation in nearly a decade, of which clear evidence has been found that it increases cancer risk. Now the corrupt agency is suing RFK for simply reducing vaccines that are federally recommended.
This proves that ‘recommendations’ are far, far more than recommendations.
Similarly to Lymeland where treatment ‘guidelines’ serve as literal mandates, ‘the powers that be’ know well and good that ‘recommendations’ will be used to mandate vaccines if you want to attend public school, obtain higher education, work in the health field, see grandma in the hospital, and basically anything else a free person should be able to do without submitting to a medical device/treatment.
I just spoke with someone yesterday that reiterated that science changes depending upon what is known at the time. She, like the 19 states listed above like to tritely say this, but only follow it when it matches their pre-determined belief.
Time and time again, people have been maimed and killed by vaccines yet many people refuse to admit this very real, verifiable fact.
Any medical treatment should be a personal decision between the patient and their doctor. A ‘one size fits all’ approach to medicine will never and can never work, and the mantra, ‘for the greater good,’ should be eradicated from speech. COVID proved beyond a shadow of doubt that ‘vaccinating’ for other people doesn’t work. The tyranny used with COVID needs to be admitted and refused for the present and future or history WILL repeat.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 