Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Jan. 12, 2023

James Roguski has been making the media rounds in the Alternative Media this week warning about a closed-door meeting happening at the World Health Organization (WHO) this week with The International Health Regulations Review Committee (IHRRC) from January 9-13, 2023.

While the new WHO proposed “Pandemic Treaty” has grabbed the headlines in recent weeks, James Roguski believes that the meeting this week with IHRRC is much more important, because they are proposing amendments to an agreement that all 194 member nations of the World Health Assembly have already signed and ratified, including the United States, back in 2005, regarding International Health Regulations.

The current agreement is “non-binding”, but according to Roguski they want to change the agreement to remove the wording that states these “health regulations” are not just non-binding recommendations, but requirements to be implemented in all future “pandemics.”

The Review Committee is supposed to submit their proposals to the WHO by January 15, 2023, and then the entire 194 members of the WHO could vote on these amendments as soon as this May, in 2023. The amendments could be ratified by a simple majority vote among the 194 member nations.

Go to top link for one of the interviews he gave yesterday about these proposed amendments, and you can learn more from James Roguski’s Substack account here.

And go here to read an interview with Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., bioweapons expert and professor of international law at the University of Illinois, on how the WHO’s latest proposals may violate international law.  He calls for the U.S. federal and state governments to exit the WHO immediately.

Go here to learn more about WHO Director Tedros Gherbreyesus, who according to Roguski would become the World Ruler for all health measures in future pandemics.

For more:

According to an article written last year, the U.S. is on course to become a ‘digital dictatorship’ under a proposed biomedical research agency. This agency would merge national security with public health, a perfect formula for a dangerous agenda that would destroy medical freedom as we know it.

This agency would “use both physical and mental health ‘warning signs’ to prevent outbreaks of disease or violence before they occur. Such a system is a recipe for a technocratic ‘pre-crime’ organization with the potential to criminalize both mental and physical illness as well as ‘wrongthink.’”

This article proves the political interference at HHS as well as the fact governments are working in lockstep to bring in digital I.D.s & a social credit system.

The CDC already rules both research and the medical profession with an iron fist and medical freedom is increasingly under fire.
All of this sounds like a perfect prelude to global “vaccine” passports.