Carl Hamrin was born in Sweden, emigrated to the United States, and became a US citizen. His family settled in Maine, where he worked in the field of computer sciences. He had years of good health, as he and his wife Jeannie led an active outdoor life.
However, nine years ago, things changed for Carl. That’s when he started experiencing troublesome symptoms, including partial paralysis. He couldn’t move his arms to feed himself, shave, or push himself up out of a chair. So, Jeannie started taking him to doctors.
“Since 2011, Carl was in five different hospitals, three rehabs, saw over 55 MDs, DOs, NDs – GPs, Neurologists, cardiologists, hematologists, Infectious Disease MDs, oncologists, dermatologists, allergists, hand specialists, NPs, PTs, OTs, from Boston to Bangor, as well as in four different countries,” she wrote me in an email.
A diagnosis of Lyme
At one point, a neurologist thought to test him for Lyme disease—no one else had!—and he was positive. But that didn’t settle things for most of the doctors they saw.
“He was consistently subjected to both verbal and written microaggressions. Some ‘micros’ were due to ignorance, some to systemic failures, some to inability to think outside of algorithms and protocols, some to poor social skills,” Jeannie said. “But all were due to the outdated politics of CDC, IDSA and insurance companies.”
Some of the treatments Carl received helped somewhat. Others, not so much. Yet, Carl always had a sharp intellect, says Jeannie, and he worked hard to understand Lyme disease and what it was doing to him.
“He chewed through libraries, medical journals and Kindle at an alarming rate to plan his attack on the issue at hand. He did not want to be outsmarted by a tick!” (For the record, Jeannie says they were never aware of a tick bite.)
The final insult
Last year, Carl succumbed to his illness at age 86, passing away on August 14, 2019. According to Jeannie, the final insult from the medical establishment was the failure to list Lyme disease on his death certificate as an underlying condition that began the chain of events or to list it in Part II (other significant conditions) of Carl’s death.
The cause of death on his certificate is listed as acute leukemia for one week and myelodysplastic syndrome for six years.
Jeannie has been trying to get that certificate amended, to indicate that Lyme disease was a major factor in her husband’s death. So far, she keeps running into brick walls.
In one document she shared with me, a hospital official stated: “At the time of Carl’s last hospitalization, he did not have active Lyme disease and this is the reason for not including the diagnosis on the death certificate.”
(Well, that’s pretty much the whole Lyme controversy in a nutshell, isn’t it—the question of what constitutes an “active infection”? The Infectious Diseases Society of America sets the Lyme agenda followed by most hospitals in the US. And despite lots of scientific research to the contrary, the IDSA still insists that the Lyme bacteria cannot survive a short course of antibiotics. Ergo, Carl had no active infection.)
Jeannie has asked the hospital to release Carl’s cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample, his bone marrow core biopsy, clot section and aspirate smears collected eight days prior to his death, which might shed some light on the subject. “They will not release them,” she says.
Death certificates matter
Why is this so important? As an article from Today’s Geriatric Medicine puts it:
“Despite its title, a death certificate is a living document. The submitted data impact patients and families with regard to issues of life insurance, estate settlement, genetic risk factors, and closure. The certificate exists as a medical-legal document and can stand alone in a court of law. It lives at the state level, is purchased by the National Center for Health Statistics, and is then entered into the National Vital Statistics System under the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. It subsequently merges under the statistical umbrella of the World Health Organization to inform comparisons of international mortality rates. Death certificate data therefore inform health care policy,prevention campaigns, funding streams, and research projects from the local to international levels.”
Why should the entire Lyme community care about this issue? Because severe under-reporting of Lyme-related deaths contributes to the “Lyme blindness” that afflicts so much of the medical establishment.
This CDC study published in 2011 looked at death certificates from 45 states over a four-year period. Guess what? Researchers only found 114 that mentioned Lyme disease, leading them to conclude that Lyme disease is rarely fatal. But, as Carl Hamrin’s case shows, what’s actually written on the death certificate is far from the complete story.
How do we get a better count?
In search of a clearer picture of Lyme-related deaths, the MyLymeData patient registry includes a decedent survey. It allows family members to register the cause of death for their loved one and information about that person’s Lyme experience.
Click here for information about MyLymeData.
The Lyme Disease Biobank, a project of the Bay Area Lyme Foundation, also allows Lyme patients to plan to donate organs and tissue after death from any cause. It is the only national program to collect postmortem samples from individuals with tick-borne infections.
Click here to learn more about the Lyme Disease Biobank.
Jeannie Hamrin continues her quest to have her husband’s certificate amended. “Like a canary in the coal mine, I want to honor Carl’s legacy to be a sentinel case that gets Lyme recognized as a major public health issue, so hospitals will train their staff on listing Lyme as a contributing cause of death, rather than misdiagnosed as something else or totally ignored.”
TOUCHED BY LYME is written by Dorothy Kupcha Leland, LymeDisease.org’s Vice-president and Director of Communications. She is co-author of When Your Child Has Lyme Disease: A Parent’s Survival Guide. Contact her at dleland@lymedisease.org.
______________________
**Comment**
Great article that brings up a very important issue – how death certificates are recorded. This, in light of COVID-19 over counting, and in light of Lyme/MSIDS undercounting clearly shows how numbers matter.
The problem, as always, is the CDC rigs everything for their own lucrative patent interests:
I fully believe after years of living in ‘Alice in Lymeland,’ that the only way we make forward progress is to do it ourselves. Our public ‘authorities’ are not to be trusted and are often the very problem, and this is a very old 40 year problem.
Both the biobank for specimens and MyLymeData help by being independently led and frankly for just not dodging the truth. The problem with working with the government (CDC/NIH/IDSA/NIAID/FDA) is their entire premise is wrong, therefore all outcomes will be wrong. This is a case where truth will only be found outside the system, and in the hands of those who are truly transparent and are who are searching/looking hard. From my layman’s understanding, most of these pathogens are very difficult to study and require specific elements and procedures to be seen, tracked, and experimented upon. Lazy and/or bought out researchers need not apply.
Many, many more are succumbing due to the complications of Lyme as well as numerous other tick-borne illnesses but are not being tracked. Some pathogens like B. miyamotoi aren’t even reportable diseases yet!
Similarly to COVID-19, autopsies are desperately needed to shed light on infectiousness & destruction caused by pathogens.
For more: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/04/13/chronic-lyme-post-mortem-study-needed-to-end-the-lyme-wars/
