https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-delta-variant-a-false-flag/  Video Here

THE DELTA VARIANT: A FALSE FLAG?

June 24, 2021

We are being told the ‘Delta Variant’ is dangerously sweeping across the world. Everyone from Joe Biden to medical officials are seizing the opportunity to push the experimental #Covid19 shot on young adults. But from Israel to the U.K., trends have emerged causing many to question this narrative.

While our corrupt public health ‘authorities’ continue to push fear-mongering, numerous experts are stating that the COVID injections are in fact causing the variants/mutations.

And here, we are told the so-called “Delta Variant” is actually the “Indian Variant,” which is “simply being renamed.” And here, experts state mutation is a MUNDANE ASPECT OF EXISTENCE for many viruses, and the coronavirus is no exception.

BTW: the flu virus mutates freely and vaccines haven’t eradicated it – nor will they, ever.
The flu vaccine does not prevent the spread of the flu, doesn’t reduce flu deaths, doesn’t benefit susceptible patients when healthcare workers are vaccinated, and actually INCREASES THE RISK OF CONTRACTING A NON-FLU RESPIRATORY ILLNESS BY 65%. Source

Further, more experts explain how the COVID “vaccinated” are potentially harming the unvaccinated.  In this video, “Contagious vaccinosis” is discussed and Dr. Hodkinson introduces a study conducted ironically by scientists based in Wuhan, China, which found that the excess spike protein could escape from the skin in sweat glands and become aerosolized, which could be transferred by inhalation. 

This effect is also discussed here, and reveals the Pfizer mRNA vaccine trial warns against proximity (shared air inhalation or skin contact between “vaccine” participants and the unvaccinated as a possible vector of harm).

For those paying attention, videos have surfaced where people are putting magnets on COVID injection sites and they are sticking.  Dr. Roger Hodkinson said his initial reaction was, “This has got to be fake.” But as in the case of women expressing concern about their menstrual cycles after taking the vaccine, there are too many personal testimonials to ignore.

After reviewing the literature, Hodkinson said, it becomes “very clear that for many years there’s been a delivery technology…in which there has been an attempt to deliver magnetic particles inside lipid envelopes together with potentially therapeutic agents to direct them to a source – a site where you might want to have them concentrated by applying an external magnetic field to – to that particular site.”

The pathologist continues to say that it has been “a very well described technology.” The magnetic particles, in fact, have been given a name: “superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs).” It is unknown if “SPION” technology is associated with the current vaccines, Dr. Hodkinson makes clear that this is part of the problem.

“We just don’t know what’s in this stuff,” he said. “They’ve been very secretive,” he continued.

4,115 Fully Vaccinated Have Been Hospitalized or Died With Breakthrough COVID Infections, CDC Says

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 3,907 hospitalizations and 750 deaths in people fully vaccinated against COVID with an FDA-authorized vaccine as of June 21.

Excerpts from article:

More than 4,100 people have been hospitalized or died with COVID in the U.S. despite having been fully vaccinated, according to new data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

There were a total of 3,907 hospitalizations and 750 deaths among those who had breakthrough infections, although not all of the hospitalizations may have been due primarily to COVID, Forbes reported.

A breakthrough case is recorded if a person tests positive for SARS-Cov-2 two weeks after receiving the single-dose Johnson & Johnson (J&J) shot or completing the two-dose Moderna or Pfizer vaccination.

(See link for article)

https://leohohmann.com/2021/06/21/behind-the-vaccine-veil-doctor-cites-whistleblowers-inside-cdc-who-claim-injections-have-already-killed-50000-americans  Video Here

Behind the Vaccine Veil: Doctor cites ‘whistleblowers’ inside CDC who claim injections have already killed 50,000 Americans

‘Good doctors are doing unthinkable things’ …They ‘appear to be under a spell’

The most highly cited physician on the early treatment of COVID-19 has come out with an explosive new video that blows the lid off the medical establishment’s complicity in the unnecessary deaths of tens of thousands of Americans.

Dr. Peter McCullough said these deaths have been facilitated by a false narrative bent on pushing an all-new, unproven vaccine for a disease that was highly treatable.

He said COVID was a bioweapon and the vaccines represent “phase two” of that bioweapon.

“As this, in a sense, bioterrorism phase one was rolled out, it was really all about keeping the population in fear and in isolation and preparing them to accept the vaccine, which appears to be phase two of a bioterrorism operation,” McCullough said in a June 11 webinar with German attorney Reiner Fuellmich and several other doctors.

He noted:

“Both the respiratory virus and the vaccine delivered to the human body the spike protein, the gain of function target of this bioterrorism research.”

Most of McCullough’s comments come in the first 10 minutes of the video in link above.  (See link for article)

https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/frontlinenews/lisbon-court-rules-only-0-9-of-verified-cases-died-of-covid-numbering-152-not-17000-claimed/

Lisbon court rules only 0.9% of ‘verified cases’ died of COVID, numbering 152, not 17,000 claimed

Following a citizen’s petition, a Lisbon court was forced to provide verified COVID-19 mortality data, reports AndreDias.net.

According to the ruling, the number of verified COVID-19 deaths from January 2020 to April 2021 is only 152, not about 17,000 as claimed by government ministries.

All the “others” died for various reasons, although their PCR test was positive.

“We live in a fraud of unprecedented dimensions,” wrote Dias.

(See link for article)

_____________________

Important quote:

“If these figures are of the same order of magnitude for other countries as well, and there is no reason to assume otherwise, then the plague is a deception of unprecedented proportions and crimes committed against humanity on a huge scale have been committed here.”

https://lymediseaseassociation.org/resources/clinical-trials-studies/columbia-clinical-trials-network-seeks-treatment-approaches-from-public-clinician-others/

Columbia Clinical Trials Network Seeks Treatment Approaches From Public, Clinicians, & Others

From Columbia Clinical Trials Network: In recognition of a severe unmet need, the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation’s grant to Columbia University has established the first national Columbia Clinical Trials Network for Lyme and other Tick-borne Diseases [www.lymectn.org]. The Research Network starts with a team of leading investigators, including Dr. Brian Fallon at Columbia University Irving Medical Center in New York City, Dr. John Aucott at Johns Hopkins University Medical Center in Baltimore Maryland, and Dr. Roberta DeBiasi at Children’s National Hospital in Washington D.C.

Providing oversight to ensure that the highest-quality clinical trials are undertaken, the Clinical Trials Network will:

  • provide internal funding support for small pilot studies
  • assist investigators in protocol design and statistical research planning
  • establish and manage a national case registry
  • create a data management system for multi-site clinical trials
The clinical trials network will be a powerful engine to drive large-scale clinical trials and potentially transformational early-stage research.

To generate as many ideas as possible and to hear directly from the front lines of clinical experience, Columbia CTNCC invites public, community clinicians, and other stakeholders to submit their ideas on treatment approaches. These ideas may spark off development of a pilot study and be included in clinical trials conducted at one of the CTN nodes.

You may contribute to a groundbreaking research project in the field of Lyme and the tick-borne diseases.

The deadline for the first round of submissions for treatment research ideas from the general public is July 1, 2021. The submission period opened June 1.

To submit your suggestions for treatments, please go to www.lymectn.org and submit on the “Treatment Research Idea Hub”.

_________________

From the LDA:  The Lyme Disease Association Inc (LDA) President Pat Smith, had this to say about the release,

“This is a great opportunity for individuals to provide suggestions which might lead to research on a treatment which could lead to a cure or to a better life for many of our sickest Lyme/TBD patients. I hope those who have promising ideas will submit them to the Columbia CTNCC for consideration.”

https://lymediseaseassociation.org/about-lyme/research-articles/peer-reviewed-articles/review-of-evidence-supporting-idsa-guidelines-em-treatment-in-us/

Review of Evidence Supporting IDSA Guidelines EM Treatment in US

2014 ElizabethMaloneyMD
Elizabeth Maloney, MD

The IDSA guidelines for Lyme disease contain 2 recommendations for antibiotic therapy for patients with erythema migrans (EM) rashes. The first recommendation identified which antibiotics were preferred and the second specified therapy duration.

In “Evidence-Based, Patient-Centered Treatment of Erythema Migrans in the United States,” Antibiotics 2021, author Elizabeth L. Maloney, MD, reviews the US trial evidence on EM rashes, problems of the IDSA recommendations considering that evidence, and provides evidence-based patient-centered strategies for managing patients with EM.

“The EM rash is the hallmark finding of early disease,” along with other symptoms. “In light of the physical and financial costs, identifying and promoting highly effective therapeutic interventions for US patients with erythema migrans (EM) rashes that return them to their pre-infection health status should be a priority.” 

The paper states:

“when promptly diagnosed and appropriately treated with antibiotics, early Lyme disease is curable.” Untreated and inadequately treated infections can progress to long-term sequalae. Patient-centered care–defined by the National Academy of Medicine—“…is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values and ensuring that patient values guide all clinical decisions. Patient-centered outcomes are outcomes that matter to patients, such as reductions in symptoms or improvements in quality of life.” In recent times, patient-centered outcomes are becoming part of trial designs.

Dr. Maloney uses a Medline search with specified criteria to identify the trials conducted in the US for the named antibiotics recommended by IDSA Lyme guidelines.  There were 25 results of which 8 met the search criteria, other 17 were EM trials in Europe, disseminated disease in Europe, European antibiotic retreatment, culture difficulty, and tick bite prophylaxis. The US trials were old, were small, and 2 had high non completion rates of 40%+ and two others had single arm with 20%+ non—completion, thus Dr. Maloney indicates these should not be included to determine treatment efficacy.

The paper goes on to examine the remaining US trials, several of which used disease centered endpoints, not patient centered endpoints, and all those trials used what is currently considered outdated statistical methodology, pointing out the weaknesses of the evidence used by IDSA. In the conclusion, Dr. Maloney highlights the need for more research.

Click here to read the entire study

Click here to read Johns Hopkins Lyme Research Center Challenges IDSA Guidelines & Addresses Lyme-COVID

Click here to see video of Bransfield & Smith Discuss IDSA Guidelines

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/693

The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Ralph J. DiClemente
Vaccines 2021, 9(7), 693; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9070693
Received: 2 June 2021 / Revised: 19 June 2021 / Accepted: 21 June 2021 / Published: 24 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Background: COVID-19 vaccines have had expedited reviews without sufficient safety data. We wanted to compare risks and benefits.
Method: We calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) from a large Israeli field study to prevent one death. We accessed the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl) to extract the number of cases reporting severe side effects and the number of cases with fatal side effects.
Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11/100,000 vaccinations.

For three deaths prevented by vaccination we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination.

Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy. View Full-Text
______________________
For more:

Regarding efficacy:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/05/06/vaccine-makers-destroy-covid-vaccine-safety-studies/

Excerpt:

  • Makers of COVID-19 vaccines are now destroying long-term safety studies by unblinding their trials and giving the control groups the active vaccine, claiming it is “unethical” to withhold an effective vaccine
  • In so doing, they make it virtually impossible to assess any long-term safety and effectiveness, and the true benefit versus cost
  • It’s ironic, because vaccine mandates are being justified on the premise that the benefit to the community is more important than an individual’s risk of harm. 
  • Vaccine makers are also very careful about only referencing relative risk, not absolute risk. By doing so, the vaccines appear far more protective than they actually are. It’s a commonly used statistical trick that makes them look more effective than they are. 

When absolutely risk is taken into account, the effectiveness of the COVID injections is LESS THAN 1%.

Lastly, a “vaccine” isn’t needed for a disease that has effective treatments; however, these treatments are maligned, censored, and ignored because they want to push their lucrative injections.  On top of it all is the fact COVID has the mortality rate of the seasonal flu.