Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

CDC’s Troubling Lack of Research Ethics

https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/a-matter-of-right-and-wrong-the-cdcs-troubling-lack-of-research-ethics/

MARCH 29, 2018

A Matter of Right and Wrong: The CDC’s Troubling Lack of Research Ethics

By Brian S. Hooker, Science Advisor, Focus for Health and Board Member, World Mercury Project

Documents obtained by the Freedom of Information Act indicate that Centers for Disease Control (CDC) officials gave preferential treatment to the Danish grantees (including Dr. Poul Thorsen) at Aarhus University, and took no apparent action to evaluate the veracity of any of the study data when theft of over $1 million of grant money by Thorsen was made known. Furthermore, in 2009, when CDC officials including Dr. Coleen Boyle (Director of the National Center for Birth Defects and Development Disabilities [NCBDDD]), Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp (Chief of the Developmental Disabilities Branch), Joanne Wojcik (Public Health Analyst, Developmental Disabilities Branch), and Diana Schendel (former CDC NCBDDD senior epidemiologist) became aware that Thorsen failed to obtain legally required ethics permissions for the autism bio and genetic data projects, these CDC employees worked with the Danish grantees to hide this fact.

…studies were conducted and results published without legally-required ethics clearances.

These officials have never made public that both the validity of childhood autism in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register (Lauritsen et al. 2010 Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders) and the population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism (Madsen et al. 2002 New England Journal of Medicine) studies were conducted and results published without legally-required ethics clearances. They knew that the psychiatric registry records were reviewed without required permissions, a serious ethical violation.

On the 30th of November 2009, Coleen Boyle, Diana Schendel, Joanne Wojcik, and Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp, along with Danish grantees, failed to report this serious ethical violation in previously published research, as well as a study near publication. They sought to cover their tracks on their failure to ensure Poul Thorsen had obtained all the needed ethical approvals for autism bio and genetic studies. Two studies were published in which legally required ethical permissions were apparently never applied for and granted, according to their notes. When repeatedly asked to provide them, Thorsen did not.

These acts were a clear violation of both ethical and legal standards.

It appears that the biggest concern the CDC-Danish collaborators had at that point was getting ethical coverage for Diana Schendel’s paper on autism and inflammatory markers that was about to be published. They decided to extend the permissions obtained by another researcher (Dr. Rikke Maimburg from Aarhus) to Schendel’s work because Maimburg had been approved in 2000 for an unrelated study entitled ‘Obstetric factors and autism’. Their thinking was that since Diana’s study used mothers’ obstetric files, the 2000 Ethics Committee approval could be extended to her study (even though the committee never reviewed Schendel’s study design.) However, permissions for child records, which were also reviewed, were never obtained. These acts were a clear violation of both ethical and legal standards.

Thorsen, the principle investigator for the granted CDC funds, failed to provide evidence after the fact that he had obtained ethical committee permissions for his research on bio and genetic markers and autism. The team eventually determined no requests had ever been submitted. By all appearances, they found that studies related to the two papers, one previously published, were done without legally-required ethical approval. The two papers in question are:

  1. A population-based study of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination and autism. Madsen KM, Hviid A, Vestergaard M, Schendel D, Wohlfahrt J, Thorsen P, Olsen J, Melbye M., 2002, New England Journal of Medicine 347:1477
  2. Validity of childhood autism in the Danish Psychiatric Central Register: findings from a cohort sample born 1990-1999. Lauritsen MB, Jørgensen M, Madsen KM, Lemcke S, Toft S, Grove J, Schendel DE, Thorsen P., 2010, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 40:139
…the seminal Denmark study on the MMR and autism, used to “debunk” the vaccine-autism hypothesis both in the Institute of Medicine’s 2004 report “Vaccines and Autism” as well as in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program’s Omnibus Autism Proceedings, is an illegal study.

Notes from the Nov. 30, 2009 phone call between the CDC officials and Danish grantees include:

We have not been able to find a permission from ethical committee that covers both bio and genetic markers and autism. As far as we understand only one paper has been published using these data and Diana will soon be submiting (sic) another. Apart from the letter from the EC in our region (attached) we have not been able to locate the permission for abstraction of the psychiatric records, and it is likely that it does not exist.

Dr. Coleen Boyle, current Director of NCBDDD at CDC, should have shut this grant down immediately upon being informed that ethical clearances were not in place. She should have immediately contacted the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity as well as the Office of Inspector General. Funding should have been discontinued. She should have led the charge to have these papers retracted. There should have been, at a minimum, a press release from the CDC to inform the public. Instead, Dr. Boyle along with Dr. Marshalyn Yeargin-Allsopp, Joanne Wojcik and Dr. Diana Schendel worked with their Danish Grantees to ‘fix it’ and retrospectively apply ethics approvals. Their next call on 14 December 2009 closed the case on Poul providing information to Aarhus.

Poul Thorsen’s reply from the Dec. 14, 2009 conference call was:

“As I have stated before to Carsten and Erik, I have not been able to locate the ethical approval for the autism pilot study. I recommend that new approvals are requested just as stated in the notes from the last conference call.”

Not only is this egregious behavior for government officials, but it also points to poor grant management by CDC staff. The CDC staff responsible for this multimillion dollar grant, starting with Diana Schendel, should have had copies of all the legally required ethics permissions in hand before the Danish grantees were allowed to get started, and before the first US taxpayer dollar was sent to Denmark.

Also, most notable is the fact that the seminal Denmark study on the MMR and autism, used to “debunk” the vaccine-autism hypothesis both in the Institute of Medicine’s 2004 report “Vaccines and Autism” as well as in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program’s Omnibus Autism Proceedings, is an illegal study. Without proper ethics approval, it should have never been published and indeed should be retracted from the New England Journal of Medicine.

This is one of two studies that the CDC has completed regarding the MMR vaccine and autism. Of course, the other study was completed by DeStefano et al. (2004 Pediatrics 113:259) and showed a statistically significant relationship between MMR timing and the incidence of autism, specifically in boys, despite the fact that the authors erroneously dismissed the relationship as evidence that individuals with autism had to get early vaccines to enroll in special education programs.

CDC officials in the Immunization Safety Office and the Developmental Disabilities Branch have repeatedly omitted data and manipulated statistical results to deny any relationship between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders.

How can the CDC be trusted with stewarding vaccine safety for the U.S. if this is an example of how ethics are regarded within their ranks? Unfortunately, this is just one of many instances of research fraud and malfeasance within the CDC. CDC officials in the Immunization Safety Office and the Developmental Disabilities Branch have repeatedly omitted data and manipulated statistical results to deny any relationship between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders. These same officials have covered up the embezzlement of Federal funds by CDC grantee, Dr. Poul Thorsen as well as the romantic relationship between Thorsen and his CDC grant supervisor, Dr. Diana Schendel. As described by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.,

this agency is truly “a cesspool of corruption” and should be disqualified from protecting the health of our children.

_______________

**Comment**

And this institution has led the charge on all things Lyme/MSIDS related.

For more on the CDC and corruption:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/11/29/spider-attacks-cdc/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/01/31/another-cdc-conflict-of-interest-director-resigns/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/03/21/congress-receives-vaccine-safety-project-details-since-the-cdc-fda-ignore-their-own-data-and-proclaim-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/09/27/strange-case-of-poul-thorsen-vaccine-data-manipulator-extraordinaire/

CDC Corruption with Lyme:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/09/25/speaking-of-fake-science-fifty-seven-million-anti-trust-lawsuit-against-cdc-lyme-tests/   An anti-trust law suit of $57 million is being prepared against the CDC. They are accused of deliberately suppressing the use of an accurate DNA direct diagnostics for Lyme disease.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/12/13/suppression-of-microscopy-for-lyme-diagnostics-professor-laane/  After publishing the 2013 article ‘A simple method for the detection of live Borrelia spirochetes in human blood using classical microscopy techniques’, professor Laane was invited to give a lecture at the 2014 Norvect conference in Oslo. I was present at that conference and still remember how nervous he was. The reason was that several medical professors complained to his university. He was threatened with losing his job, if he would speak at the conference. In fact, he did not literally speak – as you can see in the movie below – but used performing arts to show the slides of the spirochetes. Professor Laane was fired anyway and his laboratory was closed down.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/10/06/remembering-dr-masters-the-rebel-for-lyme-patients-who-took-on-the-cdc-single-handedly/ Masters went over the charts with a fine tooth comb and found huge CDC errors. Another contentious point was the arbitrary cut off date imposed by the CDC which did not pick up serious late-stage symptoms. Another was the CDC’s rejection of many positive blood tests performed in its own lab, as well as other lab work showing “motile spirochetes” in nearly 5% of lone star nymphs. Long story short, after numerous revisions, Masters could never sign onto the bastardized study. The CDC had purposely tossed out data and manipulated the results.
The CDC essentially tried blackmailing Masters into signing off on the study before they would let him see the final draft. Refusing the bait, he published a letter of objection in the Journal of Infectious Diseases as well as an article of his own in Missouri Medicine which showed Missouri patients met the CDC surveillance definition for LD and growing evidence that lone star ticks were infected with an unidentified spirochete causing identical symptoms of LD in patients. When the CDC study came out they unbelievably attributed the rashes they labeled STARI to an allergy to tick saliva! In the acknowledgment section of the paper where dozens of folks were thanked, they completely omitted the man who made it all possible – Dr. Ed Masters.  RIP – we will never forget you.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/01/31/when-als-is-lyme-letter-to-tbi-working-group/ The racketeering scheme to downplay the severity of Lyme disease as identified in the RICO lawsuit should be addressed and documented by the TBD Working Group and not ignored as if this crime does not exist otherwise it will be business as usual at the Centers for Disease Control and we’ll have another thirty years of failure to properly diagnose, treat and control this life-altering infection.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/12/09/25303/ 10 points – Suing the Architects of Lyme Policy as Task Force Meets to Review it

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/01/28/the-secret-x-files-the-untold-history-of-the-lymerix-vaccine/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/09/07/20268/  (complete convoluted history about Lymerix found in this link)  In 2012, when the CDC revised the official case number of new Lyme disease infections per year from 30,000 to over 300,000 new Lyme––overnight, those of us in the know understood that they were getting the public ready to accept this upcoming vaccine with open arms and a sense of relief. In other words, scare the public just enough to make them open to wanting this product without causing mass panic nationwide or worldwide. And without having to explain their denial to date.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/07/01/pbs-lyme-vaccine/  Did you know that the LYMERIX vaccine caused 640 emergency room visits, 34 life threatening reactions, 77 hospitalizations, 198 disabilities, and 6 deaths? In a vile cesspool of conflicts of interest are university patent holders, drug companies, and the FDA itself as another patent holder. It generated 40 million dollars before it was yanked. (2008, Drymon)

Category:

Activism, Lyme, vaccines

The Truth Never Stood in the Way of a Good Story – How to Be Wakefielded

A lot of stuff comes across my desk.  The following is one such item that does a great job explaining how large establishments with deep pockets and financial ties to powerful sources can and do ruin anyone they deem a threat.  The media disseminates and propagates it, and before long lies are accepted as fact.  The public is caught in the cross hairs and suffers due to this bullying which has effectively hijacked Science.

https://mailchi.mp/460f498dd15d/wakefield-vaccines-autism-and-science?e=13022b5758  Used By Permission From Wellness Journeys

The Truth Never Stood in the Way of a Good Story

Whenever I read that Wakefield’s research has been thoroughly debunked and that he is considered a fraud and a quack, it saddens me because that is just not what happened, and Wakefield has never been proven to be a quack.

That is just the story everyone wants us to believe.

A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes.

Perhaps one or two of you don’t know about Dr Andrew Wakefield, who was attacked and maligned for his study that discovered problems with the MMR vaccination. Whenever someone says vaccination and autism in the same sentence, a deluge of screams echoing from the far ends of the earth is heard, saying, “That has been so debunked!”

However

To debunk a scientific study, one needs to debunk the science of that study. The man responsible for this so-called debunking is Brian Deer, who is not a scientist but a professional skeptic (and journalist), who was hired to debunk Wakefield’s study and write up the story. Coincidentally, Deer belongs to a group of professional skeptics that Fiona Godlee addressed during one of their meetings.  Fiona Godlee is the Chief Editor of the British Medical Journal.

According to Tim Bolen, an investigative reporter, it was Godlee who hired Deer to debunk Wakefield, while other sources say it was the Sunday Times who hired Deer. Both sources are linked here:

http://bolenreport.com/who-in-the-hell-is-brian-deer/

http://www.ageofautism.com/…/brian-deer-hired-to-find-somet…

The thing is, if you start to investigate this entire imbroglio, you’ll find that certain details have been ignored by a media more interested in sensationalism.

A simple point of fact is that when the British Medical Journal published Deer’s story, the article looked nothing like anything the journal had published in its esteemed history. It was, just like the rest of the media, a bit sensational, and lacking any real science. To a scientist, it looked like a libelous, ad hominem attack (an attack on the person of Andrew Wakefield).

We’ve been told that since Wakefield’s research, there have been further studies that showed the exact opposite, but we have to ask, were those studies fraudulent? while Wakefield’s study was not? I mean, who is to say which side is science and which side is fraud?

There are no objective arbiters in a field whose bottom line is the almighty dollar (or pound or euro). And when these cases go to court, the judges are not familiar with the science so both sides can bullshit their way through any court hearing using terminology that goes way over the court’s collective mind.

Since it seems that everyone in the world has come out against Wakefield (in fact there’s a new verb in the lexicon, “to be wakefielded”) and most doctors are afraid to go against the tidal wave of criticism, one must ask why have the actual findings in Wakefield’s study been ignored by everyone and the media and why was something debunked that actually never happened.

For instance, the study never claimed that MMR vaccine caused autism. Did you know that? Well here is the actual statement from the paper itself:

We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described [autism]. Virological studies are underway that may help to resolve this issue.

Next, it is suggested in the paper that the three in one vaccinations be broken up and administered at different times because there has never been a problem when that was exactly how they were handled, whereas they did find a significant problem when the three were given at once. 

That is really the only suggestion of the paper, and after the hullabaloo died down, Britain’s General Medical Council took that option away from the people. Three-in-one was it, and that’s that.

And finally, in the end, because the sampling was so small, the researchers did exactly what every study does that is small like this, it said that more research must be done before we really know anything.

The idea that vaccinations should be broken up and administered over an extended period of time is not a new one. But there really have never been any studies on how often, how many, and the timing of all these vaccines being administered to infants. Never. Doctors rely on adverse reactions being reported, but in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System database there have been reports of children turning into The Incredible Hulk. There are no real studies and the data cannot be trusted.

It’s just assumed, as Dr Paul Offit states, that “each infant would have the theoretical capacity to respond to about 10,000 vaccines at any one time.”

Well, I’ve got a few things for you to peruse. First off, here is Wakefield’s original paper published in The Lancet (which has been since been retracted):

http://www.thelancet.com/…/ar…/PIIS0140673697110960/fulltext

Next, there is a recently released movie on Amazon (if you have Amazon Prime it’s free) that I think everyone must see, which give’s Wakefield’s side. You’ll see he’s not a monster:

I would love to hear your comments. I’m not an anti-vaxer. I’m just interested in the truth and in good science; not science that is backed by billions of dollars, but science that is backed by sound methodology.

Wait A Minute! There’s More . . . And You Have To Hear This!

Because of Brian Deer’s so-called “debunking” of what will henceforth be known as the “Wakefield Study,” The Lancet’s retraction of the published results, and all the uproar and hullabaloo, the United Kingdom’s General Medical Council regulatory board ruled against the Wakefield team, denouncing them as frauds and they all lost their licenses to practice medicine.

Having moved to Texas where he still finds it hard to practice because of the defamation that began in England, Wakefield filed a defamation lawsuit against the BMJ and Brian Deer. It cost him millions to do so, millions being donated by his supporters. The courts threw it out on the grounds of jurisdiction, meaning, Texas was not the place to file this lawsuit. Wakefield would have to go to England to do that. And it only took the Texas courts (if I’m not mistaken) over three years to decide this.

But this isn’t the news you just have to hear. 

This did not make headlines. You didn’t hear about it. I didn’t hear about it. How could we hear anything when the moment the MMR is questioned, reporters who wouldn’t know real science if they tripped and fell into it just started echoing the continued screed of the BMJ, “That’s been thoroughly debunked! That’s been thoroughly debunked! That’s been thoroughly debunked!”

It’s hard to hear the truth when the lie is so loud. 

But, in 2012, just 6 years ago to this month (March), one of the doctors on Wakefield’s team, won his High Court appeal, with the Judge in the case quashing the General Medical Council’s findings. Though retired, Professor John Walker-Smith got his license to practice medicine returned to him and a third doctor, Professor Simon Murch was also cleared. 

The justice in this case ruled that there was “inadequate reasoning” to pronounce these researchers quacks and frauds and anything else the British press wanted to call them. That they performed their study and published it in good faith with no intent to do harm or defraud the public. But the good justice just had to reiterate that, “There is now no respectable body of opinion which supports (Dr Wakefield’s) hypothesis, that MMR vaccine and autism/enterocolitis are causally linked.”

Once again, that was never Wakefield’s hypothesis, and no, nobody has published a study linking autism to the MMR. The judge is correct on this last point.

However, there is a whistle blower from the CDC who has quite a bit to say on the subject.

In August 2014, Dr. Thompson revealed that the data underlying CDC’s principle vaccine safety studies demonstrated a causal link between vaccines and autism or autism symptoms, despite CDC’s claims to the contrary. According to Thompson, based upon interpretation of the data, “There is biologic plausibility right now to say that thimerosal causes autism-like features.” Dr. Thompson invoked federal whistleblower protection in August 2014. [Ref]

No, you won’t find any studies about thimerosal because the drug companies have removed it from their infant vaccines. 

So, as you can see, we’re cleared up nothing here. The media still screams, “That’s been thoroughly debunked!” thimerosal is still linked to autism like symptoms, and the MMR is given all at once, though in the US you may request to have them given separately, a year apart.

And Andrew Wakefield is still a quack, at least according to conventional, profit based medicine.

You can call me an antivaxxer or a quack all you want, but as a person truly interested in the Science, I am more than aware that anyone saying all vaccines are great or all vaccines are dangerous is not being scientific at all. When science actually focuses on healing with no conflicts of interest to worry about, then we’ll start to find the truth about all of medicine; and then we will start to focus on healing our brothers and sisters.

Copyright © 2018 Minnesota Wellness Publications, All rights reserved.

_______________

For More:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/11/28/biological-mechanisms-of-vaccine-injury/  (Many more links following the article in this link)

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/09/07/20268/  The Lyme vaccine has caused the same symptoms as the disease and yet they keep peddling it without a care.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/01/28/the-secret-x-files-the-untold-history-of-the-lymerix-vaccine/  This article has the harrowing details of cases affected negatively by the Lyme vaccine.  Seriously heartbreaking stuff.

Category:

Activism, vaccines

HHS Proposes Rule Expanding Religious & Conscience Protections in Health Care – Including Vaccinations: Please Provide Comments

https://parentalrights.org/hhs-rule/

HHS Proposes Rule Expanding Religious and Conscience Protections in Health Care

March 21, 2018

 

The Office of Civil Rights (OCR) in the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently released a wide-ranging proposed rule https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/01/26/2018-01226/protecting-statutory-conscience-rights-in-health-care-delegations-of-authority that focused on increasing protections for the rights of conscience and religious liberties in the area of health care services. Several provisions of the rule pertain to the issue of parental rights.

Interested people can provide comments until Tuesday, March 27.

The proposed rule, Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care; Delegations of Authority, (83 FR 3880) states that:

HHS proposes this rule to enhance the awareness and enforcement of federal health care conscience and associated anti-discrimination laws, to further conscience and religious freedom, and to protect the rights of individuals and entities to abstain from certain activities related to health care services without discrimination or retaliation.

In addition to laying down some new regulations, it also revises old regulations to make certain that the correct practices and policies are in place that will help promote the rights of individuals and entities in the area of individual health care decisions. Toward this end, the proposed rule states the following:

Through this rulemaking, the Department proposes to grant overall responsibility to its Office of Civil Rights (OCR) for ensuring that the Department, its components, HHS programs and activities, and those who participate in HHS programs or activities comply with federal laws protecting the rights of conscience and prohibiting associated discriminatory policies and practices in such programs and activities.

One provision affecting parental rights addresses the issue of vaccinations. While ParentalRights.org does not take any official position on the use of vaccinations, the provision in this proposed rule does guarantee greater protection for parents to make their own informed medical decisions for their children. Section XII C (1) (i) specifically makes reference to ensuring that persons and entities are not “being required to administer or receive certain vaccinations derived from aborted fetal tissues as a condition of work or receipt of educational services.” This rule also includes broader “provisions [to] protect parents who conscientiously object to their children being forced to receive certain treatments or health interventions.” (Section III (I))

ParentalRights.org is excited to see the steps that HHS is taking to ensure that parents have the right to make their own choices regarding the health care of their children.

If you would like to comment and voice your opinions regarding the proposed rule, formal comments may be submitted here:  https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2018/01/26/2018-01226/protecting-statutory-conscience-rights-in-health-care-delegations-of-authority#open-comment

Finally, if you would like to learn more about the new Conscience and Religious Freedom Division within the OCR whose jurisdiction the provisions of this rule fall under, visit https://www.hhs.gov/conscience.

Other issues the proposed rule concerns:

  • Conscience protections related to abortion, sterilization, and certain other health services to participants in programs—and their personnel—funded by the Department (the Church Amendments, 42 U.S.C. 300a-7);
  • Conscience protections for health care entities related to abortion provision or training, referral for such abortion or training, or accreditation standards related to abortion (the Coats-Snowe Amendment, 42 U.S.C. 238n);
  • Protections from discrimination for health care entities and individuals who object to furthering or participating in abortion under programs funded by the Department’s yearly appropriations acts (e.g., Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017, Pub. L. 115-31, Div. H, Tit. V, sec. 507(d) (the Weldon Amendment) and at Div. H, Tit. II, sec. 209);
  • Conscience protections under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) related to assisted suicide (42 U.S.C. 18113), the ACA individual mandate (26 U.S.C. 5000A(d)(2)), and other matters of conscience (42 U.S.C. 18023(c)(2)(A)(i)-(iii), (b)(1)(A) and (b)(4));
  • Conscience protections for objections to counseling and referral for certain services in Medicaid or Medicare Advantage (42 U.S.C. 1395w-22(j)(3)(B) and 1396u-2(b)(3)(B));
  • Conscience protections related to the performance of advanced directives (42 U.S.C. 1395cc(f), 1396a(w)(3), and 14406);
  • Conscience protections related to Global Health Programs to the extent administered by the Secretary (22 U.S.C. 7631(d); Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017, Pub. L. 115-31, Div. J, Tit. VII, sec. 7018 (Helms Amendment));
  • Exemptions from compulsory health care or services generally (42 U.S.C. 1396f & 5106i(a)(1)), and under specific programs for hearing screening (42 U.S.C. 280g-1(d)), occupational illness testing (29 U.S.C. 669(a)(5)); vaccination (42 U.S.C. 1396s(c)(2)(B)(ii)), and mental health treatment (42 U.S.C. 290bb-36(f)); and
  • Protections for religious nonmedical health care (e.g., 42 U.S.C. 1320a-1, 1320c-11, 1395i-5 and 1397j-1(b)).

(These laws will be collectively referred to as “Federal health care conscience and associated anti-discrimination laws” for purposes of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.)

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Congress Receives Vaccine Safety Project Details Since the CDC & FDA Ignore Their Own Data and Proclaim Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism

https://worldmercuryproject.org/news/congress-gets-vaccine-safety-project-details-including-actions-needed-for-sound-science-and-transparency/

Congress Receives Vaccine Safety Project Details Including Actions Needed for Sound Science and Transparency

 

 Approx. 9 Min.

Vaccine Safety Project Trailer

Since the FDA considers vaccines to be “biologics” not drugs, they have the capacity to fast track them without mandating rigorous studies as drugs must go through.

This short informative video shows exactly how vaccines are not rigorously studied with any sort of sincere science.

According to HHS’s own calculations, if they were able to capture ALL adverse events, they state that nearly 6 MILLION Americans would be adversely affected every year by vaccines if all of them were reported to the current Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).

The committee overseeing vaccine safety should be absolutely free of any conflicts of interest, particularly the pharmaceutical industry, yet the opposite is true.

A new investigation in 2009 found that:

  • CDC has a systemic lack of oversight of the ethics program.
  • 97% of committee members’ conflict disclosures had omissions.
  • 58% had at least one unidentified potential conflict of interest.
  • CDC & FDA scientists receive royalties of $150K per year on vaccines they develop.

Looking at the IOM 700 page report on DTap, the conclusion reads,

“The evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between diphtheria toxoid-, tetanus toxoid-, or acellular pertussis-containing vaccine and autism.”

What this means is they claim they couldn’t find any study on the relationship between Dtap and autism.  But, in fact they acknowledge in the first paragraph that there is one study that does show a causal relationship between Dtap and autism, but they reject it because it provides data from passive surveillance (VAERS) that lacked a comparison of an unvaccinated population.

So while the CDC website cites the 2011 Institute of Medicine study that “vaccines do not cause autism,” they seem to be counting on people not reading the 700+ page report. Anyone who does can find that the researchers behind this study ignored existing research showing a correlation between vaccines and autism.

Rather than doing their due diligence (scientific studies) they just proclaim vaccines do not cause autism.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/03/01/vaccines-could-contribute-to-disease-epidemics-due-to-retrovirus-contamination/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/12/04/ingredients-in-kinrix-a-dtap-ipv-vaccine/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/10/04/pharma-using-scare-tactics-over-pertussis-vaccine-failure/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/09/21/aluminum-flawed-assumptions-fueling-autoimmune-disease-and-lyme/

Vaccines have been found to activate latent Lyme/MSIDS infections: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/12/02/scottish-doctor-gives-insight-on-lyme-msids/ (Please read comment section after article for more links)

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/04/24/gardasil-and-bartonella/ Asymptomatic girls after receiving Gardasil activated dormant Bartonella which was confirmed by testing.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/01/28/the-secret-x-files-the-untold-history-of-the-lymerix-vaccine/

 

Category:

Activism, Bartonella, Lyme, vaccines, Viruses

Junk Science: Pertussis Vaccination in Pregnancy Study by Journal of Pediatrics

https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2018/03/13/its-that-bad-in-an-embarrassment-to-harvard-and-yale-journal-of-pediatrics-and-the-american-academy-of-pediatrics-publishes-another-great-example-of-junk-science-pertussis-vaccination-in-pre/

“It’s That Bad”: In an Embarrassment to Harvard and Yale, JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS and the American Academy of Pediatrics Publishes Another Great Example of Junk Science – Pertussis Vaccination in Pregnancy

by James Lyons Weiler

I AM CALLING ON ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES AND FRIENDS AT UNIVERSITIES AND MEDICAL CENTERS IN THE US TO MOVE TO HAVE THEIR UNIVERSITIES DROP THEIR SUBSCRIPTIONS TO THE JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS UNTIL THIS INCREDIBLY FAKE STUDY IS RETRACTED. I AM CALLING ON ALL STATE UNIVERSITIES TO DO THE SAME.

You would think now that they know that the public knows that they cook vaccine safety studies, and how they do it, the people from

Immunization Safety Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut; Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington; Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland, California; Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Northwest, Portland, Oregon; Marshfield Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, Wisconsin; Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California; Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts; and Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado

who conducted the latest study to attempt to convince the public that TdaP vaccination during pregnancy is safe would try to either do better science, or better hide their bad science.

Nope.

Instead, they stuck w/the tried and true formula: use covariates as confounders, exclude bad outcomes, do not measure fetal deaths…

Here’s the garbage study: Infant Hospitalizations and Mortality After Maternal Vaccination:  http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/pediatrics/early/2018/02/16/peds.2017-3310.full.pdf

You won’t believe this.

I’ll start with excluding bad outcomes:

“We also excluded infants of multiple gestation pregnancies…”

NO REASON GIVEN – AND WOMEN W/MULTIPLES WILL SURELY STILL BE VACCINATED (TRANSLATIONAL FAILURE)

“infants born before 34 weeks’ gestation…”

OK. STOP. REALLY. PRE-TERM BIRTHS ARE A VERY SERIOUS CONCERN. WHAT IF TDAP USE IN PREGNANCY CAUSES PRE-TERM BIRTHS??? I’m sure pregnant women would like to know. IT GETS WORSE:

“…and infants with major birth defects because these infants are at a higher risk of hospitalization and death.”

WHA? WHAT?? INFANTS WITH MAJOR BIRTH DEFECTS??? THAT’S THE F*CKING POINT OF THE STUDY!!!! OH, AND THEY WERE JUST GETTING STARTED:

“Furthermore, we excluded all infants who died during their delivery hospitalization because cause of death in these infants is often…” [YOU HAVE THE RECORDS, HOW OFTEN??] – BUT WAIT –

‘…a perinatal complication (such as placental abruption) that would likely be unrelated to maternal vaccination”….

I’M GOING FOR MY PITCHFORK ABOUT NOW. WE KNOW THAT ISSUES WITH THE PLACENTA EXIST DUE TO PROBLEMS WITH THE UNFOLDED PROTEIN RESPONSE AND ER-STRESS, but that’s only part of the issue…

THIS IS NOT SCIENCE. CIRCULAR REASONING RULES. VACCINES ARE SAFE, SO LET’S NOT DO A VACCINATED VS. UNVACCINATED. VACCINES ARE SAFE, SO LET’S IGNORE THE DATA THAT WE HAVE ALREADY COLLECTED TO DETERMINE IF VACCINES ARE SAFE – BECAUSE VACCINES ARE SAFE.

“Additionally, infants who die during the birth hospitalization may be less likely to be enrolled in the VSD and captured in our data.”

WELL, THEN WE HAVE A PROBLEM WITH VACCINE ADVERSE EVENTS REPORTING THEN, DON’T WE???

AND THEN THIS GEM:

We also excluded infants with external causes of death (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision [ICD-10] codes S00-T98 and V00-Y98) and infants with external causes of hospitalizations (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision [ICD-9] codes 800-999, E800-E999) due to injury and poisonings because these are unlikely to result from a maternal vaccination. ICD-10 coding was not available for hospitalization diagnoses in the United States during the time of this study.

WAIT, YOU HAD ICD-10 FOR EXTERNAL CAUSES OF DEATH, BUT YOU LOST THE BOOK FOR ‘HOSPITALIZATION DIAGNOSES’???

LOOK AT THE FIGURE, THEY ALSO EXCLUDED CASES THAT HAD MULTIPLE VACCINES. YOU CAN BET THEY WON’T NOT GIVE MULTIPLE VACCINES TO PREGNANT WOMEN (TRANSLATIONAL FAILURE).

They also excluded >16,000 who had no prenatal care. Why exclude them? Oh, they didn’t take folic acid, and were not exposed to pertussis by health care workers who are silent carriers because they vaccinate against pertussis every 10 years.

THEY EXCLUDED THE UNVACCINATED.

junk

THIS IS HARVARD? THIS IS YALE?? They should ask their faculty with their names on this garbage to request that the ‘study’ be withdrawn.

But, not to worry. The exclusion criteria were approved by…

THE US CDC.

And I never even got to the over-correction (model over-fit) and use of covariates as confounders. What’s the point?

If I were a pregnant woman, and I was offered Tdap or influenza, I’d get up and leave and find another ob/gyn. Or I’d home birth. Yikes.

And I’d leave a copy of this blog article for them.

JUNK SCIENCE KILLS.

No apologies for yelling or profanity. CDC, just stop. You’re hurting people.

JLW, allison park, pa Tuesday, March 13, 2018

 

 

Category:

Activism, vaccines