Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Creatures vs Climate: The Tick. Why They are Wrong

https://tvo.org/article/current-affairs/creatures-vs-climate-the-tick

Creatures vs. climate: The tick

Thanks to warming temperatures, ticks are now establishing populations across Ontario — and they’re bringing Lyme disease with them

Ticks are nature’s hitchhikers. They latch on to migratory birds, deer, mice, and other creatures, feed to their heart’s content, and then drop off to moult.

One study suggests that between 50 million and 175 million ticks may be dropped by migratory birds each year across Canada. Wherever they land becomes their new temporary home. Depending on the tick’s age and species, it may lay hundreds or thousands of eggs.

Whether it’s able to lay eggs — and whether they’re able to grow to maturity — is determined in part by what the climate is like where it touches down. In colder weather, ticks tend to grow more slowly, says Kateryn Rochon, an assistant professor of entomology at the University of Manitoba.

“The life cycle is lengthy when you get north because of temperatures, but as that changes and the conditions get better, the ticks can grow more quickly,” says Rochon. “It’s a tough world out there. It’s very likely not to make it to reproduction. But if the conditions are getting better and better, there’s better likelihood of survival, better likelihood of finding a mate, and better chance of making it to reproduction.”

It’s not unusual for ticks to land in areas in the north. What is new is that populations of them are now able to survive and, in many cases, thrive in places they couldn’t before. Species such as the black-legged tick and the American dog tick — both increasingly common in Ontario — carry diseases that can be passed on to humans. The black-legged tick (also called the deer tick), for example, is a carrier of Lyme disease, which, if not detected quickly, can cause fever, headaches, and nerve and tissue damage.

“The thing is, what makes it that all of a sudden ticks have been able to establish?” says Rochon.

Warm weather, moisture, and the availability of food create ideal conditions for the arachnid. Increasingly high temperatures have been linked to increased survival rates for the black-legged and other species of tick.

Although not all ticks flourish at the same temperature, warmer is generally better because it promotes faster growth, says Nicholas Ogden, senior research scientist with the Public Health Agency of Canada.

A tick larva attaches to a host and feeds. After absorbing sufficient energy, it drops off into leaf litter and ages into a nymph. The nymph then finds a host, where it will feed before falling off and developing into an adult.

“Development from egg to larva, engorged larva to nymph, engorged nymph to adult, adult to egg-laying adult are all processes the length of which depends on the ambient temperature,” says Ogden.

The warmer it is, the faster the ticks can move through these stages. A more compressed life cycle means that more of them will survive and establish populations.

And with those populations comes Lyme disease. In 2009, there were just 144 documented cases in Ontario; in 2017, there were 2,025.

Given the fact that temperatures are expected to rise still further, researchers predict that there could be a moderate risk of Lyme disease in all parts of Ontario by 2050.

“What happens first of all is that the ticks spread, and people get tick bites, which isn’t a great problem until the bugs that cause Lyme disease start to become established and transmission cycles start to become established,” says Ogden. “What we have seen is the emergence of not just the tick with climate change, but Lyme disease. We’re seeing exponentially increasing number of cases.”

________________

**Comment**

Rochon and Ogden have obviously missed their own countryman’s work:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/08/13/study-shows-lyme-not-propelled-by-climate-change/

John Scott, an independent tick researcher in Canada, who also happens to be infected himself, insists that while migratory birds are indeed carrying ticks far and wide, tick survival actually declines in warmer winters as they need the snow cover for protection.

Another issue Rochon and Ogden fail to mention is “photo-period.”

Evidently, ticks have sensory organs that monitor the external environment which includes light. Light wavelength as well as intensity will make the difference from if and when a nymph will molt and if and when an engorged female will lay eggs.  Scott’s in-house tick studies have shown that black-legged ticks require 14 hours of daylight to molt. If ticks can’t molt, they can’t move on to their next life-cycle. Photoperiod is innate and can not be altered by the climate. He states:

“The hypothesis that I. scapularis ticks will expand further north in the Prairie Provinces because of climate change is not only unscientific, but deceiving.”

So light, not climate, is a determining factor in tick survival as ticks will seek out leaf litter and/or snow when weather is harsh for them.

But there’s more.

According to Scott, the issue of climate change is an elaborate plot to keep authorities from digging into the real issues:

“The climate change range expansion model is what the authorities have been using to rationalize how they have done nothing for more than thirty years. It’s a huge cover-up scheme that goes back to the 1980’s. The grandiose scheme was a nefarious plot to let doctors off the hook from having to deal with this debilitating disease. I caught onto it very quickly. Most people have been victims of it ever since.”

“This climate change ‘theory’ is all part of a well-planned scheme. Even the ticks are smarter than the people who’ve concocted this thing,” he says.

Divert our attention from what? I ask.

“From what is not happening medically. In simple terms, the feds have diverted our attention by saying ‘let’s worry about ticks and climate change, put all our funding there and we will solve the problem of Lyme disease’.”  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/08/14/canadian-tick-expert-climate-change-is-not-behind-lyme-disease/

Category:

Activism, Uncategorized

Coconut Oil Poisonous?

https://wellnessjourneys.org/2018/08/29/is-coconut-oil-a-poison-by-dr-bruce-fife-coconut-research-center/

Coconut_Clipart_Cartoon-Custom

By Dr. Bruce Fife

Coconut oil is poisonous, so claims Karin Michels, PhD, a part-time professor at Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health.

Her comments given in a talk at the University of Freiburg, Germany, sparked a media frenzy with headlines such as, “Coconut Oil is Pure Poison Harvard Professor Claims” appearing in newspapers and on the internet.

What makes Dr. Michels an authority on coconut oil? She is not a physician, or a nutritionist, or even a biologist. Her PhD is in biostatistics. Her specialty is statistics—manipulating numbers—not the study of diet or fats and oils. From her profile on the Harvard website, it appears she has never published any studies on saturated fat, let alone on coconut oil. Her comments were not based on any of her own published research, but were simply her opinion based on old, outdated theories about saturated fats.

Michels calls coconut oil “pure poison,” saying it was “one of the worst foods you can eat” because it is full of saturated fat, and “saturated fatty acids can clog your arteries.” She adds that “there is no study that proves significant health benefits of coconut oil.”

Dr. Michels makes three general claims:

  1. saturated fats cause heart disease
  2. coconut oil is a poison and one of the worst foods we could eat
  3. there are no studies that show any health benefits to coconut oil.

Let’s look at what the science actually says about each of these statements.

Saturated Fats Cause Heart Disease

There has never been a study published that has been able to show that saturated fats or coconut oil cause heart disease. The diet-heart disease hypothesis that has been popular for the past 6 decades basically states that heart disease is caused by high cholesterol. Many studies have shown that some saturated fats can raise blood cholesterol, and therefore it has be assumed that eating too much saturated fat can promote or even cause heart disease. Researchers have been trying to prove this hypothesis for over a half a century without success. In fact, many studies have seriously challenged this hypothesis and serious researchers have now moved on to studying new, more likely, causes for heart disease.

Cholesterol is no longer considered the evil villain as it was once portrayed. There are many types of cholesterol, some good and some potentially harmful. Saturated fats, and in particular coconut oil, have been shown to raise HDL, the good cholesterol, that has been shown to protect against heart disease. The ratio of total cholesterol to HDL cholesterol is considered one of the most accurate and reliable indicators of heart disease risk. Coconut oil raises HDL, which lowers the cholesterol ratio, thus lowering the risk of heart disease.1

It is apparent that Dr. Michels has not kept up with the current science on coconut oil or fats and oils in general. Earlier this year researchers at the University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine published a study on the relationship between coconut oil and heart disease risk. The researchers compared the effects of coconut oil with butter and olive oil. Butter was chosen to represent a commonly used highly saturated animal fat and extra virgin olive oil was chosen as it is generally regarded as one of, if not the healthiest of fats. The study involved 96 participants who were assigned to consume 50 mg (about 3 tablespoons) of one of each of the three oils daily for 4 weeks as a part of their ordinary diet. The researchers found that coconut oil dramatically raises the protective HDL cholesterol without affecting the LDL or so-called bad cholesterol. Coconut oil lowered the cholesterol ratio, and the risk of heart disease, more than either of the other two fats, indicating that it is even more heart-friendly than extra virgin olive oil.2

In recent years numerous studies have exonerated saturated fat as a cause of heart disease and put to rest the outdated diet-heart disease hypothesis. Last year the Lancet, one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world, published a study involving a team of 37 researchers from 18 countries. They gathered data on 135,000 subjects to evaluate heart disease risk in relation to fat intake. They discovered that fat consumption protected against heart disease and increased lifespan. Those people who cut back on fats, including saturated fat, had far shorter lives than those who ate coconut oil, butter, cheese, and meats. Consuming high levels of all fats, cut early death rates by up to 23 percent. The researchers stated that they found no correlation between saturated fat consumption and cardiovascular disease and that current dietary restrictions on saturated fat should be revised.3

This isn’t the only study in recent years that has called for a revision on the recommendation to restrict saturated fats. A study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition a year earlier investigated whether dietary saturated fat was associated with ischemic heart disease. The study involved 35,597 participants. The researchers also concluded that high saturated fat intake was not associated with increased risk of ischemic heart disease.4

In 2010 a groundbreaking study was published clearly showing that saturated fats do not cause heart disease. The study published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition analyzed all the previous studies with data for dietary saturated fat intakes and the risk of cardiovascular disease. This meta-analysis combined the data from 21 previously published studies, involving over 347,000 subjects. The study showed that there was no connection between saturated fat consumption and heart disease. Those people who ate the greatest amount of saturated fat where no more likely to suffer a heart attack or stroke than those who ate the least. No matter how much saturated fat one ate, the incidence of heart disease was not affected. This was the most complete review of the medical research on saturated fat ever done up to this time.5

Four years later, a different group of researchers from Cambridge University published another meta-analysis. This time the researchers combined the data from 72 previously published studies involving more than 600,000 participants from 18 countries. The researchers basically combined all the highest quality studies on fats and diet that had been done for the past several decades and analyzed them together. The results confirmed the previous meta-analysis—there is no connection between saturated fat intake and heart disease.6

The studies are clear, neither saturated fat nor coconut oil cause or even promote heart disease. Because they raise good HDL cholesterol and lower the cholesterol ratio, if anything, they help to protect against it.

Coconut Oil Is a Poison and One of the Worst Foods We Could Eat

Dr. Michels calls coconut oil a “pure poison.” She claims it is not just a poison, but a “pure” poison; the connotation is, that it is extremely dangerous at even the smallest dosage. What is a poison? According to the English Oxford Living Dictionary, poison is defined as, “A substance that is capable of causing the illness or death of a living organism when introduced or absorbed.” Does coconut oil fit this definition? Not hardly.

Coconut oil has been a major part of the diet of millions of people for thousands of years. In all that time it has never been known to cause any illness or kill anyone. On the contrary, there are many plants that are poisonous such as hemlock, belladonna (deadly nightshade), and death cap mushrooms. Consuming any of them, even in small amounts, will bring about sudden illness and quick death. Coconut oil, on the other hand, can be consumed daily in relatively large quantities without any ill effect. I know some people who consume as much as 12 tablespoons (180 ml) a day and are in excellent health.

According the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) coconut oil is perfectly harmless. It is included among the FDA’s exclusive GRAS (Generally Regarded as Safe) list of food substances. To be included on this list requires rigorous testing to confirm that the item is safe. Coconut oil is given a GRAS classification of “1,” which is the highest or safest category within the GRAS list. According to the FDA this means that all available studies and historical data have shown that there is “no evidence” that shows or even “suggests” that coconut oil is harmful in any way.7

It is ironic that Dr. Michels calls coconut oil a poison, because it has proven to be not only harmless, but highly effective in saving the lives of people who have ingested actual poisons. The medical literature has described numerous instances in which coconut oil has been used in hospital settings as an antidote to otherwise fatal poisonings. For instance, the use of coconut oil has become a routine practice in some hospitals in the treatment of aluminum phosphide poisoning.8 Aluminum phosphide is a common poison used for rodent control. There is no other known antidote and poisonings are almost always fatal unless treated with coconut oil.

Using coconut oil to nullify the effects of poisons is not that unusual. Researchers have known for many years about the detoxifying properties of coconut oil. Numerous animal studies have shown that coconut oil blocks the deleterious effects of a number of different chemical toxins. Coconut oil has been shown to alleviate the effects of at least 36 known toxins ranging from industrial solvents to aflatoxin.9

Calling coconut oil a pure poison only illustrates Dr. Michels’ lack of knowledge about coconut oil, which makes anything she says about it totally unreliable.

There Are No Studies That Show Any Health Benefits to Coconut Oil

One of the most common arguments given in an attempt to discredit coconut oil is to claim that there is no evidence proving coconut oil has any health benefits. When a doctor or professor makes this statement, he or she is inferring that there are no studies to support the use of coconut oil as a healthy fat. They are counting on the listener to take their word on this simply because they are considered an expert. In reality, what they are doing is exposing their own ignorance and lack of knowledge on the subject.

When someone makes this type of statement it means they have not bothered to make even the slightest effort to find the facts. If they had, they would have found an abundance of information and research on coconut oil describing its many health benefits. Currently, there are over 10,000 studies on coconut oil listed in the medical literature. Most of these studies can be easily accessed on the internet.

If you go to my website,www.coconutresearchcenter.org and look under the heading “Medical Research,” you will find a listing of hundreds of studies. Here you will find references to an abundance of published studies showing the therapeutic or beneficial effects of coconut oil on cardiovascular health, immune function, cancer, diabetes, liver and kidney health, digestive function, weight management, and much more. To say that there is no evidence for the health benefits of coconut oil is totally wrong and indicates that the speaker is either woefully ignorant, too lazy to do any research, or lying.

If you want to know the truth about saturated fats and coconut oil you should not listen to professors who have no idea what they are talking about, instead listen to researchers who have actually researched the topic. One of the reasons why Dr. Michels’ comments received such notoriety is because of her association with Harvard. Being a Harvard professor gives a person some air of authority. However, there are other Harvard professors who are far more qualified than Dr. Michels on this subject, who have studied and published works on the health effects of coconut oil. One group of Harvard researchers that includes George L. Blackburn, MD, PhD, Edward Mascioli, MD, and Vigan K. Babyan, PhD state,

“Coconut oil has an important medical role to play in nutrition, metabolism, and health care. Indeed, properly formulated and utilized, coconut oil may be the preferred vegetable oil in our diet and the special hospital foods used promoting patient recovery.”

These researchers made this statement after having spent years studying the health effects of coconut oil and other fats. Their comments hold far more authority than a biostatistician who apparently has never even bothered to do even an internet search on the subject.

References

  1. Assuncao, ML, et al. Effects of dietary coconut oil on the biochemical and anthropometric profiles of women presenting abdominal obesity. Lipids 2009;44:593-601.
  2. Khaw, KT, et al. Randomised trial of coconut oil, olive oil or butter on blood lipids and other cardiovascular risk factors in healthy men and women. BMJ Open 2018;8:e020167.
  3. Dehghan, M, et al. Associations of fats and carbohydrate intake with cardiovascular disease and mortality in 18 countries from five continents (PURE): a prospective cohort study. Lancet 2017;390:2050-2062.
  4. Praagman, J, et al. The association between dietary saturated fatty acids and ischemic heart disease depends on the type and source of fatty acid in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Netherlands cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 2016;103:356-365.
  5. Siri-Tarino, PW, et al. Meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies evaluating the association of saturated fat with cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr 2010;91:535-546.
  6. Chowdhury, R, et al. Association of dietary, circulating, and supplement fatty acids with coronary risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2014;160:398-406.
  7. https://www.fda.gov/Food/IngredientsPackagingLabeling/GRAS/SCOGS/default.htm.
  8. Singh Baiwa, SJ, et al. Management of celphos poisoning with a novel intervention: a ray of hope in the darkest of clouds. Anesth Essays Res 2010;4:20-24.
  9. Fife, B. Ketone Therapy: The Ketogenic Cleanse and Anti-Aging Diet. Piccadilly Books, Ltd.: Colorado Springs, CO; 2017.

_________________

Information on Dr. Fife here:  http://www.faim.org/dr-bruce-fife

Dr. Bruce Fife is a certified nutritionist and naturopathic physician. He is the author of more than 20 books including The Coconut Oil Miracle, The New Arthritis Cure, and Stop Alzheimer’s Now!: How to Prevent and Reverse Dementia, Parkinson’s, ALS, Multiple Sclerosis, and Other Neurodegenerative Disorders. He serves as the director of the Coconut Research Center in Colorado.

News story on Michels here:  https://www.businessinsider.com/harvard-speaker-busts-coconut-oil-health-myth-calling-it-pure-poison-2018-8

 

 

 

Category:

Activism, Detoxing, diet and nutrition, research

Is Ozone 10-Pass Safe? Free Webinar

WEDNESDAY, Oct 10    8:00 PM Eastern Time, 7:00 pm in Wisconsin

Register here:  https://sopmed.org/webinar-registration/

The Webinar

Ozone therapy is taking the world by storm, but is 10x the average dose actually safe?  A new but controversial method used by a small number of doctors in Europe and now here in the USA has the ozone world doing battle.

Hear straight from Dr. Rowen why he believes that 10 Pass is not only safe, but also more effective.

Dr. Robert Rowen is an innovator who isn’t afraid to lead the charge on the medical frontier.  He has used ozone therapy for many years in his own clinic, is a recognized ozone therapy trainer and has travelled the world to educate doctors on the use of ozone therapy.

Tom Lowe, President, SOPMed, is a gifted inventor and entrepreneur who has developed a passion for alternative medicine.  He intends that the Society of Progressive Medical Education (SOPMed) be a platform for fighting human suffering and promoting human flourishing. 

___________

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/12/04/ozone-ten-pass-lyme-msids-treatment-in-ca/

For testimonials of using ozone 10-pass:  https://www.youtube.com/user/RobertRowenMD

 Approx. 7 Min.

Husband and wife, both doctors, tell of their ozone experience.

Their daughter also tells of her experience.

Category:

Activism, Treatment

Lyme & Reason: Interviews with Advocates & Researchers

 Approx. 20 Min

Lyme & Reason: Battles & Breakthroughs Against Lyme Disease

Published on Sep 5, 2018

It’s a battle that has been raging for decades – the battle against Lyme Disease. Over the years, progress has been made against this dreaded tick-borne illness. But with breakthroughs come even more barriers. Watch this early peek at a new Fox 5 News special on the fight that could be signaling a new chapter in the ongoing bout against Lyme.
  • Interview with President and CEO of Valneva, Thomas Lingelbach on the Lyme Vaccine
  • Interview with Dr. Sung Lee on Lyme testing and his lawsuit against the CDC
  • Interview with Olivia Goodreau of LivLyme – an organization that raises money for research

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Lyme Vaccine, research, Testing, vaccines

LDA & Columbia – 19th Annual CME Conference

Lyme & Tick-Borne Diseases: Turning the Corner Through Research

The Lyme Disease Association & Columbia University’s 19th annual CME scientific conference, will be held October 27 & 28, 2018, Marriott Providence Downtown Hotel, Providence, RI.

Help ensure the success of this event. Please print the flyer CONFERENCE PRINTABLE FLYER and distribute to places in your community such as:

Doctor’s office, local hospital, Urgent Care Centers, School Nurse, Support group meetings, Library, etc. (Note: flyer requires legal sized paper, please adjust your printer accordingly).

The conference is designed for physicians and researchers, but the public is invited, and all registrants can attend the reception and network with conference faculty. The conference will feature 22 faculty consisting of clinicians and researchers from across the US and one from Czechia.

Topics of the conference:

  • Fallon, Columbia, Phase 1 of a post-mortem study on Borrelia & the brain
  • Lewis, Northeastern, New treatments for Borrelia persisters
  • Molins, CDC, Biomarkers of Lyme; Naviaux, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, Metabolomic features of chronic illness
  • Aucott, Johns Hopkins, Lyme research updates
  • Robinson, Stanford, B cell responses in Lyme; Skare, Texas A&M, Lyme pathogenesis
  • Oaklander, Harvard, small fiber peripheral neuropathy; Pal, University of Maryland, Borrelia immune evasion and persistence
  • Platts-Mills, UVA School of Medicine, alpha-gal meat allergy
  • Tokarz, Columbia, serologic diagnosis of TBD; Occi
  • Rutgers, invasive longhorn tick in the US; Gulia-Nuss, University of Nevada, genetic modifications of ticks
  • Buchthal, MIT, genetically modified mice
  • Ben Mamoun, Yale, Babesia treatments
  • Patel & Reece, Brown, Powassan
  • Spector, Duke, cancer research & the diagnosis and treatment of TBD
  • Delaney, Columbia, Borrelia miyamotoi
  • Szantyr, Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, prevention strategies and vaccine development
  • Flegr, National Institute of Mental Health, Czechia, Bartonella, toxoplasmosis & psychiatric effects
  • Maloney, Partnership for Tick-Borne Diseases Education, concurrent TBD case report & literature review.

Category:

Activism, Lyme