FREE Book on LYME

https://www.lymedisease.org/misdiagnosis-lyme-disease/
By Lorraine Johnson, JD, MBA

On November 3, I was honored to give a presentation to the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine (SIDM). This nonprofit organization seeks to bring together researchers and patients to reduce diagnostic delays and avoid missed diagnosis.
LymeDisease.org is a patient partner with SIDM. We value the opportunity to work with this group to amplify patient concerns about how misdiagnosis and delays in diagnosis harm patients. My speech—which draws on insights from the MyLymeData patient registry—highlights some of the factors that contribute to delayed diagnosis in Lyme disease.
Misdiagnosis is unfortunately quite common in Lyme disease. Most patients with late or chronic Lyme disease were either misdiagnosed or waited years for their diagnosis—with devastating consequences.
We know that early diagnosis in Lyme disease can spell the difference between patients who get well quickly and are able to get on with their lives, and those who remain ill or whose course of treatment is much more difficult.
SIDM is funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute and by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, both of which were created by and are funded by the U.S. Congress.
A large part of SIDM’s focus is on identifying and preventing diagnostic errors, using a diagram first developed by the Institute of Medicine (now the National Academy of Medicine) in its highly acclaimed report “Improving Diagnosis in Care.”
This report identifies different points along the path to diagnosis where things can go wrong and diagnosis can be delayed or missed.
We have modified the graphic from the report that illustrate points of diagnostic error to reflect the diagnostic issues we encounter in Lyme disease.
Click here to learn more about the Society to Improve Diagnosis in Medicine.
____________________
**Comment**
Lots of great info here.
This presentation was whittled down to just Lyme or Borrelia; however, most of us out here have a plethora of infections, which research hasn’t touched with a ten-foot pole. In fact, it’s only been recently even mentioned: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/10/30/study-shows-lyme-msids-patients-infected-with-many-pathogens-and-explains-why-we-are-so-sick/
For the first time, Garg et al. show a 85% probability for multiple infections including not only tick-borne pathogens but also opportunistic microbes such as EBV and other viruses. 83% of all commercial tests focus only on Lyme (borrelia), despite the fact we are infected with more than one microbe. The review also states it takes 11 different visits to 11 different doctors, utilizing 11 different tests to be properly diagnosed. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20181101/Tick-borne-disease-is-multiple-microbial-in-nature.aspx? Presence of long-term IgM and IgG antibodies have been reported in LD patients that were tested by the CDC two-tier system. In 2001, Kalish and colleagues reported anti-Borrelia IgM or IgG persistence in patients that suffered from LD 10–20 years ago63. Similarly, Hilton and co-workers recorded persistent anti-Borrelia IgM response in 97% of late LD patients that were considered cured following an antibiotic treatment64.
The study not only broaches the polymicrobial issue, but the persistence issue of borrelia, which also hasn’t been dealt with properly.
Since testing misses half of all Lyme cases, and they aren’t even considering other pathogens, and the persistence factor, we are in a horrible mess.
They state that only 10-20% of patients are “chronically/persistently” infected. I believe these percentages to be far too low. This group is all I deal with. This issue also desperately needs to be studied.
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/medical-cannabis-superior-opioids-chronic-pain-study-finds?
Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
NOV 16, 2018 —
Today’s letter to Dr. Paul Mead of the CDC with Cc: to the TBD Working Group.
—— Original Message ———-
From: Carl Tuttle <runagain@comcast.net>
To: pfm0@cdc.gov, tickbornedisease@hhs.gov
Date: November 16, 2018 at 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: Direct Diagnostic Tests for Lyme Disease Published: 11 October 2018
Nov 16, 2018
Division of Vector-Borne Diseases
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
3156 Rampart Rd
Fort Collins, Colorado CO 80521
Attn: Paul Mead, MD, MPH Acting Branch Chief
pfm0@cdc.gov
Dear Dr. Mead,
You recently coauthored the following paper in Clinical Infectious Diseases:
Direct Diagnostic Tests for Lyme Disease
Clinical Infectious Diseases, ciy614, https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciy614
Published: 11 October 2018
Excerpt:
“… serologic tests cannot distinguish active infection, past infection, or reinfection. Reliable direct-detection methods for active B. burgdorferi infection have been lacking in the past but are needed and appear achievable.”
You are aware that Dr. Neil Spector’s serologic tests were repeatedly negative missing his Lyme disease which led to the destruction of his heart requiring a transplant.[i] And I’m sure you have seen the lawsuit in the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania regarding a misdiagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis due to four negative serology results for Lyme disease. [ii]
These are just two examples of how faulty/misleading antibody tests can alter a person’s life; proof that we are dealing with a very serious life-altering/life-threatening infection here when left untreated.
I want to point out that Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS) and untreated Lyme disease of months, years or decades are two entirely separate disease states with the latter being entirely ignored for over three decades. (Wormser’s racketeering scheme to downplay the severity of Lyme disease)
Could you please answer the following six questions?
Dr. Mead, I would like to call attention to your perspective on plague published last year in the New England Journal of Medicine as one of your comments struck a chord with me:
Plague in Madagascar — A Tragic Opportunity for Improving Public Health
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMp1713881
Paul S. Mead, M.D., M.P.H.
Excerpt:
“Recent reports suggest that the outbreak is subsiding. This is encouraging news, but the epidemic will leave in its wake several important questions — first and foremost: How big was it really? Without diminishing the suffering of individual patients and their loved ones, it’s important to recognize that plague’s gruesome reputation can cloud short-term understanding of an outbreak.4” [End of excerpt]
How ironic is that statement!
“Without diminishing the suffering of individual patients and their loved ones”
A response to these six questions is requested and please hit “Reply All” as I have carbon copied our legislators here in New Hampshire who have recognized Lyme disease as an “insidious disease.”
Sincerely,
-Carl Tuttle
Lyme endemic Hudson, NH
References:
[i] Neil Spector “Gone in a Heartbeat”
https://www.bayarealyme.org/blog/story/neil-spector/
[ii] [J-13-2018] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Supreme/out/Majority%20Opinion%20%20ReversedVacatedRemanded%20%2010373940443079867.pdf?cb=1
Approx. 15 min.
Published on Nov 24, 2018