IS PROLONGED TREATMENT FOR LYME DISEASE THE NEW NORM?
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines recommend a 3- to 4-week course of antibiotics for the treatment of Lyme disease. But a new study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) indicates that nearly 2 out of every 3 patients with Lyme disease are treated longer than 4 weeks.
- 20.3% were treated for 5 to 8 weeks, while
- 35.6% were treated for more than 8 weeks.
The CDC authors were surprised at the number of Lyme disease (LD) cases being treated with prolonged therapy.
Prolonged therapy for Lyme disease is not new. “Many respondents reporting receiving prolonged therapy is concordant with other reports of providers’ non-adherence to or unfamiliarity with LD treatment guidelines,” writes Hook.
The CDC authors were not able to address the rationale for extended treatment without having access to the attending physician or patient charts. Instead, they cited the familiar dogma regarding Lyme disease treatment.
- “There is no scientiﬁc evidence of clinical beneﬁt from antibiotic treatment longer than current guidelines recommend.”
- “In patients with persistent symptoms and a history of LD, several controlled trials showed no beneﬁt in prolonged antibiotic therapy.”
The authors postulate that prolonged therapy for Lyme disease could be stopped with education.
“Our results indicate that providers in LD endemic areas may beneﬁt from education regarding the duration of therapy needed, especially in light of the risk of antibiotic-related complications and development of resistance.”
Editor’s note: I find that most doctors are well aware of the IDSA and CDC opposition to more than a 4-week course of antibiotics. The evidence behind the IDSA and CDC recommendations is flawed. I am an author of the International Lyme and Associated Diseases Society (ILADS) guidelines, which recommend prolonged therapy for Lyme disease if needed.
- Hook SA, Nelson CA, Mead PS. U.S. public’s experience with ticks and tick-borne diseases: Results from national HealthStyles surveys. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2015 Jun;6(4):483-8.
All I can say is “THANK GOD FOR ILADS!”
To understand the shady biased back story on why we are in the straits we are in: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2019/02/22/why-mainstream-lyme-msids-research-remains-in-the-dark-ages/
Also worth noting are the severe conflicts of interest within the CDC, the very people making treatment guidelines:
ConflictReport Go to part III
I just posted this excellent article on the backstory of the Lymerix vaccine which also uncovers shady dealings, dishonesty, and conflicts of interest: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/02/10/the-bitter-feud-over-lymerix/