Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Lyme & Reason Up For Three Emmys

1st nomination for entire 22 minute special report.  2nd nomination for “Gone in a Heartbeat,” Dr. Spector’s story of how undiagnosed Lyme necessitated a heart transplant.  3rd nomination in the category of “Interactivity,” due to how Fox5NY impacted the entire country by these Lyme broadcasts.

Here they are again

Lyme & Reason:  The Cause & Consequence of Lyme Disease.  June 30,2016

Brian A. Fallon, MD, Steven Phillips, MD, Paul Mead, MD, singer and songwriter Dana Parish, Lyme patient and advocate Susan Green, oncologist Neil Spector, MD, actress and TV personality Marla Maples, author, artist and designer Ally Hilfiger, Patricia De La Mora, Associate Professor, Lawrence Putter, MD, and 12-year-old Julia Bruzzese all speak on MSIDS.

Lyme & Reason 2.0:  The Voices of Change.  Nov 18, 2016

Focuses on the use of social media as a tool to inform and open the door to change on the Lyme disease front, and how patients, advocates, physicians and others are moving the conversation forward. Plus, host Teresa Priolo sits down with TV personality and Lyme disease patient and advocate Yolanda Hadid about her ongoing battle with Lyme.

Lyme & Reason Interview with Lorraine Johnson

LymeDisease.org  CEO Lorraine Johnson’s extended “Lyme & Reason” interview
where she discusses the power of social media and technology to help change the national conversation about Lyme disease.

Only parts of her interview were included in Lyme & Reason 2.0. However, Fox5NY has generously made the uncut interview available to the public as well.

Published on Jul 1, 2016

“LYME AND REASON: THE CAUSE AND CONSEQUENCE OF LYME DISEASE” presents an in-depth look at the cause and effect of Lyme disease, including the controversy over testing, the issues of misdiagnosis, and the personal struggles of medical professionals and patients contending with this life-changing illness.

-Brian A. Fallon, MD, MPH, Director of the Center for Neuroinflammatory of the Lyme and Tick-Borne Diseases Research Center at Columbia University talks about the cause of Lyme disease and what you should do if you’re bitten by a tick!

-Yale-trained Lyme disease expert Steven Phillips, MD, addresses the controversy surrounding Lyme disease, while Paul Mead, MD, Chief of Epidemiology and Surveillance Activity of The Bacterial Diseases Branch of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, offers the perspective from the country’s lead public health agency.

-Singer and songwriter Dana Parish describes how Lyme disease temporarily derailed her music career during the prime of her life, and how she is now raising awareness about this debilitating illness!

-Lyme patient and advocate Susan Green of the non-profit The National Capital Lyme and Tick-Borne Disease Association (NatCapLyme) talks about the burden placed on families in terms of costs for the treatment of Lyme disease!

-Renowned oncologist Neil Spector, MD, shares his own personal story of his transition from doctor to patient, and how Lyme disease led to an emergency heart transplant!

-Actress and TV personality Marla Maples talks about her own diagnosis of Lyme disease, and how she is encouraging other celebrities to share their stories to put the spotlight on Lyme!

-Author, artist and designer Ally Hilfiger, the daughter of fashion icon Tommy Hilfiger, reflects on how Lyme disease stole her childhood, and her mind after being committed to a psychiatric hospital!

-Patricia De La Mora, Associate Professor of Clinical Pediatrics, Weill Cornell Medical College talks about prevention and how to keep your children safe, while Lawrence Putter, MD – Medical Director Lenox Hill Veterinarians discuss pet safety when it comes to ticks!

-12-year-old Julia Bruzzese shares her heartbreaking story of how Lyme disease has left her unable to walk, and how a blessing from Pope Francis on his visit to NYC last year has given her and her family hope for recovery!

MiraLAX & Behavioral Issues in Children

http://abc7chicago.com/video/embed/?pid=1776754“>http://abc7chicago.com/video/embed/?pid=1776754

ABC 7 Eyewitness News Video News report

http://abc7chicago.com/news/update-more-families-speak-out-over-miralax-side-effects-for-kids/1777380/

By Wendy Saltzman

Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:38AM
An Action News Investigation making national headlines has revealed parents’ concerns that a popular over the counter medication is sickening kids.

Following our report, we heard from families across the country who are also voicing claims that their children have developed neuro-psychiatric problems and other troubling side effects after taking MiraLAX.

Lots of parents have reached out to us asking what to do, desperate for answers, because some say after their children were prescribed MiraLAX off label, the behavioral issues started – from depression to anger, anxiety and mood swings.

Now, we have some answers from the experts, including new details on the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia study, and resources where parents can turn.

“I didn’t feel like a normal kid,” Nicole Oerkfitz from North Wales, Pa. told Action News.

Oerkfitz was placed on MiraLAX when she was just 3-1/2 years old.

“I would be very aggressive towards my sister; I would want to kill my sister, and I was 4,” Oerkfitz said.

Her mother Jeanie Ward said she was horrified to see her once care-free daughter change drastically after she says she took MiraLAX for just ten days.

“Near psychiatric events with paranoia, mood swings, aggression, rage, the OCD repetitive chewing,” Ward said.

It was similar to the stories other families shared with Action News, after they say doctors prescribed MiraLAX off label to treat their children’s constipation.

“After six days on MiraLAX, we noticed overnight he acted out of character,” parent Sarah Locatelli said.

As Action News reported, MiraLAX is made up of Polyethylene Glycol or PEG 3350. The label says for use in “adults and children 17 years of age and older” and for “no more than 7 days.”

But our investigation found many doctors prescribe MiraLAX for young kids, and in some cases for long term use.

Now, doctors at CHOP are speaking out to Action News for the first time, defending the safety of MiraLAX.

“Since MiraLAX came out, we found it so effective, currently it is the go to medication to start with,” CHOP pediatric gastroenterologist Dr. Ritu Verma said.

Dr. Verma admits some of her own patients have claimed their children experienced concerning side effects from the medication, but she says there is no evidence as of yet that it causes any harm.

“We do not at this time have any information at all to say that this is an unsafe medication,” Verma said.

The FDA previously told Action News there was “insufficient data to demonstrate a link between PEG 3350 and serious neuropsychiatric issues in children”citing only 167 adverse events reported to the FDA.

But we dug through a 3,900 page document of 14,688 adverse event reports through 2016 and found more than five times as many. The FDA’s own records actually document 950 children who have reported adverse events to the FDA after taking MiraLAX, ranging from mouth ulcers, to suicidal thoughts, mood swings, aggression and seizures.

The Administration confirmed these numbers, but says there are several limitations including that adverse event reports don’t necessarily prove a relationship between the product and the event. And said, “the FDA has considered these reports…and at this time does not believe additional warnings or other changes are warranted.”

“If a parent is extremely concerned about the side effects of MiraLAX or any other medication, they should stop the medicine,” Verma said.

Osteopathic pediatrician, Dr. Kristen Berry, says she’s anxious to see the results of CHOP’s study.

“We should not be using something off label that’s not approved in children. I definitely have a great concern over that,” Berry said.

CHOP wouldn’t talk about the $325,000 study they are conducting for the FDA, which was commissioned back in 2014.

But to our surprise, apparently it hasn’t started yet.

After our report, they published a statement online, which says, “Researchers…have not begun enrolling children, but once enrollment begins, an announcement will be made.”

“To me, there is definitely what I would call a red flag,” civil attorney Derek Braslow told Action News.

Braslow says he is now reviewing more than 500 families’ claims and is considering filing a lawsuit against Bayer, the maker of MiraLAX.

“The manufacturer has a duty to give an adequate and fair warning of what the benefits of the drug are, and what the risks of the drug are and if they are not doing that then they are liable,” Braslow said.

But for now, for the families we spoke with, questions still remain.

“The rage lasted about 13 years, like it just stopped,” Oerkfitz said.

Oerkfitz, now 19, says the side effects – anger, paranoia, and anxiety – have just recently subsided. And while her memories are filled with pain, she hopes other families will think twice before giving their children MiraLAX.

“I don’t feel like I got to live a normal childhood,” Oerkfitz said.

Bayer previously told Action News there have been many clinical studies conducted with PEG 3350 in pediatric populations which have demonstrated safety for short and long term use in children.

Link to CHOP study: http://heuckeroth.research.chop.edu/peg-3350-study

FDA Statement:

Response to your question on adverse events reported to the FDA:
It is important to note that over-the-counter products containing PEG 3350 are not labeled for use in pediatric patients (other than to direct parents to consult a doctor) or for extended periods of time. However, the agency has undertaken comprehensive reviews of adverse event reports and medical literature. These reviews have indicated that the approved labeling for PEG 3350 products accurately conveys their risks, and additional warnings regarding neuropsychiatric issues in children are not warranted at this time. However, we understand that many parents and physicians rely on these products to treat serious constipation. Because the FDA takes the health and welfare of pediatric populations very seriously, the agency is funding research at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) to better determine the benefits and risks associated with the use of these products in children. The study is ongoing.

With respect to adverse events, the FDA confirms that, as found in the provided FOIA report which dates up to September 16, 2016, there are nearly 1,100 reports of adverse events in FAERS referencing MiraLAX and pediatric patients. However, it is important to understand that adverse event reports (FAERS data) do have limitations. First, there is no certainty that the reported event was actually due to the product. For a safety report, the FDA does not require that a causal relationship between a product and event be proven, and reports do not always contain enough detail to fully evaluate an event. Reports are often duplicates or updates of previously reported events, and therefore a raw count of reports may not accurately convey the number of unique events that have actually been reported to FDA. Further, the FDA does not receive all adverse event reports that occur with a product. Many factors can influence whether or not an event will be reported, such as the time a product has been marketed and publicity about a drug or event. Therefore, FAERS cannot be used to calculate the incidence of an adverse event in the U.S. population. In addition, while adverse event reports give us some information about a product and serious injuries or deaths related to use of a particular product, they often indicate situations that require additional analysis and do not constitute conclusive evidence of a problem with the product. Sometimes after further analysis, the adverse events may inform agency decisions to take regulatory action. Other times, further analysis shows that the adverse events were not attributable to a problem with the product but to other factors, such as a patient’s underlying health conditions. It also is important to note that the number of adverse events identified may fluctuate with our growing understanding of an issue, as well as through identification and elimination of duplicate reports.

For more information regarding FAERS: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Surveillance/AdverseDrugEffects/default.htm

As mentioned above, the FDA has considered these reports as part of its review and at this time does not believe additional warnings or other changes are warranted. We look forward to results of the CHOP study, to further determine the benefits and risks associated with the use of these products in children.

I also refer you to the previous responses FDA has provided you, and the FDA’s response to the 2012 Citizen Petition from the Empire State Consumer Project, available at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FDA-2012-P-0566-0006

REPORT AN ADVERSE EVENT TO THE FDA:

For information on how to submit an adverse event, see here:
Healthcare professionals and patients are encouraged to report adverse events or side effects related to the use of medical products to the FDA’s MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program:
Complete and submit the report Online: www.fda.gov/MedWatch/report
Download form or call 1-800-332-1088 to request a reporting form, then complete and return to the address on the pre-addressed form, or submit by fax to 1-800-FDA-0178

BAYER STATEMENT:

Bayer Consumer Health has a long history as a leader in the manufacture and marketing of a broad range of over-the-counter (OTC) healthcare products and nutritional supplements. The health of our consumers is our top priority.

The MiraLAX brand became part of Bayer’s OTC portfolio in the United States in October 2014 with the acquisition of Merck Consumer Care. MiraLAX is an osmotic laxative that relieves occasional constipation. MiraLAX was introduced as a prescription laxative in February 1999 and was approved by the FDA as an OTC medication in 2006. OTC labeled dosing applies to adults and children 17 years and older for up to 7 days, unless otherwise directed by a doctor.

While MiraLAX is not labeled for use in the pediatric population, there have been many clinical studies conducted with PEG 3350 in pediatric populations which have demonstrated safety for short and long term use in children with a history of chronic constipation.

As part of Bayer’s ongoing commitment to consumer well-being, we regularly track, analyze and report all adverse event data related to the use of the product. Results of this ongoing monitoring support the continued safe use of MiraLAX.

With regard to the clinical study in question, it is a government-funded study by the National Institute of Health being conducted by the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. As Bayer is not involved in the study, any inquiries should be directed to them.

Lyme Event in Chicago

Want to hear from doctors what Lyme is, what it isn’t, symptoms and risk, and be able to ask questions?

https://globallymealliance.org/events/evening-of-art-and-education-chicago-lyme-disease/

The Matthew Rachman Gallery in Chicago has graciously opened their space for a special evening. Two respected, Lyme-literate doctors, Dr. Casey Kelley and Dr. Chris Janson, will each present helpful information with a Q & A after.

The event will also serve to support GLA. 100% of ticket proceeds will go to GLA. In addition, 10% of all proceeds from art purchased at the Matthew Rachman Gallery, in person, March 9, 2017 – Sept 9, 2017, will be donated to GLA; simply mention “GLA”.

WHEN: March 9, 2017 – 6 pm to 8:30 pm

WHERE: Matthew Rachman Gallery, 1659 W Chicago Avenue, Chicago

ON EXHIBIT: SERIOUS/Play – Artwork by Amanda Gentry & Maura Segal

COST: $40 per ticket

Space is limited; purchase your tickets today (go to link above).

Parental Rights in Medical Settings

http://www.parentalrights.org

Over the last couple of decades we have seen the emergence of a lobby that believes in giving power to “experts” to seek the good of all children. Nevertheless parents continue to defend their right to make the best individualized decisions for their child. We are seeing that tension between parent and professional become more entrenched each year.

This year has seen a rise in the number of appeals in which an earlier guilty verdict from a charge of “shaken baby syndrome” or “medical child abuse” has been thrown out. These appeals are rising as reports and expert witnesses show flaws in the science behind those convictions. Parent and child advocates like Diane Redleaf at the Family Defense Center in Chicago and law professor Maxine Eichner at the University of North Carolina are exposing the legal and ethical issues that arise when doctors act in a forensic role (gathering evidence against parents) rather than in the traditional care-giving role of their field.

Parents and children infected with tick borne illness (TBI’s), understand this all too well.  Due to a schism in the medical community over proper diagnosis and treatment – patients are the ones who suffer.  Parents are often told by the mainstream medical community that they have Munchausen by proxy, a psychological disorder marked by attention-seeking behavior by a caregiver through those who are in their care.  Children having a difficult time in school are told they are “lazy,” or “bored” and they just need to buckle down and work harder.

In other words – parents and children with TBI’s are frequently told they are just making up symptoms to get attention.  

Having lived this nightmare on steroids for over 4 years, I can attest to the mental anguish, out of pocket expense, marital/familial strife, and pain Lyme/MSIDS (multiple systemic infectious disease syndrome – or Lyme with coinfections as many have far more than just borrelia the causative agent of Lyme Disease) causes.  

Solution: The Parental Rights Amendment

A proposed Parental Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (PRA) would provide that “the liberty of parents to direct the upbringing, education, and care of their children is a fundamental right.” By setting a firm constitutional standard to protect these rights, the Amendment would provide clear direction for courts, doctors, child welfare workers, and other government officials. Racial bias would diminish as fewer cases are left to the discretion of a judge or other state agent.

Another provision of the proposed Amendment would protect the rights of persons with disabilities so that mothers like Sara Gordon never lose their children in the first place. The proposal states, “The parental rights guaranteed by this article shall not be denied or abridged on account of disability.”

The attack on parents in America continues. The PRA provides the single greatest means for parents to fight back – and win.

Sadly, medical error is the #3 cause of death in our country according to a 2016 report. And even the best doctors are rarely in a better position than a loving parent to make the difficult decisions for a child.

Most recently is the case of Charlie Gard of the United Kingdom whose parents raised $1.6 million in private funds to transport him to the U.S. for further care but the state hospital has been granted the legal right to pull the plug on the disabled infant at any time.

What happens in Europe has a way of coming here, and way has been paved due to the Supreme Court’s Troxel v. Granville (2000) decision.  Where once parental rights were afforded “strict judicial scrutiny” protection (Troxel, p. 80), now those same rights are granted only “some special weight” (ibid., p. 70)—and what that means varies from judge to judge and case to case.

Right here in the U.S., the family of Justina Pelletier found that out the hard way in 2014 when the state of Massachusetts took Justina from them and placed her in the custody of Boston Children’s Hospital. Doctors there were free to enroll her in clinical trials (without parental consent) for the somatoform disorder diagnosis they had given her, rather than continuing the treatment for Mitochondrial disease that her parents and doctors at Tufts Medical Center had been following. After public outrage following her parents going public, Justina was finally returned to her parents 16 months later, in much worse condition than when she was taken away. Her story reemerged in 2016 as the family filed suit in federal court against the state and the hospital who so severely injured their daughter.
Isaiah Rider of Missouri was also taken by the state over a disagreement regarding his treatment. He was finally released by the state of Illinois who had been granted custody (though he was never a resident of the state until he went into foster care) when Lurie Children’s Hospital (Chicago) doctors decided they knew better than his mom. While in foster care, Rider suffered sexual assault. He was finally returned to the custody of his grandparents in his home state, but wasn’t fully released from Illinois care until June of 2016, months after his 18th birthday!

As sad as it sounds, though, the Riders and the Pelletiers are the lucky ones. A family in New York found themselves facing allegations of child abuse after their infant died at the hands of New York doctors, according to a lawsuit filed last year. The suit alleges that the Long Island infant was pumped full of a “cornucopia of drugs,” including Propofol, “the powerful sedative linked to Michael Jackson’s death” according to a NY Post article. As the baby lay dying, Suffolk County social workers and a “pediatric child abuse specialist” were accusing the parents of shaking her to death, a charge the parents contend was fabricated to cover up the hospital’s own serious errors in the child’s treatment. The couple’s two older children were taken from their care, but returned after two autopsies of the baby showed no signs of criminality. The child protection agency kept its case open for 11 long months, and is now a codefendant in the suit.

Two other cases, one in California and another in Tennessee, also saw the state take children away from loving parents over a disagreement in the child’s diagnosis and treatment.

Yet even as the evidence is showing more and more the fallibility of the medical profession, states are heeding doctors’ and pharmaceutical companies’ urgings to clamp down on parents’ rights in medical decisions. California in 2015 notoriously passed SB 277, a bill to remove from parents the right to make an informed medical decision regarding their child’s vaccinations. https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2015/07/15/vaccines-continued/   Similar bills were introduced in 19 other states but failed to pass. Proponents of these bills, though, are undeterred, as evidenced by the number of states dealing with similar measures again this legislative session – already as many as 30.

In the medical sub-category of psychotropic drugs, parental rights have seen a slight improvement. Though most psychotropic drugs are not approved by the FDA for use by adolescents, many localities have nevertheless required their prescription to students who misbehave in school. Maryanne Godboldo of Detroit made national headlines 3 years ago when she barricaded herself and her daughter in her apartment and refused to let the city force her 13-year-old to receive Risperdol. The ensuing standoff brought out the SWAT team, a tank, and the national news.  Maryanne’s own case was finally resolved this year when charges – which had been filed or appealed 5 separate times – were finally dropped. Sadly, they were dropped only because Godboldo suffered a massive aneurysm and is not expected to recover from her current comatose state.

But in the state of New Mexico, real progress has been made. That state in 2015 passed a law prohibiting a parent’s choice to withhold psychotropic medications from being used as the sole basis for removal of a child. A New Mexico mother in Godboldo’s situation will no longer have to barricade herself in her home in the first place. If she determines that Risperdol is dangerous, that New Mexico mom can rest easy in the knowledge that no one will be coming for her child.

If you and/or your children have Lyme/MSIDS and you need legal help, contact:  mailto://info@parentalrights.org and ask for the list of legal organizations who will be able to help you.

ParentalRights.org is a 501(c)4 non-profit political lobbying organization whose goal is to protect children by empowering parents through passage of the Parental Rights Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. They do not provide legal help, nor do they have lawyers on staff.  However, they will help you find help.