Archive for the ‘Anaplasmosis’ Category

TBI’s Increasing and Spreading

Tick Borne Infections (TBI’s) were tested in 9 national parks in this study.

As a patient and advocate, I wish researchers would carefully choose their wording when reporting results.  For instance the authors state:  “Ba. microti occurred at just 20% of the parks.   http://jme.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/12/28/jme.tjw213.  That wording will bias people into thinking it isn’t significant, but 20% is nothing to sniff at, particularly when you are one of the 20%.  Also, that is what they discovered.  Someone else may discover something else and if time is any indicator, that number will probably rise.  I would also like to see Bartonella strains added to the pathogen list.  Interesting to note: there are 210 cases of locally acquired Zika in the Continental U.S., yet Congress is considering appropriating billions of dollars toward it.   https://www.cdc.gov/zika/intheus/maps-zika-us.htmlhttp://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/01/28/who-warns-zika-spread/79451430/http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2016/05/25/zika-funding-mired-congress/84914934/

Abstract

Tick-borne pathogens transmitted by Ixodes scapularis Say (Acari: Ixodidae), also known as the deer tick or blacklegged tick, are increasing in incidence and geographic distribution in the United States. We examined the risk of tick-borne disease exposure in 9 national parks across six Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic States and the District of Columbia in 2014 and 2015. To assess the recreational risk to park visitors, we sampled for ticks along frequently used trails and calculated the density of I. scapularis nymphs (DON) and the density of infected nymphs (DIN). We determined the nymphal infection prevalence of I. scapularis with a suite of tick-borne pathogens including Borrelia burgdorferi, Borrelia miyamotoi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Babesia microti. Ixodes scapularis nymphs were found in all national park units; DON ranged from 0.40 to 13.73 nymphs per 100 m2. Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, was found at all sites where I. scapularis was documented; DIN with B. burgdorferi ranged from 0.06 to 5.71 nymphs per 100 m2. Borrelia miyamotoi and A. phagocytophilum were documented at 60% and 70% of the parks, respectively, while Ba. microti occurred at just 20% of the parks. Ixodes scapularis is well established across much of the Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic States, and our results are generally consistent with previous studies conducted near the areas we sampled. Newly established I. scapularis populations were documented in two locations: Washington, D.C. (Rock Creek Park) and Greene County, Virginia (Shenandoah National Park). This research demonstrates the potential risk of tick-borne pathogen exposure in national parks and can be used to educate park visitors about the importance of preventative actions to minimize tick exposure.

In the eastern United States, the blacklegged tick, Ixodes scapularis Say, is the primary vector of Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative agent of Lyme disease, which is the most commonly reported vector-borne disease in the United States (Mead 2015). Ixodes scapularis also vectors other pathogens that can cause potentially serious disease, including Borrelia miyamotoi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Babesia microti (Barbour and Fish 1993, Homer et al. 2000, Jin et al. 2012, Krause et al. 2015). Established blacklegged tick populations are nearly continuous across counties in the Northeastern and North-Central United States where the majority of I. scapularis-borne disease cases are reported (Mead 2015, Eisen et al. 2016). The risk of acquiring Lyme disease is influenced by spatio-temporal variation in the density of host-seeking infected nymphs (Diuk-Wasser et al. 2012). This metric often correlates with Lyme disease incidence, though to varying degrees (Mather et al. 1996, Stafford et al. 1998, Falco et al. 1999, Pepin et al. 2012). Human behavior, including time spent in tick-infested areas or engaged in behaviors that enhance or reduce the likelihood of encounters with ticks (Orloski et al. 2000, Connally et al. 2009), also influences the likelihood of acquiring Lyme disease and may explain some of the lack of concordance between measures of density of infected host-seeking nymphs and Lyme disease incidence (Pepin et al. 2012).

Understanding where people may come into contact with infected vector-competent ticks is central to mitigating tick-borne disease risk. For example, in the Mid-Atlantic and Northeastern United States, peridomestic exposure to I. scapularis likely occurs frequently (Falco and Fish 1988, Maupin et al. 1991, Klein et al. 1996, Connally et al. 2006, Feldman et al. 2015), whereas in the North-Central United States, recreational exposures are believed to be more common than peridomestic exposures (Kitron and Kazmierczak 1997, Paskewitz et al. 2001). Regardless of geographic region, previous studies have demonstrated a risk of human exposure to infected host-seeking I. scapularis nymphs in recreational settings (Falco and Fish 1989, Schulze et al. 1992, Oliver and Howard 1998, Paskewitz et al. 2001, Han et al. 2014, Prusinski et al. 2014, Ford et al. 2015). National parks are popular recreation destinations and may represent areas of elevated acarological risk, yet one cannot adequately infer the risk of tick-borne disease for park visitors or employees from the epidemiological surveillance conducted at the county spatial scale (Eisen et al. 2013). National parks often vary ecologically from surrounding areas, and thus the density of infected ticks may differ between settings; further, human behavior within the parks may differ from behavior in surrounding communities.

In this study, we sought to characterize the acarological risk, that is, the risk of human exposure to tick-borne pathogens, in national parks in the Eastern United States. We surveyed frequently used trails in national park units across six Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic States and the District of Columbia, ranging from Maine in the north to Virginia in the south. Our collection efforts focused on the nymphal stage of I. scapularis. This stage likely poses the greatest threat of transmission of B. burgdorferi and other pathogens to humans, as peak activity of questing nymphs occurs in late spring and early summer which coincides with peak onset of human disease (Piesman 1989, Fish 1993, Falco et al. 1999, Mead 2015). Here, we describe the diversity of ticks collected by drag sampling during summer months, density of host-seeking I. scapularis nymphs, and diversity and prevalence of B. burgdorferi, B. miyamotoi, A. phagocytophilum, and Ba. microti infection in I. scapularis nymphs.

Unlike Mosquitoes, Ticks Year Long Threat

http://www.omaha.com/living/move-over-mosquitoes-tick-fight-takes-attention/article_996c6495-f986-59cf-8649-6bfd46fc4209.html

According to the Companion Animal Parasite Council (CAPC) 2016 is going to be a banner year for ticks, with the CDC listing 15 different tick borne diseases (TBI’s) which range from debilitating to fatal.

The council sates that they thrive everywhere from wooded areas to gardens, landscape plants and even backyard grasses with most people coming into contact with them in their own backyards.

The article states a big help in lowering the tick population is by deterring deer from your living area by planting vegetation deer don’t like to building a tall fence, although they can jump over fences as high as 10 feet. They state a foliar spray such as Bobbex Deer Repellent is effective year-round and supposedly safe for use around children and pets and won’t wash off from rain or snow. It was found to be 93% effective in deterring deer when compared to other like repellents.

According to Sam Telford, a professor of infectious diseases at Tufts, “One or two years of severe weather may depress their numbers, but remember….the successful feeding of one female tick on a deer translates to 2,000 eggs.”

Many believe that ticks are not active in the winter. Unfortunately, this is a myth.

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/01/20/polar-vorticks/

TBI’s in Florida

http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ttbdis.2016.09.016

Abstract

Tick-borne diseases are an emerging public health threat in the United States. In Florida, there has been public attention directed towards the possibility of locally acquired Borrelia burgdorferi sensu stricto, the causative agent of Lyme disease, in association with the lone star tick. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of ticks and the pathogens they carry and potentially transmit, such as B. burgdorferi, in a highly utilized teaching and research forest in North Central Florida.

Ticks were collected by dragging and flagging methods over a four month period in early 2014, identified, and tested by PCR for multiple pathogens including Anaplasma, Borrelia, Rickettsia, and Ehrlichia species. During the study period the following ticks were collected: 2506 (96.5%) Amblyomma americanum L., 64 (2.5%) Ixodes scapularis Say, 19 (0.7%) Dermacentor variabilis Say, and 5 (0.2%) Ixodes affinis Neuman.

Neither Borrelia spp. (0/846) nor Anaplasma spp. (0/69; Ixodes spp. only) were detected by PCR in any of the ticks tested. However, Rickettsia DNA was present in 53.7% (86/160), 62.5% (40/64), 60.0% (3/5) and 31.6% (6/19) of A. americanum, I. scapularis, I. affinis and D. variabilis, respectively. Furthermore, E. chaffeensis and E. ewingii DNA were detected in 1.3% and 4.4% of adult A. americanum specimens tested, respectively.

Although receiving an A. americanum bite is likely in wooded areas in North Central Florida due to the abundance of this tick, the risk of contracting a tick-borne pathogen in this specific area during the spring season appears to be low. The potential for pathogen prevalence to be highly variable exists, even within a single geographical site and longitudinal studies are needed to assess how tick-borne pathogen prevalence is changing over time in North Central Florida.

Dr. Zubcevik Challenges TBI Standard of Care

http://www.mvtimes.com/2016/07/13/visiting-physician-sheds-new-light-lyme-disease/

Dr. Nevena Zubcevik, attending physician at Harvard Medical School and co-director of Dean Center for Tick Borne Illness at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, http://spauldingrehab.org/research-and-clinical-trials/lyme-disease/, recently spoke at a weekly meeting of clinicians, which was open to the public at Martha’s Vineyard Hospital.

In standing room only, Zubcevic admonished that singer/actor Kris Kristofferson’s recent cure of dementia, once diagnosed and properly treated for Lyme Disease, should be a lesson for medical professionals.  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/06/09/alzheimers-byproduct-of-infection/.  She also stated that children present differently than adults, with headache being the most common symptom but to get them tested if they are acting out, experiencing mood issues, irritability, and fatigue.  (They need to be tested; however, with sensitive testing that Lyme Literate Doctors – LLMD’s use.  One lab that offers these tests is Igenex Labs in CA.  The best way to get good information is to contact a Lyme Support Group in your state.  They have all the information regarding LLMD’s, testing, costs, and educational materials.)

She explained of a haunting case of a young male institutionalized for schizophrenia. After proper testing for Lyme Disease, he started daily antibiotics and within six months he was normal.

For more information on how borrelia, the causative agent of Lyme Disease, and various coinfections can and often do affect the brain see: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2015/10/18/psychiatric-lymemsids/ .  Also, see Amy Hilfiger’s story: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/07/01/ally-hilfiger-on-fox-5-ny/, as well as how Toxoplasmosis can affect the brain: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/05/21/toxoplasmosis/.

She also debunked myths.

*Studies show you can get Anaplasmosis in 15 minutes from tick attachment, 10 minutes for Powassan virus, and that it is UNKNOWN how long it takes for the various strains of borrelia (LD). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=296pVc5Zbxw&index=2&list=UUTXTo-yWGZkRwrQ9X6X7E0A

*Doxycycline CAN be given to children, infants, and pregnant women.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26680308  (no correlation between the use of doxycycline and teratogenic effects during pregnancy or dental staining in children was found)

*A two-day course of Doxy has little to no prophylactic value, and that the proper course is 100-200mg twice a day for 20 days, regardless of engorgement time.

*The current testing misses 69 out of 100 patients who have LD, and doesn’t pick up borrelia miyamotoi at all, not to mention other strains. Miyamotoi is prevalent in Massachusetts.

*The “classic” bullseye rash only happens 20% of the time and when it does present can look like a spider bite or bruise.

*Patients often have coinfections which tests do not pick up. These coinfections make patient cases extremely difficult and complex.

She also stated that borrelia can go into tissue, travel in the bloodstream and is twice the speed of a white blood cell which means it can swim against the flow of blood and evade the white cell by quickly burrowing into tissue, thereby avoiding the immune system.

She stated that having LD is a body-wide toxic war – leaving the patient feeling miserable, and that while she is fairly new to this field, she sees no controversy – that animal studies clearly show persistence after treatment and that human tests do too.

She mentions the work of Dr. Ying Zhang of Johns Hopkins Lyme Center and that his work has indicated that current treatments may not clear persisters. Due to this research she feels a combination of several antibiotics, particularly new combinations, are promising.

Zubcevik found that a patient with chronic LD, when given a PET scan, showed blue and purple, indicating atrophy, whereas after six months of IV antibiotics, presented with yellow and green, indicating metabolically active regions.

Zubcevik has patients who have been ignored, beaten down, and who have lost the will to live. They show signs of post-traumatic stress and have destroyed marriages often leaving them alone. They break down crying with she tells them she believes them.

Why We Can’t Get Better

Most MSIDS (multi systemic infectious disease syndrome – or Lyme with friends) sufferers are familiar with Dr. Horowitz, a famous and gifted LLMD (Lyme Literate Doctor) who wrote the book, “Why I Can’t Get Better?  Solving the Mystery of Lyme and Chronic Disease.”  I just noticed you can get it new for $7.99 – the best eight bucks you’ll ever spend!  I warn you; however, it’s deep and it’s wide, and you will be looking up a few terms unless you’re a M.D. http://www.amazon.com/Better-Solving-Mystery-Chronic-Disease/dp/1250019400

In fact, he’s the person who came up with the term MSIDS as it more adequately explains what’s going on in most patients diagnosed with “Lyme Disease,” as research shows we are typically infected with multiple pathogens making our treatment pictures far more complex than most GP’s realize and is also a very good reason why people don’t get better.  This issue is what he discusses in the following videos.  For some of you, you just can’t get on top of things – even after years of treatment.  There can be numerous reasons for this but the following videos may enlighten both you and your doctor.

Working with an LLMD is definitely a partnership.  In the beginning, unless you’ve watched someone go down this pot-hole riddled road, you know very little other than the fact that your body’s going to hell in a hand basket!  As time progresses, you talk to others, watch videos, read books, and become an on-line researcher learning things you never in your wildest dreams would have thought about learning (the life-cycles of ticks).

For those of you who are new to the journey, you want to get someone you know up to speed quickly, or if you need a refresher course, these videos will do it.  Horowitz is engaging, intelligent, and funny.  The first video is only 8 minutes long and explains the nuts and bolts of how he came to his current knowledge.

The second video is an hour long, but definitely worth watching.  In a much more detailed fashion, it explains many symptoms of the various coinfections that could be holding up your progress unless you are dealing with them.  Watch these videos, take notes, and go back to your doctor and discuss these possibilities.  Remember, testing for all of these pathogens is extremely poor and not to be solely relied upon for diagnosis.  It’s important to “study thy enemy,” so you understand him and know how to combat him.  In this case the more you know about the various pathogens and how they affect the human body the better.

Published on Nov 3, 2014
At the “Symposium on Tick-borne Diseases” held May 17, 2014 at the Hyatt in Cambridge, Maryland, Dr. Richard Horowitz provided insights into the many diseases humans are contracting from ticks, and he helps us to differentiate between the different illnesses. The event was hosted by the Lyme Disease Association of the Eastern Shore of Maryland (soon to be the Lyme Disease Association of Delmarva), a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization providing educational resources on tick-borne diseases. This and other videos from the Symposium were made possible by a very generous private donation for which we are very thankful to have received. The wonderful videographer/editor for the event was Bryan Krandle (krandle86@yahoo.com). If you enjoy having wonderful resources like the videos from this conference, please consider a donation to the LDAESM, P.O. Box 5360, Salisbury, Maryland 21802. Thank you!