The BMJ and Commonwealth Fund: All Hat, No Cattle?

February 17, 2026

Before reading the following article, read this first.  It’s crucial to understand that Gates and Farrar had their hands all over everything related to COVID – including but not limited to the research being done and the global messaging about it.

The BMJ writes about how the Wellcome Trust’s investments overlap with its research efforts.  At the very bottom of the page it also lists the competing interests and that the BMJ publishes work by research groups and academics funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.

So there’s that……read on….

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/the-bmj-public-health-commonwealth-fund-debate-mary-holland-rapid-response/?

The BMJ and Commonwealth Fund: All Hat, No Cattle?

On Jan. 29, The BMJ published an op-ed by Lucinda Hiam of the Commonwealth Fund: “Public health must bridge the divide with groups who mistrust science.” Using the online “Rapid Response” form provided by The BMJ, I replied to Ms. Hiam’s call to “bridge the divide.” I said I agreed and invited her to engage with CHD. We have received no response from her, and The BMJ has not published our response.

by Mary Holland, J.D.
February 9, 2026

On Jan. 29, The BMJ published an op-ed by Lucinda Hiam of the Commonwealth Fund. The op-ed — “Public health must bridge the divide with groups who mistrust science” — specifically referenced Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

Using the online “Rapid Response” form provided by The BMJ, I replied to Ms. Hiam’s call to “bridge the divide.” I said I agreed and invited her to engage with CHD.

In my response, submitted Feb. 3, I wrote:

“Let’s have an adult conversation about science, vaccination, informed consent, vaccine injury, and civil rights. I invite Ms. Hiam to engage in a public dialogue on CHD’s public platform CHD.TV, or anywhere else, to debate these critical issues.”

Despite Ms. Hiam’s stated goal to “bridge the divide,” we have received no response from her, and The BMJ has not published our “Rapid Response” to her op-ed.

As a result, The BMJ and the Commonwealth Fund have only driven the divide deeper — by failing even to afford the courtesy of a reply.  (See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

And this is where ‘science’ stands…..in a vice-grip of investors who are running the show.

Those without an agenda are willing to debate those with differing opinions.  Remaining silent shows propaganda politics, not science.

Examples:

By contrast, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has agreed for years to debate anyone on vaccines.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Comments Off on The BMJ and Commonwealth Fund: All Hat, No Cattle?