https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37680261/

2023 Sep 4;15(9):e44684.

 doi: 10.7759/cureus.44684. eCollection 2023 Sep.

COVID-19 Infection Rates in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Inmates: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Free PMC article

Abstract

Background

In 2023, breakthrough COVID-19 infections among vaccinated individuals and reinfections in previously infected people have become common. Additionally, infections are due to Omicron subvariants of the virus that behave differently from those at the onset of the pandemic. Understanding how vaccination and natural immunity influence COVID-19 infection rates is crucial, especially in high-density congregate settings such as prisons, to inform public health strategies.

Methods

We analyzed COVID-19 surveillance data from January to July 2023 across 33 California state prisons, primarily a male population of 96,201 individuals. We computed the incidence rate of new COVID-19 infections among COVID-bivalent-vaccinated and entirely unvaccinated groups (those not having received either the bivalent or monovalent vaccine).

Results

Our results indicate that the infection rates in the bivalent-vaccinated and entirely unvaccinated groups are 3.24% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.06-3.42%) and 2.72% (CI: 2.50-2.94%), respectively, with an absolute risk difference of only 0.52%. When the data were filtered for those aged 50 and above, the infection rates were 4.07% (CI: 3.77-4.37%) and 3.1% (CI: 2.46-3.74%), respectively, revealing a mere 0.97% absolute risk difference. Among those aged 65 and above, the infection rates were 6.45% (CI: 5.74-7.16%) and 4.5% (CI: 2.57-6.43%), respectively, with an absolute risk difference of 1.95%.

Conclusion

We note low infection rates in both the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups, with a small absolute difference between the two across age groups. A combination of monovalent and bivalent vaccines and natural infections likely contributed to immunity and a lower level of infection rates compared to the height of the pandemic. It is possible that a degree of ‘herd immunity’ has been achieved. Yet, using p<0.05 as the threshold for statistical significance, the bivalent-vaccinated group had a slightly but statistically significantly higher infection rate than the unvaccinated group in the statewide category and the age ≥50 years category. However, in the older age category (≥65 years), there was no significant difference in infection rates between the two groups. This suggests that while the bivalent vaccine might offer protection against severe outcomes, it may not significantly reduce the risk of infections entirely. Further research is needed to understand the reasons behind these findings and to consider other factors, such as underlying health conditions. This study underscores the importance of developing vaccines that target residual COVID-19 infections, especially in regard to evolving COVID-19 variants.

Please see video:  https://www.theepochtimes.com/epochtv/study-hits-newly-vaccinated-with-bad-news-facts-matter  Video Excerpt:

  • 96,201 inmates
  • 2,835 COVID cases
  • 1,187 of those cases were boosted
  • 1,080 of those cases were “vaccinated”
  • 568 of those cases were unvaccinated showing yet again the superior advantage of natural immunity

The study showed the boosted have a 20% higher risk (statistically significant) of getting COVID compared to the unvaccinated.

While the authors state boosters might offer protection against severe outcomes, they offer zero data to support this notion.  It is also worth mentioning that the federal government approved the latest booster formulation without ANY clinical trial data or ANY data on efficacy.  All that exists at this point are some observational studies that do not follow up for any significant length of time.

_______________

**Comment**

Interestingly, another prison study in Nature used to promote COVID shot effectiveness has been thoroughly dismantled as it removes 99% of the data.

The Cleveland Clinic study looking at over 51,000 people found that the more “vaccine” doses, the higher the risk of infection.

More research continues to show that over time there is actually NEGATIVE effectiveness:

But does any of this matter in the topsy-turvy world of COVID?  Nope.