The War Over Your Medical Rights: AAP Sues RFK While IMA Seeks to End Medical Mandates

January 15, 2026

The war is on…..

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2026/01/aap-and-other-medical-groups-sue-secretary-of-health-and-human-services/

AAP and Other Medical Groups Sue Secretary of Health and Human Services

by Carolyn Hendler, JD

Published 

Large medical groups including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) have sued U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in response to recent changes to federal vaccine policy, including removal of the COVID shot from the federally recommended childhood vaccine schedule for healthy children  The AAP, American College of Physicians, Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA), American Public Health Association, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Massachusetts Public Health Alliance, and a pregnant woman filed a lawsuit in July 2025 against HHS Secretary Kennedy in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts.1

Plaintiffs alleged that changes to federal vaccine policy were made without scientific review and without following regulatory norms. They argued that the replacement of 17 members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the cancellation of certain advisory meetings not only violated federal law, but also serves to erode public confidence in the public health infrastructure and the federal government’s mass vaccination program.

Plaintiffs aim to stop the vaccine policy changes implemented by Kennedy and restore the previous vaccine schedule.2 Plaintiffs further allege that the replacement of previous ACIP members created a new panel of biased members in order to support Kennedy’s views on vaccination and the harm associated with mRNA biologics such as the COVID shot.3

Federal Judge Allows Case to Continue

The government moved to have the case dismissed for lack of standing, but on Jan. 6, 2026, a Massachusetts federal judge decided that the lawsuit can continue.

In order to bring a lawsuit, a party needs standing which means they have shown they suffered actual and direct harm from the challenged action.4 Judge Brian Murphy of the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts ruled that the plaintiffs have legal standing to sue the Secretary.

The government argued that the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue because they failed to show that they suffered direct harm from the new vaccine schedule and the changes that took place as a result of ACIP recommendations. However, Judge Murphy concluded that the changes at ACIP violates the requirements of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, which sets forth that membership on government advisory panels be “fairly balanced.”5  (See link for article)

Important quote:

While I am somewhat surprised that the court found that plaintiffs have standing to sue here, [the ruling] reflects misperceptions about vaccines and children’s health generally [and the decision] does not reflect the reality that the American Academy of Pediatrics and other organizations are in many respects trade organizations for their professions — primarily protecting the interests of their members, not children.7 ~ Kim Mack Rosenbert, Attorney for CHD

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/breaking-imas-national-network-of?

Breaking: IMA’s National Network of Independent Doctors Anchors New Coalition to End Medical Mandates in all 50 States

“This is the next step in bringing patient-centered reform to American healthcare. We’re mobilizing thousands of independent doctors to dismantle medical mandates state by state” – Dr. Joseph Varon

 
Independent Medical Alliance
Jan 15, 2026
 
new coalition

“This is the next step in bringing patient-centered reform to American healthcare. We’re mobilizing thousands of independent doctors to dismantle medical mandates state by state, restoring true patient-informed choice and freedom.” – Dr. Joseph Varon

The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), a powerhouse network of independent physicians, providers, and researchers, today announced its role as a founding member of the Medical Freedom Act Coalition. Launched alongside Stand for Health Freedom (SHF) and Health Freedom Defense Fund (HFDF), this alliance unites over a dozen organizations to prohibit medical mandates in all 50 states and safeguard informed consent, parental rights, and doctor-patient autonomy.

“America’s patchwork of coercive mandates is eroding patient rights,” said IMA President and Chief Medical Officer Dr. Joseph Varon. “We’re mobilizing thousands of independent doctors to dismantle them state by state and restore true freedom of choice in healthcare decisions.”

Building on Idaho’s groundbreaking 2025 Medical Freedom Act, the coalition targets the coercive regulations eroding personal health freedoms. IMA mobilizes its tens of thousands of doctors to drive state-level reforms, ensuring no American faces discrimination over medical decisions.

“No American should fear that their medical choices will impact their right to live a normal life,” said HFDF Founder Leslie Manookian in an announcement news release.

See the full Health Freedom Defense Fund news release here. For more information, contact Lynne@IMAHealth.org.

 

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Comments Off on The War Over Your Medical Rights: AAP Sues RFK While IMA Seeks to End Medical Mandates

U.S. Intelligence Classified & Redacted COVID PCR Test Findings & The Replacement for PCR Has Arrived

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/us-intelligence-classified-and-redacted?

U.S. Intelligence Classified and Redacted Findings on COVID-19 PCR Tests: New FOIA Documents

New records show top U.S. nuclear, national security laboratories scrutinized primers used to define the pandemic—but hid the results.

Jon Fleetwood
Jan 14, 2026

Newly released Department of Energy (DOE) records obtained by U.S. Right to Know through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request show that U.S. federal intelligence agencies classified and redacted the results of an internal review of COVID-19 PCR test primers, even as those tests were used to define “cases,” drive emergency policy, and justify unprecedented social and economic controls.

The documents reveal that during the pandemic, the U.S. government quietly subjected PCR test primer sets—the molecular components that determine what PCR tests detect—to classified scrutiny by top national security laboratories, while withholding the findings from the public under national-security and intelligence exemptions.

At the center of the release is a classified internal communication titled “DRAFT memo on Primer Sets,” circulated through the DOE’s Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence and reviewed by assay experts at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

The memo itself remains classified.

Its conclusions were redacted.

No public explanation was ever provided.

PCR Testing Was Treated as a Classified Intelligence Issue

PCR tests do not detect an intact virus and do not prove infection.

They work by using short genetic sequences—primers—to bind to matching genetic material and amplify it until a signal is detected.

What a PCR test detects depends entirely on what its primers bind to. (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

What this means is while the public was repeatedly told COVID testing was reliable, specific, and settled science, the test was never handled in a public scientific manner but as a classified intelligence issue.

This should tell you everything you need to know, but it’s actually far worse.

In 2020 we were warned about the CDC’s monopolized COVID testing – something those in Lymeland have had to live with for over 40 years.

Experts have now shown repeatedly that the genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 as well as the flu, and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed “genome” and even the so-called “target genes” allegedly specific to the “new coronavirus”.

The test is worthless and all “positive” results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world’s leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/the-replacement-for-pcr-tests-has?  Go here for article & video interview

The Replacement for PCR Tests Has Arrived

Dr. Roger Hodkinson breaks down how MultiSeq could replace PCR and fix infectious disease testing with multi-target panels and confirmatory Sanger sequencing.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Jan 13, 2026

The COVID era exposed a diagnostic failure that can no longer be ignored: PCR-based testing is not a true “gold standard” for clinical infection diagnosis. PCR is widely treated as definitive, but mechanistically it is not an identification method—it is an amplification step that simply makes more copies of genetic material. The real weakness comes from what many systems use after amplification: probe-based fluorescence detection, which generates a “signal” without actually confirming what is present. That is how medicine ends up with false positives, misclassification, and policy decisions built on unstable data.

In my interview with Dr. Roger Hodkinson—a highly respected pathologist and Chairman of MultiSeq—he explains why the PCR problem is structural: probe-based testing functions like a “lock-and-key,” where partial matches can still trigger a positive signal. Even worse, infectious syndromes (cough/cold, diarrhea, suspected STI) are rarely caused by only one organism—yet most PCR workflows are narrow, slow, and often treated as confirmatory when they’re not. In practice, clinicians are forced into an “educated guess” model because results frequently come back days later and only cover a limited scope.

MultiSeq is attempting to replace this entire model with something fundamentally different: sequence-confirmed diagnosis. Instead of relying on probe fluorescence to “suggest” identity, it uses modified Sanger sequencing to directly read the nucleotide sequence and confirm which pathogen is actually present.  (See link for article & video)

Category:

Activism, Testing, Viruses

Comments Off on U.S. Intelligence Classified & Redacted COVID PCR Test Findings & The Replacement for PCR Has Arrived

Treating Lyme & TBDs on a Budget With Herbs

Webinar: Treating Lyme and Tick-Borne Diseases on a Budget

Date: Wednesday, March 18

Time: 6:00-7:00 PM ET

Presenter: Teresa Holler, MS, PA-C, FMAPS

Free to ILADS members/$49 for non-members

Register Here

Description:

Teresa will discuss a simple, effective, and well researched approach to utilizing herbals in the management of Lyme disease, bartonella, and babesia. Participants will leave the presentation with treatment options that are easy to implement.

Upon completion of Teresa’s presentation, participants will be aware of the following:

• Unique signs and symptoms to help differentiate between borrelia, bartonella, and babesia by history and physical exam
• What causes microbial persistence and how to address these difficulties
• Awareness of clinical studies comparing several antibiotic protocols to herbal products
• Review the properties of the most efficacious herbs for the treatment of Lyme disease, bartonella and babesia.

This webinar will be recorded and sent to all registered attendees.

Available through ILADS

To access the FREE 1.5 hour ILADS December webinar titled “At the Frontlines of Chronic Illness: A Conversation with ILADS Experts”, go here.

It features ILADS panelists:

  • Chris Winfrey, MD
  • Melanie Stein, ND
  • Nicole Bell (Galaxy Diagnostics)
  • Tania Dempsey, MD responding to patient questions

Category:

Activism, Babesia, Bartonella, Herbs, Lyme, Treatment

Comments Off on Treating Lyme & TBDs on a Budget With Herbs

Reduce Cancer Risk by 90% Using Evidence-Based Natural Compounds

January 12, 2026

This protocol was derived by the author’s personal experience, which is often how we move forward in health.  It’s amazing what you can find when you are desperate for yourself or your loved ones.  This is certainly true in Lymeland. The sick and infected are the ones who find answers.

https://justusrhope.substack.com/p/how-to-reduce-cancer-risk-by-90-using?

How to Reduce Cancer Risk by 90% Using Evidence-Based Natural Compounds

The Most Practical ROOT™ Protocol Solution in the Modern Era

Justus R. Hope
Jan 12, 2026
Article Excerpts:

This is the first time a 90% cancer prevention threshold has been achieved using six or fewer readily available, over-the-counter agents—making it both scientifically sound and practically achievable for the majority of people.

The author then traces hidden sources of carcinogens that drive cancer:

  • processed meat at 3 daily servings elevates colorectal cancer risk to levels comparable to heavy smoking
  • sugar-sweetened beverages create a metabolic environment that systematically promotes cancer growth
  • advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) caused by high temperature cooking, food additives and ultra-processed foods (UPFs) operate as independent carcinogens multiplying cancer risk beyond sugar and processed ingredients alone, driving chronic inflammation, promoting tumor cell growth and immune evasion and creating hypoxic conditions
  • fast food
  • synergistic combination of the 4 carcinogens listed above creates catastrophic AGE accumulation – a continuous state of cellular damage and malignant transformation
By eliminating the carcinogen listed and adopting Mediterranean-style eating, overall cancer is reduced 50-66% across multiple cancers – which rivals or exceeds pharmaceutical interventions.

Dosage Protocol: Nine Agents Daily

  1. Vitamin D3: 1000-2000 IU
  2. Curcumin: 500-1000 mg + piperine
  3. EGCG: 400-800 mg
  4. Omega-3 (EPA/DHA): 1000-2000 mg (500-1000 mg for prostate)
  5. Aged Garlic Extract: 2.4 mL daily OR 600-900 mg standardized extract
  6. Sulforaphane: 40-60 mg daily (2 tablespoons fresh broccoli sprouts OR supplement)
  7. Berberine: 900-1500 mg daily (300-500 mg three times daily before meals
  8. Monk Fruit Extract (Mogroside V): 150-250 mg mogrosides daily (as sweetener replacement)
  9. Stevia Extract (Stevioside): 750-1500 mg daily (250-500 mg three times as sweetener replacement)

All can be taken once daily with food. Excellent safety: No significant interactions. Minimal side effects.

To achieve even greater benefits, fast overnight 16 hours 2-3 days per week.
The author gives his routine implementation of the 9 ingredient protocol as well as this cost comparison:
  • Nine-supplement protocol: ~$80-120 per month (preventive intervention achieving 93% cancer risk reduction)​
  • Single chemotherapy cycle: $10,000-30,000 (palliative intervention with modest survival benefit)​

For more:

Category:

Cancer, diet and nutrition, research, Supplements, Treatment

Comments Off on Reduce Cancer Risk by 90% Using Evidence-Based Natural Compounds

Welcome to Clown World: Bayer Sues Pfizer & Moderna For Using Monsanto’s Patented GMO Technology to Build COVID Vaccines Which Are Indistinguishable From Bio-Chemical Weapons

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/bayer-lawsuit-claims-pfizer-moderna-used-monsantos-gmo-technology-covid-vaccines/?

Bayer Lawsuit Claims Pfizer, Moderna Used Monsanto’s GMO Technology to Build COVID Vaccines

Bayer on Tuesday filed a federal lawsuit, accusing Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson of unlawfully using mRNA optimization technology — originally developed by Monsanto to genetically engineer crops — as the platform for their COVID-19 vaccines, Reuters reported. Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018.

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
January 8, 2026This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
mrna vaccine and bayer logo

Bayer is suing COVID-19 vaccine makers Pfizer,  Moderna and Johnson & Johnson (J&J) in federal court.

The chemical giant on Tuesday accused the drugmakers of unlawfully using mRNA optimization technology — originally developed by Monsanto — as the platform for their COVID-19 vaccines, Reuters reported.

Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018 for $63 billion.

The lawsuits claim the three companies used Monsanto’s decades-old patented technology for removing “problem sequences” from genetic code to improve mRNA stability and protein expression — obstacles the vaccine makers had previously identified as key challenges in vaccine development.

Even though J&J used a viral vector, not mRNA technology, for its vaccine, the lawsuit alleges J&J also relied on the same patented genetic engineering techniques to stabilize and amplify protein expression in its vaccines.

“Welcome to clown world,” the McCullough Foundation epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher wrote on Substack, commenting on the lawsuit.

“One of the world’s largest agrochemical companies — responsible for mass harm through its highly toxic herbicide glyphosate — is now in federal court claiming that the deadly COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ platforms were built on stolen GMO [genetically modified organism] technology.”

In the court filings, Bayer said it doesn’t want to interfere with the production of the COVID-19 vaccines, or any other mRNA vaccines. Instead, it seeks a cut of the profits from the most lucrative pharmaceutical products in history. (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

In the the end, evil always eats its own.

Interestingly, Glyphosate has been found in all five vaccines recently tested, the COVID shots have been shown to induce cancer in 17 distinct ways according to more than 100 studies, and a major cancer journal has confirmed a global turbo cancer safety signal.

Glyphosate, cancer, and COVID shots appear to be synonymous

Please notice Bayer makes sure to posture itself by stating it wouldn’t dream of interfering with the production of the shot shots, it just wants a financial cut.

Well, isn’t that humanitarian of them?

For any still denying it, this drives the nail in the coffin that the clot shots are built with GMO technology, only instead of putting it in your mouth, you roll up your sleeve to get it injected into your muscle, which then spreads systemically and accumulates everywhere.

The shots are proven to be dangerous, unsafe and ineffective, so the experiment failed radically.
Pull them off the market already!

________________

https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/my-testimony-for-the-case-in-the

Covid Shots are Indistinguishable From Bio-Chemical Weapons

My written testimony for the case in the Netherlands against the orchestrators of the global democide falsely presented as the “Covid-19 pandemic response”.

Sasha Latypova
Dec 26, 2025

This post is very long as it contains my full written testimony for the Dutch court. The post is structured into:

  1. Case Background and video links to RechtOprecht YT channel
  2. The news coverage of the case
  3. The smear campaign
  4. Executive Summary of my testimony
  5. Full testimony

1. Case Background:

As an introduction for those who are unaware of this case, this is a short video message from Peter Stassen, the only remaining attorney on the case. His colleague, Arno van Kessel, has been imprisoned on [fabricated] charges of terrorism and disbarred:

http://  Approx. 9 Min

Peter Stassen: The Great Reset on Trial

Dec. 15, 2025

Attorney Peter Stassen has brought a lawsuit against the architects of The Great Reset and has entered testimony from experts Sasha Latypova, Catherine Austin Fitts, Dr. Joeseph Sansone, Dr. Michael Yeadon, and Katherine Watt, into the record, to prove Bill Gates, Mark Rutte, and Albert Bourla have committed crimes against humanity.

2. The News Coverage:

Recent article by The Defender providing an excellent summary of the case and developments to date:

Expert witnesses: COVID shots ‘indistinguishable from bioweapons’

During the press conference, Stassen also noted his efforts to have the Dutch courts accept his expert witnesses’ in-person testimony. He said the witnesses intend to present evidence showing that the COVID-19 shots:

  • Are “indistinguishable from bioweapons.”
  • Offer “no health benefits whatsoever.”
  • Are “neither safe nor effective.”
  • Were released in the U.S. under emergency use authorization, “a legal status that removes the enforcement of the pharmaceutical law and consumer safeguards by the FDA,” or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  • Are “by design, intended to cause the damage described in the package insert and reports as ‘side effects’” — including, “sudden death, heart failure, cancer, and the most horrific diseases.”
  • Are a “key component” of the “Great Reset,” “a military project in which NATO plays a significant role.”

This is coverage of this case from a Dutch newspaper (click on the English translation button): “Court rules that the defendants must show up to the hearing in person”

(See link for article & video.  An incredible amount of work went into this by Latypova et. al)

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Comments Off on Welcome to Clown World: Bayer Sues Pfizer & Moderna For Using Monsanto’s Patented GMO Technology to Build COVID Vaccines Which Are Indistinguishable From Bio-Chemical Weapons