Madison Area Lyme Support Group

U.S. Senator Marsha Blackburn has released a 291-page legislative framework that would repeal Section 230, expand liability across the artificial intelligence ecosystem, and establish a unified federal rulebook governing how AI systems are built, deployed, and controlled in the United States.

The proposal—titled the TRUMP AMERICA AI Act—is being presented as a pro-innovation, pro-safety measure designed to “protect children, creators, conservatives, and communities” while ensuring U.S. dominance in the global AI race.

But the actual structure of the bill reveals a comprehensive system that centralizes regulatory authority, expands legal exposure for platforms, and creates new mechanisms for controlling AI outputs and digital information flows.

For independent journalists and publishers operating on platforms like Substack, the repeal of Section 230 shifts the risk upstream.

Platforms would no longer be shielded from liability tied to user-generated content, meaning they must evaluate whether hosting certain reporting could expose them to lawsuits.

In practice, that creates pressure to restrict or deprioritize content that could be framed as causing harm—particularly reporting on public health, government programs, or other high-stakes issues—regardless of whether it is sourced or accurate.  (See link for article)

Important excerpts:

The practical effect is that once liability protections are removed, platforms are no longer free to host content neutrally.

They must actively manage and restrict content—or risk being sued……

….the bill shifts risk away from the speaker and onto the infrastructure that distributes their work.

That means companies like Substack are no longer simply hosting content—they are legally exposed to it.

The move follows warnings from a bipartisan coalition of 40 state attorneys general that similar efforts to centralize AI authority at the federal level would strip states of their ability to protect citizens and override hundreds of existing state laws.

The White House document is not vague about the shift.

It directly calls for removing states from core areas of AI governance and placing that authority in Washington.

The language is unusually blunt, laying out—in plain terms—a plan to cut states out of decision-making entirely.

Trump is asking Congress to pass a law that removes states from AI regulation and places that authority in Washington—while at the same time backing massive AI infrastructure consolidation through Stargate and supporting legislation that builds a single federal rulebook for AI and online content.

Together, these moves concentrate control over AI systems, data, and information flows at the federal level, where that authority does not reset with elections—it transfers intact to whoever holds power next.  Source

______________

**Comment**

It’s easy to see the hand writing on the wall with this. 

People aren’t dumb and writing platforms will simply not want to take risks on content that could subject them to legal actions – particularly by a government with endless pockets to pursue them.

Also remember that the COVID response was a federal response and states and hospitals simply cow-towed to its directives.  The same tyranny we saw with COVID, WILL be repeated if this passes.  The same life-saving information that came out during COVID will systematically be stamped out by whoever’s in power at the time.